Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Thomas Richard Spilker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Thomas Richard Spilker.


SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS INT.FORUM-STAIF 2003: Conf.on Thermophysics in Microgravity; Commercial/Civil Next Generation Space Transportation; Human Space Exploration; Symps.on Space Nuclear Power and Propulsion (20th); Space Colonization (1st) | 2003

NEPTranS; A Shuttle‐Tended NEP Interplanetary Transportation System

John O. Elliott; Roy Y. Nakagawa; Thomas Richard Spilker; Ronald J. Lipinski; David I. Poston; Dean W. Moreland

Recently, a study was performed by a team from JPL and the DOE to develop a mission architecture for a reusable NEP Interplanetary Transfer Vehicle, a “Space Truck”. This vehicle is designed to be used for delivery of payloads from Earth to a variety of destinations, including Mars and Venus, dependent on mission needs. In addition to delivering payloads to the target bodies, the vehicle is designed to perform autonomous rendezvous and capture of sample return capsules at the destination for return to Earth. In order to maximize the utility of the vehicle, its design is optimized for servicing between missions with the Space Shuttle. Fuel tanks, ion thrusters, and Power Management and Distribution electronics are all on‐orbit replaceable units, located at the payload interface end of the spacecraft to ensure a minimal radiation dose to the Shuttle and crew during maintenance and resupply operations. Operational flexibility is maximized through the use of replaceable fuel tanks and thrusters, allowing tailoring of fuel load to any given destination and payload mass. This paper discusses the preliminary design developed for the NEP Interplanetary Transfer Vehicle, including its configuration and design features, and outlines the concept for mission design, including discussion of unique requirements for launch, deployment and operations with the Space Shuttle, and rendezvous and servicing by the Shuttle in Earth orbit following a return from each target destination.Recently, a study was performed by a team from JPL and the DOE to develop a mission architecture for a reusable NEP Interplanetary Transfer Vehicle, a “Space Truck”. This vehicle is designed to be used for delivery of payloads from Earth to a variety of destinations, including Mars and Venus, dependent on mission needs. In addition to delivering payloads to the target bodies, the vehicle is designed to perform autonomous rendezvous and capture of sample return capsules at the destination for return to Earth. In order to maximize the utility of the vehicle, its design is optimized for servicing between missions with the Space Shuttle. Fuel tanks, ion thrusters, and Power Management and Distribution electronics are all on‐orbit replaceable units, located at the payload interface end of the spacecraft to ensure a minimal radiation dose to the Shuttle and crew during maintenance and resupply operations. Operational flexibility is maximized through the use of replaceable fuel tanks and thrusters, allowing tail...


54th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law | 2003

Mixing moons and atmospheric entry probes: challenges and limitations of a multi-objective science mission to Jupiter

Tibor S. Balint; Gregory J. Whiffen; Thomas Richard Spilker

Current advanced mission concepts to explore the Jovian system target either Jupiter or its satellites.


ieee aerospace conference | 2008

The "Billion Dollar Box" Study of Science Missions to Saturnian Satellites

Thomas Richard Spilker; Kim R. Reh; John O. Elliott; Ralph D. Lorenz; John R. Spencer

Cassini/Huygens (C/H) mission investigations verify Saturnian satellites Titan and Enceladus as objects of intense interest to planetary scientists and astrobiologists. Recently NASA commissioned a study of potential relatively low-cost missions to these icy satellites, led by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) with science and engineering teams from prominent universities, FFRDCs, and NASA centers. NASA was interested in determining whether there are scientifically viable missions to Titan or Enceladus within the constraints of a (possibly slightly expanded) New Frontiers mission. The C/H missions extremely capable instrumentation and thorough investigation of the Saturn system make that a difficult, though not obviously impossible, task. Any such mission must exceed C/H capabilities (in, for instance, imaging coverage or resolution, or range of constituents identifiable) to be scientifically worthwhile. Beginning in October 2006 these teams assessed science objectives for the two destinations and surveyed architectural options for implementing worthwhile subsets of the global lists of science objectives, attempting to find mission concepts both scientifically justifiable and within New Frontiers constraints. These studies were completed in early 2007 and the somewhat surprising results, that there appear to be no such missions, reported to NASA. This presentation gives the results of the studies and examines interesting individual missions.


Experimental Astronomy | 2012

OSS (Outer Solar System): A fundamental and planetary physics mission to Neptune, Triton and the Kuiper Belt

Bruno Christophe; Linda J. Spilker; John D. Anderson; N. André; Sami W. Asmar; Jonathan M. Aurnou; Donald J. Banfield; Antonella M. Barucci; Orfeu Bertolami; R. Bingham; P. Brown; B. Cecconi; Jean-Michel Courty; Hansjörg Dittus; Leigh N. Fletcher; Bernard Foulon; Frederico Francisco; P. J. S. Gil; Karl-Heinz Glassmeier; William M. Grundy; Candice J. Hansen; Jörn Helbert; Ravit Helled; Hauke Hussmann; Brahim Lamine; Claus Lämmerzahl; L. Lamy; Rolland Lehoucq; Benjamin Lenoir; Agnès Levy


Archive | 2006

Aerocapture Systems Analysis for a Neptune Mission

Mary Kae Lockwood; Karl T. Edquist; Brett R. Starr; Brian R. Hollis; Glenn A. Hrinda; Robert W. Bailey; Jeffery L. Hall; Thomas Richard Spilker; Muriel Noca; N. O'Kongo


Planetary and Space Science | 2005

Connecting atmospheric science and atmospheric models for aerocapture at Titan and the outer planets

C.G. Justus; Aleta Duvall; Vernon W. Keller; Thomas Richard Spilker; Mary Kae Lockwood


Archive | 2001

Exploration of the Neptune System

Heidi B. Hammel; Kevin H. Baines; J. D. Cuzzi; Imke de Pater; William M. Grundy; G. W. Lockwood; Jason Perry; Kathy A. Rages; Thomas Richard Spilker; J. A. Stansberry


Archive | 2008

A Neptune Orbiter with Probes Mission with Aerocapture Orbit Insertion

Andrew P. Ingersoll; Thomas Richard Spilker


Archive | 2007

Scientific Investigation of the Jovian System: the Jupiter System Observer Mission Concept

Thomas Richard Spilker; David A. Senske; Louise M. Prockter; Johnny H. Kwok; G. H. Tan-Wang; Jso Sdt


Archive | 2006

In-Situ Probing of Titan's Surface and Near-Surface Organic Environment From a Montgolfiere

Thomas Richard Spilker; Kim R. Reh; John O. Elliott; Jonathan I. Lunine; Robert D. Lorenz

Collaboration


Dive into the Thomas Richard Spilker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nathan J. Strange

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kim R. Reh

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John O. Elliott

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Hofstadter

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Patricia M. Beauchamp

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dennis L. Matson

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert D. Abelson

California Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Athena Coustenis

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge