Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tom Barber is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tom Barber.


Science Translational Medicine | 2013

Inertial Focusing for Tumor Antigen–Dependent and –Independent Sorting of Rare Circulating Tumor Cells

Emre Özkumur; Ajay M. Shah; Jordan C. Ciciliano; Benjamin L. Emmink; David T. Miyamoto; Elena F. Brachtel; Min Yu; Pin-i Chen; Bailey Morgan; Julie Trautwein; Anya M. Kimura; Sudarshana Sengupta; Shannon L. Stott; Nezihi Murat Karabacak; Tom Barber; John Walsh; Kyle C. Smith; Philipp S. Spuhler; James P. Sullivan; Richard J. Lee; David T. Ting; Xi Luo; Alice T. Shaw; Aditya Bardia; Lecia V. Sequist; David N. Louis; Shyamala Maheswaran; Ravi Kapur; Daniel A. Haber; Mehmet Toner

A multistage microfluidic chip is capable of sorting rare EpCAM+ and EpCAM− CTCs from cancer patients’ whole blood. Positive and Negative Outcomes Usually people want the good news first, to help cope with the bad news that inevitably follows. However, patients will soon desire both the positive and the negative outcomes together, according to the latest study by Ozkumur and colleagues. These authors have developed a multistage microfluidic device that is capable of sorting rare circulating tumor cells (CTCs) that are either positive or negative for the surface antigen epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). EpCAM+ cells found in the bloodstream have long defined the typical CTC. Many sorting technologies have been developed to enumerate EpCAM+ CTCs in cancer patient’s blood; however, these cells are not always detectable in cancers with low EpCAM expression, like triple-negative breast cancer or melanoma. Ozkumur et al. engineered an automated platform, called the “CTC-iChip,” that captured both EpCAM+ and EpCAM− cancer cells in clinical samples using a series of debulking, inertial focusing, and magnetic separation steps. The sorted CTCs could then be interrogated using standard clinical protocols, such as immunocytochemistry. The authors tested the “positive mode” of their device using whole blood from patients with prostate, lung, breast, pancreatic, and colorectal cancers. After successfully separating out the EpCAM+ CTCs, they confirmed that the cells were viable and had high-quality RNA for molecular analysis, in one example, detecting the EML4-ALK gene fusion in lung cancer. Using the “negative mode” of their device, the authors were able to capture EpCAM− CTCs from patients with metastatic breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and melanoma. The isolated CTCs showed similar morphology when compared with primary tumor tissue from these patients, suggesting that the microfluidic device can be used for clinical diagnoses—delivering both positive and negative news at once. Ozkumur et al. also demonstrated that CTCs isolated using the iChip could be analyzed on the single-cell level. One such demonstration with 15 CTCs from a prostate cancer patient reveals marked heterogeneity in the expression of mesenchymal and stem cell markers as well as typical prostate cancer–related antigens. The CTC-iChip can therefore process large volumes of patient blood to obtain not just EpCAM+ CTCs but also the EpCAM− ones, thus giving a broader picture of an individual’s cancer status and also allowing the device to be used for more cancer types. With the ability to further analyze the molecular characteristics of CTCs, this CTC-iChip could be a promising addition to current diagnostic tools used in the clinic. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are shed into the bloodstream from primary and metastatic tumor deposits. Their isolation and analysis hold great promise for the early detection of invasive cancer and the management of advanced disease, but technological hurdles have limited their broad clinical utility. We describe an inertial focusing–enhanced microfluidic CTC capture platform, termed “CTC-iChip,” that is capable of sorting rare CTCs from whole blood at 107 cells/s. Most importantly, the iChip is capable of isolating CTCs using strategies that are either dependent or independent of tumor membrane epitopes, and thus applicable to virtually all cancers. We specifically demonstrate the use of the iChip in an expanded set of both epithelial and nonepithelial cancers including lung, prostate, pancreas, breast, and melanoma. The sorting of CTCs as unfixed cells in solution allows for the application of high-quality clinically standardized morphological and immunohistochemical analyses, as well as RNA-based single-cell molecular characterization. The combination of an unbiased, broadly applicable, high-throughput, and automatable rare cell sorting technology with generally accepted molecular assays and cytology standards will enable the integration of CTC-based diagnostics into the clinical management of cancer.


