Thomas W. Packard

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A proven growth technology for human NEO/Mars exploration missions

The nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) represents the next “evolutionary step” in high performance rocket propulsion. Unlike conventional chemical rockets that produce their energy through combustion, the NTR derives its energy from fission of Uranium-235 atoms contained within fuel elements that comprise the engines reactor core. Using an “expander” cycle for turbopump drive power, hydrogen propellant is raised to a high pressure and pumped through coolant channels in the fuel elements where it is superheated then expanded out a supersonic nozzle to generate high thrust. By using hydrogen for both the reactor coolant and propellant, the NTR can achieve specific impulse (Isp) values of ~900 seconds (s) or more - twice that of todays best chemical rockets. From 1955-1972, twenty rocket reactors were designed, built and ground tested in the Rover and NERVA (Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications) programs. These programs demonstrated: (1) high temperature carbide-based nuclear fuels; (2) a wide range of thrust levels; (3) sustained engine operation; (4) accumulated lifetime at full power; and (5) restart capability - all the requirements needed for a human Mars mission. Ceramic metal “cermet” fuel was pursued as well, as a backup option. The NTR also has significant “evolution and growth” capability. Configured as a “bimodal” system, it can generate its own electrical power to support spacecraft operational needs. Adding an oxygen “afterburner” nozzle introduces a variable thrust and Isp capability and allows bipropellant operation. In NASAs recent Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 study, the NTR was selected as the preferred propulsion option because of its proven technology, higher performance, lower launch mass, versatile vehicle design, simple assembly, and growth potential. In contrast to other advanced propulsion options, no large technology scale-ups are required for NTP either. In fact, the smallest engine tested during the Rover program - the 25,000 lbf (25 klbf) “Pewee” engine is sufficient when used in a clustered engine arrangement. The “Copernicus” crewed spacecraft design developed in DRA 5.0 has significant capability and a human exploration strategy is outlined here that uses Copernicus and its key components for precursor near Earth object (NEO) and Mars orbital missions prior to a Mars landing mission. The paper also discusses NASAs current activities and future plans for NTP development that include system-level Technology Demonstrations - specifically ground testing a small, scalable NTR by 2020, with a flight test shortly thereafter.

Modular Growth NTR Space Transportation System for Future NASA Human Lunar, NEA and Mars Exploration Missions

The nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) is a proven, high thrust propulsion technology that has twice the specific impulse (Isp ~900 s) of today’s best chemical rockets. During the Rover and NERVA (Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications) programs, twenty rocket reactors were designed, built and ground tested. These tests demonstrated: (1) a wide range of thrust; (2) high temperature carbide-based nuclear fuel; (3) sustained engine operation; (4) accumulated lifetime; and (5) restart capability – everything required for affordable human missions beyond LEO. In NASA’s recent Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 study, the NTR was selected as the preferred propulsion option because of its proven technology, higher performance, lower IMLEO, versatile vehicle design, and growth potential. Furthermore, the NTR requires no large technology scale-ups since the smallest engine tested during the Rover program – the 25 klbf “Pewee” engine is sufficient for human Mars missions when used in a clustered engine configuration. The “Copernicus” crewed Mars transfer vehicle developed for DRA 5.0 was an expendable design sized for fastconjunction, long surface stay Mars missions. It therefore has significant propellant capacity allowing a reusable “1-year” round trip human mission to a large, high energy near Earth asteroid (NEA) like Apophis in 2028. Using a “split mission” approach, Copernicus and its two key elements – a common propulsion stage and integrated “saddle truss” and LH2 drop tank assembly – configured as an Earth Return Vehicle / propellant tanker, can also support a short round trip (~18 month) / short orbital stay (60 days) Mars reconnaissance mission in the early 2030’s before a landing is attempted. The same short stay orbital mission can be performed with an “all-up” vehicle by adding an “in-line” LH2 tank to Copernicus to supply the extra propellant needed for this higher energy, opposition-class mission. To transition to a reusable Mars architecture, Copernicus’ saddle truss / drop tank assembly is replaced by an in-line tank and “star truss” assembly with paired modular drop tanks to further increase the vehicle’s propellant capacity. Shorter “1-way” transit time fast-conjunction Mars missions are another possibility using this vehicle configuration but, as with reusability, increased launch mass is required. “Scaled down” versions of Copernicus (sized to a SLS lift capability of ~70 t – 100 t) can be developed initially allowing reusable lunar cargo delivery and crewed landing missions, easy NEA missions (e.g., 2000 SG344 also in 2028) or an expendable mission to Apophis. Mission scenario descriptions, key vehicle features and operational characteristics are provided along with a brief discussion of NASA’s current activities and its “pre-decisional” plans for future NTR development.

Near Earth Asteroid Human Mission Possibilities Using Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) Propulsion

The NTR is a proven technology that generates high thrust and has a specific impulse (Isp ~900 s) twice that of today’s best chemical rockets. During the Rover and NERVA (Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Applications) programs, twenty rocket reactors were designed, built and ground tested. These tests demonstrated: (1) a wide range of thrust; (2) high temperature carbide-based nuclear fuel; (3) sustained engine operation; (4) accumulated lifetime; and (5) restart capability – all the requirements needed for a human mission to Mars. Ceramic metal fuel was also evaluated as a backup option. In NASA’s recent Mars Design reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 study, the NTR was selected as the preferred propulsion option because of its proven technology, higher performance, lower launch mass, versatile vehicle design, simple assembly, and growth potential. In contrast to other advanced propulsion options, NTP requires no large technology scale-ups. In fact, the smallest engine tested during the Rover program – the 25 klbf “Pewee” engine is sufficient for a human Mars mission when used in a clustered engine configuration. The “Copernicus” crewed NTR Mars transfer vehicle design developed for DRA 5.0 has significant capability that can enable reusable “1-year” round trip human missions to candidate near Earth asteroids (NEAs) like 1991 JW in 2027, or 2000 SG344 and Apophis in 2028. A robotic precursor mission to 2000 SG344 in late 2023 could provide an attractive Flight Technology Demonstration of a small NTR engine that is scalable to the 25 klbf-class engine used for human missions 5 years later. In addition to the detailed scientific data gathered from on-site inspection, human NEA missions would also provide a valuable “check out” function for key elements of the NTR transfer vehicle (its propulsion module, TransHab and life support systems, etc.) in a “deep space” environment prior to undertaking the longer duration Mars orbital and landing missions that would follow. The initial mass in low Earth orbit required for a mission to Apophis is ~323 t consisting of the NTR propulsion module (~138 t), the integrated saddle truss and LH2 drop tank assembly (~123 t), and the 6-crew payload element (~62 t). The later includes a multi-mission Space Excursion Vehicle (MMSEV) used for close-up examination and sample gathering. The total burn time and required restarts on the three 25 klbf “Pewee-class” engines operating at Isp ~906 s, are ~76.2 minutes and 4, respectively, well below the 2 hours and 27 restarts demonstrated on the NERVA eXperimental Engine, the NRX-XE. The paper examines the benefits, requirements and characteristics of using NTP for the above NEA missions. The impacts on vehicle design of HLV payload volume and lift capability, crew size, and reusability are also quantified.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): A Proven, Growth Technology for Fast Transit Human Missions to Mars

The “fast conjunction” long surface stay mission option was selected for NASA’s recent Mars Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0 study because it provided adequate time at Mars (~540 days) for the crew to explore the planet’s geological diversity while also reducing the “1-way” transit times to and from Mars to ~6 months. Short transit times are desirable in order to reduce the debilitating physiological effects on the human body that can result from prolonged exposure to the zero-gravity (0-gE) and radiation environments of space. Recent measurements from the RAD detector attached to the Curiosity rover indicate that astronauts would receive a radiation dose of ~0.66 Sv (~66 rem)—the limiting value established by NASA—during their 1-year journey in deep space. Proven nuclear thermal rocket (NTR) technology, with its high thrust and high specific impulse (Isp ~900 s), can cut 1-way transit times by as much as 50 percent by increasing the propellant capacity of the Mars transfer vehicle (MTV). No large technology scale-ups in engine size are required for these short transit missions either since the smallest engine tested during the Rover program—the 25 klbf “Pewee” engine is sufficient when used in a clustered arrangement of three to four engines. The “Copernicus” crewed MTV developed for DRA 5.0 is a 0-gE design consisting of three basic components: (1) the NTP stage (NTPS); (2) the crewed payload element; and (3) an integrated “saddle truss” and LH2 propellant drop tank assembly that connects the two elements. With a propellant capacity of ~190 t, Copernicus can support 1-way transit times ranging from ~150 to 220 days over the 15-year synodic cycle. The paper examines the impact on vehicle design of decreasing transit times for the 2033 mission opportunity. With a fourth “upgraded” SLS/HLV launch, an “in-line” LH2 tank element can be added to Copernicus allowing 1-way transit times of 130 days. To achieve 100 to 120 day transit times, Copernicus’ saddle truss/drop tank assembly is replaced by a “star truss” assembly with paired modular drop tanks to further increase the vehicle’s propellant capacity. The HLV launch count increases (from ~5 to 7) and a fourth engine is needed to reduce total mission burn time and gravity losses. Using a “split mission” approach, the NTPS, in-line tank and the saddle truss/LH2 drop tank elements can be configured as a pre-deployed Earth Return Vehicle/propellant tanker supporting 90-day crewed mission transits. The split mission approach also eliminates the need for onorbit assembly. Mission scenario descriptions, key features and operational characteristics for five different vehicle configurations are presented.

Nuclear Electric Propulsion Application: RASC Mission Robotic Exploration of Venus

The following paper documents the mission and systems analysis portion of a study in which Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) is used as the in-space transportation system to send a series of robotic rovers and atmospheric science airplanes to Venus in the 2020 to 2030 timeframe. As part of the NASA RASC (Revolutionary Aerospace Systems Concepts) program, this mission analysis is meant to identify future technologies and their application to far reaching NASA missions. The NEP systems and mission analysis is based largely on current technology state of the art assumptions. This study looks specifically at the performance of the NEP transfer stage when sending a series of different payload package point design options to Venus orbit.

Solar vs. Fission Surface Power for Mars

A multi-discipline team of experts from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) developed Mars surface power system point design solutions for two conceptual missions. The primary goal of this study was to compare the relative merits of solar- versus fission-powered versions of each surface mission. First, the team compared three different solar power options against a fission power system concept for a sub-scale, uncrewed demonstration mission. The 4.5 meter (m) diameter pathfinder landers primary mission would be to demonstrate Mars entry, descent, and landing techniques. Once on the Martian surface, the landers In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) payload would demonstrate liquid oxygen propellant production using atmospheric resources. For the purpose of this exercise, location was assumed to be at the Martian equator. The three solar concepts considered included a system that only operated during daylight hours (at roughly half the daily propellant production rate of a round-the-clock fission design), a battery-augmented system that operated through the night (matching the fission concepts propellant production rate), and a system that operated only during daylight, but at a higher rate (again, matching the fission concepts propellant production rate). Including 30% mass growth allowance, total payload masses for the three solar concepts ranged from 1,116 to 2,396 kg, versus the 2,686 kg fission power scheme. However, solar power masses are expected to approach or exceed the fission payload mass at landing sites further from the equator, making landing site selection a key driver in the final power system decision. The team also noted that detailed reliability analysis should be performed on daytime-only solar power schemes to assess potential issues with frequent ISRU system on/off cycling. Next, the team developed a solar-powered point design solution for a conceptual four-crew, 500-day surface mission consisting of up to four landers per crewed expedition mission. Unlike the demonstration mission, a lengthy power outage due to the global dust storms that are known to occur on Mars would pose a safety hazard to a crewed mission. A similar fission versus solar power trade study performed by NASA in 2007 concluded that fission power was more reliable-with a much lower mass penalty-than solar power for this application. However, recent advances in solar cell and energy storage technologies and changes in operational assumptions prompted NASA to revisit the analysis. For the purpose of this exercise a particular landing site at Jezero Crater, located at 18o north latitude, was assumed. A fission power system consisting of four each 10 kW Kilopower fission reactors was compared to a distributed network of Orion-derived Ultraflex solar arrays and Lithium ion batteries mounted on every lander. The team found that a solar power system mass of about 9,800 kg would provide the 22 kilowatts (kW) keep-alive power needed to survive a dust storm lasting up to 120-days at average optical depth of 5, and 35 kW peak power for normal operations under clear skies. Although this is less than half the mass estimated during the 2007 work (which assumed latitudes up to 30o) it is still more than the 7,000 kg mass of the fission system which provides full power regardless of dust storm conditions.

