Tim Hammond

How can we improve our understanding of cardiovascular safety liabilities to develop safer medicines

Given that cardiovascular safety liabilities remain a major cause of drug attrition during preclinical and clinical development, adverse drug reactions, and post‐approval withdrawal of medicines, the Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science hosted a workshop to discuss current challenges in determining, understanding and addressing ‘Cardiovascular Toxicity of Medicines’. This article summarizes the key discussions from the workshop that aimed to address three major questions: (i) what are the key cardiovascular safety liabilities in drug discovery, drug development and clinical practice? (ii) how good are preclinical and clinical strategies for detecting cardiovascular liabilities? and (iii) do we have a mechanistic understanding of these liabilities? It was concluded that in order to understand, address and ultimately reduce cardiovascular safety liabilities of new therapeutic agents there is an urgent need to:

Safety and secondary pharmacology: Successes, threats, challenges and opportunities

This review summarises the lecture of Dr Tim Hammond, recipient of the Distinguished Service Award of the Safety Pharmacology Society, given on 20 September 2007 in Edinburgh. The lecture discussed the rationale behind the need for optimal non-clinical Safety and Secondary Pharmacology testing; the evolution of Safety and Secondary Pharmacology over the last decade; its impact on drug discovery and development; the value of adopting an integrated risk assessment approach; the translation of non-clinical findings to humans and finally the future challenges and opportunities facing these disciplines.

A framework to assess the translation of safety pharmacology data to humans

This article outlines a strategy for collecting accurate data for the determination of the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of safety pharmacology models. This entails performing a retrospective analysis on commonly used safety pharmacology endpoints and an objective assessment of new non-clinical models. Such assessments require a systematic quantitative analysis of safety pharmacology parameters as well as clinical Phase I adverse events. Once the sensitivity, specificity and predictive capacity of models have been determined, they can be aligned within specific phases of the drug discovery and development pipeline for maximal impact, or removed from the screening cascade altogether. Furthermore, data will contribute to evidence-based decision-making based on the knowledge of the model sensitivity and specificity. This strategy should therefore contribute to the reduction of candidate drug attrition and a more appropriate use of animals. More data are needed to increase the power of analysis and enable more accurate comparisons of models e.g. pharmacokinetic/phamacodynamic (PK/PD) relationships as well as non-clinical and clinical outcomes for determining concordance. This task requires the collaboration and agreement of pharmaceutical companies to share data anonymously on proprietary and candidate drugs.

Value of non‐clinical cardiac repolarization assays in supporting the discovery and development of safer medicines

Non‐clinical QT‐related assays aligned to the pharmaceutical drug discovery and development phases are used in several ways. During the early discovery phases, assays are used for hazard identification and wherever possible for hazard elimination. The data generated enable us to: (i) establish structure–activity relationships and thereby; (ii) influence the medicinal chemistry design and provide tools for effective decision making; and provide structure–activity data for in silico predictive databases; (iii) solve problems earlier; (iv) provide reassurance for compound or project to progress; and (v) refine strategies as scientific and technical knowledge grows. For compounds progressing into pre‐clinical development, the ‘core battery’ QT‐related data enable an integrated risk assessment to: (i) fulfil regulatory requirements; (ii) assess the safety and risk–benefit for compound progression to man; (iii) contribute to defining the starting dose during the phase I clinical trials; (iv) influence the design of the phase I clinical trials; (v) identify clinically relevant safety biomarkers; and (vi) contribute to the patient risk management plan. Once a compound progresses into clinical development, QT‐related data can be applied in the context of risk management and risk mitigation. The data from ‘follow‐up’ studies can be used to: (i) support regulatory approval; (ii) investigate discrepancies that may have emerged within and/or between non‐clinical and clinical data; (iii) understand the mechanism of an undesirable pharmacodynamic effect; (iv) provide reassurance for progression into multiple dosing in humans and/or large‐scale clinical trials; and (v) assess drug–drug interactions. Based on emerging data, the integrated risk assessment is then reviewed in this article, and the benefit–risk for compound progression was re‐assessed. Project examples are provided to illustrate the impact of non‐clinical data to support compound progression throughout the drug discovery and development phases, and regulatory approval.

Safety pharmacology in 2010 and beyond: Survey of significant events of the past 10 years and a roadmap to the immediate-, intermediate- and long-term future in recognition of the tenth anniversary of the Safety Pharmacology Society

In recognition of the tenth anniversary of the Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS), this review summarizes the significant events of the past 10years that have led to the birth, growth and evolution the SPS and presents a roadmap to the immediate-, intermediate- and long-term future of the SPS. The review discusses (i) the rationale for an optimal non-clinical Safety Pharmacology testing, (ii) the evolution of Safety Pharmacology over the last decade, (iii) its impact on drug discovery and development, (iv) the merits of adopting an integrated risk assessment approach, (v) the translation of non-clinical findings to humans and finally (vi) the future challenges and opportunities facing this discipline. Such challenges include the emergence of new molecular targets and new approaches to treat diseases, the rapid development of science and technologies, the growing regulatory concerns and associated number of guidance documents, and the need to train and educate the next generation of safety pharmacologist.