Thomas R. Eubanks

Minimally invasive surgery for achalasia: an 8-year experience with 168 patients.

BACKGROUND Seven years ago, the authors reported on the feasibility and short-term results of minimally invasive surgical methods to treat esophageal achalasia. In this report, they describe the evolution of the surgical technique and the clinical results in a large group of patients with long follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1991 and October 1998, 168 patients (96 men, 72 women; mean age 45 years, median duration of symptoms 48 months), who fulfilled the clinical, radiographic, endoscopic, and manometric criteria for a diagnosis of achalasia, underwent esophagomyotomy by minimally invasive techniques. Forty-eight patients had marked esophageal dilatation (diameter >6.0 cm). Thirty-five patients had a left thoracoscopic myotomy, and 133 patients had a laparoscopic myotomy plus a partial fundoplication. Follow-up to October 1998 was complete in 145 patients (86%). RESULTS Median hospital stay was 72 hours for the thoracoscopic group and 48 hours for the laparoscopic group. Eight patients required a second operation for recurrent or persistent dysphagia, and two patients required an esophagectomy. There were no deaths. Good or excellent relief of dysphagia was obtained in 90% of patients (85% after thoracoscopic and 93% after laparoscopic myotomy). Gastroesophageal reflux developed in 60% of tested patients after thoracoscopic myotomy and in 17% after laparoscopic myotomy plus fundoplication. Laparoscopic myotomy plus fundoplication corrected reflux present before surgery in five of seven patients. Patients with a dilated esophagus had excellent relief of dysphagia after laparoscopic myotomy; none required an esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive techniques provided effective and long-lasting relief of dysphagia in patients with achalasia. The authors prefer the laparoscopic approach for three reasons: it more effectively relieved dysphagia, it was associated with a shorter hospital stay, and it was associated with less postoperative reflux. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication should be considered the primary treatment for esophageal achalasia.

Does botulinum toxin injection make esophagomyotomy a more difficult operation

AbstractBackground: Some patients with achalasia treated by botulinum toxin injection still require an esophagomyotomy. In this study, we analyzed the impact of botulinum toxin injection on the technical aspects and outcome of esophagomyotomy. Methods: We studied 57 patients, with a mean age of 46 years (range, 12–97) who were treated between January 1995 and March 1998 by esophagomyotomy performed via minimally invasive techniques by one team. Operative reports, videotapes, and clinical outcome were analyzed to define the technical difficulties, perforations, and outcome. Results: Fifteen of the 57 patients had received one or more injections of botulinum toxin (botox group) preoperatively. Difficulties in dissection of the submucosal plane were encountered in eight of the 15 cases (53.3%), and a mucosal laceration (perforation) occurred in two cases (13.3%). Forty-two of the 57 patients had not received any injections (non-botox group). In three patients (7%), difficulties in identifying or following the submucosal plane were encountered, although 29 patients had one or more previous dilations, and perforation occurred in one case (2.4%). All mucosal injuries were repaired laparoscopically, and the patients recovered without obvious sequelae. Dysphagia improved significantly after the operation in both groups (botox group, from preoperative score of 3.8 to a postoperative score of 0.7; non-botox, from a score of 3.4 preoperatively to 0.5 postoperatively). Regurgitation also improved in both groups (botox, 2.7 preoperatively, 0.92 postoperatively; non-botox group, 2.0 preoperatively, 0.56 postoperatively). Conclusions: Injection of botulinum toxin significantly increases the technical difficulties and thus the potential risk of esophagomyotomy. The immediate results were equally good for both groups in our series, but the long-term sequelae of repeated injections are unknown. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is a safe and effective procedure even after unsuccessful treatment with botulinum toxin.

