Thomas Soliman

Sirolimus Use in Liver Transplant Recipients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 3 Trial.

Background We investigated whether sirolimus-based immunosuppression improves outcomes in liver transplantation (LTx) candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods In a prospective-randomized open-label international trial, 525 LTx recipients with HCC initially receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression were randomized 4 to 6 weeks after transplantation into a group on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor–free immunosuppression (group A: 264 patients) or a group incorporating sirolimus (group B: 261). The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was conducted after 8 years. Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results Recurrence-free survival was 64.5% in group A and 70.2% in group B at study end, this difference was not significant (P = 0.28; hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.62; 1.15). In a planned analysis of RFS rates at yearly intervals, group B showed better outcomes 3 years after transplantation (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.48-1.00). Similarly, OS (P = 0.21; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13) was not statistically better in group B at study end, but yearly analyses showed improvement out to 5 years (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.49-1.00). Interestingly, subgroup (Milan Criteria-based) analyses revealed that low-risk, rather than high-risk, patients benefited most from sirolimus; furthermore, younger recipients (age ⩽60) also benefited, as well sirolimus monotherapy patients. Serious adverse event numbers were alike in groups A (860) and B (874). Conclusions Sirolimus in LTx recipients with HCC does not improve long-term RFS beyond 5 years. However, a RFS and OS benefit is evident in the first 3 to 5 years, especially in low-risk patients. This trial provides the first high-level evidence base for selecting immunosuppression in LTx recipients with HCC.

Combination of extended donor criteria and changes in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score predict patient survival and primary dysfunction in liver transplantation: a retrospective analysis.

Background. The purpose of this study was to analyze the impact of extended donor criteria (EDC) and of changes in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score while waiting for liver-transplantation (&Dgr;-MELD) on patient survival and initial graft function. Methods. We included 386 consecutive patients with end-stage liver disease who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation at the Medical University Vienna between 1997 and 2003. Primary outcome was patient survival and secondary outcome was initial graft function. EDC included: age >60 years, >4 days intensive medical care, cold ischemia time >10 hr, need for noradrenalin >0.2 &mgr;g/kg/min or doputamin >6 &mgr;g/kg/min, a donor peak serum sodium >155 mEq/L, a donor serum creatinine >1.2 mg/100 mL, and a body mass index >30. Results. &Dgr;-MELD was significantly higher in the nonsurvivor population (P=0.01) and EDC showed a significant influence on initial graft function (P=0.01). Worsening in either &Dgr;-MELD or the presence of at least two EDC was not associated with an increased risk of primary graft dysfunction and death. Worsening in &Dgr;-MELD and the presence of at least two EDC was significantly associated with primary graft dysfunction (P=0.01) and death (P=0.008). Conclusion. The combination of a liver recipient with worsening &Dgr;-MELD and a potential donor with at least two EDC should be avoided.

Short-term induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin and delayed use of calcineurin inhibitors in orthotopic liver transplantation.

The appropriate time point for starting immunosuppressive treatment with calcineurin inhibitors after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been a subject of debate. The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of anti‐thymocyte globulin (ATG) induction therapy on rejection, renal function, infection, tumor rate, and survival. We retrospectively analyzed 391 patients after OLT who had either received calcineurin inhibitors immediately after OLT (n = 129) or after an initial short‐term Thymoglobulin induction therapy (n = 262). The 1‐year acute rejection rate was 14.5% vs. 31.8% in favor of ATG (P = 0.0008). Rejection grades and the need for treatment also differed significantly (7.3% vs. 23.3%; P = 0.001). Serum creatinine at transplantation was similar in both groups (1.14 mg/dL vs.1.18 mg/dL; P = NS). Postoperative hemofiltration was less frequently seen after induction therapy (P < 0.05). Reduced renal function at 1 year was commonly observed, but serum creatinine (1.26 mg/dL vs. 1.37mg/dL; P = 0.015) and glomerular filtration rate (81 mL/min vs. 75 mL/min; P = 0.02) were far better in the ATG group. Undesired side effects occurred at a similar rate in both groups. Five‐year patient survival was also similar in the 2 groups (70.1% and 74.3%; P > 0.05). Short‐term ATG induction therapy with delayed administration of calcineurin inhibitors led to a more favorable rejection rate and an improved clinical course in case of a rejection episode. It has beneficial effects on renal function immediately after OLT as well as later, and no additional harmful effects. Liver Transpl 13:1039–1044, 2007.

Influence of cumulative number of marginal donor criteria on primary organ dysfunction in liver recipients.

Abstract:  Background:  The aim of this cohort study was to assess the cumulative effect of marginal donor criteria on initial graft function and patient survival after liver transplantation.

