Thomas Wilhelmsson

“Social force majeure” — A new concept in Nordic consumer law

Empirical research from various countries indicates that overindebtedness of consumers is, to a considerable extent, attributable to unexpected changes in the consumers situation caused by illness, unemployment, and other such circumstances. It is therefore relevant to discuss whether and in what way such circumstances should be taken into account in the rules of private law. In Nordic (especially Finnish) legislation, mainly from the 1980s, there are several provisions which provide for mitigation of sanctions against a defaulting consumer if the delay is caused by illness, unemployment, etc. Such rules are contained, inter alia, in the legislation on consumer credit and on interest on delayed payments.On the basis of these provisions as well as some practices developed by the consumer authorities, a general principle of social force majeure is seen to be evolving. This doctrinal principle would enable the courts and other decision-makers to take into account unfavourable changes in the consumers health, work, housing, and family situation in cases not regulated by specific legislation, e.g., by giving the consumer the right of withdrawal from burdensome contracts in such circumstances or to protect his right to retain electricity and telephone connections in spite of his temporary payment difficulties. The principle is expected to carry increasing weight in the future, especially in the practice of the consumer authorities. Strong arguments speak in favour of the general acceptance of such a principle.ZusammenfassungEmpirisch-rechtssoziologische Untersuchungen aus verschiedenen Ländern kommen zu dem Ergebnis, daß Verschuldung und Zahlungsunfähigkeit von Verbrauchern zu einem großen Teil auf unerwartete Umweltänderungen zurückzuführen sind, etwa Krankheit, Arbeitslosigkeit und ähnliches. Es ist deshalb wichtig zu diskutieren, ob und in welcher Weise solche Umstände bei der Anwendung von Privatrechtsvorschriften berücksichtigt werden sollen. In den Nordischen Staaten, insbesondere in Finnland, gibt es seit den achtziger Jahren gesetzliche Vorschriften, die eine Abmilderung von Sanktionen gegen in Verzug geratene Schuldner vorsehen, wenn der Verzug auf Krankheit, Arbeitslosigkeit usw. zurückgeht. Diese Regeln finden sich im Recht des Konsumentenkredits und der Verzugszinsen. Auf der Basis dieser Vorschriften entwickelt sich eine neue Rechtsfigur der “wirtschaftlichen Unmöglichkeit aus sozialen Gründen”. Dieser Grundsatz würde es Gerichten und anderen Entscheidungsträgern ermöglichen, nachteilige Veränderungen der Gesundheit, Arbeitswelt, Haushalt und Familie des Verbrauchers auch in noch nicht gesetzlich geregelten Bereichen zu berücksichtigen, z.B. durch Gewährung eines Auflösungsrechts bei übermäßig belastenden Verträgen oder durch Schutz seines Rechts auf Versorgung mit Elektrizität und Telefon trotz zeitweiliger Zahlungsschwierigkeiten. Es wird erwartet, daß sich dieses Prinzip in Zukunft verstärkt durchsetzen wird, insbesondere in der Praxis von Verbraucherschutzbehörden. Wichtige Argumente sprechen für die allgemeine Anerkennung dieses Prinzips.

Control of Unfair Contract Terms and Social Values: EC and Nordic Approaches

The paper analyses the relationship between traditional market rational contract law and rules on the control of unfair contract terms. The question is asked to what extent Nordic and EC rules on such control express a radical departure from traditional contract values. As a background Nordic law is compared to the recently adopted EC Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. The most important differences are that individually negotiated contracts as well as the essential terms of the contract are excluded from the scope of the Directive, exclusions which have no counterpart in Nordic law. The abstract and static approach of the Directive also differs from Nordic thinking. As to the question of the impact of these rules, the paper first focuses on the possibilities of the contractual fairness principle functioning as an instrument for redistribution of wealth. The EC Directive does not include this aim, as the contract balance is expressly left outside the scope of the Directive. Nordic law, which contains more possibilities in this respect, has mostly focused on deviators. Not even this adjustment-friendly milieu has exerted any general influence on the prevailing balance between contractual performances in the market. The fairness principle contains other social values as well, such as autonomy, responsibility, freedom, fair consequences, access to justice, security, and social responsibility. Many of these values, which in the welfarist contract law are interpreted materially, are in their formal form central also to the market society, based on the rule of law. The fairness principle, as understood in the EC Directive, does not in any radical way upset the traditional values of contract law.

Towards a better understanding of unfair commercial practices

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the concept of unfair commercial practices in advertising and marketing law.Design/methodology/approach – The differences addressed in the paper relate to the role or tasks of consumer law in regulating the marketplace.Findings – A comparison of the UK, German and Nordic approaches reveal interesting differences at least in nuances in the approach to omission of information as an unfair commercial practice.Originality/value – The paper provides useful analysis of the deeper understandings behind unfair commercial practices law.

Control of unfair contract terms and social values: EC and Nordic approaches@@@Die Kontrolle unlauterer Geschäftsbedingungen und gesellschaftliche Werte: Die Ansätze der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und der Nordischen Staaten

The paper analyses the relationship between traditional market rational contract law and rules on the control of unfair contract terms. The question is asked to what extent Nordic and EC rules on such control express a radical departure from traditional contract values. As a background Nordic law is compared to the recently adopted EC Directive on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts. The most important differences are that individually negotiated contracts as well as the essential terms of the contract are excluded from the scope of the Directive, exclusions which have no counterpart in Nordic law. The abstract and static approach of the Directive also differs from Nordic thinking.As to the question of the impact of these rules, the paper first focuses on the possibilities of the contractual fairness principle functioning as an instrument for redistribution of wealth. The EC Directive does not include this aim, as the contract balance is expressly left outside the scope of the Directive. Nordic law, which contains more possibilities in this respect, has mostly focused on deviators. Not even this adjustment-friendly milieu has exerted any general influence on the prevailing balance between contractual performances in the market. The fairness principle contains other social values as well, such as autonomy, responsibility, freedom, fair consequences, access to justice, security, and social responsibility. Many of these values, which in the welfarist contract law are interpreted materially, are in their formal form central also to the market society, based on the rule of law. The fairness principle, as understood in the EC Directive, does not in any radical way upset the traditional values of contract law.ZusammenfassungDer Beitrag analysiert die Beziehung zwischen dem traditionellen marktrationalen Vertragsrecht und den Vorschriften gegen unlautere Geschäftsbedingungen. Er stellt die Frage, wie stark sich diese Regelungen der Nordischen Staaten und die der Europäischen Gemeinschaft von den traditionellen vertragsrechtlichen Prinzipien entfernen. Als Hintergrund wird das Nordische Recht mit der kürzlich verabschiedeten EG-Richtlinie über unfaire Bedingungen in Konsumentenverträgen verglichen. Der wichtigste Unterschied besteht darin, da\ individuell ausgehandelte Verträge ebenso wie essentienelle Bestandteile des Vertrages vom Anwendungsbereich der Direktive ausgeschlossen werden, ein Ausschlu\, der im Nordischen Recht keine Entsprechung hat. Der abstrakte und statische Ansatz der Direktive unterscheidet sich vom Nordischen Denken. Was die Wirkungen der Bestimmungen gegen unlautere Geschäftsbedingungen anlangt, so befa\t sich der Beitrag mit den Möglichkeiten des Prinzips der vertraglichen Fairne\ als Instrument für Wohlstandsumverteilung. Die EG-Richtlinie verfolgt dieses Ziel nicht, ebenso wie sie auch ausdrücklich das Prinzip des vertraglichen Gleichgewichtes nicht mit einbezieht. Nicht einmal aber das interventionistische Milieu des Nordischen Rechts hat irgendeinen allgemeineren Einflu\ auf das vorherrschende Gleichgewicht zwischen dem vertraglichen Marktergebnis beider Vertragsparteien ausgeübt. Hinter dem Fairne\-Prinzip stehen auch andere gesellschaftliche Werte, wie Autonomie, Verantwortlichkeit, Freiheit, Rechtsschutz, Sicherheit oder soziale Verantwortlichkeit. Viele dieser Werten werden im wohlfahrtsorientierten Vertragsrecht materiell interpretiert, sind aber in ihrem formalen Gehalt auch zentral für eine rechtsstaatlich fundierte Marktgesellschaft. Das Fairne\-Prinzip, so wie es die EG-Richtlinie versteht, stellt sich nicht grundlegend gegen die traditionellen Werte des Vertragsrechts.

Administrative procedures for the control of marketing practices - theoretical rationale and perspectives

The paper purports to analyze some features of administrative control of marketing practices with the help of concepts drawn from modern legal-theoretical debate. As a background a general overview of the traditional justifications for the creation of an administrative control system is presented. These justifications underline the insufficiency of other agencies of control, such as individual consumers, competitors, consumer organizations, public prosecutors, and self-regulatory bodies.The development of administrative control measures has obvious connections with modern legal-theoretical concepts like “reflexive law” and “proceduralization.” The theory of reflexive law highlights the fact that effective control presupposes a sufficient consideration of the autonomy of social systems. This leads to emphasizing a flexible negotiation approach of control authorities in order to increase efficiency by creating some degree of internal acceptance of the measures.“Legal pluralism” again sees the State disintegrating in a constellation of more or less autonomous “governments” with their own goals and interests. In such a disintegrated State an active consumer authority can, under certain preconditions, create new legal institutions in the consumer law field and thereby contribute to the development not only of consumer law but of general private law as well.ZusammenfassungDer Autor analysiert einige Kennzeichen von administrativer Kontrolle von Marketingpraktiken und zieht dazu Konzepte der neueren rechstheoretischen Diskussion heran. Er prÄsentiert zunÄchst als Hintergrund einen überblick über die traditionellen Rechtfertigungen für ein administratives Kontroll-system. Diese Rechtfertigungen betonen die UnzulÄnglichkeit anderer Kontrollinstanzen, wie z. B. einzelne Konsumenten, Wettbewerber, Verbraucherorganisationen, öffentliche Anklage oder Instanzen der Selbstkontrolle.Die Entwicklung von Ma\nahmen der administrativen Kontrolle hat offenkundig Bezüge zu modernen rechtstheoretischen Konzepten wie “reflexives Recht” und “Prozeduralisierung”. Die Theorie des reflexiven Rechts betont als Voraussetzung für effektive Kontrolle, da\ die Autonomie sozialer Systeme ausreichend respektiert wird. Dies führt zur Notwendigkeit flexibler Verhandlungen zwischen Kontrollinstanzen, damit über ein hinreichendes Ma\ an interner Akzeptanz der Mittel, deren Effizienz gesteigert werden kann.“Rechtlicher Pluralismus” wiederum sieht den Staat zerfallen in eine Konstellation mehr oder weniger autonomer Teilregierungen mit jeweils eigenen Zielen und Interessen. In einem so aufgespaltenen Staat kann eine aktive Verbraucherbehörde unter bestimmten Bedingungen neue rechtliche Institutionen im Bereich des Verbraucherrechts schaffen und dadurch zur Entwicklung nicht nur des Verbraucherrechts, sondern des gesamten Privatrechtes beitragen.

Social Force Majeure

Structuring the general principles of a branch of law anew may be expected to have a greater effect the more concisely the new principles can be formulated. The more clearly the new norms can be presented in the form of ordinary “rules” in the meaning Alexy and Dworkin give this term (see above II.1) the easier it is for the legal decision-maker to use the new instruments. In this chapter it will be shown how such a new, relatively precise legal principle can be created on the basis of a fragmented concrete legal material.

Rethinking EU consumer law

In Rethinking EU Consumer Law, the authors analyse the development of EU consumer law on the basis of a number of clear themes, which are then traced through specific areas. Recurring themes include the artificiality of the EU’s consumer image, the problems created by the drive towards maximum harmonisation, and the unexpected effects EU Consumer Law has had on national law. The book argues that EU Consumer Law has the potential of enhancing the protecting of consumers throughout the EU and could offer a model for consumer law elsewhere in the world, but in order to unlock this potential, there needs to be a rethink with regard to the EU’s approach to consumer law and policy.

Excellence in Serving Society and Mankind

The third mission of universities, serving society, has received much attention in international debate on university policy. It is increasingly presented as one of the key tasks of universities, in addition to their traditional tasks of research and teaching.

Free Movement of Legal Sources: The Use of Foreign Sources in Private Law in Europe

In this essay, I focus on what kind of legal reasoning and what arguments one may use to legitimate references to foreign sources. Such legitimation is needed when the foreign source is used as an argument with some degree of authority. The typology of arguments that emerges includes reasoning of three kinds. Firstly, the authoritative status of the foreign source may be based on some meta-level authority, for example legislation or conventions that prescribe the use of foreign sources. This, however, is seldom the case. Secondly, the authority of the foreign source can be based on a particular trust in the expertise of those that have created the source. This trust can already be embedded in tradition—then the reasoning lies near the first case—or on substantively based reasons for assuming a superior expertise in the foreign court, foreign author or foreign legal order more generally. And thirdly, the authority of the foreign source may be based on meta-level substantive arguments mainly related to the value of harmonisation of legal orders. Depending on which arguments one uses to support harmonisation—the needs of cross-border trade, the importance of equal conditions of competition, the striving for a European identity or the requirements of justice for and equal treatment of all Europeans—the circumstances in which a free movement of sources seems particularly well-founded are bound to vary. This typology is based on the assumption that not only foreseeability of outcome, but also foreseeability of reasoning matters. A line of reasoning expressly based on an analysis of this type is obviously more transparent than a pure use of foreign sources without any express justification. Transparency of arguments—an open and honest presentation of the arguments used—is a way to enhance equality and foreseeability in a legal world where the ideal of coherent and relatively stable national legal orders is no longer convincing. In today’s complicated and fragmented legal structures this is probably the most one can hope for.

On the Juridical Roles of Contract Law

When the problem was stated (above I.3.2) we saw how it has been asserted that the abstract “juridical roles” of private law can immunize private law against an explicitly value-bound alternative legal dogmatics. Private-law dogmatics of this kind therefore presupposes a critical re-valuation of the role concepts of private law.