Toine C. G. Egberts

Frequency and determinants of drug administration errors in the intensive care unit

Objective The study aimed to identify both the frequency and the determinants of drug administration errors in the intensive care unit. Design Administration errors were detected by using the disguised-observation technique (observation of medication administrations by nurses, without revealing the aim of this observation to the nurses). Setting Two Dutch hospitals. Patients The drug administrations to patients in the intensive care units of two Dutch hospitals were observed during five consecutive days. Interventions None. Measurements and Main Results A total of 233 medications for 24 patients were observed to be administered (whether ordered or not) or were observed to be omitted. When wrong time errors were included, 104 administrations with at least one error were observed (frequency, 44.6%), and when they were excluded, 77 administrations with at least one error were observed (frequency, 33.0%). When we included wrong time errors, day of the week (Monday, odds ratio [OR] 2.69, confidence interval [CI] 1.42–5.10), time of day (6–10 pm, OR 0.28, CI 0.10–0.78), and drug class (gastrointestinal, OR 2.94, CI 1.48–5.85; blood, OR 0.12, CI 0.03–0.54; and cardiovascular, OR 0.38, CI, 0.16–0.90) were associated with the occurrence of errors. When we excluded wrong time errors, day of the week (Monday, OR 3.14, CI 1.66–5.94), drug class (gastrointestinal, OR 3.47, CI 1.76–6.82; blood, OR 0.21, CI 0.05–0.91; and respiratory, OR 0.22, CI 0.08–0.60), and route of administration (oral by gastric tube, OR 5.60, CI 1.70–18.49) were associated with the occurrence of errors. In the hospital without full-time specialized intensive care physicians (which also lacks pharmacy-provided protocols for the preparation of parenteral drugs), more administration errors occurred, both when we included (OR 5.45, CI 3.04–9.78) and excluded wrong time errors (OR 4.22, CI 2.36–7.54). Conclusions Efforts to reduce drug administration errors in the intensive care unit should be aimed at the risk factors we identified in this study. Especially, focusing on system differences between the two intensive care units (e.g., presence or absence of full-time specialized intensive care physicians, presence or absence of protocols for the preparation of all parenteral drugs) may help reduce suboptimal drug administration.

Incidence of fractures among epilepsy patients: a population-based retrospective cohort study in the General Practice Research Database.

Summary:  Purpose: To compare the incidence of various fractures in a cohort of patients with epilepsy with a reference cohort of patients not having epilepsy.

Pharmacogenetics: From Bench to Byte

Despite initial enthusiasm, 1 , 2 , 3 the use of pharmacogenetics has remained limited to investigation in only a few clinical fields such as oncology and psychiatry. 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 The main reason is the paucity of scientific evidence to show that pharmacogenetic testing leads to improved clinical outcomes. 9 , 10 Moreover, for most pharmacogenetic tests (such as tests for genetic variants of cytochrome P450 enzymes) a detailed knowledge of pharmacology is a prerequisite for application in clinical practice, and both physicians and pharmacists might find it difficult to interpret the clinical value of pharmacogenetic test results. Guidelines that link the result of a pharmacogenetic test to therapeutic recommendations might help to overcome these problems, but such guidelines are only sparsely available. In 2001, an early step was taken to develop such guidelines for the therapeutic use of antidepressants, and these included CYP2D6‐related dose recommendations drawn from pharmacokinetic study data. 11 However, the use of such recommendations in routine clinical practice remains difficult, because they are currently outside the ambit of the clinical environment and are not accessible during the decision‐making process by physicians and pharmacists, namely the prescription and dispensing of drugs.

