Todd Pulerwitz

Echocardiography-Guided Interventions

A major advantage of echocardiography over other advanced imaging modalities (magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomographic angiography) is that echocardiography is mobile and real time. Echocardiograms can be recorded at the bedside, in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, in the cardiovascular intensive care unit, in the emergency room-indeed, any place that can accommodate a wheeled cart. This tremendous advantage allows for the performance of imaging immediately before, during, and after various procedures involving interventions. The purpose of this report is to review the use of echocardiography to guide interventions. We provide information on the selection of patients for interventions, monitoring during the performance of interventions, and assessing the effects of interventions after their completion. In this document, we address the use of echocardiography in commonly performed procedures: transatrial septal catheterization, pericardiocentesis, myocardial biopsy, percutaneous transvenous balloon valvuloplasty, catheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) and patent foramen ovale (PFO), alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and cardiac electrophysiology. A concluding section addresses interventions that are presently investigational but are likely to enter the realm of practice in the very near future: complex mitral valve repairs, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion devices, 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic guidance, and percutaneous aortic valve replacement. The use of echocardiography to select and guide cardiac resynchronization therapy has recently been addressed in a separate document published by the American Society of Echocardiography and is not further discussed in this document. The use of imaging techniques to guide even well-established procedures enhances the efficiency and safety of these procedures.

Clinical utility of new real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography in assessment of mitral valve prolapse.

Background: Noninvasive and accurate assessment of mitral valve anatomy has become integral in the presurgical evaluation of patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Recently developed real time three‐dimensional (RT3D) ultrasound allows online acquisition, rendering, and can provide accurate information on cardiac structures. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of RT3D for the assessment of MVP segments when compared with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intraoperative findings. Methods: We examined 42 patients with MVP using RT3D, two‐dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and TEE. For RT3D analysis, cropping planes were used to slice the 3D volume on line to visualize the prolapsed segments of the mitral valve leaflets. The mitral valve was divided into six segments based on the American Society of Echocardiographys recommendations. Two experienced cardiologists evaluated echocardiographic images. Results: Adequate RT3D images of the mitral valve were acquired in 40 out of 42 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of RT3D for defining prolapsed segments when compared with TEE were 95% and 99%, respectively (anterior leaflet: 96% and 99%, posterior leaflets: 93% and 100%, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of TTE were 93% and 97%, respectively (anterior leaflet: 96% and 98%, posterior leaflets: 90% and 97%, respectively). Interobserver agreement for RT3D (Kappa 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.00) was significantly greater than for TTE (Kappa 0.85, 95% CI 0.78–0.93) (P < 0.05). The elapsed time for completion of RT3D (14.4 ± 2.8 min) was shorter than for TEE (26.4 ± 4.7 min, P < 0.0001) and TTE (19.0 ± 3.1 min, P< 0.0001). Conclusions: RT3D is fast, accurate, and highly reproducible for assessing MVP.

A rationale for the use of anticoagulation in heart failure management.

Heart failure is a major public health concern for which treatment options have continued to evolve. While specific therapies such as beta blockers and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to decrease hospitalizations and improve survival, the benefits of anticoagulation are less clear. Clinical guidelines detailing the appropriate use of anticoagulation for the management of atrial fibrillation and embolic stroke exist, but similar recommendations for their use in isolated cardiac dysfunction are lacking. Epidemiologic studies have documented increased risk of thrombus formation and stroke occurrence in patients with cardiomyopathy that is inversely related to ejection fraction. However, it remains at the clinicians discretion to determine at what degree of left ventricular dysfunction the potential benefits of stroke reduction outweigh the risks of undesirable bleeding with anticoagulation. This paper summarizes the pathophysiology of thrombus formation in heart failure patients; reviews previous studies and current recommendations for anticoagulation; provides a clinical rationale for anticoagulation when conclusive data are lacking; and discusses ongoing clinical trials designed to clarify these issues.

Comparison between Three-Dimensional Echocardiography and Computed Tomography for Comprehensive Tricuspid Annulus and Valve Assessment in Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Implications for Tricuspid Regurgitation Grading and Transcatheter Therapies

Background: Tricuspid valve imaging is frequently challenging and requires the use of multiple modalities. Knowledge of limitations and methodologic discrepancies among different imaging techniques is crucial for planning transcatheter valve interventions. Methods: Thirty‐eight patients with severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation were included in this retrospective analysis. Tricuspid annulus (TA) measurements were made during mid‐diastole using three‐dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiographic direct planimetry (TTE_direct) and transesophageal echocardiographic direct planimetry (TEE_direct). Moreover, a semiautomated software was used to generate two‐dimensional (2D) and 3D perimeter and area on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images. Both methods were compared with direct computed tomographic planimetry (CT_direct) and cubic spline interpolation (CT_indirect). The different TA values were used to calculate the effective regurgitant orifice area and compared with 3D Doppler vena contracta area. For tricuspid valve area TEE_direct and CT_direct as well as CT_indirect were measured. Results: Agreement between TEE and computed tomography (CT) for TA sizing was obtained using semiautomated methods (3D TEE_indirect and CT_indirect). TTE_direct was overall less reliable compared with CT. TA area quantified by TEE_direct was 25% (difference 305 ± 238 mm2, P < .001, R = 0.9) and 19% (166 ± 247 mm2, P < .001, R = 0.89) smaller compared with CT_direct and CT_indirect, respectively. TA perimeter measurements by TEE_direct differed by 11% compared with CT_direct (12 ± 11 mm, P < .001, R = 0.87) and 3D CT_indirect (12 ± 11 mm, P < .001, R = 0.88), and 9% compared with 2D CT_indirect (7 ± 11 mm, P = .002, R = 0.87). TEE_direct of the TA allows the most accurate calculation of effective regurgitant orifice area compared with 3D vena contracta area (−8 ± 62 mm2, P = .50, R = 0.85). Tricuspid valve area by CT_indirect best correlated with conventional TEE_direct (80 ± 250 mm2, P = .11, R = 0.80). Conclusions: In patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, semiautomated indirect planimetry results in high agreement between TEE and CT for TA sizing and measurement of the tricuspid valve area. TEE_direct of the TA allows the most accurate measurement of diastolic stroke volume for the calculation of regurgitation severity compared with 3D vena contracta area. HIGHLIGHTSTV imaging is frequently challenging and requires the use of multimodality imaging.Knowledge of methodologic discrepancies is crucial for preprocedural planning.Semiautomated indirect planimetry results in high agreement between TEE and CT.