A Cubesat Asteroid Mission: Propulsion Trade-offs

A conceptual design was performed for a 6-U cubesat for a technology demonstration to be launched on the NASA Space Launch System (SLS) test launch EM-1, to be launched into a free-return translunar trajectory. The mission purpose was to demonstrate use of electric propulsion systems on a small satellite platform. The candidate objective chosen was a mission to visit a Near-Earth asteroid. Both asteroid fly-by and asteroid rendezvous missions were analyzed. Propulsion systems analyzed included cold-gas thruster systems, Hall and ion thrusters, incorporating either Xenon or Iodine propellant, and an electrospray thruster. The mission takes advantage of the ability of the SLS launch to place it into an initial trajectory of C3=0.

Conventional and Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket (NTR) Artificial Gravity Mars Transfer Vehicle Concepts

A variety of countermeasures have been developed to address the debilitating physiological effects of “zero-gravity” (0-g) experienced by cosmonauts and astronauts during their ~0.5 – 1.2 year long stays in LEO. Longer interplanetary flights, combined with possible prolonged stays in Mars orbit, could subject crewmembers to up to ~2.5 years of weightlessness. In view of known and recently diagnosed problems associated with 0-g, an artificial gravity spacecraft offers many advantages and may indeed be an enabling technology for human flights to Mars. A number of important human factors must be taken into account in selecting the rotation radius, rotation rate, and orientation of the habitation module or modules. These factors include the gravity gradient effect, radial and tangential Coriolis forces, along with cross-coupled acceleration effects. Artificial gravity (AG) Mars transfer vehicle (MTV) concepts are presented that utilize both conventional NTR, as well as, enhanced “bimodal” nuclear thermal rocket (BNTR) propulsion. The NTR is a proven technology that generates high thrust and has a specific impulse (Isp) capability of ~900 s – twice that of today’s best chemical rockets. The AG/MTV concepts using conventional NTP carry twin cylindrical “ISS-type” habitation modules with their long axes oriented either perpendicular or parallel to the longitudinal spin axis of the MTV and utilize photovoltaic arrays (PVAs) for spacecraft power. The twin habitat modules are connected to a central operations hub located at the front of the MTV via two pressurized tunnels that provide the rotation radius for the habitat modules. For the BNTR AG/MTV option, each engine has its own “closed” secondary helium-xenon gas loop and Brayton rotating unit that can generate 10’s of kilowatts (kWe) of spacecraft electrical power during the mission coast phase eliminating the need for large PVAs. A single inflatable “TransHab-type” habitation module is also used with multiple vertical floors oriented radial to the MTV spin axis. The BNTR MTV’s geometry – long and linear – is naturally compatible with AG operation. By rotating the vehicle about its center-of-mass and perpendicular to its flight vector at ~3.0 – 5.2 rpm, a centrifugal force and AG environment corresponding to ~0.38 – 1.0 g can be established to help maintain crew fitness out to Mars and back. Vehicles using NTP/BNTP can more readily accommodate the heavier payload mass and increased RCS propellant loading associated with AG operation, and can travel faster to and from Mars thereby reducing the crew’s exposure to galactic cosmic radiation and solar flares. Mission scenario descriptions, key vehicle features and operational characteristics for each propulsion options are presented using the lift capability and payload volumes estimated for the SLS-1A and HLV.

A Crewed Mission to Apophis Using a Hybrid Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Electric Propulsion (BNTEP) System

A BNTEP system is a dual propellant, hybrid propulsion concept that utilizes Bimodal Nuclear Thermal Rocket (BNTR) propulsion during high thrust operations, providing 10s of kilo-Newtons of thrust per engine at a high specific impulse (Isp) of 900 s, and an Electric Propulsion (EP) system during low thrust operations at even higher Isp of around 3000 s. Electrical power for the EP system is provided by the BNTR engines in combination with a Brayton Power Conversion (BPC) closed loop system, which can provide electrical power on the order of 100s of kWe. High thrust BNTR operation uses liquid hydrogen (LH2) as reactor coolant propellant expelled out a nozzle, while low thrust EP uses high pressure xenon expelled by an electric grid. By utilizing an optimized combination of low and high thrust propulsion, significant mass savings over a conventional NTR vehicle can be realized. Low thrust mission events, such as midcourse corrections (MCC), tank settling burns, some reaction control system (RCS) burns, and even a small portion at the end of the departure burn can be performed with EP. Crewed and robotic deep space missions to a near Earth asteroid (NEA) are best suited for this hybrid propulsion approach. For these mission scenarios, the Earth return V is typically small enough that EP alone is sufficient. A crewed mission to the NEA Apophis in the year 2028 with an expendable BNTEP transfer vehicle is presented. Assembly operations, launch element masses, and other key characteristics of the vehicle are described. A comparison with a conventional NTR vehicle performing the same mission is also provided. Finally, reusability of the BNTEP transfer vehicle is explored.

Nuclear Thermal Propulsion for Human Exploration and Potential Threat Mitigation of Near Earth Objects

High thrust / high specific impulse (Isp) nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) has been identified as a key technology that can enhance or enable a variety of future NASA missions that include outer planet robotic science and crewed missions to the Moon, near Earth asteroids (NEAs), and eventually Mars. Candidate “1-year” round trip human NEA missions have been identified (1991 JW in 2027) that can provide valuable scientific data on the chemical composition of these near Earth objects (NEOs) important for determining the viability of extraterrestrial resource utilization and for designing NEO intercept / diversion missions should such objects pose a future threat to Earth. High velocity (~20-60 km/s) impacts of kilometer size NEAs, short period (SPCs) and long period comets (LPCs) with Earth can deliver tremendous kinetic energies (measured in 1000’s of megatons (MT) of TNT) that can destroy land areas the size of small-to-moderate states. Using the heavy lift launch vehicle capability (~130 t) being proposed by NASA for human lunar return missions, ~5-20 t nuclear payloads (with yield-to-weight ratio of ~1 kiloton per kg) can be delivered at high intercept velocities (~12.3-9.3 km/s) for close approach NEO deflection using NTP. With 5, 10 and 20 t payloads, a 1-km diameter stony NEA (with ρ~3000 kg/m 3 ) traveling at ~20 km/s can be deflected by an Earth radii (RE = 6378 km) if detected at ~2.82, 1.49 and 0.84 AU from Earth, respectively. With the same NTP-injected 20 t payload, 20 km/s NEAs with diameters of ~840 and ~750 m can be deflected even when detected at distances from Earth as small as 0.5 and 0.358 AU, respectively. Long period comets (ρ~2000 kg/m 3 ) can impact Earth with significantly higher velocities and require detection at greater distances for deflection to be successful. For a 1-km LPC traveling at 45-60 km/s, the corresponding detection range from Earth is ~2.34-3.98 AU using the same 20 t payload. NTP systems allow a viable response / NEO intercept capability even when the detection range is small (~1 AU or less) and response times are short. NTP may also be the only option available to deflect high velocity LPCs if their detection range is limited to ~4 AU from Earth! Smaller size NEOs (~150 m) might use the “burn-out” mass of the NTP intercept stage itself for kinetic energy deflection at detection distances < 1 AU.