Todd D. Royer
University of Delaware
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Todd D. Royer.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | 2000
Sarah J. Mattes; Philip E. Martin; Todd D. Royer
OBJECTIVES To investigate the hypothesis that increasing the mass and moment of inertia of the prosthetic limb of people with unilateral, transtibial amputations to match the mass and moment of inertia of the intact limb improves walking symmetry without increasing energy cost. DESIGN Gait symmetry and metabolic energy cost of walking for six subjects with unilateral, transtibial amputations were evaluated under three prosthesis loading conditions. SETTING University research laboratory. SUBJECTS Six ambulatory individuals with unilateral, transtibial amputations. INTERVENTIONS Subjects walked at 1.34 m/sec under three prosthetic limb loading conditions: (1) no added load; (2) loading that produced a match of prosthetic shank and foot mass and moment of inertia with those of the intact limb (100% load); and (3) a load that was half that of the 100% condition (50% load). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Step length, swing time, stance time, and metabolic energy expenditure. RESULTS As mass and moment of inertia of the prosthetic limb became more closely matched to the intact limb, step length, swing time, and stance time became less symmetrical. Energy cost for the 100% load condition was significantly greater (6% to 7%) than the baseline and 50% conditions. CONCLUSIONS The loading configuration required to produce a match in the moments of inertia of the prosthetic and intact lower legs resulted in greater gait asymmetry and higher energy cost.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport | 2010
Rebecca E. Fellin; William C. Rose; Todd D. Royer; Irene S. Davis
When analysing gait, the identification of the period of stance is often needed. Forceplates are typically used, but in their absence kinematic data can be employed. Five kinematic methods have been previously described in the literature. However, these methods have not been compared to each other for overground or treadmill running. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare these five kinematic methods of identifying the stance phase with vertical ground reaction force data both during overground and treadmill running. We recruited forty recreational runners (20 males) for this study. Twenty runners underwent an instrumented gait analysis during overground running, and twenty were tested during instrumented treadmill running. All runners ran at 3.35 m/s. Each kinematic method was compared with stance identified from the vertical ground reaction force (gold standard) for overground running. This method was then repeated for treadmill running. Two methods were found to be valid and reliable for determining footstrike. These were the time when the distal heel marker reached a minimum vertical position, and when the vertical velocity of this same marker changed from negative to positive. These methods had absolute errors that ranged from 22.4 ms to 24.6 ms for both modes of running. Toe-off was best identified using peak knee extension, with absolute errors of 4.9 ms for overground running and 5.2 ms for treadmill running. Utilising automated kinematic methods of determining stance will aid researchers studying running when forceplates are unavailable.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume | 2006
David Hudson; Todd D. Royer; James G. Richards
BACKGROUND The purpose of the present study was to determine the validity and reliability of using ultrasound to measure tibial and femoral torsion. METHODS In vitro ultrasound measurements of torsion in 118 matched dried tibiae and femora were compared with direct anatomical measurements with use of simple regression. The second part of the study involved repeated in vivo ultrasound measurements made on twenty adult limbs to determine the clinical reliability of our methods. RESULTS The in vitro ultrasound measurements of femoral and tibial torsion were significantly related to the anatomical measurements (p < 0.001 for both). The inter-rater correlation coefficients between three examiners were 0.84 for both the tibial and femoral measurements, and the intra-rater correlation coefficients ranged from 0.86 to 0.98. The in vivo measurements were similar to the in vitro measurements, and the intra-rater correlation coefficients for repeated measures were 0.91 and 0.93 for femoral and tibial torsion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound is a viable tool for measuring torsion of the tibia and femur. In order to minimize measurement errors, the ultrasound measurement should be used to calculate the predicted value of torsion with use of the regression equation.
Human Movement Science | 2008
Rebecca Avrin Zifchock; Irene S. Davis; Jill S. Higginson; Steven T. McCaw; Todd D. Royer
Despite the number of studies examining factors associated with overuse running injury, little is known about why an individual gets injured on a particular side of the body. Abnormal levels of several strength, structural, kinetic, and kinematic factors have been attributed to injury susceptibility. However, while most studies have compared the injured limb of injured runners to an arbitrary limb of healthy controls, there is some evidence to suggest that injury risk is related to characteristics on both sides of a runner. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate how bilateral characteristics of strength, structural, kinetic, and kinematic factors relate to overuse injury. The first purpose was to compare these factors between the injured and uninjured limbs of runners with a history of injury on only one side of their bodies. The results showed that hip internal rotation range of motion and peak tibial acceleration were both elevated on the side with a history of injury. The second purpose was to compare asymmetry levels between the injured runners and runners who had never sustained a running-related injury. Asymmetry levels were similar between groups for all variables, which suggests that some level of asymmetry is normal. The final purpose of the study was to compare bilateral values of these factors between the injured and uninjured runners. The results showed that hip internal rotation range of motion, as well as the deviation from normal arch height index, were bilaterally elevated in the injured runners. Although peak tibial acceleration was different between sides of the injured runners, it was not bilaterally elevated compared to the uninjured runners. These results support the notion that injury risk may be related to risk factors on both sides.
Knee | 2009
Joaquin A. Barrios; Jeremy R. Crenshaw; Todd D. Royer; Irene S. Davis
The purpose of the study was to examine the clinical efficacy of individually prescribed laterally wedged orthoses and walking shoes in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis using a prospective, single-blind, block-randomized controlled design. Sixty-six subjects (29 males, 37 females, mean age 62.4 years, mean BMI 33.0 kg/m(2)) were block-randomized to a lateral wedge (treatment) or neutral (control) orthotic group. Both groups were issued a standardized walking shoe for use with the orthoses. Primary outcome measures included the pain, stiffness, and functional limitations subscales of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index. Secondary outcome measures included the 6-minute walk distance and pain change, and stair negotiation time and pain change. A significant interaction (p=0.039) favoring the treatment group was observed for pain change during the 6-minute walk. The treatment group demonstrated significant improvements at both 1 month (p<0.001) and 1 year (p<0.001) compared to baseline. The control group only demonstrated significant improvements at 1 year (p=0.017). No other interactions were observed. Both groups were improved at each follow-up in the WOMAC subscales for pain (p<0.001), stiffness (p<0.001), and physical function (p<0.001). Both groups also improved in 6-minute walk test distance (p<0.001), stair negotiation test time (p=0.004), and stair negotiation test pain change (p<0.001). The results suggest that both neutral and laterally wedged orthoses may be beneficial in the management of medial knee osteoarthritis when used with walking shoes. However, the addition of lateral wedging was associated with early improvements in 6-minute walk test pain change not seen in the control group.
American Journal of Sports Medicine | 2012
Gregory M. Gutierrez; Christopher A. Knight; Charles B. Swanik; Todd D. Royer; Kurt Manal; Brian Caulfield; Thomas W. Kaminski
Background: Ankle instability is a costly public health concern because of the associated recurrent sprains. It is evident there are neuromuscular control deficits predisposing these individuals to their ankle “giving way.” Individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprain, who did not develop instability, may hold the key to understanding proper neuromuscular control after injury. Hypotheses: On the basis of previous research, the authors hypothesized that individuals with ankle instability would demonstrate reduced peroneal activation, causing a more inverted position of the ankle, before and after landing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate preparatory and reactive neuromuscular control when landing on a custom-designed ankle supinating device in individuals with ankle instability (AI), individuals with a history of lateral ankle sprains without instability (LAS), and uninjured controls (CON). Forty-five participants (15 per group) were asked to land on a device built to simulate the mechanism of a lateral ankle sprain (supination) while kinematics and muscle activity of the lower extremity were monitored. Results: Contrary to our hypotheses, the AI group displayed significantly increased preparatory (P = .01) and reactive (P = .02) peroneal activation, while the LAS group demonstrated a trend toward increased preparatory tibialis anterior muscle activation (P = .07), leading to a decreased plantar flexion of the ankle at landing. Conclusion: The AI group was likely acting in a protective fashion to a potentially injurious situation, indicating these individuals can activate the peroneals if needed. The LAS group’s strategy may be a safer strategy in that a less plantar-flexed position of the ankle is more close-packed and stable. Further, it appears the long-latency response of the peroneals may be enhanced in these individuals, which indicates motor learning at the supraspinal level to promote dynamic restraint. Clinical Relevance: Individuals with AI can increase peroneal activation when necessary to dynamically stabilize the ankle, indicating the potential for training/rehabilitation. Further, the LAS group may deploy a different control strategy after injury to protect the ankle from subsequent sprains, which deserves investigation during activities of daily living. A greater understanding of these strategies will lead to the development of more appropriate treatment paradigms after injury to minimize the incidence of instability.
Prosthetics and Orthotics International | 2009
Robert J. Butler; Joaquin A. Barrios; Todd D. Royer; Irene S. Davis
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of laterally wedged foot orthotic devices, used to treat knee osteoarthritis, on frontal plane mechanics at the rearfoot and hip during walking. Thirty individuals with diagnosed medial knee osteoarthritis were recruited for this study. Three dimensional kinematics and kinetics were recorded as the subjects walked in the laboratory at an intentional walking speed. Peak eversion, eversion excursion and peak eversion moment were increased while the peak knee adduction moment was reduced in the laterally wedged orthotic condition compared to the no wedge condition. In contrast, no changes were observed in the variables of interest at the hip. There was no significant relationship between the change in the peak frontal plane moment at the rearfoot and change in the peak frontal plane moment at the knee or hip as a result of the lateral wedge. Laterally wedged foot orthotic devices, used to treat knee osteoarthritis, do not influence hip mechanics. However, they do result in increased rearfoot eversion and inversion moment. Therefore, a full medical screen of the foot should occur before laterally wedged foot orthotic devices are prescribed as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis.
Foot & Ankle International | 2010
Katherine E. Morrison; David Hudson; Irene S. Davis; James G. Richards; Todd D. Royer; Tracy A. Dierks; Thomas W. Kaminski
Background: It has been suggested that dynamic foot and ankle mechanics predispose individuals with CAI to repetitive episodes of the ankle “giving way.” Plantar pressure variations during a walking gait have been detected in those with CAI, but more dynamic conditions for analysis are needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate plantar pressure distributions during a running gait in individuals with CAI, individuals who suffered a lateral ankle sprain, but did not develop CAI (AS), and subjects with no history of a lateral ankle sprain (CON). Materials and Methods: Forty-five subjects [15 in each group, healthy males (18) and females (27), age 18 to 45] were recruited from University communities to participate in this study. Plantar pressure distributions were analyzed on a Tekscancopy; plantar pressure mat at 66 frames per second during a running gait at a controlled speed. The following variables were obtained: rearfoot medial/lateral (M/L) pressure ratio at foot strike (FS) and center-of-pressure (COP) trajectory during the initial loading response (heel strike to initial peak GRF). Separate one-way ANOVA with Tukeys post-hoc were used to test for group differences. The significance level was defined as p < 0.05. Results: The CAI group had a significantly more lateral ratio (0.97 ± 0.12) at FS when compared to the CON (1.01 ± 0.13) and AS (1.11 ± 0.13) groups. The CAI subjects had a lateral COP trajectory during the loading phase (7.97 degrees ± 11.02), while both the AS (−3.68 degrees ± 10.24) and CON groups (−6.27 degrees ± 9.86) had medial trajectories. The difference was significant between the CAI group and both the AS and CON groups (all significant p values were less than 0.05). Conclusion: Our results confirm that CAI subjects have a more lateral foot positioning and loading pattern during a barefoot running gait when compared to both the CON and LAS groups. Clinical Relevance: Clinicians treating patients with CAI should consider providing interventions to decrease the amount of rearfoot inversion at FS and during loading in order to create a more medial COP trajectory upon impact.
Physical Therapy | 2011
Robert J. Butler; Joaquin A. Barrios; Todd D. Royer; Irene S. Davis
Background The majority of research on gait mechanics in knee osteoarthritis has focused on people with medial compartment involvement. As a result, little is known about the gait mechanics of people with the less common, lateral compartment disease. Objective The objective of this study was to compare walking mechanics—specifically, differences in frontal-plane lower-extremity kinematics and kinetics—in people with medial knee osteoarthritis, people with lateral knee osteoarthritis, and people who were healthy. Design A cross-sectional design was used. Methods Fifteen people with medial knee osteoarthritis, 15 people with lateral knee osteoarthritis, and 15 people who were healthy (control group) were recruited for the study. All participants underwent a gait analysis at an intentional walking speed. The variables of interest for the study were peak frontal-plane moments and angles and angular excursions of the lower extremity during the stance phase of gait. Data were statistically analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance. Results Participants with lateral knee osteoarthritis exhibited significantly less knee adduction excursion, lower peak knee abduction moment, and lower peak rear-foot eversion compared with the control group and the medial knee osteoarthritis group. Limitations Participants in the control group were approximately 10 years younger than participants with knee osteoarthritis. Despite this difference, neither body mass index nor gait speed, each of which is a factor with a stronger influence on gait mechanics, differed among the groups. Conclusions Participants with lateral knee osteoarthritis exhibited frontal-plane gait mechanics at the knee and rear foot that were different from those of participants with medial knee osteoarthritis. The results of this study may guide the development of interventions specific to treating people with lateral knee osteoarthritis.
Clinical Biomechanics | 2009
Joaquin A. Barrios; Jill S. Higginson; Todd D. Royer; Irene S. Davis
BACKGROUND Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis often present with varus knee alignment and ambulate with increased knee adduction moments. Understanding the factors that relate to the knee adduction moment in healthy individuals may provide insight into the development of this disease. Thus, this study aimed to examine the relationships of both static and dynamic lower extremity measures with the knee adduction moment. We hypothesized that the dynamic measures would be more closely related to this moment. METHODS Arch height index, hip abduction strength and two static measures of knee alignment were recorded for 37 young asymptomatic knees that varied from normal to varus-aligned. Overground gait analyses were also performed. Correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationships between the static and dynamic variables to the knee adduction moment. Hierarchical regression analyses were then conducted using the static measures, the dynamic measures, and the static and dynamic measures together. RESULTS Among the static measures, the tibial mechanical axis and the distance between the medial knee joint lines were correlated with the knee adduction moment. The best predictive static model (R(2)=0.53) included only the tibial mechanical axis. Among the dynamic variables, knee adduction and rearfoot eversion angles were correlated with the knee adduction moment. Knee adduction and rearfoot eversion, together, were the best dynamic model (R(2)=0.53). The static and dynamic measures together created the strongest of the three models (R(2)=0.59). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that dynamic measures slightly enhance the predictive strength of static measures when explaining variation in the knee adduction moment.