Tolib Mirzoev
University of Leeds
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tolib Mirzoev.
International Journal of Mental Health Systems | 2010
Maye Omar; Andrew Green; Philippa Bird; Tolib Mirzoev; Alan J. Flisher; Fred Kigozi; Crick Lund; Jason Mwanza; Angela Ofori-Atta
BackgroundMental illnesses are increasingly recognised as a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet many countries lack a mental health policy or have an outdated, inappropriate policy. This paper explores the development of appropriate mental health policies and their effective implementation. It reports comparative findings on the processes for developing and implementing mental health policies in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia as part of the Mental Health and Poverty Project.MethodsThe study countries and respondents were purposively selected to represent different levels of mental health policy and system development to allow comparative analysis of the factors underlying the different forms of mental health policy development and implementation. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and document analysis. Data analysis was guided by conceptual framework that was developed for this purpose. A framework approach to analysis was used, incorporating themes that emerged from the data and from the conceptual framework.ResultsMental health policies in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia are weak, in draft form or non-existent. Mental health remained low on the policy agenda due to stigma and a lack of information, as well as low prioritisation by donors, low political priority and grassroots demand. Progress with mental health policy development varied and respondents noted a lack of consultation and insufficient evidence to inform policy development. Furthermore, policies were poorly implemented, due to factors including insufficient dissemination and operationalisation of policies and a lack of resources.ConclusionsMental health policy processes in all four countries were inadequate, leading to either weak or non-existent policies, with an impact on mental health services. Recommendations are provided to strengthen mental health policy processes in these and other African countries.
Health Policy and Planning | 2014
Tolib Mirzoev; Gillian Lê; Andrew Green; Marsha Orgill; Adalgot Komba; Reuben K. Esena; Linet Nyapada; Benjamin Uzochukwu; Woldekidan K Amde; Nonhlanhla Nxumalo; Lucy Gilson
The importance of health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR+A) is widely recognized. Universities are central to strengthening and sustaining the HPSR+A capacity as they teach the next generation of decision-makers and health professionals. However, little is known about the capacity of universities, specifically, to develop the field. In this article, we report results of capacity self- assessments by seven universities within five African countries, conducted through the Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa (CHEPSAA). The capacity assessments focused on both capacity ‘assets’ and ‘needs’, and covered the wider context, as well as organizational and individual capacity levels. Six thematic areas of capacity were examined: leadership and governance, organizations’ resources, scope of HPSR+A teaching and research, communication, networking and getting research into policy and practice (GRIPP), demand for HPRS+A and resource environment. The self-assessments by each university used combinations of document reviews, semi-structured interviews and staff surveys, followed by comparative analysis. A framework approach, guided by the six thematic areas, was used to analyse data. We found that HPSR+A is an international priority, and an existing activity in Africa, though still neglected field with challenges including its reliance on unpredictable international funding. All universities have capacity assets, such as ongoing HPSR+A teaching and research. There are, however, varying levels of assets (such as differences in staff numbers, group sizes and amount of HPSR+A teaching and research), which, combined with different capacity needs at all three levels (such as individual training, improvement in systems for quality assurance and fostering demand for HPSR+A work), can shape a future agenda for HPSR+A capacity strengthening. Capacity assets and needs at different levels appear related. Possible integrated strategies for strengthening universities’ capacity include: refining HPSR+A vision, mainstreaming the subject into under- and post-graduate teaching, developing emerging leaders and aligning HPSR+A capacity strengthening within the wider organizational development.
Health Policy | 2011
Andrew Green; Nancy Gerein; Tolib Mirzoev; Philippa Bird; Stephen Pearson; Le Vu Anh; Tim Martineau; Maitrayee Mukhopadhyay; Xu Qian; K. V. Ramani; Werner Soors
This article reports on a comparative analysis to assess and explain the strengths and weaknesses of policy processes based on 9 case-studies of maternal health in Vietnam, India and China. Policy processes are often slow, inadequately coordinated and opaque to outsiders. Use of evidence is variable and, in particular, could be more actively used to assess different policy options. Whilst an increasing range of actors are involved, there is scope for further opening up of the policy processes. This is likely, if appropriately managed with due regard to issues such as accountability of advocacy organisations, to lead to stronger policy development and greater subsequent ownership; it may however be a more messy process to co-ordinate. Coordination is critical where policy issues span conventional sectoral boundaries, but is also essential to ensure development of policy considers critical health system and resource issues. This, and other features related to the nature of a specific policy issue, suggests the need both to adapt processes for each particular policy issue and to monitor the progress of the policy processes themselves. The article concludes with specific questions to be considered by actors keen to enhance policy processes.
BMC Public Health | 2010
Mengiste M Mesfin; James Newell; Richard Madeley; Tolib Mirzoev; Israel Tareke; Yohannes T Kifle; Amanuel Gessessew; John Walley
BackgroundDelays seeking care worsen the burden of tuberculosis and cost of care for patients, families and the public health system. This study investigates costs of tuberculosis diagnosis incurred by patients, escorts and the public health system in 10 districts of Ethiopia.MethodsNew pulmonary tuberculosis patients ≥ 15 years old were interviewed regarding their health care seeking behaviour at the time of diagnosis. Using a structured questionnaire patients were interviewed about the duration of delay at alternative care providers and the public health system prior to diagnosis. Costs incurred by patients, escorts and the public health system were quantified through patient interview and review of medical records.ResultsInterviews were held with 537 (58%) smear positive patients and 387 (42%) smear negative pulmonary patients. Of these, 413 (45%) were female; 451 (49%) were rural residents; and the median age was 34 years. The mean (median) days elapsed for consultation at alternative care providers and public health facilities prior to tuberculosis diagnosis was 5 days (0 days) and 3 (3 days) respectively. The total median cost incurred from first consultation to diagnosis was
Journal of Health Organisation and Management | 2007
Tolib Mirzoev; Andrew Green; James Newell
27 per patient (mean =
BMC Public Health | 2007
Deepak K Karki; Tolib Mirzoev; Andrew Green; James Newell; Sushil C Baral
59). The median costs per patient incurred by patient, escort and the public health system were
BMJ Open | 2013
Comfort Mshelia; Reinhard Huss; Tolib Mirzoev; Helen Elsey; Sebastian Olikira Baine; Moses Aikins; Peter Kamuzora; X Bosch-Capblanch; Joanna Raven; K Wyss; Andrew Green; Tim Martineau
16 (mean =
Health Research Policy and Systems | 2012
Tolib Mirzoev; Maye Omar; Andrew Green; Philippa Bird; Crick Lund; Angela Ofori-Atta; Victor Doku
29),
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation | 2008
Tolib Mirzoev; Sushil C Baral; Deepak K Karki; Andrew Green; James Newell
3 (mean =
Global Health Action | 2014
Anar Ulikpan; Tolib Mirzoev; Eliana V. Jimenez; Asmat Ullah Malik; Peter S. Hill
23) and