Tineke M. Snijders
Max Planck Society
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tineke M. Snijders.
Neuropsychologia | 2017
David Peeters; Tineke M. Snijders; Peter Hagoort
ABSTRACT In everyday communication speakers often refer in speech and/or gesture to objects in their immediate environment, thereby shifting their addressees attention to an intended referent. The neurobiological infrastructure involved in the comprehension of such basic multimodal communicative acts remains unclear. In an event‐related fMRI study, we presented participants with pictures of a speaker and two objects while they concurrently listened to her speech. In each picture, one of the objects was singled out, either through the speakers index‐finger pointing gesture or through a visual cue that made the object perceptually more salient in the absence of gesture. A mismatch (compared to a match) between speech and the object singled out by the speakers pointing gesture led to enhanced activation in left IFG and bilateral pMTG, showing the importance of these areas in conceptual matching between speech and referent. Moreover, a match (compared to a mismatch) between speech and the object made salient through a visual cue led to enhanced activation in the mentalizing system, arguably reflecting an attempt to converge on a jointly attended referent in the absence of pointing. These findings shed new light on the neurobiological underpinnings of the core communicative process of comprehending a speakers multimodal referential act and stress the power of pointing as an important natural device to link speech to objects. HIGHLIGHTSWe investigate the comprehension of everyday object‐reference in speech and gesture.A pointing gesture‐induced speech‐object mismatch elicited LIFG and pMTG activation.The mentalizing system was involved in comprehending speech without pointing.The findings extend our knowledge of comprehending everyday multimodal communication.
Infant Behavior & Development | 2018
Laura E. Hahn; Titia Benders; Tineke M. Snijders; Paula Fikkert
Childrens songs often contain rhyming words at phrase endings. In this study, we investigated whether infants can already recognize this phonological pattern in songs. Earlier studies using lists of spoken words were equivocal on infants spontaneous processing of rhymes (Hayes et al., 2000; Jusczyk et al., 1999). Songs, however, constitute an ecologically valid rhyming stimulus, which could allow for spontaneous processing of this phonological pattern in infants. Novel childrens songs with rhyming and non-rhyming lyrics using pseudo-words were presented to 35 9-month-old Dutch infants using the Headturn Preference Procedure. Infants on average listened longer to the non-rhyming songs, with around half of the infants however exhibiting a preference for the rhyming songs. These results highlight that infants have the processing abilities to benefit from their natural rhyming input for the development of their phonological abilities.
Brain and Language | 2016
Ferdy Hubers; Tineke M. Snijders; Helen de Hoop
Native speakers of Dutch do not always adhere to prescriptive grammar rules in their daily speech. These grammatical norm violations can elicit emotional reactions in language purists, mostly high-educated people, who claim that for them these constructions are truly ungrammatical. However, linguists generally assume that grammatical norm violations are in fact truly grammatical, especially when they occur frequently in a language. In an fMRI study we investigated the processing of grammatical norm violations in the brains of language purists, and compared them with truly grammatical and truly ungrammatical sentences. Grammatical norm violations were found to be unique in that their processing resembled not only the processing of truly grammatical sentences (in left medial Superior Frontal Gyrus and Angular Gyrus), but also that of truly ungrammatical sentences (in Inferior Frontal Gyrus), despite what theories of grammar would usually lead us to believe.
theoretical issues sign language research | 2016
E.A. Ormel; M. Giezen; M. van Zuilen; Tineke M. Snijders; L. Smoll; N. Schiller
the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neurobiology of Language (SNL 2016) | 2016
Tineke M. Snijders; Titia Benders; Paula Fikkert
the Developing Mind Series - Developmental Perspectives on Language Processing | 2016
Titia Benders; Tineke M. Snijders; Paula Fikkert
the 2nd Workshop on Psycholinguistic Approaches to Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions | 2016
S. Arana; L. Rommers; Peter Hagoort; Tineke M. Snijders; Anne Kösem
the 2nd Workshop on Psycholinguistic Approaches to Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions | 2016
L. Hahn; Titia Benders; Tineke M. Snijders; Paula Fikkert
the Workshop on Infant Speech Perception,(WISP) | 2015
Titia Benders; Tineke M. Snijders; Paula Fikkert
the 7th Annual Society for the Neurobiology of Language Conference (SNL 2015) | 2015
Julia Udden; Tineke M. Snijders; Simon E. Fisher; Peter Hagoort