Nature Protocols | 2014

Microfluidic, marker-free isolation of circulating tumor cells from blood samples

Nezihi Murat Karabacak; Philipp S. Spuhler; Fabio Fachin; Eugene J. Lim; Vincent Pai; Emre Özkumur; Joseph M. Martel; Nikola Kojic; Kyle C. Smith; Pin-i Chen; Jennifer Yang; Henry Hwang; Bailey Morgan; Julie Trautwein; Tom Barber; Shannon L. Stott; Shyamala Maheswaran; Ravi Kapur; Daniel A. Haber; Mehmet Toner

The ability to isolate and analyze rare circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has the potential to further our understanding of cancer metastasis and enhance the care of cancer patients. In this protocol, we describe the procedure for isolating rare CTCs from blood samples by using tumor antigen–independent microfluidic CTC-iChip technology. The CTC-iChip uses deterministic lateral displacement, inertial focusing and magnetophoresis to sort up to 107 cells/s. By using two-stage magnetophoresis and depletion antibodies against leukocytes, we achieve 3.8-log depletion of white blood cells and a 97% yield of rare cells with a sample processing rate of 8 ml of whole blood/h. The CTC-iChip is compatible with standard cytopathological and RNA-based characterization methods. This protocol describes device production, assembly, blood sample preparation, system setup and the CTC isolation process. Sorting 8 ml of blood sample requires 2 h including setup time, and chip production requires 2–5 d.


Clinical Cancer Research | 2016

Detection of T790M, the Acquired Resistance EGFR Mutation, by Tumor Biopsy versus Noninvasive Blood-Based Analyses

Tilak Sundaresan; Lecia V. Sequist; John V. Heymach; Gregory J. Riely; Pasi A. Jänne; Walter H. Koch; James P. Sullivan; Douglas Fox; Robert C. Maher; Alona Muzikansky; Andrew Webb; Hai T. Tran; Uma Giri; Martin Fleisher; Helena A. Yu; Wen Wei; Bruce E. Johnson; Tom Barber; John Walsh; Jeffrey A. Engelman; Shannon L. Stott; Ravi Kapur; Shyamala Maheswaran; Mehmet Toner; Daniel A. Haber

Purpose: The T790M gatekeeper mutation in the EGFR is acquired by some EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) as they become resistant to selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). As third-generation EGFR TKIs that overcome T790M-associated resistance become available, noninvasive approaches to T790M detection will become critical to guide management. Experimental Design: As part of a multi-institutional Stand-Up-To-Cancer collaboration, we performed an exploratory analysis of 40 patients with EGFR-mutant tumors progressing on EGFR TKI therapy. We compared the T790M genotype from tumor biopsies with analysis of simultaneously collected circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Results: T790M genotypes were successfully obtained in 30 (75%) tumor biopsies, 28 (70%) CTC samples, and 32 (80%) ctDNA samples. The resistance-associated mutation was detected in 47% to 50% of patients using each of the genotyping assays, with concordance among them ranging from 57% to 74%. Although CTC- and ctDNA-based genotyping were each unsuccessful in 20% to 30% of cases, the two assays together enabled genotyping in all patients with an available blood sample, and they identified the T790M mutation in 14 (35%) patients in whom the concurrent biopsy was negative or indeterminate. Conclusions: Discordant genotypes between tumor biopsy and blood-based analyses may result from technological differences, as well as sampling different tumor cell populations. The use of complementary approaches may provide the most complete assessment of each patients cancer, which should be validated in predicting response to T790M-targeted inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 22(5); 1103–10. ©2015 AACR.


