Tom D. Bennett

Transition From Chronic Compensated to Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Pathophysiological Insights Obtained From Continuous Monitoring of Intracardiac Pressures

Background— Approximately half of all patients with chronic heart failure (HF) have a decreased ejection fraction (EF) (systolic HF [SHF]); the other half have HF with a normal EF (diastolic HF [DHF]). However, the underlying pathophysiological differences between DHF and SHF patients are incompletely defined. The purpose of this study was to use echocardiographic and implantable hemodynamic monitor data to examine the pathophysiology of chronic compensated and acute decompensated HF in SHF versus DHF patients. Methods and Results— Patients were divided into 2 subgroups: 204 had EF <50% (SHF) and 70 had EF ≥50% (DHF). DHF patients had EF of 58±8%, end-diastolic dimension of 50±10 mm, estimated resting pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (ePAD) of 16±9 mm Hg, and diastolic distensibility index (ratio of ePAD to end-diastolic volume) of 0.11±0.06 mm Hg/mL. In contrast, SHF patients had EF of 24±10%, end-diastolic dimension of 68±11 mm, ePAD of 18±7 mm Hg, and diastolic distensibility index of 0.06±0.04 mm Hg/mL (P<0.05 versus DHF for all variables except ePAD). In SHF and DHF patients who developed acute decompensated HF, these events were associated with a significant increase in ePAD, from 17±7 to 22±7 mm Hg (P<0.05) in DHF and from 21±9 to 24±8 mm Hg (P<0.05) in SHF. As a group, patients who did not have acute decompensated HF events had no significant changes in ePAD. Conclusions— Significant structural and functional differences were found between patients with SHF and those with DHF; however, elevated diastolic pressures play a pivotal role in the underlying pathophysiology of chronic compensated and acute decompensated HF in both SHF and DHF.

Measurement of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure from the right ventricle

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the feasibility of estimating pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure from within the right ventricle. If feasible, this could have important implications for long-term hemodynamic monitoring. BACKGROUND Right ventricular pressure at the time of pulmonary valve opening closely approximates pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure. Because maximal first derivative of right ventricular pressure (dP/dt) can be easily measured, if it occurs at or very near pulmonary valve opening, right ventricular pressure at maximal right ventricular dP/dt would be an estimation of pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure. METHODS In 10 patients undergoing routine right and left heart catheterization, simultaneous measurements were made using micromanometers in the right ventricle and pulmonary artery at baseline, during isometric work and Valsalva maneuver. Right ventricular pressure at maximal right ventricular dP/dt was considered the estimated pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure and was compared with the actual pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure. RESULTS At baseline, estimated and actual pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressures were (mean +/- SD) 17.7 +/- 6.6 and 16.7 +/- 6.7 mm Hg, respectively (p = NS). During isometric stress, estimated and actual pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressures were 30.4 +/- 12.7 and 28.4 +/- 10.1 mm Hg, respectively (p = NS). During Valsalva maneuvers, estimated and actual pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressures were 36.5 +/- 17.8 and 38.0 +/- 16.1 mm Hg, respectively (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS Although more extensive testing is necessary to evaluate validity in different physiologic and pathologic situations, it appears that right ventricular pressure at maximal right ventricular dP/dt can provide accurate estimation of pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure.

Chronic Ambulatory Intracardiac Pressures and Future Heart Failure Events

Background—Intracardiac pressures in heart failure (HF) have been measured in patients while supine in the hospital but change at home with posture and activity. The optimal level of chronic ambulatory pressure is unknown. This analysis compared chronic intracardiac pressures to later HF events and sought a threshold above which higher pressures conferred worse outcomes. Methods and Results—Median pressures were measured every 24 hours from continuous 8-minute segments for 6 months after implantation of hemodynamic monitors in 261 patients with New York Heart Association class III-IV HF in the Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure Study. Baseline and chronic daily medians of estimated pulmonary artery diastolic, right ventricular systolic, and right ventricular end-diastolic pressures were compared with HF event rate. The group median for chronic 24-hour estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure was 28 mm Hg (excluding 7 days before and after events). Despite weight-guided management, events occurred in 100 of 261 (38%) patients. Event risk increased progressively with higher chronic 24-hour estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure, from 20% at 18 mm Hg to 34% at 25 mm Hg and 56% at 30 mm Hg, with similar relations for right ventricular pressures. Among patients with baseline day median estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressures of ≥25 mm Hg, event risk was 1.10/6 mo when they remained chronically ≥25 mm Hg, but risk fell to 0.47 when 24-hour pressures declined to <25 mm Hg for more than half of the days. Conclusions—Despite current management, many patients with advanced HF live on a plateau of high filling pressures from which later events occur. This risk is progressively higher with higher chronic ambulatory pressures. It is not known whether more targeted intervention could maintain lower chronic ambulatory pressures and better outcomes.

