Tobias Meister

Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is the first choice endoscopic technique for small-bowel visualization. However, preparation and handling of the double-balloon enteroscope is complex. Recently, a single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) system has been introduced as being a simplified, less-complex balloon-assisted enteroscopy system. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study was a randomized international multicenter trial comparing two balloon-assisted enteroscopy systems: DBE vs. SBE. Consecutive patients referred for balloon-assisted enteroscopy were randomized to either DBE or SBE. Patients were blinded with regard to the type of instrument used. The primary study outcome was oral insertion depth. Secondary outcomes included complete small-bowel visualization, anal insertion depth, patient discomfort, and adverse events. Patient discomfort during and after the procedure was scored using a visual analog scale. RESULTS A total of 130 patients were included over 12 months: 65 with DBE and 65 with the SBE technique. Patient and procedure characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Mean oral intubation depth was 253 cm with DBE and 258 cm with SBE, showing noninferiority of SBE vs. DBE. Complete visualization of the small bowel was achieved in 18 % and 11 % of procedures in the DBE and SBE groups, respectively. Mean anal intubation depth was 107 cm in the DBE group and 118 cm in the SBE group. Diagnostic yield and mean pain scores during and after the procedures were similar in the two groups. No adverse events were observed during or after the examinations. CONCLUSIONS This head-to-head comparison study shows that DBE and SBE have a comparable performance and diagnostic yield for evaluation of the small bowel.

Post-ERCP pancreatitis in 2364 ERCP procedures: is intraductal ultrasonography another risk factor?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Acute pancreatitis is considered a relevant major complication following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); according to literature data, the incidence varies between 1.5 % and 17 %. In the present study, we aimed to identify potentially new, hitherto unknown risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 2364 ERCP procedures performed in 1275 patients during the years 2004 - 2008 were included in the study. Post-ERCP pancreatitis was defined as acute abdominal pain within 48 hours following ERCP with at least 3-fold elevated levels of serum lipase and a requirement for analgesic drugs for at least 24 hours. The severity of the pancreatitis was determined using the Imrie score. RESULTS In our cohort study a total of 54 different patients (2.3 %) developed post-ERCP pancreatitis. In 50 of these patients (92.6 %) the pancreatitis was mild; in 54 (7.4 %) it was severe. Patients with post-ERCP pancreatitis had highly significantly lower bilirubin levels than patients who did not have post-ERCP pancreatitis ( P < 0.001). Length of hospital stay, duration of analgesics, and need for analgesic drugs were significantly higher in patients suffering from severe pancreatitis ( P ≤ 0.01). In multivariate analysis, among other, already well-described risk factors we identified intraductal ultrasonography as another risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis, with a hazard ratio of 2.41 ( P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS According to our retrospective data, intraductal ultrasonography seems to be another independent risk factor for developing post-ERCP pancreatitis, which needs to be further elucidated in prospective studies.

Single-step versus multi-step transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: the use of cystostome is effective and timesaving.

Abstract Background and aims. Pancreatic pseudocysts are a major complication of chronic and acute pancreatitis and often require endoscopic intervention. Endoscopic single-step and multi-step transmural drainage techniques have been reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare technical results and clinical outcome rates of the single-step versus multi-step endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided endoscopic transmural drainage in patients with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts of >4 cm size. Design. Retrospective study at an academic tertiary referral center. Patients and methods. A total of 38 consecutive patients comprising 42 interventions were studied: 16 patients with pancreatic pseudocysts (18 interventions) had undergone single-step EUS-guided transmural cystostome drainage between 2007 and 2010. Results were compared with a cohort of 22 patients who had submitted to multi-step EUS-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in 24 cases between 2005 and 2007. Results. The technical success rate for using the single-step procedure was 94% compared with multi-step procedure with 83% (n.s.). Primary clinical success rate was 88% for single-step drainage and 90% for the multi-step approach (n.s.). The mean procedure time was 36 ± 9 min in the single-step group compared with 62 ± 12 min for the multi-step access (p < 0.001). Conclusions. The use of single-step cystostome appears useful in managing selected patients with symptomatic pancreatic pseudocysts as it is effective and timesaving.

Endoscopic ultrasound in staging esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy – results of a multicenter cohort analysis

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is considered a gold standard in the initial staging of esophageal cancer. There is an ongoing debate whether EUS is useful for tumor staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).MethodsNinety-five patients with esophageal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. In 45 patients, EUS was performed prior to and after NAC, while 50 patients had no induction therapy. Histological correlation through surgery was available. uT/uN classifications were compared to pT/pN stages. Statistical analysis included calculation of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates. Agreement between endosonography and T staging was assessed with Cohens kappa statistics.ResultsFor those patients with prior NAC, overall accuracy of yuT and yuN classification was 29 and 62%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates for local tumor extension after NAC were as follows (%): T1: –/97/84, T2: 13/76/53, T3:86/29/46, T4:20/100/91, T1/2: 27/83/56, T3/4: 89/31/56. Cohens kappa indicated poor agreement (kappa = 0.129) between yuT classification and ypT stage. Relative to positive lymph node detection, sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 6%, respectively (kappa = 0.06). T stage was overstaged in 23 (51%) and understaged in seven (16%) patients.ConclusionEUS is an unreliable tool for staging esophageal cancer after NAC. Overstaging of the T stage is common after NAC.

Outcome of supraselective transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract Objective. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common tumor in cirrhotic patients with a median survival of only 8–10 months if untreated. Supraselective transarterial chemoembolization (STACE) is supposed to be a well-established method for treating HCC patients. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of STACE on post-transplant survival in patients with HCC. Material and Methods. The charts of 53 HCC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-seven patients had STACE as a bridging therapy while 26 patients were scheduled for liver transplantation (LTX) without prior STACE therapy. A total of 53% of the patients who underwent LTX preoperatively fulfilled the Milan criteria, while 70.6% fulfilled the expanded University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) transplant criteria. Primary endpoint was the post-transplant survival. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier-method, log rank, and chi square tests. Results. Between the LTX groups (STACE vs. non-STACE), there was no significant difference in terms of age, Child classification, Okuda stage, co-morbidities, underlying disease, and post-transplant survival (p > 0.05). Independent of prior STACE, however, disease-free survival after LTX was highly significantly prolonged if LTX was performed within 3 months after initial diagnosis of HCC (p < 0.01) or if patients met the expanded transplant UCSF criteria (p = 0.02). Post-transplant survival did not depend on tumor size. Conclusions. We conclude that STACE performed prior to LTX does not secure any post-transplant survival benefit, while early LTX, i.e. within 3 months after HCC diagnosis, does improve survival regardless of whether STACE was performed or not. Additionally, fulfillment of the expanded transplant UCSF criteria leads to a prolonged post-transplant survival.