Scientific Reports | 2017

Monolithic Chip for High-throughput Blood Cell Depletion to Sort Rare Circulating Tumor Cells

Fabio Fachin; Philipp S. Spuhler; Joseph M. Martel-Foley; Jon F. Edd; Tom Barber; John Walsh; Murat Karabacak; Vincent Pai; Melissa Yu; Kyle C. Smith; Henry Hwang; Jennifer Yang; Sahil Shah; Ruby Yarmush; Lecia V. Sequist; Shannon L. Stott; Shyamala Maheswaran; Daniel A. Haber; Ravi Kapur; Mehmet Toner

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a treasure trove of information regarding the location, type and stage of cancer and are being pursued as both a diagnostic target and a means of guiding personalized treatment. Most isolation technologies utilize properties of the CTCs themselves such as surface antigens (e.g., epithelial cell adhesion molecule or EpCAM) or size to separate them from blood cell populations. We present an automated monolithic chip with 128 multiplexed deterministic lateral displacement devices containing ~1.5 million microfabricated features (12 µm–50 µm) used to first deplete red blood cells and platelets. The outputs from these devices are serially integrated with an inertial focusing system to line up all nucleated cells for multi-stage magnetophoresis to remove magnetically-labeled white blood cells. The monolithic CTC-iChip enables debulking of blood samples at 15–20 million cells per second while yielding an output of highly purified CTCs. We quantified the size and EpCAM expression of over 2,500 CTCs from 38 patient samples obtained from breast, prostate, lung cancers, and melanoma. The results show significant heterogeneity between and within single patients. Unbiased, rapid, and automated isolation of CTCs using monolithic CTC-iChip will enable the detailed measurement of their physicochemical and biological properties and their role in metastasis.


Cancer Research | 2016

Abstract 2422: Isolation of canonical and non-canonical circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by negative depletion using the Harpoon CTC Isolator and Chip

David Chianese; Mark Carle Connelly; Carrie Morano; Thai Bui; Steven Gross; Renouard Sanders; Tom Barber; Ravi Kapur; Shyamala Maheswaran; Mehmet Toner; Daniel A. Haber

Today, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can provide important prognostic information about a patient. However, to one day help guide decisions for precision medicine, more and increasingly sophisticated information will have to be extracted from each patient blood sample. We describe a new microfluidic CTC isolation technology, the Harpoon CTC Isolator and Chip (Hrp Isolator). From a single sample the Hrp Isolator can enable the analysis of plasma components such as ctDNA, as well as the ability to enrich all circulating tumor cell types, regardless of their antigenic expression. To enrich the CTCs from 7.5 mL of whole blood, the Hrp Isolator removes the red blood cells and platelets based on their small size and the white blood cells by negative depletion using magnetic particles. The time required to process 7.5 mLs of blood is approximately 90 minutes. In contrast, the CELLSEARCH® CTC Test (CS), the only US FDA-cleared test, uses antigens expressed by CTCs to target the CTCs and positively select them out of blood. To enumerate CTCs from patient samples, the output from the Hrp Isolator was then loaded into and run on the CELLSEARCH® System using the CS test (Hybrid method). CTCs were enumerated from 37 breast and prostate cancer patients by CS and by the Hybrid method. At least 1 CTC was found in 23 (62%) patient samples by the Hybrid method versus 17 (46%) by CS. The product of the Hrp Isolator enrichment contained on average the same numbers of CTCs as were found by CS (mean = 13.3 ± 18 by CS versus 12.0 ± 16 by Hybrid) in patient samples having 75), the Hybrid method may have underestimated the total Hrp Isolator CTC count. An important feature of the Hrp Isolator is its ability to enrich CTCs that are negative or low expressers of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) or cytokeratin (CK). These cells could have been missed by positive-selection technologies such as CS and may not have been counted using the Hybrid method. CTC spiked samples were run on the Hrp Isolator and the CTC enriched product was spun onto microscope slides, stained, and examined using a Vectra Multispectral Imaging System (Hrp+Vec method). Using the Hrp+Vec method, 79% to 100% of spiked CTCs were recovered depending on the slide fixation method used. Also, using Hrp+Vec we confirmed the ability of the Harpoon Isolator to enrich EpCAM-/CK+ and EpCAM+/CK- CTCs from patient samples. This establishes the existence of “non-canonical” tumor cell types in circulation and adds to the biological diversity of the CTC population in circulation. These results emphasize the need to further characterize all tumor cell populations and to determine what, if any, clinical significance may be assigned to these diverse CTC types. Citation Format: David Chianese, Mark Connelly, Carrie Morano, Thai Bui, Steven Gross, Renouard Sanders, Tom Barber, Ravi Kapur, Shyamala Maheswaran, Mehmet Toner, Daniel Haber. Isolation of canonical and non-canonical circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by negative depletion using the Harpoon CTC Isolator and Chip. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2422.


Cancer Research | 2016

Abstract 4955: Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in breast and prostate cancer: Comparison of Harpoon CTC assay performance with the CellSearch CTC Test

Mark Carle Connelly; David Chianese; Carrie Morano; Thai Bui; Shemeeakah Powell; Noel Ngoubilly; Renouard Sanders; Tom Barber; Ravi Kapur; Shyamala Maheswaran; Mehmet Toner; Daniel A. Haber

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can provide important information about a patient9s prognosis. Currently, the CELLSEARCH® CTC Test (hereafter referred to as CS) is the only US Food and Drug Administration-cleared assay for isolating and enumerating CTCs. This technology uses a CTC antigen-dependent method to isolate CTCs that may limit its ability to detect CTCs with low or no epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) expression. We evaluated the Harpoon CTC Isolator and Chip, which uses an antigen-independent, negative depletion method to enrich CTCs from patient blood samples. As a result of the negative depletion method, the final Harpoon Product (ie, CTC-enriched cell suspension) contains CTCs that express cytokeratin (CK) and EpCAM (canonical CTCs) as well as those with low or no expression of these antigens (non-canonical CTCs). After isolation, CTCs were spun onto microscope slides and imaged using a Vectra Multispectral Imaging System. We obtained performance data on an initial prototype Harpoon assay (Harpoon + Vectra [Hrp+Vec]) and compared CTC enumeration between Hrp+Vec and CS using blood samples from 36 breast and prostate cancer patients. From 7.5 mLs of blood, the Hrp+Vec assay recovered 79.0% to 93.5% of canonical EpCAM+/CK+ CTCs recovered by CS. The Hrp+Vec assay also successfully detected non-canonical CTCs (EpCAM-/CK+ or EpCAM+/CK-) in these samples. At the CS clinical cutoff for prognostic value, where ≥5 CTCs is associated with poor prognosis, the Hrp+Vec assay was 97% concordant with CS. Hrp+Vec also detected CTCs in 12.5% (2/16) more patient samples than CS. Finally, a consensus analysis of all Vectra scan results (including both canonical and non-canonical CTCs) demonstrated that the Hrp+Vec assay detected between 90.5% and 108.9% of the number of CTCs as identified by CS. These results indicate that, when compared with CS, the prototype Hrp+Vec assay detected CTCs with similar efficiency and identified more samples as CTC-positive in these breast and prostate cancer patients. Importantly, the Hrp+Vec assay did enrich non-canonical CTCs thought to be missed by CS, and ongoing efforts are aimed to further characterize these cell populations. Citation Format: Mark Connelly, David Chianese, Carrie Morano, Thai Bui, Shemeeakah Powell, Noel Ngoubilly, Renouard Sanders, Tom Barber, Ravi Kapur, Shyamala Maheswaran, Mehmet Toner, Daniel Haber. Isolation and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in breast and prostate cancer: Comparison of Harpoon CTC assay performance with the CellSearch CTC Test. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4955.


Archive | 2006

Devices and methods for enrichment and alteration of cells and other particles

Lotien Richard Huang; Tom Barber; Bruce L. Carvalho; Ravi Kapur; Paul Vernucci; Mehmet Toner; Zihua Wang


Archive | 2005

Veterinary diagnostic system

Tom Barber; Lotien R. Huang; Darren Gray; Ravi Kapur


Archive | 2005

System for delivering a diluted solution

Maury D. Cosman; Ravi Kapur; Bruce L. Carvalho; Tom Barber; Ulysses J. Balis; Mehmet Toner; Lotien Richard Huang; Darren Gray


Archive | 2008

DIAGNOSIS OF FETAL ABNORMALITIES USING NUCLEATED RED BLOOD CELLS

Ravi Kapur; Diana Bianchi; Tom Barber; Mehmet Toner

Collaboration


Dive into the Tom Barber's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge