Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tim Schutte is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tim Schutte.


Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology | 2017

Pharmacovigilance Skills, Knowledge and Attitudes in our Future Doctors - A Nationwide Study in the Netherlands

Tim Schutte; Jelle Tichelaar; M.O. Reumerman; Rike van Eekeren; R. Rissmann; Cornelis Kramers; Milan C. Richir; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Michiel A. van Agtmael

Pharmacovigilance centres monitor the safety of drugs, based on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported by doctors, pharmacists and pharmaceutical companies. However, the under‐reporting of ADRs remains a major problem. Our aim was to investigate preparedness of future doctors for their role in pharmacovigilance, by assessing their pharmacovigilance awareness, skills and knowledge. The study was a nationwide e‐survey among medical students (third to sixth year) of all eight medical schools in the Netherlands. The survey consisted of questions regarding pharmacovigilance awareness, skills and knowledge. Overall, 874 students provided informed consent and participated (response 12%). Almost all students (96%) intended to report serious ADRs in their future practice. Almost half (44%) of the students did not know where to report an ADR, and 78% did not know which items were necessary for a good‐quality ADR report. While more than 78% of the students agreed that pharmacovigilance is an important topic in their medical education, only 26% found that their current curriculum covered pharmacovigilance adequately. Although ADR reporting is considered relevant and important among future doctors, many do not know where and what to report. This is highly undesirable and should have consequences for pharmacotherapy teaching.


Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology | 2017

Students and Doctors are Unaware of the Cost of Drugs they Frequently Prescribe

Tim Schutte; Jelle Tichelaar; Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara; Milan C. Richir; Michiel A. van Agtmael

Given the increasing healthcare costs of an ageing population, there is growing interest in rational prescribing, which takes costs of medication into account. We aimed to gain insight into the attitude to and knowledge of medication costs of medical students and doctors in daily practice. This was a cross‐sectional electronic survey among medical students (bachelor/master) and doctors (consultants/registrars). Attitude to costs was evaluated using a cost‐consciousness scale. In open questions, the participants estimated the cost of commonly prescribed (generic/non‐generic) drugs (including separate pharmacy dispensing costs). They were asked where they could find information about drug costs. Overall, a reasonable cost‐consciousness was found. Students were less conscious of the cost than were doctors (15.56 SD 3.25 versus 17.81 SD 2.25; scale 0–24; p = 0.001). In contrast to this consciousness, actual estimated drug costs were within a 25% margin for only 5.4% of generic and 13.7% of proprietary drugs (Wilcoxon signed‐rank, p < 0.001). The price of generic drugs was frequently overestimated (77.5%) and that of proprietary drugs was underestimated (51.4%). The dispensing costs were estimated correctly for 30% of the drugs. Most doctors (84%) and a minority of students (40%) were able to identify at least one source of information about drug costs. While doctors and students considered it important to be aware of the cost of drugs, this attitude is not reflected in their ability to estimate the cost of frequently prescribed drugs. Cost awareness is important in therapeutic reasoning and cost‐effective prescribing. Both should be better addressed in (undergraduate) pharmacotherapy education.


BMC Medical Education | 2017

Motivation and competence of participants in a learner-centered student-run clinic: an exploratory pilot study

Tim Schutte; Jelle Tichelaar; Ramon S. Dekker; Abel Thijs; Theo P. G. M. de Vries; Rashmi A. Kusurkar; Milan C. Richir; Michiel A. van Agtmael

BackgroundThe Learner-Centered Student-run Clinic (LC-SRC) was designed to teach and train prescribing skills grounded in a real-life context, to provide students with early clinical experience and responsibility. The current studies’ theoretical framework was based on the Self-determination Theory. According to the Self-determination Theory, early involvement in clinical practice combined with a high level of responsibility makes the LC-SRC an environment that can stimulate intrinsic motivation. We investigated the different types of motivation and the proficiency in CanMEDS competencies of the participating students.MethodType of motivation was measured using the Academic Motivation Scale and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. CanMEDS competencies were evaluated by faculty using a mini-clinical examination and by the students themselves using a post-participation questionnaire.ResultsThe 29 participating students were highly intrinsic motivated for this project on all subscales of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Motivation for medical school on the Academic Motivation Scale was high before and was not significantly changed after participation. Students considered that their CanMEDS competencies “Collaborator”, “Communicator”, “Academic”, and “Medical expert” had improved. Their actual clinical team competence was judged by faculty to be at a junior doctor level.ConclusionStudents showed a high level of intrinsic motivation to participate in the LC-SRC and perceived an improvement in competence. Furthermore their actual clinical competence was at junior doctor level in all CanMEDS competencies. The stimulating characteristics of the LC-SRC, the high levels of intrinsic motivation and the qualitative comments of the students in this study makes the LC-SRC an attractive place for learning.


