Timothy N. Welsh

Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching

Consistent with action–based theories of attention, the presence of a nontarget stimulus in the environment has been shown to alter the characteristics of goal–directed movements. Specifically, it has been reported that movement trajectories veer away from (Howard & Tipper, 1997) or towards (Welsh, Elliott, & Weeks, 1999) the location of a nontarget stimulus. The purpose of the experiments reported in this paper was to test a response activation model of selective reaching conceived to account for these variable results. In agreement with the model, the trajectory changes in the movements appear to be determined by the activation levels of each competing response at the moment of response initiation. The results of the present work, as well as those of previous studies, are discussed within the framework of the model of response activation.

Hand deviations toward distractors : Evidence for response competition

Abstract It has been suggested that, when movements are planned within cluttered environments, competing responses programmed to distracting stimuli are inhibited based on their relation to the action being performed. Further, as a result of this inhibition, the path of the movement made to the target object deviates away from the distractor. In contrast to the object avoidance hypothesis, the results of the present study show that, for aiming movements made in environments in which distractors are present, the path of the movement veers toward the distractor. Moreover, the effects of the distractors on the movement trajectory were independent of the direction of limb movement. These findings suggest that, when a distractor is not a potential physical barrier, a response to the distractor may be activated along with the target response and, owing to temporal advantages, cause a deviation of the movement trajectory toward the distractor.

Does Joe influence Fred's action?: Inhibition of return across different nervous systems

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the slowing of responses to a target that appears in the same location as a previous event. Many researchers have speculated that IOR arises from inhibitory neural processes that have developed through evolution to facilitate efficient search patterns by biasing the action and/or attention of an individual towards novel locations. Throughout evolution, however, humans conducted searches as individuals as well as members of a group. In this context, we sought to determine if IOR could also be observed in the behavior of one individual after the observation of anothers behavior. Consistent with our reasoning, there was no difference in the magnitude of the IOR effect found when participants followed their own response or the response of their partner. These results are discussed in the context of action-based attention and possible underlying neural mechanisms.

Cerebral specialization and verbal-motor integration in adults with and without Down syndrome

Persons with Down syndrome (DS) tend to exhibit an atypical left ear-right hemisphere advantage (LEA) for the perception of speech sounds. In the present study, a recent adaptation of the dichotic listening procedure was employed to examine interhemispheric integration during the performance of a lateralized verbal-motor task. Although adults with DS (n = 13) demonstrated a right ear-left hemisphere advantage in the dichotic-motor task similar to their peers with (n = 14) and without undifferentiated developmental disabilities (n = 14), they showed an LEA in a free recall dichotic listening task. Based on a comparison of the laterality indices obtained from both dichotic listening procedures, it appears that the manifestation of lateral ear advantages in persons DS may dependent on the response requirements of the task.

Relative Processing Demands Influence Cerebral Laterality for Verbal-Motor Integration in Persons with Down Syndrome

The study of cerebral specialization in the Down syndrome (DS) population has revealed an anomalous pattern of organization. In particular, dichotic-listening studies have suggested a left-ear/right hemisphere dominance for speech perception, whereas motor control research has revealed a left hemisphere dominance for executive-motor control. In the present investigation, we employed a recent adaptation of the dichotic listening procedure to examine interhemispheric integration during the performance of a lateralized verbal-motor task. Specifically, using the selective dichotic-listening procedure, participants were required to complete a rapid left or right hand pointing movement to one of two pictorial icons corresponding to the word presented to their precued ear. We observed that persons with DS (N = 17) and age-matched controls (N = 35) exhibited a right-ear advantage (REA) for our dichotic-aiming task. While these results appear to contradict previous dichotic listening studies, we propose that the manifestation of a lateral ear advantage in the DS population may have more to do with the response requirements of the task than with the characteristics or complexity of the stimulus material.

Influence of terminal action requirements on action-centered distractor effects

Tipper (1985; Q J Exp Psychol A 37:571–590) has suggested that competing responses programmed to distracting stimuli are inhibited based on their relationship to the action being performed. The present paper reports two experiments designed to examine the influence of the terminal action of a task on the allocation of visual attention. Taken together the results suggest that when engaging targets in an environment, which includes distracting stimuli, competing responses are likely to be programmed in parallel and that the relationship between competing responses can include both spatial position and action characteristics.

The effect of postural stability and spatial orientation of the upper limbs on interlimb coordination

It has recently been reported that the spatial orientation of two moving limbs has a determining influence on the relative accuracy and stability of coordination patterns. The purpose of the present experiments was to test perceptual and neuromuscular explanations of these spatial orientation effects. Experiment 1 was an initial test of the hypotheses and an extension of a previous study [Lee et al. (2002) Exp Brain Res 146:205–212] that required participants to coordinate inphase and antiphase movement patterns in four spatial orientations: two symmetric orientations (90° and 180° separation between the limbs) and two asymmetric orientations (90° and 135° separation between the limbs). Results of Experiment 1 suggest that the symmetry of movement may be a key factor influencing spatial orientation effects observed during interlimb coordination. In Experiment 2, participants again performed inphase and antiphase movement patterns in symmetric and asymmetric spatial orientations. However, one-half of the participants in Experiment 2 were provided with mechanical constraints during the performance of the desired coordination patterns. The mechanical constraints provided postural support but did not influence the visual experience. Results showed that the addition of the postural support improved performance. These findings suggest that neuromuscular, and perhaps biomechanical, constraints contribute more to the influence of spatial orientation than visual–perceptual constraints.

RESPONSE TO VISUAL STIMULI BY ADULTS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES

Young college students with (n = 20) and without (n = 20) developmental disabilities performed a hand-eye coordination task that involved contacting illuminated target buttons on a wall-mounted board while simultaneously reading numbers in central vision. The target buttons were arranged in 5 concentric rings allowing for the computation of successful contact rates between different areas of the movement environment. Analysis showed, although students with developmental disabilities had lower overall contact rates than peers without such disabilities, both groups performed with comparable accuracy in all locations within the movement environment. This finding suggests that special adaptations of visual information in the working environment for a person with developmental disabilities may not be necessary.