Thomas T. Poels

Left Bundle-Branch Block Induced by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Increases Risk of Death

Background— Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a novel therapy for treatment of severe aortic stenosis. Although 30% to 50% of patients develop new left bundle-branch block (LBBB), its effect on clinical outcome is unclear. Methods and Results— Data were collected in a multicenter registry encompassing TAVI patients from 2005 until 2010. The all-cause mortality rate at follow-up was compared between patients who did and did not develop new LBBB. Of 679 patients analyzed, 387 (57.0%) underwent TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve System and 292 (43.0%) with the Edwards SAPIEN valve. A total of 233 patients (34.3%) developed new LBBB. Median follow-up was 449.5 (interquartile range, 174–834) days in patients with and 450 (interquartile range, 253–725) days in patients without LBBB (P=0.90). All-cause mortality was 37.8% (n=88) in patients with LBBB and 24.0% (n=107) in patients without LBBB (P=0.002). By multivariate regression analysis, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were TAVI-induced LBBB (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; confidence interval [CI], 1.12–2.10), chronic obstructive lung disease (HR, 1.56; CI, 1.15–2.10), female sex (HR, 1.39; CI, 1.04–1.85), left ventricular ejection fraction ⩽50% (HR, 1.38; CI, 1.02–1.86), and baseline creatinine (HR, 1.32; CI, 1.19–1.43). LBBB was more frequent after implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve System than after Edwards SAPIEN implantation (51.1% and 12.0%, respectively; P<0.001), but device type did not influence the mortality risk of TAVI-induced LBBB. Conclusions— All-cause mortality after TAVI is higher in patients who develop LBBB than in patients who do not. TAVI-induced LBBB is an independent predictor of mortality.

Occurrence, fate and consequences of ventricular conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is frequently complicated by new left bundle branch block (LBBB). We investigated the development and persistence of LBBB during follow-up and its clinical consequences. METHODS AND RESULTS ECGs at baseline, within 24 hours, before discharge and at 12 months after TAVI were assessed in 476 patients without pre-existing LBBB and/or pacemaker before or after TAVI. TAVI-induced new LBBB was categorised based on the timing of the occurrence (within 24 hours [acute], after 24 hours but before discharge [subacute], and after discharge [late]), in addition to persistence (transient or persistent). A total of 175 patients (36.8%) developed new LBBB of which 85.7% occurred within 24 hours after TAVI, 12.0% before and 2.3% after hospital discharge, and was persistent in 111 patients (63.4%). Implantation of the Medtronic CoreValve System (MCS) more frequently led to new LBBB than the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valve (ES) (53.8% versus 21.7%) with less recovery during follow-up (39.0% versus 9.5%). Late new LBBB was only seen in four patients (0.8%). During a median follow-up of 915 (578-1,234) days, persistent LBBB was associated with a significant increase in mortality as compared to no LBBB and temporary LBBB combined (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.03; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS TAVI-induced new LBBB occurs in almost 40% of patients, almost all before hospital discharge. It occurs three times more frequently after MCS than after ES valve implantation and has a twofold lower tendency to resolve during follow-up. Persistent LBBB is associated with a higher mortality.

Trends in the occurrence of new conduction abnormalities after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

The aim of the study was to investigate trends over time in the occurrence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Medtronic CoreValve System (MCS) and Edwards SAPIEN Valve (ESV). Background: TAVI‐induced conduction abnormalities (TAVI‐CAs) such as LBBB and the need for PPI are frequent postoperative complication. New techniques, procedural refinements, and increased awareness are focused on the reduction of these abnormalities.

Modalities and Effects of Left Ventricle Unloading on Extracorporeal Life support: a Review of the Current Literature

Veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V‐A ECMO) support is increasingly used in refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest, but is characterized by a rise in afterload of the left ventricle (LV) which may ultimately either further impair or delay cardiac contractility improvement. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview regarding the different LV venting techniques and results currently available in the literature.

Frequency and prognosis of new bundle branch block induced by surgical aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES Recently, transcatheter aortic valve implantation has been introduced, but one of its complications is left bundle branch block (LBBB), a conduction disturbance that has been associated with increased mortality. We investigated the incidence and fate of both right bundle branch block (RBBB) and LBBB after aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a retrospective analysis. We also studied the predictive value of both disorders for all-cause mortality. METHODS All patients who underwent AVR, with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting surgery, between 2002 and 2010 in our centre were included. All-cause mortality was compared between patients who did and those who did not develop persistent new bundle branch block (BBB) within 7 days postoperatively. Patients were not eligible if one of their electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings prior to AVR showed a BBB or pacemaker activity. A postoperative period of 3-12 months was used to collect follow-up ECGs. RESULTS Of the 2279 AVR patients, 2033 patients were eligible for analysis. After excluding patients lacking baseline or follow-up ECG (n = 269), 1764 patients remained for analysis. Early LBBB and RBBB occurred in 71 (4.0%) and 92 (5.2%) patients, respectively. At follow-up, LBBB was persistent in 29 patients (1.6%) and RBBB in 74 patients (4.2%). During a median follow-up of 4.5 (2.4-6.5) years, the mortality rate was 16.3% (n = 271) in patients without BBB, 24.1% (n = 7) in patients with persistent LBBB and 18.9% (n = 14) in patients with persistent RBBB (log-rank P = 0.49). Though, in univariate analysis, the hazard ratio for mortality was 1.54 and 1.10 for LBBB and RBBB, respectively, the small numbers precluded identifying AVR-induced LBBB and RBBB as a predictor of mortality. CONCLUSIONS In the current practice of AVR, persistent postoperative LBBB and RBBB occur infrequently (∼ 5% of cases), a percentage less than half of that in current transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures. Given the adverse effects of LBBB, the lower prevalence of procedure-induced LBBB in AVR should be taken into account while deciding which valve replacement procedure is chosen for a patient.

Severely Thrombosed Transcatheter Aortic Valve 9 Months After Implantation

Bioprosthetic aortic valve thrombosis is a rare complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation; however, one with a high mortality. We describe the case of a patient with a completely thrombosed transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis 9 months after implantation and review the diagnosis and management of this complication.

Reservations about the Selvester QRS score in left bundle branch block — Experience in patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation ☆

BACKGROUND The Selvester QRS score (S-score) estimates myocardial scar using electrocardiographic criteria. We evaluated the S-score for left bundle branch block (LBBB). MATERIAL AND METHODS Studied were 36 patients who developed persistent LBBB upon transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI, TAVI-LBBB group) and 36 matched patients with persistent narrow QRS (TAVI-nQRS group). Electrocardiograms were recorded before and briefly after TAVI and during ~6months follow-up. S-score was calculated using criteria for hypertrophic (in absence of LBBB) or LBBB hearts. RESULTS In TAVI-LBBB patients correlation between S-scores pre-TAVI and post-TAVI was absent (R2=0.023). High S-scores post-TAVI occurred in patients with low pre-TAVI scores. Pre-post TAVI scores correlated weakly in TAVI-nQRS (R2=0.182), indicating a possible influence of ventricular unloading by TAVI. In both groups S-scores at post-TAVI and follow-up compared reasonably (R2=0.389 and R2=0.386), indicating reproducibility in more stable conditions. CONCLUSION This study indicates that the use of the LBBB S-score criteria overestimates scar size and that caution is recommended in the use of the score in patients with LBBB.