An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND Direct observation with structured criteria for performance is the most reliable and valid method of assessing technical skill during operative procedures. We developed such a system to evaluate technical performance during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The reliability and validity of the system were tested by analyzing the correlation among three observers in a multicenter study and comparing performance with years of surgical experience. STUDY DESIGN Thirty consecutive cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were recorded on videotape, 10 from each of 3 institutions. Independent scores were generated by three observers examining each of the videotapes, providing a total of 90 scores. Points were awarded for successful completion of each of 23 different steps required to perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Error points were tabulated based on the frequency and relative severity of each of 21 potential technical mistakes during the operation. The final score was assumed to be a relative measure of technical skill and was derived by subtracting error points from points awarded for completion of each step of the procedure. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess agreement among examiners and correlation with year of surgical experience. RESULTS Agreement in final scores among the three observers was excellent (r = 0.74-0.96) despite the fact that one observer assigned significantly fewer error points. Correlation between year of experience and two-handed technique scoring was good (r = 0.5, p = 0.057), but the correlation between experience and one-handed technique scores was poor (r = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS The technical skills required to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy can reliably be measured using this tool. This method can be used to track the learning curve of surgeons in training, evaluate the efficacy of alternative training tools, and provide a means of self-assessment for the trainee.

Outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux procedures.

BACKGROUND Laparoscopy has increased the number of patients undergoing operative correction of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Symptom improvement has been most commonly reported as the means to assess operative outcome. We compared symptomatic outcome to postoperative pH testing at short-term follow-up to determine the accuracy of clinical assessment at predicting whether acid exposure would be normal or abnormal. METHODS Of 640 patients who had antireflux surgery between 1993 and 1999, 228 (36%) agreed to repeat manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring 8 to 12 weeks postoperatively and are the subject of this study. Symptom resolution was assumed if the frequency was less than once per week. Normal acid exposure consisted of a distal esophageal pH below 4 less than 4% of the time and a DeMeester composite score less than 14.7. Accuracy of symptom scoring was calculated using acid exposure as the standard. RESULTS The primary symptom was improved in 93% of the 228 patients. Acid exposure was reduced from a preoperative DeMeester score of 71 to 16 (P <0.05). Eighty percent of patients had normalization of acid exposure postoperatively. Heartburn was the only symptom to have a significant correlation with acid exposure in the postoperative period (P <0.05). Heartburn resolved in 181 patients, 168 of whom had normal acid exposure (true negative). Thirty-eight patients without symptoms had abnormal acid exposure (false negative). Nine patients had persistent heartburn with abnormal acid exposure (true positive) whereas 13 patients had persistent heartburn with normal acid exposure (false positive). Thus, the positive predictive value of heartburn was 43%, the negative predictive value was 82%, and the overall accuracy was 78%. CONCLUSIONS Operative treatment improves both the symptoms of GERD and the degree of acid exposure as measured by pH monitoring. The most accurate symptom for predicting acid exposure in the postoperative period is heartburn. Although the absence of heartburn postopertively is fairly reliable at predicting normal acid exposure on pH testing, the presence of heartburn warrants postoperative pH monitoring, as more than half of these patients will have normal acid exposure.

Repair of paraesophageal hernias

BACKGROUND Three years ago we proposed the use of laparoscopy and systematic addition of an antireflux procedure to repair paraesophageal hernias. We now present an analysis of the outcome on patients and the evolution of the technique proposed. METHODS Symptoms and esophageal function were prospectively collected and followed in 41 consecutive patients treated over a 4-year period. Indications for repair included chronic anemia in 15 patients, and previous incarceration in 8. Twenty-two patients had symptoms of reflux. RESULTS All operations were started laparoscopically, two were converted. Mean operating time was 210 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 4 days. Mean follow-up was 3 years. The operation was effective; all symptoms had improved significantly at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia with the addition of an antireflux procedure, although difficult, lengthy, and not totally without risk, improves symptoms substantially, resolves anemia, and prevents incarceration in nearly all patients.

Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH are complementary in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal-laryngeal reflux.

Pharyngeal pH monitoring and laryngoscopy are routinely used to diagnose gastroesophageal-laryngeal reflux as a cause of respiratory symptoms. Although their use seems intuitive, their ultimate diagnostic value is yet to be defined. We studied 10 asymptomatic (control) subjects and 76 patients with respiratory symptoms. Both patients and control subjects were given a symptom questionnaire. Each underwent direct laryngoscopy using the reflux finding score (RFS) to grade laryngeal injury, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH monitoring. The patients were then classified as RFS+, if the score was greater than 7, and pharyngeal reflux (PR)+, if they had more than one episode of PR detected during pH monitoring. The most common symptoms reported by patients were hoarseness (87%), cough (53%), and heartburn (50%). Control subjects had a significantly lower RFS (2.1 vs. 9.6, P < 0.01) and fewer episodes of PR (0.2 vs. 3.4, P < 0.01), than patients. None of the control subjects had more than one episode of PR during a 24-hour period. Fifty patients (66%) were RFS+ and 26 (34%) were RFS—. Thirty-two patients (42%) were PR+ and 44 (58%) were PR-. Fifteen patients had a normal RFS and no PR (group I = RFS—/PR—). Forty patients had discordance between the laryngoscopic findings and the pH monitoring (group II = RFS—/PR + or RFS+/PR—). Twenty-one patients had both an abnormal RFS and PR (group III = RFS+/PR+). Patients in group III had significantly higher heartburn scores and distal esophageal acid exposure. Eighty-three percent of patients in group III but only 44% in group I improved their respiratory symptoms as a result of antireflux therapy. An abnormal PR or RFS differentiates patients with laryngeal symptoms from control subjects. Agreement between PR and RFS helps establish or refute the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux as a cause of laryngeal symptoms. Patients who are RFS+ and PR—may have laryngeal injury from another source, whereas patients who are RFS— and PR+ may not have acid entering the larynx, despite the presence of PR. Patients who are RFS+ and PR+ have more severe gastroesophageal reflux disease and their reflux causes laryngeal damage. Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH monitoring should be considered complementary studies in establishing the diagnosis of laryngeal injury induced by gastroesophageal reflux.

Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux

To determine the existence of and characterize gastroesophagopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of airway irritation, we monitored pharyngeal pH over a 24-hour period in 222 consecutive patients. Pharyngeal reflux was defined as a drop in pH to less than 4 at the pharyngeal sensor, which occurred simultaneously with acidification of the distal esophagus. Patients were divided into two groups: those with pharyngeal reflux (PR+) and those without (PR-). The Mann-Whitney U test and Student’s t test were used to assess intergroup comparisons. Episodes of pharyngeal reflux (range 1 to 36, average 4.4) were identified in 90 PR+ patients (40%). No pharyngeal reflux was identified in the remaining 132 patients (PR-). Episodes of pharyngeal reflux were rapidly cleared (average duration 1.5 minutes), and occurred while in the upright position in 77 (86%) of 90 patients and while in the supine position in 11 (12%) of 90 patients. Twenty-three patients (25%) experienced symptoms in association with an episode of pharyngeal reflux. In the distal esophagus, the percentage of time the pH was below 4 during the upright position and the total percentage of time the pH was below 4 were greater in PR+ patients (6.4% and 5.8%, respectively) when compared to PR-patients (2.6% and 2.6%, respectively). Laryngoscopic findings did not distinguish PR+ from PR- patients. Pharyngeal reflux occurs most commonly in the upright position and can be identified in more than 40% of patients thought to have acid-induced laryngeal symptoms. Even though these episodes are short lived and rapidly cleared, symptoms occur concomitantly in 25% of patients with proven pharyngeal reflux. Patients with laryngeal symptoms and documented pharyngeal reflux have greater amounts of esophageal reflux when compared to patients with laryngeal symptoms and no demonstrable pharyngeal reflux.

Symptomatic and physiologic outcomes after operative treatment for extraesophageal reflux

Background: Pharyngeal pH monitoring has recently been used to identify patients with extraesophageal symptoms induced by gastroesophageal reflux. We employed this method of acid detection to evaluate patients with respiratory symptoms prior to and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication to further elucidate the relationship between GERD and respiratory symptoms. Methods: Twenty-one consecutive patients with extraesophageal symptoms thought to be caused by reflux underwent symptomatic and functional evaluation (esophageal manometry and 24-h pH monitoring with a pharyngeal probe) before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Episodes of pharyngeal acid exposure were considered abnormal if the pH dropped below 4, occurred simultaneously with esophageal acidification, and occurred outside meal times. Results: All patients had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and respiratory symptoms; nine of 15 (60%) had evidence of pharyngeal reflux preoperatively. Antireflux procedures resulted in a significant decrease in pharyngeal reflux (7.9 to 1.6 episodes/24h; p <0.05) and esophageal acid exposure (7.5% to 2.1%; p <0.05). In patients with pharyngeal reflux and complete postoperative testing, three (60%) obtained improvement of respiratory symptoms and resolution of pharyngeal reflux. In two patients with recurrent respiratory symptoms after surgery, persistent pharyngeal reflux was detected. Conclusions: Operative treatment of GERD is effective in controlling extraesophageal reflux, measured subjectively and objectively. Evidence of pharyngeal reflux on pH testing helps to identify which patients with respiratory symptoms will benefit from an antireflux procedure.

Total fundoplication is the operation of choice for patients with gastroesophageal reflux and defective peristalsis

BackgroundPartial fundoplication has traditionally been indicated for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who have defective peristalsis (DP). Because partial fundoplication had been reported to be a less effective means of controlling acid reflux than total fundoplication, in 1997 we stopped performing partial fundoplication for patients with DP and switched to a floppy total fundoplication. This study analyzes the results of our new strategy and compares it to our former approach.MethodsWe performed a partial fundoplication in 39 patients with DP (distal amplitude>40% of swallows) between 1994 and 1997 and a total fundoplication in 57 patients between 1997 and 2000. Symptoms scores derived from a standard questionnaire with a scale of 0–4, manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring were completed preoperatively in 86 patients and postoperatively in 40 patients.ResultsHeartburn scores improved in both groups (preoperative, 2.8; postoperative, 0.65; p<0.05). Dysphagia was 1.1 preoperatively and 0.62 postoperatively (p=NS) in the partial fundoplication group and 1.2 preoperatively and 0.3 postoperatively (p<0.05) in the total fundoplication group. Furthermore, none of the patients in the total fundoplication group developed new dysphagia and none required dilatation. Distal esophageal acid exposure normalized in both groups after operative treatment (median DeMeester score: 72.3 vs 11.3, p<0.05, For partial fundoplication; 57.1 vs 6.3, p<0.05, For total fundoplication). Distal esophageal amplitudes averaged 27.8 mmHg preoperatively and 35.6 mmHg (p=NS) in the partial fundoplication group, they averaged 28.2 mmHg preoperatively vs 49.0 mmHg postoperatively (p<0.005) in the total fundoplication group. Two patients with a previous partial fundoplication required a conversion to a total fundoplication. No postoperative dilation was required in either group.ConclusionsOur study shows that both a partial and a total fundoplication are effective in controlling the symptoms of GERD in patients with defective peristalsis. Dysphagia improves significantly after total fundoplication but not after partial fundoplication. Although both operations brought acid reflux to within normal limits, the effect was more pronounced with total fundoplication. Total, but not partial, fundoplication produced a significant increase in amplitude of esophageal peristalsis, which may explain the subjective improvement during deglution. Therefore, fundoplication should be the treatment of choice in patients with GERD and defective peristalsis.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of Esophageal Diverticula

Minimally invasive approaches are ideally suited to treat diverticula of the mid- and lower esophagus. The most commonly reported procedure is a laparoscopic diverticulectomy and myotomy, particularly when the diverticulum is located within 10 cm of the lower esophageal sphincter. Treatment is the same as for the open approach: Symptomatic patients are offered surgical treatment, the diverticulum is excised without compromise of the esophageal lumen, the proximal extent of the myotomy is dictated by preoperative manometry, and postoperative evaluation is performed to exclude recurrence and gastroesophageal reflux. The results of laparoscopic treatment of esophageal diverticula are similar to the results reported in the open procedure. The laparoscopic technique used to treat esophageal diverticula is described.