Drug Safety | 2018

What Future Healthcare Professionals Need to Know About Pharmacovigilance: Introduction of the WHO PV Core Curriculum for University Teaching with Focus on Clinical Aspects

Rike van Eekeren; Leàn Rolfes; Andries S. Koster; Lara Magro; Gurumurthy Parthasarathi; Hussain Al Ramimmy; Tim Schutte; Daisuke Tanaka; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Linda Härmark

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) can cause serious health problems, as shown in studies about drug-related hospitalizations. To build knowledge of and raise awareness about ADRs among healthcare professionals, more education in the field of ADRs and pharmacovigilance (PV) is needed. No standard exists for teaching PV at universities for medical, pharmacy, dentistry and nursing students, so a core curriculum needs to be developed to teach important aspects of PV to students. In September 2016, a stakeholders’ meeting was initiated on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO) and organized by the Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb. This meeting addressed and agreed on the PV competencies students need to develop and what key aspects of the subject should be taught. Five key aspects were identified: understanding the importance of PV in the context of pharmacotherapy, and preventing, recognizing, managing and reporting ADRs. Since time and resources for PV education are limited, elements of the WHO PV core curriculum for university teaching were designed to be integrated into existing courses but can be used as a stand-alone programme. The basis of and outline for the WHO PV core curriculum for university teaching are addressed in this paper. It is expected that PV competencies for students are vital for their contribution to safe use of medicines in the future. In addition, this article aims to stimulate discussion on this subject and promote collaboration between universities, national PV centres and other stakeholders to integrate key aspects of PV in their educational programmes.


British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2018

Essential diseases in prescribing: A national Delphi study towards a core curriculum in pharmacotherapy education

B.H.E. Jansen; G.W. Disselhorst; Tim Schutte; B. Jansen; R. Rissmann; Milan C. Richir; Carolina J. P. W. Keijsers; F.H.M. Vanmolkot; A. Maassen van den Brink; C. Kramers; A.M. Vondeling; Glenn Dumont; I. de Waard‐Siebinga; M.A. van Agtmael; Jelle Tichelaar

Prescribing is a core skill for junior doctors, yet 8–10% of their prescriptions contain errors. To ensure adequate training in prescribing, it is important to define the diseases for which junior doctors should be competent to prescribe. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify the essential diseases in prescribing for junior doctors.


European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2015

A novel approach to teaching pharmacotherapeutics—feasibility of the learner-centered student-run clinic

Ramon S. Dekker; Tim Schutte; Jelle Tichelaar; Abel Thijs; Michiel A. van Agtmael; Theo P. G. M. de Vries; Milan C. Richir


Drug Safety | 2017

Feasibility and Educational Value of a Student-Run Pharmacovigilance Programme: A Prospective Cohort Study

Tim Schutte; Jelle Tichelaar; M.O. Reumerman; Rike van Eekeren; Leàn Rolfes; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Milan C. Richir; Michiel A. van Agtmael


Naunyn-schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology | 2018

The adverse drug reaction reporting assignment for specialist oncology nurses: a preliminary evaluation of quality, relevance and educational value in a prospective cohort study

Tim Schutte; Rike van Eekeren; Milan C. Richir; Jojanneke van Staveren; Eugène van Puijenbroek; Jelle Tichelaar; Michiel A. van Agtmael


Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology | 2018

Opportunities for Students to Prescribe: An Evaluation of 185 Consultations in the Student‐run Cardiovascular Risk Management Programme

Tim Schutte; Katinka Prince; Milan C. Richir; Erik Donker; Leonie van Gastel; Ferdynand Bastiaans; Henk de Vries; Jelle Tichelaar; Michiel A. van Agtmael


Clinical Therapeutics | 2015

Learning by doing in the student-run Pharmacovigilance Program

Tim Schutte; Jelle Tichelaar; M.O. Reumerman; R. Van Eekeren; Leàn Rolfes; Milan C. Richir; van Eugène Puijenbroek; Van Agtmael

Collaboration


Dive into the Tim Schutte's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jelle Tichelaar

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Milan C. Richir

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M.A. van Agtmael

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Leàn Rolfes

University of Groningen

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

M.O. Reumerman

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ramon S. Dekker

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Abel Thijs

VU University Medical Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge