Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tom Carrell is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tom Carrell.


Circulation | 2012

Early Results of Fenestrated Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms in the United Kingdom

G. Ambler; Jonathan R. Boyle; C. Cousins; P.D. Hayes; T. Metha; T.C. See; K. Varty; A. Winterbottom; D.J. Adam; A.W. Bradbury; M.J. Clarke; R. Jackson; J.D. Rose; A. Sharif; V. Wealleans; R. Williams; L. Wilson; M.G. Wyatt; I. Ahmed; Rachel Bell; Tom Carrell; P. Gkoutzios; Tarun Sabharwal; R. Salter; M. Waltham; Colin Bicknell; P. Bourke; Nicholas Cheshire; Ian J. Franklin; A. James

Background— Fenestrated endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms has been proposed as an alternative to open surgery for juxtarenal and pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. At present, the evidence base for this procedure is predominantly limited to single-center or single-operator series. The aim of this study was to present nationwide early results of fenestrated endovascular repair in the United Kingdom. Methods and Results— All patients who underwent fenestrated endovascular repair between January 2007 and December 2010 at experienced institutions in the United Kingdom(>10 procedures) were retrospectively studied by use of the GLOBALSTAR database. Site-reported data relating to patient demographics, aneurysm morphology, procedural details, and outcome were recorded. Data from 318 patients were obtained from 14 centers. Primary procedural success was achieved in 99% (316/318); perioperative mortality was 4.1%, and intraoperative target vessel loss was observed in 5 of 889 target vessels (0.6%). The early reintervention (<30 days) rate was 7% (22/318). There were 11 deaths during follow-up; none were aneurysm-related. Survival by Kaplan–Meier analysis was 94% (SE 0.01), 91% (0.02), and 89% (0.02) at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Freedom from target vessel loss was 93% (0.02), 91% (0.02), and 85% (0.06), and freedom from late secondary intervention (>30 days) was 90% (0.02), 86% (0.03), and 70% (0.08) at 1, 2, and 3 years. Conclusions— In this national sample, fenestrated endovascular repair has been performed with a high degree of technical and clinical success. Late survival and target vessel patency are satisfactory. These results support continued use and evaluation of this technique for juxtarenal aneurysms, but illustrate the need for a more robust evidence base.


European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2009

Is endovascular repair of mycotic aortic aneurysms a durable treatment option

Rachel E. Clough; Stephen Black; Oliver Lyons; Hany Zayed; Rachel Bell; Tom Carrell; Matthew Waltham; Tarun Sabharwal; Philip R. Taylor

OBJECTIVE Endovascular repair for degenerative aortic aneurysms is well established, but its role in those with infective pathology remains controversial. This study aims to assess the durability of endovascular repair with a review of our midterm results. METHOD A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained endovascular database (1998-2008) was conducted, which identified 673 consecutive patients with aortic aneurysms. RESULTS Nineteen patients (2.8%) were identified with infected aortic aneurysms, in which there were a total of 23 separate aneurysms (16 thoracic and seven abdominal). Six patients (32%) presented with rupture. Eleven patients (58%) had received antibiotics preoperatively for a median duration of 11 days (1-54 days). Fifteen of the 19 (79%) had positive blood cultures, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common organism. All 19 patients underwent endovascular repair. There were three Type I endoleaks (one requiring conversion to open repair) and two Type II endoleaks. One patient developed transient paraplegia, resolved by cerebrovascular fluid (CSF) drainage, and one patient had a stroke. The 30-day mortality was 11%, and survival at median follow-up of 20 months (0-83 months) was 73%. All eight deaths in the series were related to aneurysm. CONCLUSION Endovascular treatment of infective aortic pathology provides an early survival benefit; however, concerns over on-going graft infection remain.


Communications of The ACM | 2014

Touchless interaction in surgery

Kenton O'Hara; Gerardo Gonzalez; Abigail Sellen; Graeme P. Penney; Andreas Varnavas; Helena M. Mentis; Antonio Criminisi; Robert Corish; Mark Rouncefield; Neville Dastur; Tom Carrell

Touchless interaction with medical images lets surgeons maintain sterility during surgical procedures.