Drug-Related Problems in Hospitalised Patients

Drug-related problems include medication errors (involving an error in the process of prescribing, dispensing, or administering a drug, whether there are adverse consequences or not) and adverse drug reactions (any response to a drug which is noxious and unintended, and which occurs at doses normally used in humans for prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy of disease, or for the modification of physiological function). Furthermore, adverse drug events can be defined as an injury — whether or not causally-related to the use of a drug.Drug-related problems are relatively common in hospitalised patients and can result in patient morbidity and mortality, and increased costs. In order to get an overview of studies on drug-related problems in hospitalised patients, with specific attention to the incidence of drug-related problems and their costs, to the possibilities of prevention and to the effect of these interventions, we performed a literature search.Incidences of medication errors reported in studies vary widely. The range of reported incidences of adverse drug reactions is even wider. These wide ranges can be largely explained by the different study methods and definitions used.Problems related to drug therapy may be averted by preventive interventions. Several possibilities for prevention exist, especially for the prevention of medication errors. Prescribing, transcription and interpretation errors can be reduced by using computerised physician order entry. Together with the use of automated dispensing systems and bar-code technology, this will aid in the reduction of both dispensing and administration errors. Education of nursing staff involved in the process of drug distribution is another important measure for preventing medication errors. Finally, the introduction of systems for the early detection of adverse drug reactions may help to reduce problems related to drug therapy. Identifying risk factors that contribute to the development of adverse drug reactions, may aid in the prevention of these reactions.

Pharmacist-Based Medication Review Reduces Potential Drug-Related Problems in the Elderly The SMOG Controlled Trial

AbstractBackground: The high prevalence of drug-related problems (DRPs) in the elderly, occurring as a result of multiple drug use combined with age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, is a well known phenomenon. However, effective intervention strategies are uncommon. Objective: A pharmacy-based controlled trial (SMOG [Screening Medicatie Oudere Geneesmiddelgebruiker; Screening Medications in the Older Drug User]) was performed to investigate whether a community pharmacist-led intervention reduces the number of potential DRPs in patients aged ≥65 years using six or more drugs concomitantly. Methods: This intervention study was conducted from June 2002 until June 2003 in 16 community pharmacies in the Netherlands. Medication assessment was undertaken in elderly patients aged ≥65 years using six or more drugs concomitantly on the date of inclusion. Ten types of potential DRPs were determined and grouped into the following three categories: (i) patient-related potential DRPs: non-compliance; (ii) prescriber-related potential DRPs: expired indication, therapeutic duplication, inappropriate dosage (over- and under-dosage), off-label use, undertreatment, inconvenience of use; and (iii) drug-related potential DRPs: contraindications, drug-drug interactions, drug treatment of adverse drug reactions.A list of recommended changes in medication was compiled by the pharmacist for the patients in the intervention group. Recommendations for medication change were discussed with the general practitioner (GP). Four months after the date of inclusion, the medications of each patient were again reviewed and screened for potential DRPs. The primary outcome corresponded to the change in the number of potential DRPs; the secondary outcome was related to the change in number of used medications between the intervention group and the control group at baseline and 4 months later. Results: A total of 174 patients were analysed: 87 patients in the intervention arm and 87 patients in the usual care arm. After a 4-month period, we observed a significant reduction in the mean number of DRPs per patient (mean difference −16.3%; 95% CI −24.3, −8.3). The mean number of drugs per patient was not significantly reduced (mean difference −4.7%; 95% CI −9.6, 0.2). Conclusion: This study showed a positive influence of the community pharmacist in reducing potential DRPs in the elderly. Future interventions should also focus on actual outcomes, including quality of life, morbidity and mortality.

Use of antidepressant drugs and risk of osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures

AIM Both tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have been associated with an increased risk of fractures. The serotonin transporter (5-HTT) has been located in the bone and may play a role in bone physiology. We assessed the association between antidepressant drug use, categorized in a therapeutical-based way and on basis of their affinity for the 5-HTT, and the risk of both osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic fractures. METHODS A case-control study was conducted using the PHARMO RLS. Cases were patients with a first hospital admission for a fracture during the study period. Up to four controls were matched to each case on gender, age, geographical area, and index date. RESULTS We identified 16,717 cases, of whom 59.5% had an osteoporotic fracture, and 61,517 controls. Compared to no use, current use of SSRIs was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of osteoporotic fractures (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.69-2.26), as was current use of TCAs and non-SSRI/non-TCA antidepressant drugs (ORs 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.63 and 1.40, 95% CI 1.06-1.85, respectively). The risk of an osteoporotic fracture was statistically significantly higher for antidepressants with a high affinity for the 5-HTT (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.63-2.13) compared to antidepressants with a medium or low affinity (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.19-1.72 (medium) and OR 1.32 95% CI 0.98-1.79 (low) (p<0.05 for trend). The risk of non-osteoporotic fractures did not show the same trend. CONCLUSIONS The extent of affinity for the 5-HTT may contribute to the increased risk of osteoporotic fractures related to antidepressant drug use. The pharmacological mechanism-based classification could to be an appropriate alternative for traditional classification to study the association between the use of antidepressants and the risk of fractures.

Association between anti-thymocyte globulin exposure and CD4+ immune reconstitution in paediatric haemopoietic cell transplantation: a multicentre, retrospective pharmacodynamic cohort analysis

BACKGROUND Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was introduced into the conditioning regimen in haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to prevent graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD) and graft failure. However, ATG can also cause delayed immune reconstitution of donor T cells. We studied the relation between exposure to active ATG and clinical outcomes in children. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, all patients (age 0·2-23 years) receiving their first HCT between April 1, 2004, and April 1, 2012, who received ATG (thymoglobulin) in two Dutch paediatric HCT programmes were included. The cumulative dose of ATG was chosen according to local protocols and was given intravenously over 4 days consecutively. ATG exposure measures (maximum concentration, concentration at time of HCT, clearance, days to reach a concentration below the lympholytic concentration of one arbitrary unit [AU] per mL, total area under the curve [AUC], AUC before HCT, and AUC after HCT) were calculated using a validated population pharmacokinetic model. The main outcome of interest was immune reconstitution (defined as CD4+ T cells >0·05 × 10(9) cells per L in two consecutive measurements within 100 days). Other outcomes of interest were survival, acute and chronic GvHD, and graft failure. We used Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression models, and Fine-Gray competing risk regressions for analyses. FINDINGS 251 patients were included. The chance of successful immune reconstitution decreased as the ATG AUC after HCT increased (odds ratio 0·991, 95% CI 0·987-0·996; p<0·0001). Within the cord blood group, we noted decreased immune reconstitution above the lowest AUC quartile (≥ 20 AU × day/mL; p=0·0024), whereas in the bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell group, decreased immune reconstitution was noted only in the highest quartile (≥ 100 AU × day/mL; p=0·0024). Successful immune reconstitution by day 100 was associated with increased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·49, 95% CI 0·29-0·81; p=0·0047) caused by reduced non-relapse mortality (0·40, 0·21-0·77; p=0·0062), and relapse-related mortality in myeloid leukaemia (0·25, 0·08-0·76; p=0·015). An AUC before transplantation of at least 40 AU × day/mL resulted in a lower incidence of acute GvHD (grade 2-4 HR 0·979, 95% CI 0·963-0·994; p=0·0081; and grade 3-4 0·975, 0·952-0·998; p=0·033), chronic GvHD (0·983, 0·968-0·998; p=0·029), and graft failure (0·981, 0·965-0·997; p=0·020) compared with an AUC of less than 40 AU × day/mL. INTERPRETATION These results stress the importance of improving the efficacy and safety of ATG in HCT by amending dosage and timing. Individualised dosing and timing of ATG to aim for optimum exposure before and after HCT could result in improved outcomes after paediatric HCT. FUNDING Dutch Organization for Scientific Research.

Use of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and the Reporting of Infections: A Disproportionality Analysis in the World Health Organization VigiBase

OBJECTIVE Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a new class of antidiabetic drugs. They inactivate incretin hormones but also have many other effects throughout the body, among which are effects on the immune system. This might result in an increased infection risk. This study assessed the association between use of DPP-4 inhibitors and the reporting of infections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A nested case-control was conducted using VigiBase, the World Health Organization-Adverse Drug Reactions (WHO-ADR) database. The base cohort consisted of ADRs for antidiabetic drugs (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code A10). Cases were defined as ADRs of infection according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) classification system. All other ADRs were considered controls. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated to estimate the strength of the association between different classes of antidiabetic drugs and the reporting of infections. RESULTS We identified 305,415 suspected ADRs involving antidiabetic drugs in 106,469 case reports, of which 8,083 involved DPP-4 inhibitors monotherapy. Overall, the reporting of infections was higher for patients using DPP-4 inhibitors compared with users of biguanides (ROR 2.3 [95% CI 1.9–2.7]). Reporting of upper respiratory tract infections (ROR 12.3 [95% CI 8.6–17.5]) was significantly associated with use of DPP-4 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates an increased reporting of infections, in particular upper respiratory tract infections, for users of DPP-4 inhibitors compared with users of other antidiabetic drugs. However, the limitations of spontaneous reporting systems (e.g., underreporting, the Weber-effect, reporting bias) should be taken into account. Therefore, further research is needed to evaluate this suspicion and the underlying mechanism.

High prevalence of methotrexate intolerance in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: development and validation of a methotrexate intolerance severity score

OBJECTIVE To design and validate a new questionnaire for identifying patients with methotrexate (MTX) intolerance, and to determine the prevalence of MTX intolerance in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) using this questionnaire. METHODS The MTX Intolerance Severity Score (MISS) questionnaire was constructed, consisting of 5 domains: stomach ache, nausea, vomiting, sore mouth, and behavioral symptoms. The domains each consisted of 3 questions pertaining to the presence of a symptom upon, prior to (anticipatory), and when thinking of (associative) MTX intake. The MISS questionnaire was validated in 86 patients by determining its discriminative power between patients with and those without MTX intolerance, identified as such by a gold standard (physicians opinion). Using the MISS questionnaire, the prevalence of MTX intolerance was determined in 297 JIA patients. RESULTS The MISS questionnaire discriminated well between MTX-intolerant and MTX-tolerant patients. A cutoff score of 6 yielded the best sensitivity (88%) and specificity (80%). MTX intolerance was found in 150 (50.5%) of 297 patients. Of 220 patients receiving oral MTX, 98 (44.5%) experienced MTX intolerance, whereas 67.5% of 77 patients receiving parenteral MTX experienced intolerance to the drug (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that the MISS questionnaire is a highly sensitive and specific tool for the diagnosis of MTX intolerance, and that there is a high prevalence of MTX intolerance among JIA patients. The prevalence of intolerance in patients receiving parenteral MTX exceeds that in patients receiving oral MTX. The frequent occurrence of anticipatory and associative symptoms suggests that classic conditioning plays an important role in MTX intolerance.

Glycopyrrolate for sialorrhea in Parkinson disease: a randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.

Background: Sialorrhea affects approximately 75% of patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Sialorrhea is often treated with anticholinergics, but central side effects limit their usefulness. Glycopyrrolate (glycopyrronium bromide) is an anticholinergic drug with a quaternary ammonium structure not able to cross the blood-brain barrier in considerable amounts. Therefore, glycopyrrolate exhibits minimal central side effects, which may be an advantage in patients with PD, of whom a significant portion already experience cognitive deficits. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate in the treatment of sialorrhea in patients with PD. Methods: We conducted a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial with oral glycopyrrolate 1 mg 3 times daily in 23 patients with PD. The severity of the sialorrhea was scored on a daily basis by the patients or a caregiver with a sialorrhea scoring scale ranging from 1 (no sialorrhea) to 9 (profuse sialorrhea). Results: The mean (SD) sialorrhea score improved from 4.6 (1.7) with placebo to 3.8 (1.6) with glycopyrrolate (p = 0.011). Nine patients (39.1%) with glycopyrrolate had a clinically relevant improvement of at least 30% vs 1 patient (4.3%) with placebo (p = 0.021). There were no significant differences in adverse events between glycopyrrolate and placebo treatment. Conclusions: Oral glycopyrrolate 1 mg 3 times daily is an effective and safe therapy for sialorrhea in Parkinson disease. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that glycopyrrolate 1 mg 3 times daily is more effective than placebo in reducing sialorrhea in patients with Parkinson disease during a 4-week study.