Initial Experience With an Implantable Hemodynamic Monitor

BACKGROUND Measurement of intracardiac hemodynamic parameters has been limited to brief periods in the acute care setting. We developed and evaluated an implantable hemodynamic monitor that is capable of measuring chronic right ventricular oxygen saturation and pulmonary artery pressure. METHODS AND RESULTS The device consists of an electronic controller placed subcutaneously and two transvenous leads placed in the right ventricle (reflectance oximeter) and pulmonary artery (variable capacitance pressure sensor). Implantation was performed in 10 patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. Average implant pulmonary artery pressures were systolic, 52 +/- 16 mm Hg; diastolic, 29 +/- 11 mm Hg; and mean, 40 +/- 12 mm Hg. The mean right ventricular oxygen saturation at implant was 51%. Provocative maneuvers, including postural changes, sublingual nitroglycerin, and bicycle exercise, demonstrated expected changes in measured oxygen saturation and pulmonary artery pressures over time. At follow-up of 0.5 to 15.5 months, there were no significant differences between pulmonary artery pressures or oxygen saturation values transmitted from the device and simultaneous measurement with balloon flotation catheters. Four of the pulmonary artery leads dislodged and three demonstrated sensor drift, whereas two of the oxygen saturation sensors failed. Four patients died and four received transplants. Pathological study did not demonstrate injury to the right ventricular outflow tract or pulmonic valve. CONCLUSIONS Chronic measurement of hemodynamic parameters in the outpatient setting with implantable sensor technology appears to be feasible. The devices are well tolerated without significant untoward effects, and the sensors generally function well over time, providing reliable information. Clinical usefulness remains to be established.

Development of Implantable Devices for Continuous Ambulatory Monitoring of Central Hemodynamic Values in Heart Failure Patients

Background: Care and management of patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) is a major health‐care challenge. The value of acute hemodynamic data in assessing heart failure has been questioned in some studies, while more intensive hemodynamic monitoring has been reported to improve patient care in others. A series of patient studies are reported here that were conducted to identify device requirements and verify the feasibility of continuous hemodynamic monitoring in CHF patients and devices for remote transfer and use of these data.

Monitoring of Pulmonary Arterial Diastolic Pressure Through a Right Ventricular Pressure Transducer

Pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure is an important parameter for hemodynamic monitoring in congestive heart failure. It is traditionally obtained through a pulmonary arterial catheter. If it could be obtained from a sensor in the right ventricle, chronic monitoring would be possible without the use of a pulmonary arterial catheter. This study is based on the hypothesis that pulmonary valve opening and pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure occur at the time of maximum positive rate of pressure development (dP/dt) in the right ventricle, when the pressures should be equal. Thus, right ventricular pressure at the time of maximum dP/dt (PAD index) should be a reasonable estimate of pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure. Eight patients with heart failure were catheterized and exposed to hemodynamic stress. Right ventricular and pulmonary arterial pressures were simultaneously recorded from a Millar (Houston, TX) catheter with two pressure transducers. The distal transducer was positioned in the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery and the proximal transducer was placed in the right ventricle. Pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure and PAD index were stored beat by beat on a bed-side computer. Acceptable recordings were obtained in all patients. Recordings from the individual patients showed a good covariation between PAD index and pulmonary arterial pressure during different hemodynamic manuevers, except during infusion of dobutamine, when the correlation was not as good. Pulmonary arterial diastolic pressure may be estimated from a transducer in the right ventricle, thus eliminating the need for a permanent pulmonary arterial catheter in an implantable hemodynamic monitoring system. Further studies are needed to verify the correlation on a long-term basis.

Continuous Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Mild to Moderate Heart Failure: Results of the Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (REDUCEhf) Trial

Clinical trial results support the hypothesis that implantable hemodynamic monitoring (IHM) systems may reduce hospitalizations among patients with chronic heart failure (HF). The Reducing Decompensation Events Utilizing Intracardiac Pressures in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (REDUCE hf  ) study was a prospective, randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial that enrolled patients with New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms, an indication for an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), and a previous HF hospitalization. A combination IHM-ICD was implanted and patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group in which hemodynamic information was used or a control group in which hemodynamic information was not available. Patients were followed for 12 months to evaluate the primary efficacy end point of HF hospitalizations, emergency department visits, or urgent clinic visits. The trial was designed to enroll 1300 patients, but stopped at 400 patients because of IHM lead failures experienced from previous trials. A total of 202 treatment patients and 198 controls were randomized for 12-month follow-up. The primary safety end point was met, but the rate of HF equivalents was not different between groups. REDUCE hf was unable to test clinical efficacy end points adequately. The device combining IHM-ICD technology was safe and functioned appropriately. Patients at high risk for decompensated HF have high baseline filling pressures and demonstrate consistent increases as the process of congestion worsens to the time of hospitalization.

Implant experience with an implantable hemodynamic monitor for the management of symptomatic heart failure.

Introduction: Management of congestive heart failure is a serious public health problem. The use of implantable hemodynamic monitors (IHMs) may assist in this management by providing continuous ambulatory filling pressure status for optimal volume management.

Measurement of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure from a right ventricular pressure transducer in patients with heart failure

Recent studies have demonstrated that pulmonary artery diastolic (PAD) pressure can be measured from a transducer positioned in the right ventricle (RV) based on the finding that PAD and RV pressures are equal at the time of pulmonary valve opening, which is associated with the time of maximum positive rate of pressure development (dP/dtmax) in the ventricle. The objective of this study was to assess the correlation between estimated PAD (ePAD) pressure, obtained through a RV transducer, and actual PAD (aPAD) pressure in patients with heart failure who have abnormal hemodynamics, reduced systolic function, and variable degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Simultaneous measurements of pulmonary artery and RV pressures were obtained with a high-fidelity Millar catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, TX) in 10 patients with New York Heart Association class III-IV heart failure who were being evaluated for cardiac transplantation. The overall correlation between ePAD and aPAD pressures was .92 (R2 = .878). This was not significantly different during the Valsalva maneuver (r = .96, R2 = .943), submaximal bicycle exercise (r = .87, R2 = .756), or infusions of dobutamine and nitroglycerin (r = .82, R2 = .730). The overall average difference between the average ePAD (24.6 +/- 7.0 mmHg) and aPAD (23.6 +/- 7.0 mmHg) pressures was 1.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg. The average difference between the two pressures in patients with mild to severe MR or TR was not different compared to those patients with no or trace MR or TR. The estimation of PAD pressure from an RV transducer is valid in patients with heart failure who have abnormal hemodynamics, reduced systolic function, and variable degrees of MR and TR. This correlation was observed at rest and during several provocative maneuvers. These data will be important for the development of a chronic, implantable hemodynamic monitor for patients with heart failure.

Application of Implantable Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Management of Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure : A Subgroup Analysis of the COMPASS-HF Trial

BACKGROUND Nearly half of all patients with chronic heart failure (HF) have a normal ejection fraction (EF), and abnormal diastolic function (ie, diastolic heart failure [DHF]). However, appropriate management of DHF patients remains a difficult and uncertain challenge. METHODS AND RESULTS The Chronicle Offers Management to Patients with Advanced Signs and Symptoms of Heart Failure (COMPASS-HF) trial was designed to evaluate whether an implantable hemodynamic monitor (IHM) was safe and effective in reducing the number of heart failure-related events (HFRE) in patients with chronic HF. The current study presents data on a prespecified and planned subgroup analysis from the COMPASS-HF trial: 70 patients with an EF > or =50% (ie, DHF). As such, this represents a subgroup analysis of the COMPASS-HF Trial. DHF patients were randomized to IHM-guided care (treatment) vs. standard care (control) for 6 months. All 70 patients received optimal medical therapy, but the hemodynamic information from the IHM was used to guide patient management only in the treatment group. The HFRE rate in DHF patients randomized to treatment was 0.58 events/6 months compared with DHF patients randomized to control, which was 0.73 events/6 months; this represented a 20% nonsignificant reduction in the overall HFRE rate in the treatment group (95% CI = -46, 56, P = .66). There was a 29% nonsignificant reduction in the relative risk of a HF hospitalization in the DHF patients randomized to treatment compared with DHF patients randomized to control (95% CI = -69, 70, P = .43). CONCLUSIONS The IHM was shown to be safe and was associated with a very low system-related and procedure-related complication rate in DHF patients. However, in this subgroup analysis limited to 70 DHF patients, the addition IHM-guided care did not significantly lower the rate of HFR events. The results of this subgroup analysis in DHF patients, for whom there are currently no proven, effective management strategies, will be used to design future studies defining the effects of IHM-guided care in patients with DHF.