Timothy G. Cooke

Expression of the HER1-4 family of receptor tyrosine kinases in breast cancer.

EGFr/HER1 and c‐erbB‐2/HER2 expression are associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. The type I receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family to which they belong has four members (HER1–4). In this study, expression of HER1–4 and oestrogen receptor (ER) expression were determined by immunohistochemistry in 220 breast carcinomas. Elevated expression of HER1 was observed in 16.4%, HER2 in 22.8%, HER3 in 17.5%, and HER4 in 11.9% of these tumours. Patients whose tumours overexpressed HER1, 2 or 3 had reduced survival (p = <0.001), whereas those whose tumours overexpressed HER4 had increased survival (p = 0.013); 38.6% of cases overexpressed one or more of HER1, 2 or 3. HER4 was rarely overexpressed with other HERs (1.4% of cases). Coxs multiple regression analysis demonstrated that overexpression of HER1/2/3, HER4, and standard prognostic indicators independently affected survival. HER1–3 expression was related to ER negativity (p < 0.0001, χ2). Patients with ER‐positive, HER1–3‐positive tumours had a significantly poorer survival (p < 0.001) than those with ER‐positive/HER‐negative or HER4‐positive tumours. Expression of HER RTKs displays complex interactions between different family members. There is a strong interaction, in terms of survival, between HER expression and ER expression. The development of HER‐targeted agents (eg Herceptin, Iressa), and agents targeted at the downstream signalling pathways, therefore provides new possibilities in the treatment of breast cancer. Copyright

Evaluating HER2 amplification and overexpression in breast cancer

The development of Herceptin (Trazumatab) makes testing for HER2 status important for choosing optimal therapy in breast cancer. This study addresses the precision, accuracy, and reproducibility of HER2 assays. HER2 was assessed retrospectively by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with Dako ‘Herceptest’, by IHC with the monoclonal antibody CB11, and by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH, PathVysion), in a series of 216 formalin‐fixed breast carcinomas including 191 for which quantitative HER2 data from radioimmunohistochemistry (Q‐IHC) were available. All tests were scored independently by two observers. Positivity rates varied between Herceptest (12.6%), FISH (19.4%), and CB11 IHC (28.5%). Kappa values showed that IHC‐based tests were more susceptible to inter‐observer variation (κ=0.67 and 0.74 for Herceptest and CB11, respectively) than FISH (κ=0.973). Overall test accuracy (see the Materials and methods section) for CB11 IHC (83.8%) was lower than Herceptest (87.4%) or FISH (93.2%). FISH predicted p185 HER2 overexpression (determined by Q‐IHC) better (concordance index C.Ind. 0.90) than CB11 IHC (C.Ind.=0.85) or Herceptest (C.Ind.=0.81). Of 42 cases with gene amplification by FISH, 67% were positive in the Herceptest (2+ or 3+) vs. 83% with CB11. Of 174 cases negative by FISH, 96% were negative in the Herceptest and 68% with CB11. In conclusion, FISH is the most accurate, reproducible, and precise predictor of HER2 overexpression in routine diagnostic laboratories. Copyright

Correlation between immunohistochemistry (HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 in 426 breast carcinomas from 37 centres

Accurate diagnostic assessment of HER‐2 is essential for the appropriate application of the humanized anti‐HER‐2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) to the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The diagnostic test needs to be applicable to archival, fixed tissue removed at excision, in many cases several years earlier. We compared the assessment of HER‐2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC; HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 426 breast carcinomas from patients being considered for trastuzumab therapy. The tumours were tested in three reference centres having been sent in from 37 hospitals. Only 2/270 (0.7%) IHC 0/1+ tumours were FISH positive. Six of 102 (5.9%) IHC 3+ tumours were FISH negative. Five of the six had between 1.75 and 2.0 HER‐2 gene copies per chromosome 17 and the sixth had multiple copies of chromosome 17. Thirteen per cent of tumours were IHC 2+ and overall 48% of these were FISH positive but this proportion varied markedly between the centres. Sixty IHC‐stained slides selected to be enriched with 2+ cases were circulated between the three laboratories and scored. There were 20 cases in which there was some discordance in scoring. Consideration of the FISH score in these cases led to concordance in the designation of positivity/negativity in 19 of these 20 cases. These data support an algorithm in which FISH testing is restricted to IHC 2+ tumours in reference centres. The results may not extrapolate to laboratories with less experience or using different methodologies. Copyright

Interlaboratory comparison of HER-2 oncogene amplification as detected by chromogenic and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Purpose: Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is a new modification of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for detection of oncogene amplification in archival tumor samples. In CISH, the oncogene probe is detected using a peroxidase reaction, allowing use of transmitted light microscopy. We compared detection of HER-2/neu amplification by CISH with a Food and Drug Administration-approved two-color FISH test in an interlaboratory setting. Experimental Design: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 197 breast cancers were analyzed for HER-2 amplification by CISH. Two-color FISH (PathVysion) CISH of 17 centromere was done if the observer considered it necessary to ascertain amplification status in tumors with borderline HER-2 CISH copy numbers. Results: Paired CISH/FISH results were available from 192 (97%) of 197 cases, no clear difference in success rates of either method was observed. Centromere 17 CISH was considered necessary in seven tumors. CISH and two-color FISH results were concordant in 180 cases (93.8%). There were 92 and 88 tumors found HER-2 amplified and nonamplified, respectively, by both methods. Eight tumors were amplified by CISH but not by FISH, and four tumors exhibited the opposite condition (kappa coefficient 0.875). In 7 of 12 cases differences between the two methods could have related to a lack of CISH chromosome 17 information. The remaining cases were explained by difficult histology (ductal carcinoma in situ, poor representativity, dense lymphocytic infiltration, or intratumoral heterogeneity). Conclusions: These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for clinical diagnosis of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival formalin-fixed breast cancer samples.

The ERBB4/HER4 Intracellular Domain 4ICD Is a BH3-Only Protein Promoting Apoptosis of Breast Cancer Cells

ERBB4/HER4 (referred to here as ERBB4) is a unique member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family of receptor tyrosine kinases. In contrast to the other three members of the EGFR family (i.e., EGFR, ERBB2/HER2/NEU, and ERBB3), which are associated with aggressive forms of human cancers, ERBB4 expression seems to be selectively lost in tumors with aggressive phenotypes. Consistent with this observation, we show that ERBB4 induces apoptosis when reintroduced into breast cancer cell lines or when endogenous ERBB4 is activated by a ligand. We further show that ligand activation and subsequent proteolytic processing of endogenous ERBB4 results in mitochondrial accumulation of the ERBB4 intracellular domain (4ICD) and cytochrome c efflux, the essential and committed step of mitochondrial regulated apoptosis. Our results indicate that 4ICD is functionally similar to BH3-only proteins, proapoptotic members of the BCL-2 family required for initiation of mitochondrial dysfunction through activation of the proapoptotic multi-BH domain proteins BAX/BAK. Similar to other BH3-only proteins, 4ICD cell-killing activity requires an intact BH3 domain and 4ICD interaction with the antiapoptotic protein BCL-2, suppressed 4ICD-induced apoptosis. Unique among BH3-only proteins, however, is the essential requirement of BAK but not BAX to transmit the 4ICD apoptotic signal. Clinically, cytosolic but not membrane ERBB4/4ICD expression in primary human breast tumors was associated with tumor apoptosis, providing a mechanistic explanation for the loss of ERBB4 expression during tumor progression. Thus, we propose that ligand-induced mitochondrial accumulation of 4ICD represents a unique mechanism of action for transmembrane receptors, directly coupling a cell surface signal to the tumor cell mitochondrial apoptotic pathway.

Can Molecular Markers Predict When to Implement Treatment with Aromatase Inhibitors in Invasive Breast Cancer

Purpose: Resistance to tamoxifen is linked to overexpression of HER2, and aromatase inhibitors show particular benefit in progesterone receptor (PR)–negative patients. We previously reported reduced survival in patients overexpressing HER1, HER2, and HER3. We now show that both HER1-3 and PR status predicts for early relapse in estrogen receptor (ER)–positive tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. Experimental Design: Tissue microarray technology was used to analyze 402 ER-positive tamoxifen-treated patients. Immunohistochemistry using epidermal growth factor receptor, HER2, HER3, HER4, and PR antibodies was done. Kaplan-Meier life table and Cox Regression analysis (log-rank testing of differences in breast cancer–related relapse on tamoxifen) was done. Results: HER1-3 (but not HER4) overexpression predicted for early relapse on tamoxifen (P = 0.0060). PR-negative cases were also significantly more likely to relapse while on tamoxifen (P= 0.017). HER1-3-positive and/or PR-negative patients combined as a “high-risk” group were significantly more likely to relapse on tamoxifen in univariate (P < 0.0001) and Coxs multivariate analysis (P = 0.0069). However, this applied to early relapse on tamoxifen only, as any disease relapse after 3 years of tamoxifen was unrelated to PR/HER status. Conclusions: We show that HER1-3 and PR status can identify time-dependent de novo tamoxifen resistance with risk declining markedly after 3 years of tamoxifen treatment. These results parallel data from the ATAC and Intergroup Exemastane Study trials which suggest that whereas PR-negative patients derive greater benefit from initial aromatase inhibitor treatment, PR status has no effect on response when given as delayed treatment to those disease free on tamoxifen after 3 years.

Outcome and Human Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor (HER) 1-4 status in invasive breast carcinomas with proliferation indices evaluated using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labelling

BackgroundWe have shown previously that whilst overexpression of HER1, 2 and 3 is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer, HER4 is associated with a good prognosis. Cell proliferation is a key component of aggressive cancers and is driven by growth factors. In this study bromodeoxyuridine-derived proliferation indices are correlated with clinical outcome and HER1-4 status to further clarify the differing roles for the HER family at a biological level.Patients and Methods78 invasive breast cancers had BrdU in vivo labelling to determine the labelling index (BLI) and the potential tumour doubling time (Tpot). Long term clinical follow up was available for these patients. Using immunohistochemistry we established the HER1-4 status in 55 patients from the BrdU cohort.ResultsWe demonstrate a significant correlation between high BLI values and breast cancer specific death (p = 0.0174). Low Tpottimes were also significantly correlated with breast cancer specific death (p = 0.0258). However BLI did not independently predict survival in Coxs multiple regression analysis when combined with other prognostic factors such as size, grade and nodal status.Tumours found to be positive for HER 1, 2 or 3 had significantly (p = 0.041) higher labelling indices, with HER1 also showing significantly higher indices when considered independently (p = 0.024). Conversely HER4 positivity significantly correlated (p = 0.013) with low BLI values in line with previous data associating this receptor with good prognosis tumours.ConclusionsThese results support the hypothesis that HER1-3 are associated with driving tumour proliferation whilst HER4 is involved in a non-proliferative or even protective role.

CHROMOSOME 17 ANEUSOMY IS ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA

Aberrations of chromosome 17 are common in breast cancer. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) enables gene or chromosome copy number to be assessed in situ in archival tissues and related to morphology and clinical outcome. In this study direct labeled DNA probes for the chromosome 17 alpha satellite and the HER2/neu gene were applied simultaneously to 5 micron sections of 214 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded invasive primary breast carcinomas. A high proportion (54%) of invasive breast carcinomas displayed aneusomy of chromosome 17. Polysomy 17 correlated with multiple copies of HER2/neu (p = <0.001), but not with HER2/neu amplification. Eighty-six patients without HER2/neu amplification had aneusomy 17. Fifty-eight of the 86 patients that had aneusomy 17 had high HER2/neu copy number. Twelve patients with normal copy number for chromosome 17 had amplification of HER2/neu and 30 patients had amplification of HER2/neu with aneusomy 17. Aneusomy 17 was associated with grade 3 carcinoma (p = 0.008), ER negativity (p = 0.0032) and a Nottingham prognostic index of greater than 5.4 (p = 0.039) but was not associated with survival by univariate analysis. In conclusion, the determination of chromosome 17 copy number should be incorporated in assessment of HER2/neu status, as this will give an accurate measure of amplification of HER2/neu and may also be helpful in determining suitability for breast carcinoma trials.

Assessment of HER2 status in breast cancer: why, when and how?

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is overexpressed, usually as a result of HER2 proto-oncogene amplification, in 20-30% of breast cancers. A HER2-positive status is generally associated with more aggressive disease and a worse prognosis. Furthermore, a positive HER2 status may predict the likelihood of resistance to some conventional therapies, as well as probably being predictive of sensitivity to anthracycline dose intensification. In addition to this prognostic/predictive value, HER2 is a target for specific therapy, with anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody therapy available in the USA. This article reviews the different assays used to determine HER2 status, discussing their relative advantages/disadvantages and the need for their standardisation before integration alongside other pathological indices into the clinical management of breast cancer.

Amplified in Breast Cancer 1 in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Positive Tumors of Tamoxifen-Treated Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose: Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1) is a member of the p160/steroid receptor coactivators family and is involved in estrogen-dependent gene transcription by reducing the antagonistic activity of tamoxifen-bound estrogen receptor-α (ER-α). The present study was carried out to test the hypothesis that AIB1 protein expression and/or gene amplification mediates tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Experimental Design: Immunohistochemistry using AIB1 antibody and fluorescence in situ hybridization using probes specific for AIB1 and chromosome 20 was done on 402 ER-α–positive tamoxifen-treated breast cancers. Results: AIB1 overexpression was not associated with relapse during treatment with tamoxifen. In contrast, high AIB1 expression in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2– and HER3-overexpressing tumors or tumors expressing one or more of HER1, HER2, or HER3 (HER1-3 positive) was associated with an increased risk of relapse on tamoxifen [hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-3.52 (P = 0.0416); hazard ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.43 (P = 0.0030), respectively]. AIB1 gene amplification was observed in 18 of 362 (5%) patients. High AIB1 gene copy number had no effect on overall or disease-free survival. Conclusions: Data presented here support a role for AIB1 expression on relapse during tamoxifen treatment in hormone-responsive HER-expressing clinical breast cancers and support clinical evidence, suggesting a cross-talk between ER-α and growth factor receptor pathways through changes in expression of specific coactivator proteins, such as AIB1. This study highlights the potential that tumor profiling, using multiple markers of treatment response, may improve patient selection for endocrine treatment, such as tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors.