Thomas Snow
St Thomas' Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Thomas Snow.
Eurointervention | 2013
Carlo Di Mario; Hélène Eltchaninoff; Neil Moat; Javier Goicolea; Gian Paolo Ussia; Petr Kala; Peter Wenaweser; Marian Zembala; Georg Nickenig; Eduardo Alegria Barrero; Thomas Snow; Bernard Iung; Pepe Zamorano; Gerhard Schuler; Roberto Corti; Ottavio Alfieri; Bernard Prendergast; Peter Ludman; Stephan Windecker; Manel Sabaté; Martine Gilard; Adam Witowski; Haim D. Danenberg; Erwin Schroeder; Francesco Romeo; Carlos Macaya; Geneviève Derumeaux; Aldo P. Maggioni; Luigi Tavazzi
AIMS The aim of this prospective multinational registry is to assess and identify predictors of in-hospital outcome and complications of contemporary TAVI practice. METHODS AND RESULTS The Transcatheter Valve Treatment Sentinel Pilot Registry is a prospective independent consecutive collection of individual patient data entered into a web-based case record form (CRF) or transferred from compatible national registries. A total of 4,571 patients underwent TAVI between January 2011 and May 2012 in 137 centres of 10 European countries. Average age was 81.4±7.1 years with equal representation of the two sexes. Logistic EuroSCORE (20.2±13.3), access site (femoral approach: 74.2%), type of anaesthesia and duration of hospital stay (9.3±8.1 days) showed wide variations among the participating countries. In-hospital mortality (7.4%), stroke (1.8%), myocardial infarction (0.9%), major vascular complications (3.1%) were similar in the SAPIEN XT and CoreValve (p=0.15). Mortality was lower in transfemoral (5.9%) than in transapical (12.8%) and other access routes (9.7%; p<0.01). Advanced age, high logistic EuroSCORE, pre-procedural ≥grade 2 mitral regurgitation and deployment failure predicted higher mortality at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Increased operator experience and the refinement of valve types and delivery catheters may explain the lower rate of mortality, stroke and vascular complications than in historical studies and registries.
International Journal of Cardiology | 2014
Gianni Dall'Ara; Hélène Eltchaninoff; Neil Moat; Cécile Laroche; Javier Goicolea; Gian Paolo Ussia; Petr Kala; Peter Wenaweser; Marian Zembala; Georg Nickenig; Thomas Snow; Susanna Price; Eduardo Alegria Barrero; Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro; Bernard Iung; Jose Luis Zamorano; Gerhard Schuler; Ottavio Alfieri; Bernard Prendergast; Peter Ludman; Stephan Windecker; Manel Sabaté; Martine Gilard; Adam Witkowski; Haim D. Danenberg; Erwin Schroeder; Francesco Romeo; Carlos Macaya; Geneviève Derumeaux; Alessio Mattesini
BACKGROUND There is great variability for the type of anaesthesia used during TAVI, with no clear consensus coming from comparative studies or guidelines. We sought to detect regional differences in the anaesthetic management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in Europe and to evaluate the relationship between type of anaesthesia and in-hospital and 1 year outcome. METHODS Between January 2011 and May 2012 the Sentinel European TAVI Pilot Registry enrolled 2807 patients treated via a transfemoral approach using either local (LA-group, 1095 patients, 39%) or general anaesthesia (GA-group, 1712 patients, 61%). RESULTS A wide variation in LA use was evident amongst the 10 participating countries. The use of LA has increased over time (from a mean of 37.5% of procedures in the first year, to 57% in last 6 months, p<0.01). MI, major stroke as well as in-hospital death rate (7.0% LA vs 5.3% GA, p=0.053) had a similar incidence between groups, confirmed in multivariate regression analysis after adjusting for confounders. Dividing our population in tertiles according to the Log-EuroSCORE we found similar mortality under LA, whilst mortality was higher in the highest risk tertile under GA. Survival at 1 year, compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis, was similar between groups (log-rank: p=0.1505). CONCLUSIONS Selection of anaesthesia appears to be more influenced by national practice and operator preference than patient characteristics. In the absence of an observed difference in outcomes for either approach, there is no compelling argument to suggest that operators and centres should change their anaesthetic practice.
Eurointervention | 2016
Martine Gilard; Michael Schlüter; Thomas Snow; Gianni Dall'Ara; Hélène Eltchaninoff; Neil Moat; Javier Goicolea; Gian Paolo Ussia; Petr Kala; Peter Wenaweser; Marian Zembala; Georg Nickenig; Susanna Price; Eduardo Alegria Barrero; Bernard Iung; Pepe Zamorano; Gerhard Schuler; Roberto Corti; Ottavio Alfieri; Bernard Prendergast; Peter Ludman; Stephan Windecker; Manel Sabaté; Adam Witkowski; Haim D. Danenberg; Erwin Schroeder; Francesco Romeo; Carlos Macaya; Geneviève Derumeaux; Cécile Laroche
AIMS Our aim was to assess one-year outcomes of patients enrolled in the pilot European Sentinel Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS One-year outcomes of 4,571 patients (81.4±7.2 years, 2,291 [50.1%] male) receiving TAVI with the SAPIEN XT (57.3%) or CoreValve prosthesis at 137 European centres were analysed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression techniques. At one year, 3,341 patients were alive, 821 had died, and 409 were lost to follow-up. Of 2,125 patients who underwent functional assessment, 1,916 (90%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I/II at one year, with functional improvement from baseline noted in 1,682 patients (88%). One-year survival based on 4,564 patients was estimated at 79.1%. Independent baseline predictors of mortality were increasing age and logistic EuroSCORE, the presence of NYHA III/IV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atrial fibrillation. Female gender was associated with a 4% survival benefit at one year. Vascular access routes other than transfemoral were associated with poorer survival. Procedural failure and major periprocedural complications had an adverse impact on survival. CONCLUSIONS Contemporary European experience attests to the effectiveness of routine TAVI in unselected elderly patients.
Circulation-cardiovascular Interventions | 2016
Alistair C. Lindsay; Katie Harron; Richard J. Jabbour; Ritesh Kanyal; Thomas Snow; Paramvir Sawhney; Francisco Alpendurada; Michael Roughton; Dudley J. Pennell; Alison Duncan; Carlo Di Mario; Simon W. Davies; Raad H. Mohiaddin; Neil Moat
Background—Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can provide important structural information in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Although CMR is considered the standard of reference for measuring ventricular volumes and mass, the relationship between CMR findings of right ventricular (RV) function and outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation has not previously been reported. Methods and Results—A total of 190 patients underwent 1.5 Tesla CMR before transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Steady-state free precession sequences were used for aortic valve planimetry and to assess ventricular volumes and mass. Semiautomated image analysis was performed by 2 specialist reviewers blinded to patient treatment. Patient follow-up was obtained from the Office of National Statistics mortality database. The median age was 81.0 (interquartile range, 74.9–85.5) years; 50.0% were women. Impaired RV function (RV ejection fraction ⩽50%) was present in 45 (23.7%) patients. Patients with RV dysfunction had poorer left ventricular ejection fractions (42% versus 69%), higher indexed left ventricular end-systolic volumes (96 versus 40 mL), and greater indexed left ventricular mass (101 versus 85 g/m2; P<0.01 for all) than those with normal RV function. Median follow-up was 850 days; 21 of 45 (46.7%) patients with RV dysfunction died, compared with 43 of 145 (29.7%) patients with normal RV function (P=0.035). After adjustment for significant baseline variables, both RV ejection fraction ⩽50% (hazard ratio, 2.12; P=0.017) and indexed aortic valve area (hazard ratio, 4.16; P=0.025) were independently associated with survival. Conclusions—RV function, measured on preprocedural CMR, is an independent predictor of mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. CMR assessment of RV function may be important in the risk stratification of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Open Heart | 2018
Thomas Snow; Thomas Semple; Alison Duncan; Sarah Barker; Michael B. Rubens; Carlo DiMario; Simon Davies; Neil Moat; Edward D. Nicol
Introduction ‘Porcelain aorta’ is listed in the second consensus document of the Valve Academic Research Consortium as a risk factor in aortic valve replacement. However, the extent of circumferential involvement is poorly defined with great variability in reported incidence. We present a simple, reproducible classification to describe the extent of aortic calcification and thus appropriately define ‘porcelain aorta’, aiding clinical decision-making and registry data collection. Methods 175 consecutive CT aortograms were reviewed. The aorta was divided into three sections, and each section divided into quadrants. These were individually scored using a 5-point scale (0—no calcification, 5—complete contiguous calcification). Results for each quadrant were summated for each segment to provide an indication of the distribution of calcification. Results Only one patient (0.6%) had a ‘true’ porcelain aorta, defined as contiguous calcification across all quadrants at any aortic level. Intraobserver and interobserver variation was excellent for the ascending aorta (K=0.85–0.88 and 0.81–0.96, respectively) while the interobserver variation in the transverse arch was good at 0.75. Conclusions Our data suggest the incidence of ‘true’ porcelain aorta may be significantly lower than reported in the literature. The predominance of calcification within the anterior wall of the proximal ascending aorta and the superior wall of the transverse arch may be clinically important. Application of this quick, simple and reproducible grading system, with no requirement for advanced software, may provide a tool to support accurate assessment of focal aortic calcification and its relationship to subsequent procedural risk.
Global Cardiology Science and Practice | 2012
Thomas Snow; Neil Moat; Sarah Barker; Alison Duncan; Carlo Di Mario
[first paragraph of article] Aortic valve (AV) disease is a common condition with its prevalence, particularly aortic stenosis increasing exponentially with advancing age. A decade ago conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) was the only treatment when medical management failed and symptoms developed. More than half of the patients potentially eligible for surgery have coexistent conditions making them unsuitable or very high-risk candidates. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty had too rapid a rate of restenosis to make it a viable long-term alternative . It was therefore occasionally used as a bridge or test to assess suitability for AVR in patients with severe but potentially reversible left ventricular (LV) dysfunction or comorbidities.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2014
Georg Nickenig; Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro; Olaf Franzen; Corrado Tamburino; Marc Vanderheyden; Thomas F. Lüscher; Neil Moat; Susanna Price; Gianni Dall’Ara; Reidar Winter; Roberto Corti; Carmelo Grasso; Thomas Snow; Raban Jeger; Stefan Blankenberg; Magnus Settergren; Klaus Tiroch; Jan Balzer; Anna Sonia Petronio; Heinz-Joachim Büttner; Federica Ettori; Horst Sievert; Maria Giovanna Fiorino; Marc J. Claeys; Gian Paolo Ussia; Helmut Baumgartner; Salvatore Scandura; Farqad Alamgir; Freidoon Keshavarzi; Antonio Colombo
International Journal of Cardiology | 2015
Thomas Snow; Peter Ludman; Winston Banya; Mark deBelder; Philip MacCarthy; Simon W. Davies; Carlo Di Mario; Neil Moat
Journal of the American College of Cardiology | 2012
Alison Duncan; Thomas Snow; Carlo Di Mario; Simon J. Davies; Neil Moat
Heart | 2017
Thomas Semple; Thomas Snow; Alison Duncan; Sarah Barker; Michael B. Rubens; Carlo Di Mario; Simon W. Davies; Neal Moat; Edward D. Nicol