Is MELD score sufficient to predict not only death on waiting list, but also post-transplant survival?

Model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score has emerged as a useful tool in predicting mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation. There is still, however, discussion as to whether further parameters could improve the sensitivity and specificity of the MELD score. From 1997 to 2003, 621 adult patients with end‐stage liver disease were listed for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Patients suffering from hepatoma were excluded from analysis (113 patients). The MELD score was investigated at the time of listing (MELD ON) and of coming off the list (MELD OFF). Patients who died while on the waiting list showed a significant increase in their MELD score during the waiting time (MELD ON: 21 ± 7 vs. MELD OFF: 28 ± 9) as well as a significantly higher MELD ON compared with patients who were transplanted (MELD ON: 16 ± 5 vs. MELD OFF: 17 ± 7) or removed from the waiting list (MELD ON: 16 ± 6 vs. MELD OFF: 12 ± 3). Multivariate analysis identified MELD ON, ascites and recurrent infection as independent risk factors for death on the waiting list (P < 0.01). MELD score was not identified as a predictor for the post‐transplant survival rate. MELD score is a strong predictor for death on the waiting list, but refractory ascites and recurrent infection are independent risk factors, too.

Improvement of cardiac output and liver blood flow and reduction of pulmonary vascular resistance by intravenous infusion of L-arginine during the early reperfusion period in pig liver transplantation

BACKGROUND The release of liver arginase after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) causes a deficiency of L-arginine and nitrite in the plasma. This deficiency is possibly related to pulmonary hypertension and reduced hepatic blood flow, which are commonly observed in the immediate reperfusion period. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of L-arginine supplementation on metabolic and hemodynamic parameters during liver reperfusion after OLT in pigs. METHODS Thirteen pig OLTs (control group, n=6; arginine group, n=7) were performed by a standard technique. Cold ischemic time was 20 hr. L-Arginine was infused at a dosage of 500 mg/kg body weight into the donor pigs (30 min before liver explantation) and also into the recipients (over a period of 3 hr from the beginning of the reperfusion period). At the end of the experimental study, the pigs were killed with an overdose of potassium. RESULTS In the control group, liver revascularization increased plasma arginase concentrations (+615%) and reduced plasma levels of L-arginine (-87%), nitrite (-82%), and nitrate (-53%). Infusion of L-arginine increased plasma levels of L-arginine from 94+/-21 micromol/L to 1674+/-252 micromol/L (P<0.001), L-ornithine from 46+/-8 micromol/L to 2215+/-465 micromol/L (P<0.001), and L-citrulline from 58+/-8 micromol/L to 116+/-34 micromol/L (P<0.001), but had no effect on plasma levels of nitrite and nitrate. Administration of L-arginine in the donor pigs did not produce any systemic or organ-specific hemodynamic alterations. Infusion of L-arginine into the recipient pigs improved cardiac performance (increase in heart rate [+61%, P=0.017] and cardiac index [+53%, P=0.005], reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [-54%, P=0.014]). Moreover L-arginine infusion increased oxygen consumption (+65%, P=0.003), reduced pulmonary vascular resistance index (P=0.001), stimulated portal venous blood flow (P=0.014), and elevated body temperature during the reperfusion period (P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS From these data, we conclude that the infusion of L-arginine during OLT improves the hemodynamic performance of the heart, lung, and liver.

Comparison between C0 and C2 monitoring in de novo renal transplant recipients: retrospective analysis of a single-center experience.

Background. Monitoring immunosuppression with cyclosporine microemulsion formulation (CsA-MEF) by using 2-hour CsA blood levels (C2) has been strongly recommended after kidney transplantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of C2 monitoring on the clinical outcome early after transplantation in a single-center setting. Methods. Nonsensitized, consecutive, de novo cadaveric kidney-transplant recipients were treated with CsA-MEF, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Patients receiving transplants after January 2002 (n=89) were prospectively monitored by C2 levels (target: 1,500±200 ng/mL [fluorescence-polarization immunoassay]). They were retrospectively compared with the patients receiving transplants during 2001 (n=88) who had been monitored by C0 levels (target: 250±50 ng/mL). Results. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 40 (45.4%) patients in the C0 group and 25 (28.1%) patients in the C2 group received treatment for rejection (P=0.017). The incidence of histologically verified rejection of Banff grade I or higher was 20.45% in the C0 group and 13.48% in the C2 group (P=0.235). In the per-protocol analysis, incidence of treated rejection was 24.7%, and incidence of histologically verified rejection of Banff grade I or higher was 12.35% in the C2 group (P=0.004 and 0.160, respectively, vs. C0). Mean CsA-MEF doses were 1.7 to 2 times higher in the C2 group than in the C0 group throughout follow-up (P=0.019). In the C2 group, target C2 levels were achieved on average 4 days after transplantation, and there was no significant difference in C2 levels between patients who rejected and patients who did not reject. Conclusion. Kidney-transplant recipients monitored by C2 levels receive significantly higher doses of CsA-MEF and have a lower incidence of early acute allograft rejection than patients monitored by C0 levels. In C2 monitored patients, C2 levels are not predictive for the incidence of early allograft rejection.

Genetic detection of lymph node micrometastases : A selection criterion for liver transplantation in patients with liver metastases after colorectal cancer

Background. Liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer was abandoned in 1994 on account of high recurrence rates. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the genetic detection of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of the primary colon cancer could be applied to select patients for liver transplantation. Methods. We analyzed 21 patients with colorectal cancer who had undergone liver transplantation between 1983 and 1994 for liver metastases. Eleven patients were histologically lymph node negative at the time of surgery; ten patients with lymph node metastases served as control group. DNA sequencing was used to screen tumor material for p53 and K-ras mutations. Mutant allele-specific amplification (MASA) was then used to search for micrometastases in DNA from regional lymph nodes of the primary colorectal cancer. Results. p53 and K-ras mutations were detected in 12 (57%) and 3 (14%) of 21 patients in the colorectal cancer, respectively. The mutations were confirmed in the corresponding liver metastases. Of 11 patients with histologically negative lymph nodes, nine were eligible for MASA due to presence of p53 or K-ras mutation. MASA revealed six of nine patients to be genetically positive for micrometastases. Three patients were both genetically and histologically negative. These three patients showed a significantly longer overall survival (P=0.011) of 4, 5, and 20 years, respectively. Conclusions. We conclude that the genetic detection of micrometastases by MASA could be a powerful prognostic indicator for selecting patients with colorectal liver metastases who could benefit from liver transplantation.

Dynamic changes in MELD score not only predict survival on the waiting list but also overall survival after liver transplantation

The predictive value of MELD score for post‐transplant survival has been under constant debate since its implementation in 2001. Aim of this study was to assess the impact of alterations in MELD score throughout waiting time (WT) on post‐transplant survival. A single‐centre retrospective analysis of 1125 consecutive patients listed for liver transplantation between 1997 and 2009 was performed. The impact of MELD score and dynamic changes in MELD score (DeltaMELD), as well as age, sex, year of listing and WT were evaluated on waiting list mortality and post‐transplant survival. In this cohort, 539 (60%) patients were transplanted, 223 (25%) died on list and 142 (15%) were removed from the waiting list during WT. One‐, three‐ and five‐year survival after liver transplantation were 83%, 78% and 76% respectively. DeltaMELD as a continuous variable proved to be the only significant risk factor for overall survival after liver transplantation (hazard ratio (HR): 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.1, P = 0.013). The highest risk of post‐transplant death could be defined for patients with a DeltaMELD > 10 (HR: 4.87, 95% CI 2.09–11.35, P < 0.0001). In addition, DeltaMELD as well as MELD at listing showed a significant impact on waiting list mortality. DeltaMELD may provide an easy evaluation tool to identify patients on the liver transplant waiting list with a high mortality risk after transplantation in the current setting. Temporarily withholding and re‐evaluating these patients might improve overall outcome after liver transplantation.

Short-term versus long-term induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin in orthotopic liver transplantation.

T‐cell depletion is an essential aspect of clinical immunosuppression. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of two dosage regimens in this setting. We retrospectively compared 246 patients (group 1) who received a 10‐day antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction protocol with 226 patients (group 2) who received a 3‐day protocol. The 6‐month rejection rate was 22.3% in group 1 and 12.7% in group 2 (P = 0.03). The sub‐analysis showed a higher rejection rate in patients with cholestatic disease (P = 0.01), who were more numerous in group 1. This resulted in an overall difference between the groups. Rates of de novo malignancies and recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma were identical. Viral infection rates were 16% and 18%, respectively (P > 0.5). The rates of bacterial and fungal infection were also similar (37% vs. 42%, P > 0.1). However, infection and ATG administration are independent risk factors for survival. A lower rate of fatal infection was observed in group 2 (P = 0.01), while the 10‐day ATG regimen had a detrimental effect on patients who had infection (P < 0.0001). Our results strongly support the application of 3‐day ATG induction therapy regimen after orthotopic liver transplantation, as it is associated with the same rejection rate as long‐term ATG induction therapy, without the negative survival effect of the latter due to lethal infection.