Timothy F. Chen

Recommendations for the standardisation of oxytocin nasal administration and guidelines for its reporting in human research

A series of studies have reported on the salubrious effects of oxytocin nasal spray on social cognition and behavior in humans, across physiology (e.g., eye gaze, heart rate variability), social cognition (e.g., attention, memory, and appraisal), and behavior (e.g., trust, generosity). Findings suggest the potential of oxytocin nasal spray as a treatment for various psychopathologies, including autism and schizophrenia. There are, however, increasing reports of variability of response to oxytocin nasal spray between experiments and individuals. In this review, we provide a summary of factors that influence transmucosal nasal drug delivery, deposition, and their impact on bioavailability. These include variations in anatomy and resultant airflow dynamic, vascularisation, status of blood vessels, mode of spray application, gallenic formulation (including presence of uptake enhancers, control release formulation), and amount and method of administration. These key variables are generally poorly described and controlled in scientific reports, in spite of their potential to alter the course of treatment outcome studies. Based on this review, it should be of no surprise that differences emerge across individuals and experiments when nasal drug delivery methods are employed. We present recommendations for researchers to use when developing and administering the spray, and guidelines for reporting on peptide nasal spray studies in humans. We hope that these recommendations assist in establishing a scientific standard that can improve the rigor and subsequent reliability of reported effects of oxytocin nasal spray in humans.

Practice Change in Community Pharmacy: Quantification of Facilitators

Background: There has been an increasing international trend toward the delivery of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS) in community pharmacy. CPS have been developed and disseminated individually, without a framework underpinning their implementation and with limited knowledge of factors that might assist practice change. The implementation process is complex, involving a range of internal and external factors. Objective: To quantify facilitators of practice change in Australian community pharmacies. Methods: We employed a literature review and qualitative study to facilitate the design of a 43-item “facilitators of practice change” scale as part of a quantitative survey instrument, using a framework of organizational theory. The questionnaire was pilot-tested (n = 100), then mailed to a random sample of 2000 community pharmacies, with a copy each for the pharmacy owner, employed pharmacist, and pharmacy assistant. The construct validity and reliability of the scale were established using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbachs α, respectively. Results: A total of 735 (37%) pharmacies responded, with 1303 individual questionnaires. Factor analysis of the scale yielded 7 factors, explaining 48.8% of the total variance. The factors were: relationship with physicians (item loading range 0.59–0.85; Cronbachs α 0.90), remuneration (0.52–0.74; 0.82), pharmacy layout (0.52–0.79; 0.81), patient expectation (0.52–0.85; 0.82), manpower/staff (0.49–0.66; 0.80), communication and teamwork (0.37–0.65; 0.77), and external support/assistance (0.47–0.69; 0.74). Conclusions: All of the factors demonstrated good reliability and construct validity and explained approximately half of the variance. Implementing CPS requires support not only with the clinical aspects of service delivery, but also for the process of implementation itself, and remuneration models must reflect this. The identified facilitators should be used in a multilevel strategy to integrate professional services into the community pharmacy business, engaging pharmacists and their staff, policy makers, educators, and researchers. Further research is required to determine additional factors impacting the capacity of community pharmacies to implement change.

Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications

Evaluations of interrater agreement and interrater reliability can be applied to a number of different contexts and are frequently encountered in social and administrative pharmacy research. The objectives of this study were to highlight key differences between interrater agreement and interrater reliability; describe the key concepts and approaches to evaluating interrater agreement and interrater reliability; and provide examples of their applications to research in the field of social and administrative pharmacy. This is a descriptive review of interrater agreement and interrater reliability indices. It outlines the practical applications and interpretation of these indices in social and administrative pharmacy research. Interrater agreement indices assess the extent to which the responses of 2 or more independent raters are concordant. Interrater reliability indices assess the extent to which raters consistently distinguish between different responses. A number of indices exist, and some common examples include Kappa, the Kendall coefficient of concordance, Bland-Altman plots, and the intraclass correlation coefficient. Guidance on the selection of an appropriate index is provided. In conclusion, selection of an appropriate index to evaluate interrater agreement or interrater reliability is dependent on a number of factors including the context in which the study is being undertaken, the type of variable under consideration, and the number of raters making assessments.

Inappropriate Medication Use and Prescribing Indicators in Elderly Australians : Development of a Prescribing Indicators Tool

AbstractBackground: Evidence-practice gaps, adverse medication-related incidents and unplanned medical admissions to hospital are common in elderly Australians. Many prescribing indicator tools designed to address some of these problems have been reported in the literature, the most common of which is the Beers list of inappropriate medications in the elderly. However, many of these tools are not appropriate for the Australian healthcare environment without modification and validation, and there appears to be a need for a tool based on Australian data. Objective: To develop a list of prescribing indicators for elderly (aged >65 years) Australians based on the most frequent medications prescribed to Australians, and the most frequent medical conditions for which elderly Australians consult medical practitioners. Method: The most common reasons for elderly Australians to seek or receive healthcare were cross-referenced with the 50 highest-volume Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme medications prescribed to Australians in 2006 to develop prescribing indicators in the elderly using Australian medication and medical condition information resources. Results: Forty-eight prescribing indicators were identified, consisting mainly of optimum as well as inappropriate medication choices for a large number of common medical conditions in the elderly. Conclusion: A prescribing indicators tool was developed. This tool is envisaged as forming an important part of the medication review process, which is aimed at addressing the common problem of adverse medication-related events in elderly Australians.

Targeting Suboptimal Prescribing in the Elderly: A Review of the Impact of Pharmacy Services

Objective To review the currently available literature on the impact of interventions by pharmacists on suboptimal prescribing in the elderly. Data Sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases were searched for studies published between January 1992 and December 2008. Key words included medication review, drug regimen review, pharmaceutical services, pharmaceutical care, pharmacists, medications, appropriateness, suboptimal, underuse, aged, elderly, randomized controlled trial, inappropriate, prescribing, and intervention. Study Selection And Data Extraction To be included in the review, studies must have been conducted in patients 65 years or older, published in English, randomized and controlled, and must have included an intervention delivered by a pharmacist or had a pharmacist as a member of the intervention team. From each relevant study, the following data were extracted: study duration, country, number of patients, year of publication, objective, type and impact of the intervention, method used to assess suboptimal prescribing, and data concerning the quality of the study. Data Synthesis A total of 38 articles were identified, of which 12 matched our inclusion criteria. Seven articles included interventions initiated by pharmacists, and the remaining 5 described interventions in which the pharmacist was a part of the multidisciplinary team. A broad range of tools was used to measure prescribing appropriateness; we found that a consensus on the best approach has not been reached. Most of the studies involving pharmacists showed significant improvement in suboptimal prescribing at one or more time points. However, most of these interventions were directed toward reducing the overuse or misuse of medications. Conclusions Pharmacy services to reduce suboptimal prescribing have shown promising and noteworthy improvements. More research is needed to address the underutilization of medications in the elderly and healthcare impact of reducing suboptimal prescribing.

Psychotropic Prescribing in Long-Term Care Facilities : Impact of Medication Reviews and Educational Interventions

The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the evidence pertaining to the impact of medication reviews and/or educational interventions on psychotropic drug use in long-term care facilities. A computerized search was conducted using MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials, CINAHL, EMBASE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and PsycINFO, from January 1980 to April 2007. Controlled studies or randomized controlled studies were included for review. The authors identified 26 studies evaluating the impact of medication reviews and/or educational interventions on psychotropic drug use in long-term care facilities. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this review and the data from six of these studies were included in a meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio (OR) from five studies on hypnotic prescribing showed a decrease in use postintervention (OR = 0.57, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.41-0.79). The pooled OR from five studies on prevalence of antipsychotic prescribing postintervention was not significant (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.63-1.04). Medication reviews and/or educational interventions are effective at reducing psychotropic drug prescribing. However, research on the benefits of these interventions in reducing psychotropic drug use on total health care costs and resident health outcomes is lacking.

Implementing cognitive services in community pharmacy: a review of facilitators used in practice change

Objective To investigate facilitators of change in community pharmacy and their use in the implementation of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS).

Understanding practice change in community pharmacy: a qualitative research instrument based on organisational theory

Introduction: The past decade has seen a notable shift in the practice of pharmacy, with a strong focus on the provision of cognitive pharmaceutical services (CPS) by community pharmacists. The benefits of these services have been well documented, yet their uptake appears to be slow. Various strategies have been developed to overcome barriers to the implementation of CPS, with varying degrees of success, and little is known about the sustainability of the practice changes they produce. Furthermore, the strategies developed are often specific to individual programs or services, and their applicability to other CPS has not been explored. There seems to be a need for a flexible change management model for the implementation and dissemination of a range of CPS, but before it can be developed, a better understanding of the change process is required. Objectives: This paper describes the development of a qualitative research instrument that may be utilised to investigate practice change in community pharmacy. Specific objectives included gaining knowledge about the circumstances surrounding attempts to implement CPS, and understanding relationships that are important to the change process. Methods: Organisational theory provided the conceptual framework for development of the qualitative research instrument, within which two theories were used to give insight into the change process: Borums theory of organisational change, which categorises change strategies as rational, natural, political or open; and Social Network Theory, which helps identify and explain the relationships between key people involved in the change process. Results: A semi‐structured interview guide was produced, combining the factors affecting practice change found in the literature that warranted further investigation with the theoretical perspectives of organisational change and social networks. To address the research objectives, the instrument covered four broad themes: roles, experiences, strategies and networks.Conclusion: The qualitative research instrument developed in this study provides a starting point for future research to lead to a description and understanding of practice change in community pharmacy, and subsequent development of models for the sustainable implementation of CPS.

Drug Burden Index and Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Community-Dwelling Older People The Impact of Home Medicines Review

BackgroundA significant problem in older people (aged ≥65 years) is the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), including those with sedative and anticholinergic properties. However, effective intervention strategies have yet to be identified. The Drug Burden Index (DBI) is an evidence-based tool that measures a person’s total exposure to medications with sedative and anticholinergic properties and has been shown to be independently associated with impairment in cognitive and physical function.ObjectiveThe main aim of the study was to investigate whether Home Medicines Review (HMR) services by pharmacists for community-dwelling older people would lead to an improvement in the use of medications, as measured by a decrease in the DBI score. The study also aimed to investigate the (i) distribution of DBI scores and PIMs among older people living in the community, and (ii) impact of pharmacists’ recommendations on DBI scores and PIMs.MethodsA retrospective analysis of medication reviews was performed for 372 community-dwelling older people (aged ≥65 years) who received an HMR service from the pharmacist. The main outcome measure was the total DBI score at baseline and post-HMR. The data were also examined to determine the extent of PIM use (2003 Beers’ criteria), and the number and nature of pharmacists’ recommendations.ResultsOverall, medications contributing to the DBI (i.e. medications with sedative or anticholinergic properties) and PIMs were identified in 60.5% (n = 225) and 39.8% (n=148) of the patients, respectively. Following pharmacist recommendations during the HMR service, medications contributing to the DBI were identified in 51.6% (n = 192) of the patients. A statistically significant reduction in the sum total of DBI scores for all patients was observed following pharmacists’ recommendations during the HMR service (206.9 vs 157.3, p < 0.001). Pharmacists’ recommendations also led to a decrease in the use of PIMs, which were identified in 28.2% (n= 105) of the patients following the HMR service.ConclusionWhen the DBI is used for evaluation, pharmacists’ recommendations during HMR services, if acted upon, may effect changes in the prescribing of sedative and anticholinergic medications, thereby substantially reducing the patient’s drug burden. Future studies should focus on whether such a decrease may translate into functional improvements. The study also showed a positive influence of HMR services on the prescribing of PIMs.

Impact of mental health first aid training on pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported behaviour: a controlled trial

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of delivering Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training for pharmacy students on their mental health literacy and stigma towards mental illness. Methods: A non-randomized controlled design was used, with all third year pharmacy students at the University of Sydney (n = 272) in 2009 invited to participate in one of two MHFA training courses, each of 12 hours duration. Of these, 174 students applied for MHFA training, of whom 60 were randomly selected and offered MHFA training. Outcome measures that were completed by all participants in the MHFA and non-MHFA groups before and after the MHFA training included an evaluation of mental health literacy, the 7-item social distance scale, and 16 items related to self-reported behaviour. Results: The survey instrument was completed by 258 participants at baseline (59 MHFA and 199 non-MHFA) and 223 participants at follow up (53 MHFA and 170 non-MHFA). The MHFA training improved the participants’ ability to correctly identify a mental illness (p = 0.004). There was a significant mean decrease in total social distance of 2.18 (SD 3.35) p <0.001 for the MHFA group, indicating less stigmatizing attitudes. There were improvements in recognition of helpful interventions with participants’ views becoming more concordant with health professional views about treatments for depression (p = 0.009) and schizophrenia (p = 0.08), and participants were significantly more confident (p < 0.01) to provide pharmaceutical services to consumers with a mental illness following the training. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that MHFA training can reduce pharmacy students’ mental health stigma, improve recognition of mental disorders and improve confidence in providing services to consumers with a mental illness in the pharmacy setting.