Tihomir Hunjak

Decision-making on prioritization of projects in higher education institutions using the analytic network process approach

The prioritization of projects in higher education institutions is a complex decision-making problem. In this paper we deal with two scenarios within Higher Education Institutions. The first scenario is a need to prepare an action plan for activities that will result in the implementation of a portfolio of projects at the institutional level. The second scenario is making a decision on whether to start a new project application, and if so, which project to choose in a situation where project teams have several project ideas and limited resources. The purpose of the paper is to show how to include corporate strategy in the decision-making process and use the Analytic Network Process as a multiple criteria decision-making methodology which can be used in solving project selection problems.

Prioritization of e-learning forms: a multicriteria methodology

Strategic planning of e-learning implementation includes decision making about the most suitable form of implementing e-learning on different levels in an institution. Decision making about e-learning implementation has been covered as consisting of four phases: (1) intelligence, (2) design, (3) choice and (4) implementation. During the Intelligence phase we have precisely identified our central decision problem and have conducted situation analysis. In the Design phase we have developed alternatives and established criteria and subcriteria. The questionnaire about the importance of the advantages and goals of e-learning implementation and about criteria and subcriteria significant for decision making was created. Essential for the survey was use of Croatian e-learning experts that are familiar with higher education (HE) environment. Further, we connected these findings with the results of the factor analysis which was performed on the survey. The results of the factor analysis have served as input in the multicriteria decision model (AHP) that we have developed in the Choice phase. In the implementation phase we have solved the problem of prioritisation of e-learning options with the help of multi-criteria modelling in the process of group decision making. In this article, firstly we will present and analyze the results of the survey. Secondly, the outputs of factor analysis will be stated and compared with the model used in the questionnaire. Finally, the structure of AHP model will be given and the results of the quantitative evaluation of the model will be presented.

Decision making on project selection in high education sector using the analytic hierarchy process

The prioritization of projects in higher education institutions is a complex decision-making problem. In this paper we deal with a problem of making a decision on whether to start a new project application, and if so, which project to choose in a situation where project teams have several project ideas and limited resources. The purpose of the paper is to show how to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process as a multiple criteria decision-making methodology which can be used in solving project selection problems. Finally, one case study is given.

Risk Management in SMEs: The Croatian Experiences

In the context of globalisation, turbulence and recession, the future of the enterprise depends on how the management handles risks, how it will organise its uncertainty and threat management activities, how it will engage employees, follow procedures and apply risk management tools. In other words, it is essential how the enterprise balances between highly likely risks generating minimal losses and highly unlikely risks generating huge losses (Federation of Risk Management Associations FERMA 2008).

Dynamization of the Promethee Type Problems

We define multistage process as the one which can be divided into more stages so that the results of the previous stage affects the course of the following stage. Since in each step of multistage processes decisions are made about further management of process, it is logic that we look for such order of decisions, or such management of process and thus we achieve the optimal effect in relation to some chosen optimal criterion.