British Journal of Surgery | 2012

Imaging vascular trauma

Benjamin O. Patterson; Peter J. Holt; M. Cleanthis; Nigel Tai; Tom Carrell; T. M. Loosemore

Over the past 50 years the management of vascular trauma has changed from mandatory surgical exploration to selective non‐operative treatment, where possible. Accurate, non‐invasive, diagnostic imaging techniques are the key to this strategy. The purpose of this review was to define optimal first‐line imaging in patients with suspected vascular injury in different anatomical regions.


Vascular | 2006

Intraluminal thrombus enhances proteolysis in abdominal aortic aneurysms

Tom Carrell; K. G. Burnand; Nuala A. Booth; Julia Humphries; Alberto Smith

This study examined whether intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is a source of fibrinolytic activity and proteolysis that could weaken the aneurysm wall. Plasmin, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) activity, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1), and α2-antiplasmin (α2AP) antigen were measured in the AAA wall and juxtamural and luminal aspects of intraluminal thrombus in 18 patients. The aneurysm wall contained 100-fold higher tPA activity (1.06 ± 0.34 [standard error of measurement] U/mg soluble protein) compared with juxtamural thrombus (JMT) (0.011 ± 0.001 ) and luminal thrombus (LT) (0.01 ± 0.001) (p < .00001) and over 6-fold higher uPA activity (29.3 ± 3.4 IU/mg compared with the JMT (4.3 ± 2.4, p = .00024) and LT (7.9 ± 1.76, p = .0005). The LT had significantly lower levels of PAI-1 (1.26 ± 0.34 ng/mg) than the AAA wall (2.08 ± 0.51, p = .04) and the JMT (3.94 ± 0.85, p = .007). The levels of α2AP in the wall (19.4 ± 3.1 ng/mg) were lower than in the JMT or LT (43.0 ± 7.9 ng/mg, p = .013, and 47.6 ± 6.0 ng/mg, p = .002, respectively). There was no significant difference, however, in plasmin activity among the AAA wall, JMT, and LT. There were significant amounts of latent gelatinase B (matrix metalloproteinase [MMP]-9) in the AAA, JMT, and LT. Mean levels of activated MMP-9 activity were similar in the AAA, JMT, and LT. Plasmin activation of MMPs at the interface between intraluminal thrombus and the aneurysm wall may enhance proteolysis and accelerate aneurysm expansion.


Journal of Endovascular Therapy | 2010

Feasibility and limitations of an automated 2D-3D rigid image registration system for complex endovascular aortic procedures.

Tom Carrell; James R.I. Brown; Graeme P. Penney

Purpose: To examine the feasibility of an automated 2-dimensional (2D) to 3- dimensional (3D) image registration system to simplify the navigational challenges faced in complex endovascular aortic procedures. Methods: An automated 2D-3D image registration system was used to overlay pre-acquired 3D computed tomography images onto fluoroscopy images taken during endovascular aneurysm repair. Errors between the 3D overlay and digital subtraction angiograms were measured and correlated with aortic neck angulation. A mean discrepancy #3 mm was considered clinically acceptable. Results: There was a strong correlation between maximum neck angulation and maximum registration error (Pearsons r50.75). Aortas with a maximum neck angulation ≤30° had a mean error of 2.5±1.2 mm, whereas aortas with neck angulation >30° had a mean error of 6.2±2.5 mm (p<0.0001). Conclusion: The major source of registration errors is aortic deformation caused by the presence of the introducer and endovascular graft. Further work is required if this technology is to be routinely applied to severely angulated aortic anatomy.


Journal of Endovascular Therapy | 2012

Stent-Graft Limb Deployment in the External Iliac Artery Increases the Risk of Limb Occlusion Following Endovascular AAA Repair

Allan M. Conway; Philip R. Taylor; Tom Carrell; Matthew Waltham; R. Salter; Rachel Bell

Purpose To assess whether deployment of an endograft limb in the external iliac artery (EIA) increases the rate of limb occlusion following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods Interrogation of a prospectively maintained database identified 661 patients (596 men; median age 73 years, range 37–93) with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent EVAR between 1996 and 2010 using Zenith stent-grafts predominately. Of these, 567 patients [56 (9.9%) women] had both endograft limbs deployed in the CIA (1203 limbs at risk), while 94 patients [9 (9.6%) women] had at least 1 limb in the EIA (22 bilateral; 116 limbs at risk). An adjunctive bare metal stent was used in 8 (9%) limbs deployed in the EIA. Results There were 31 limb occlusions, all unilateral: 17 (3%) patients in the CIA group had an occluded limb (1% of limbs at risk) vs. 14 (15%) patients in the EIA group (12% of limbs at risk; p<0.0001). The median time to occlusion was 3 months (0–60) in the CIA group and 1 month (0–36) in the EIA group. The majority of occlusions were treated by extra-anatomical revascularization, most often a femorofemoral crossover bypass. No legs were amputated following occlusion of a limb placed in the CIA, but there were 3 amputations in the EIA group (p=0.003). Conclusion Deployment of endograft limbs into the EIA led to a higher rate of occlusion and leg amputation. Increased tortuosity of the EIA and a smaller caliber vessel are likely to account for the increased risk.


British Journal of Surgery | 2009

Long-term surveillance with computed tomography after endovascular aneurysm repair may not be justified

Stephen Black; Tom Carrell; Rachel Bell; Matthew Waltham; John F. Reidy; Philip R. Taylor

There is a common perception that a large number of secondary interventions are needed following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.


CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | 2007

Neurological Complications Following Endoluminal Repair of Thoracic Aortic Disease

J. P. Morales; Philip R. Taylor; Rachel Bell; Yiu Che Chan; Tarun Sabharwal; Tom Carrell; John F. Reidy

Open surgery for thoracic aortic disease is associated with significant morbidity and the reported rates for paraplegia and stroke are 3%–19% and 6%–11%, respectively. Spinal cord ischemia and stroke have also been reported following endoluminal repair. This study reviews the incidence of paraplegia and stroke in a series of 186 patients treated with thoracic stent grafts. From July 1997 to September 2006, 186 patients (125 men) underwent endoluminal repair of thoracic aortic pathology. Mean age was 71 years (range, 17–90 years). One hundred twenty-eight patients were treated electively and 58 patients had urgent procedures. Anesthesia was epidural in 131, general in 50, and local in 5 patients. Seven patients developed paraplegia (3.8%; two urgent and five elective). All occurred in-hospital apart from one associated with severe hypotension after a myocardial infarction at 3 weeks. Four of these recovered with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage. One patient with paraplegia died and two had permanent neurological deficit. The rate of permanent paraplegia and death was 1.6%. There were seven strokes (3.8%; four urgent and three elective). Three patients made a complete recovery, one had permanent expressive dysphasia, and three died. The rate of permanent stroke and death was 2.1%. Endoluminal treatment of thoracic aortic disease is an attractive alternative to open surgery; however, there is still a risk of paraplegia and stroke. Permanent neurological deficits and death occurred in 3.7% of the patients in this series. We conclude that prompt recognition of paraplegia and immediate insertion of a CSF drain can be an effective way of recovering spinal cord function and improving the prognosis.


European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | 2013

Occupational Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Aortic Procedures

Anurag Patel; D. Gallacher; R. Dourado; Oliver Lyons; Adam Smith; Hany Zayed; Matthew Waltham; Tarun Sabharwal; Rachel Bell; Tom Carrell; Philip R. Taylor

OBJECTIVES To measure the radiation exposure of the operating team during endovascular aortic procedures, and to determine factors that predict high exposures. MATERIALS AND METHODS Electronic dosimeters placed over and under protective lead garments, were used to prospectively record radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repairs performed in a designated interventional radiology suite. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses of predictors of radiation exposure were performed. RESULTS A total of 26 infra-renal and 10 thoracic endovascular cases were studied. Median (IQR) patient age and body mass index were 76.0 (70.0-81.8) years and 26.2 (23.9-28.9) kg/m(2) respectively. Over-lead exposure to the operator was higher for thoracic than for infra-renal procedures (421.0 [233.8-597.8] μSv vs. 52.5 [27.8-179.8] μSv, p = .0003), reflecting a significant exposure to unprotected parts of the body. Under-lead exposures for operator and assistant were 5.5 (2.0-14.2) μSv and 1.0 (0.0-2.3) μSv respectively, which for an average caseload would comply with total body effective dose limits. Type of case and percentage of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) time in left anterior oblique angulations predicted dose to the operator (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Thoracic procedures, DSA runs and obliquity of the C-arm are strong predictors of radiation exposure during endovascular aortic repairs. Understanding scatter radiation dynamics and instigating measures to minimise radiation exposure should be mandatory.

Collaboration


Dive into the Tom Carrell's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rachel Bell

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hany Zayed

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andreas Varnavas

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Matthew Waltham

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Oliver Lyons

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge