Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tim Robertson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tim Robertson.


Science | 2014

A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets

Derek P. Tittensor; Matt Walpole; Samantha L. L. Hill; Daniel G. Boyce; Gregory L. Britten; Neil D. Burgess; Stuart H. M. Butchart; Paul W. Leadley; Eugenie C. Regan; Rob Alkemade; Roswitha Baumung; Céline Bellard; Lex Bouwman; Nadine Bowles-Newark; Anna M. Chenery; William W. L. Cheung; Villy Christensen; H. David Cooper; Annabel R. Crowther; Matthew J. R. Dixon; Alessandro Galli; Valérie Gaveau; Richard D. Gregory; Nicolás L. Gutiérrez; Tim Hirsch; Robert Höft; Stephanie R. Januchowski-Hartley; Marion Karmann; Cornelia B. Krug; Fiona Leverington

In 2010, the international community, under the auspices of the Convention on Biological Diversity, agreed on 20 biodiversity-related “Aichi Targets” to be achieved within a decade. We provide a comprehensive mid-term assessment of progress toward these global targets using 55 indicator data sets. We projected indicator trends to 2020 using an adaptive statistical framework that incorporated the specific properties of individual time series. On current trajectories, results suggest that despite accelerating policy and management responses to the biodiversity crisis, the impacts of these efforts are unlikely to be reflected in improved trends in the state of biodiversity by 2020. We highlight areas of societal endeavor requiring additional efforts to achieve the Aichi Targets, and provide a baseline against which to assess future progress. Although conservation efforts are accelerating, their impact is unlikely to improve the global state of biodiversity by 2020. Indicators of progress and decline The targets set by the Convention on Biological Diversity in 2010 focused international efforts to alleviate global biodiversity decline. However, many of the consequences of these efforts will not be evident by the 2020 deadline agreed to by governments of 150 countries. Tittensor et al. analyzed data on 55 different biodiversity indicators to predict progress toward the 2020 targets—indicators such as protected area coverage, land-use trends, and endangered species status. The analysis pinpoints the problems and areas that will need the most attention in the next few years. Science, this issue p. 241


PLOS ONE | 2012

Darwin Core: an evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard.

John Wieczorek; David Bloom; Robert P. Guralnick; Stan Blum; Markus Döring; Renato De Giovanni; Tim Robertson; David Vieglais

Biodiversity data derive from myriad sources stored in various formats on many distinct hardware and software platforms. An essential step towards understanding global patterns of biodiversity is to provide a standardized view of these heterogeneous data sources to improve interoperability. Fundamental to this advance are definitions of common terms. This paper describes the evolution and development of Darwin Core, a data standard for publishing and integrating biodiversity information. We focus on the categories of terms that define the standard, differences between simple and relational Darwin Core, how the standard has been implemented, and the community processes that are essential for maintenance and growth of the standard. We present case-study extensions of the Darwin Core into new research communities, including metagenomics and genetic resources. We close by showing how Darwin Core records are integrated to create new knowledge products documenting species distributions and changes due to environmental perturbations.


PLOS ONE | 2014

The GBIF integrated publishing toolkit: facilitating the efficient publishing of biodiversity data on the internet.

Tim Robertson; Markus Döring; Robert P. Guralnick; David Bloom; John Wieczorek; Kyle Braak; Javier Otegui; Laura Russell; Peter Desmet

The planet is experiencing an ongoing global biodiversity crisis. Measuring the magnitude and rate of change more effectively requires access to organized, easily discoverable, and digitally-formatted biodiversity data, both legacy and new, from across the globe. Assembling this coherent digital representation of biodiversity requires the integration of data that have historically been analog, dispersed, and heterogeneous. The Integrated Publishing Toolkit (IPT) is a software package developed to support biodiversity dataset publication in a common format. The IPT’s two primary functions are to 1) encode existing species occurrence datasets and checklists, such as records from natural history collections or observations, in the Darwin Core standard to enhance interoperability of data, and 2) publish and archive data and metadata for broad use in a Darwin Core Archive, a set of files following a standard format. Here we discuss the key need for the IPT, how it has developed in response to community input, and how it continues to evolve to streamline and enhance the interoperability, discoverability, and mobilization of new data types beyond basic Darwin Core records. We close with a discussion how IPT has impacted the biodiversity research community, how it enhances data publishing in more traditional journal venues, along with new features implemented in the latest version of the IPT, and future plans for more enhancements.


Database | 2016

The Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) Data Standard specification

Gabriele Droege; Katharine Barker; Ole Seberg; Jonathan A. Coddington; Erica E. Benson; Walter G. Berendsohn; B. Bunk; Carol Butler; E. M. Cawsey; John Deck; Markus Döring; P. Flemons; Birgit Gemeinholzer; Anton Güntsch; T. Hollowell; Patricia Kelbert; Ivaylo Kostadinov; Renzo Kottmann; Rita T. Lawlor; C. Lyal; Jacqueline Mackenzie-Dodds; Christopher P. Meyer; Daniel G. Mulcahy; Sara Y. Nussbeck; é. O'Tuama; T. Orrell; Gitte Petersen; Tim Robertson; C. Söhngen; Jamie Whitacre

Genomic samples of non-model organisms are becoming increasingly important in a broad range of studies from developmental biology, biodiversity analyses, to conservation. Genomic sample definition, description, quality, voucher information and metadata all need to be digitized and disseminated across scientific communities. This information needs to be concise and consistent in today’s ever-increasing bioinformatic era, for complementary data aggregators to easily map databases to one another. In order to facilitate exchange of information on genomic samples and their derived data, the Global Genome Biodiversity Network (GGBN) Data Standard is intended to provide a platform based on a documented agreement to promote the efficient sharing and usage of genomic sample material and associated specimen information in a consistent way. The new data standard presented here build upon existing standards commonly used within the community extending them with the capability to exchange data on tissue, environmental and DNA sample as well as sequences. The GGBN Data Standard will reveal and democratize the hidden contents of biodiversity biobanks, for the convenience of everyone in the wider biobanking community. Technical tools exist for data providers to easily map their databases to the standard. Database URL: http://terms.tdwg.org/wiki/GGBN_Data_Standard


Standards in Genomic Sciences | 2014

Meeting Report: GBIF hackathon-workshop on Darwin Core and sample data (22-24 May 2013)

John Wieczorek; Olaf Bánki; Stan Blum; John Deck; Markus Döring; Gabriele Dröge; Dag Terje Filip Endresen; Philip Goldstein; Patrick Leary; Leonard Krishtalka; Éamonn Ó Tuama; Robert J. Robbins; Tim Robertson; Pelin Yilmaz

The workshop-hackathon was convened by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) at its secretariat in Copenhagen over 22–24 May 2013 with additional support from several projects (RCN4GSC, EAGER, VertNet, BiSciCol, GGBN, and Micro B3). It assembled a team of experts to address the challenge of adapting the Darwin Core standard for a wide variety of sample data. Topics addressed in the workshop included 1) a review of outstanding issues in the Darwin Core standard, 2) issues relating to publishing of biodiversity data through Darwin Core Archives, 3) use of Darwin Core Archives for publishing sample and monitoring data, 4) the case for modifying the Darwin Core Text Guide specification to support many-to-many relations, and 5) the generalization of the Darwin Core Archive to a “Biodiversity Data Archive”. A wide variety of use cases were assembled and discussed in order to inform further developments.


PLOS ONE | 2015

B-HIT - A Tool for Harvesting and Indexing Biodiversity Data.

Patricia Kelbert; Gabriele Droege; Katharine Barker; Kyle Braak; E. Margaret Cawsey; Jonathan A. Coddington; Tim Robertson; Jamie Whitacre; Anton Güntsch

With the rapidly growing number of data publishers, the process of harvesting and indexing information to offer advanced search and discovery becomes a critical bottleneck in globally distributed primary biodiversity data infrastructures. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) implemented a Harvesting and Indexing Toolkit (HIT), which largely automates data harvesting activities for hundreds of collection and observational data providers. The team of the Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem has extended this well-established system with a range of additional functions, including improved processing of multiple taxon identifications, the ability to represent associations between specimen and observation units, new data quality control and new reporting capabilities. The open source software B-HIT can be freely installed and used for setting up thematic networks serving the demands of particular user groups.


PLOS ONE | 2017

A conceptual framework for quality assessment and management of biodiversity data

Allan Veiga; Antonio Mauro Saraiva; Arthur David Chapman; Paul J. Morris; Christian Gendreau; Dmitry Schigel; Tim Robertson


Research Ideas and Outcomes | 2017

Tracking Invasive Alien Species (TrIAS): Building a data-driven framework to inform policy

Sonia Vanderhoeven; Tim Adriaens; Peter Desmet; Diederik Strubbe; Thierry Backeljau; Yvan Barbier; Dimitri Brosens; Julien Cigar; Maxime Coupremanne; Rozemien De Troch; Hilde Eggermont; André Heughebaert; Kris Hostens; Pierre Huybrechts; Anne-Laure Jacquemart; Luc Lens; Arnaud Monty; Jean-Yves Paquet; Céline Prévot; Tim Robertson; Piet Termonia; Ruben Van De Kerchove; Gert Van Hoey; Bert Van Schaeybroeck; Diemer Vercayie; Thomas Jethro Verleye; Sarah Welby; Quentin Groom


Biological Conservation | 2018

Unlocking biodiversity data: Prioritization and filling the gaps in biodiversity observation data in Europe

Florian Wetzel; Heather Bingham; Quentin Groom; Peter Haase; Urmas Kõljalg; Michael Kuhlmann; Corinne S. Martin; Lyubomir Penev; Tim Robertson; Hannu Saarenmaa; Dirk S. Schmeller; Stefan Stoll; Jonathan D. Tonkin; Christoph Häuser


Research Ideas and Outcomes | 2017

EU BON’s contributions towards meeting Aichi Biodiversity Target 19

Katherine Despot-Belmonte; Michel Doudin; Quentin Groom; Florian Wetzel; Donat Agosti; Kim Jacobsen; Larissa Smirnova; Lauren Weatherdon; Tim Robertson; Lyubomir Penev; Eugenie C. Regan; Anke Hoffmann; Brian MacSharry; Yara Shennan-Farpon; Corinne S. Martin

Collaboration


Dive into the Tim Robertson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Wieczorek

University of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Corinne S. Martin

World Conservation Monitoring Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Desmet

Research Institute for Nature and Forest

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Lyubomir Penev

American Museum of Natural History

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Anton Güntsch

Free University of Berlin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gabriele Droege

Free University of Berlin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Guido Sautter

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge