Tom Cariveau

Examination of efficacious, efficient, and socially valid error-correction procedures to teach sight words and prepositions to children with autism spectrum disorder.

Prior research shows that learners have idiosyncratic responses to error-correction procedures during instruction. Thus, assessments that identify error-correction strategies to include in instruction can aid practitioners in selecting individualized, efficacious, and efficient interventions. The current investigation conducted an assessment to compare 5 error-correction procedures that have been evaluated in the extant literature and are common in instructional practice for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Results showed that the assessment identified efficacious and efficient error-correction procedures for all participants, and 1 procedure was efficient for 4 of the 5 participants. To examine the social validity of error-correction procedures, participants selected among efficacious and efficient interventions in a concurrent-chains assessment. We discuss the results in relation to prior research on error-correction procedures and current instructional practices for learners with ASD.

Comparing the effects of massed and distributed practice on skill acquisition for children with autism

We replicated and extended the findings of Haq and Kodak (2015) by evaluating the efficiency of massed and distributed practice for teaching tacts and textual and intraverbal behavior to 3 children with autism. Massed practice included all practice opportunities conducted on 1 day during each week, and distributed practice included practice opportunities conducted across several days during the week. The results indicated that distributed practice was more efficient for all participants. Suggested areas for future research and implications for practice are discussed.

Selection and Implementation of Skill Acquisition Programs by Special Education Teachers and Staff for Students With Autism Spectrum Disorder

The present investigation examined special education teachers’ selection and use of teaching strategies for receptive identification training with children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in their classrooms. Teachers first responded to a survey in which they provided examples of receptive identification tasks taught in their classrooms, rated the efficacy of teaching strategies, described how they determined whether skills were mastered, listed any assessments they conducted to identify relevant prerequisite skills prior to receptive identification training, described how they selected teaching strategies for use in their classrooms, and listed their years of experience as a teacher and working with children with ASD. Subsequent observations of implementation of teaching strategies during trial-based instruction occurred in a proportion of teachers’ classrooms. The results of the observations showed that participants did not consistently implement components of trial-based instruction as described in the literature, and there were differences in implementation depending on the types of skills targeted during instruction.

Examining the Treatment Validation Consultation Model

ABSTRACT The present article explores the utility and feasibility of treatment validation consultation (TVC). Although evidence exists for behavioral consultation, few findings have been reported for TVC. TVC is based on core components of behavioral consultation, but has several unique characteristics. In this article, TVC is situated within the behavioral consultation literature; one case study is used to demonstrate TVC’s utility and feasibility; and considerations for future TVC research are explored.

A consecutive case review of token systems used to reduce socially maintained challenging behavior in individuals with intellectual and developmental delays

Objectives: The current paper describes the use of token systems in a behavioral day-treatment unit for severe challenging behavior using a consecutive case review spanning three years. Methods: Experimenters reviewed 96 patient case files, 24 of which implemented some token system as a component of the individual’s treatment package. Aspects of each token system (including schedules of token delivery and exchange; inclusion of token training and response cost; and types of backup reinforcers delivered), and participant characteristics were coded. Results: Token systems were most frequently employed during differential reinforcement for alternative behavior (DRA, most commonly for compliance) or differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO). Tokens were most frequently used in an instructional context. Several commonalities were identified (e.g. restriction of backup reinforcers between token exchanges and initial dense schedules of reinforcement). Compared to past reviews, this sample had an over-representation of individuals with challenging behavior maintained by escape, multiply maintained challenging behavior, and individuals for which the function was not identified in a functional analysis. Treatment packages including token systems resulted in a reduction in challenging behavior for 91.67% of participants, with 70.83% exhibiting at least an 80% reduction. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that token systems may be a beneficial component of treatment plans used to address challenging behavior. Some common components should likely be included in all token systems and specific client variables may guide decisions related to idiosyncratic treatments.

A Preliminary Analysis of Procedures to Teach Children with Autism to Report Past Behavior

Deficits in reporting past behavior may have implications for a child’s social development and safety. Behavioral interpretations of memory and research on do/say correspondence provide valuable strategies to teach reporting past behavior when deficits are observed. The current study examined procedures to teach accurate reporting of past behavior following a delay for two children diagnosed with autism. During baseline, both participants accurately reported past behavior when immediately probed. Neither participant emitted accurate reporting following a delay during end-of-day probes. Treatment procedures included prompting, reinforcement, and fading procedures designed to maintain stimulus control across the delay. Both participants demonstrated accurate reporting of past behavior on delayed probes, including when conducted by a caregiver.

The Effects of Conducting a Functional Analysis on Problem Behavior in Other Settings: A Descriptive Study on Potential Interaction Effects:

It has been suggested that reinforcing problem behavior during functional analyses (FAs) may raise ethical questions, such as resulting in an increase in problem behavior outside of FA sessions. The current translational study assessed whether conducting an FA resulted in increases in problem behavior outside of the FA setting for six participants using a nonconcurrent multiple baseline across participants design. The rate of problem behavior was measured outside the FA setting prior to and during an FA. Idiosyncratic results suggest that problem behavior outside of the FA setting may increase, decrease, or be unaffected by conducting an FA.

Responding to conversational partners’ behavior: Teaching children with autism strategies to recapture the interest of others

This review provides a summary and appraisal commentary on the treatment review by Peters, L. C. & Thompson, R. H. (2015). Teaching children with autism to respond to conversation partners’ interest. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 544–562. doi: 10.1002/jaba.235 Source of funding and disclosure of interest: The original authors reported that there were no conflicts of interest. No source of funding was reported.