Todd Lanman
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Todd Lanman.
Spine | 2007
Scott P. Leary; John J. Regan; Todd Lanman; Willis H. Wagner
Study Design. A large case series of anterior revision surgery in patients who had complications following lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ artificial disc. Objectives. To analyze and discuss the etiology of implant-related complications and to present a strategy that can be applied to lumbar intervertebral disc prostheses in cases where anterior revision surgery is necessary. Summary of Background Data. This report represents the largest single-site, consecutive case series reported in the literature of anterior revision surgery following lumbar disc arthroplasty. Methods. A total of 18 patients are included in this study. All patients required an anterior revision procedure for repositioning or removal of the prosthesis. The mean time to revision was 6 months (range, 9 days to 4 years). Results. In 17 of 20 cases, implant removal was required and the patient was converted to a fusion. In 3 cases, primary revision of the CHARITÉ artificial disc was performed. Six revision cases were performed within the early postoperative period, defined as 7 to 14 days. All early cases were approached via reexploration of the original anterior midline retroperitoneal incision. Late revision was required in 14 cases, ranging from 3 weeks to 4 years following initial arthroplasty. A variety of surgical approaches were used in late revisions, including the lateral transpsoas approach at L3–L4 or L4–L5 (n = 5), expanded ipsilateral left retroperitoneal approach at L4–L5 (n = 2), contralateral right retroperitoneal approach at L5–S1 (n = 6), and transperitoneal approach (n = 1). Following 20 consecutive, anterior revision procedures, implant revision was successfully achieved in all cases. Conclusions. Total disc replacement implant revisions occur largely as a result of technical errors in positioning and sizing of the implant. In addition, adherence to strict patient selection criteria will eliminate many cases of implant failure. When necessary, anterior revision surgery can be performed safely when a strategic approach is used.
Journal of Vascular Surgery | 2006
Willis H. Wagner; John J. Regan; Scott P. Leary; Todd Lanman; J. Patrick Johnson; Rajeev K. Rao; David V. Cossman
The Spine Journal | 2017
Jason M. Cuellar; Todd Lanman
The Spine Journal | 2015
Matthew F. Gornet; Jeffrey R. McConnell; J. Kenneth Burkus; Todd Lanman; Randall F. Dryer; Scott D. Hodges; Hui Nian; Frank E. Harrell
The Spine Journal | 2004
Todd Lanman; Theodore Goldstein; Thomas J. Hopkins
The Spine Journal | 2008
Pablo R. Pazmiño; Carl Lauryssen; Todd Lanman
Operative Techniques: Spine Surgery (Third Edition) | 2018
Jason M. Cuellar; Terrence T. Kim; Neil Bhamb; Todd Lanman
The Spine Journal | 2016
Matthew F. Gornet; Todd Lanman; J. Kenneth Burkus; Randall F. Dryer; Jeffrey R. McConnell; Scott D. Hodges
The Spine Journal | 2011
Matthew F. Gornet; Brett A. Taylor; Todd Lanman; John Peloza; Randall F. Dryer; Francine W. Schranck
The Spine Journal | 2009
Randall F. Dryer; Todd Lanman; Brett Gunter; Isa Canavati