Tom D. Ivey

A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus monophasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans

Biphasic waveforms have been suggested as a superior waveform for ventricular defibrillation. To test this premise, a prospective randomized intraoperative evaluation of defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses was performed in 22 survivors of out of hospital ventricular fibrillation who were undergoing cardiac surgery for implantation of an automatic defibrillator. The initial waveform used in a patient for defibrillation testing, either monophasic or biphasic, was randomly selected. Subsequently, each patient served as his or her own control for defibrillation testing of the other waveform. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate ventricular fibrillation with a single discharge delivered 10 s after initiation of an episode of ventricular fibrillation induced with alternating current. Each defibrillation pulse was recorded oscilloscopically, and defibrillation pulse voltage, current, resistance and stored energy were measured. Fifteen (68%) of the 22 patients had a lower defibrillation threshold with the biphasic pulse, 3 (14%) had a lower threshold with the monophasic pulse and 4 (18%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 1.0 J) regardless of waveform. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 317 +/- 105 V when the monophasic pulse was used and 267 +/- 102 V (16% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.008). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 7.9 +/- 3.7 A when the monophasic pulse was used and 6.8 +/- 3.8 A (14% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.051).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hypoperfusion as a possible factor in the development of gastrointestinal complications after cardiac surgery

This study has presented the spectrum of postoperative gastrointestinal system complications after open heart surgery at the University of Washington from 1980 through 1983. The frequent necessity for operative intervention and a mortality rate of 17 percent in our study of gastrointestinal complications in patients who have undergone open heart surgery indicates the need for early diagnosis and treatment. The data suggest that bypass times approaching 100 minutes and the presence of postoperative cardiogenic shock are important risk factors in the development of such complications in elective cardiac surgery patients. An incidence of gastrointestinal complications of 8.6 percent in those undergoing repair of acute aortic dissections makes gastrointestinal complaints particularly suspicious in this subgroup.

Does Preservation of the Posterior Chordae Tendineae Enhance Survival during Mitral Valve Replacement

During a 30-month period, 51 patients underwent mitral valve replacement. There were 3 hospital deaths (5.9%), 2 of which were due to ventricular rupture. The 3 patients who died were among 13 patients in whom mitral valve replacement was combined with tricuspid or aortic valve operation or both. Postmortem findings in the 2 patients who died of ventricular rupture showed that the ventricular tears were located between the atrioventricular groove and the unresected papillary muscle stumps, in an area of ventricle formerly tethered by the posterior chordae tendineae. In the last 14 patients in the series, the posterior leaflet of the mitral valve and its chordae tendineae were left intact, and there was no mortality or prosthetic valve dysfunction. In patients with myxomatous or ischemic disease, the posterior leaflet was left completely intact. For patients with fibrocalcific rheumatic disease, we have developed a technique of partial excision and debridement of the posterior leaflet, preserving the intermediate and basal chordae tendineae attachments. With the techniques described, preservation of all or part of the posterior leaflet and its chordae tendineae does not appear to interfere with prosthetic valve function and, by reducing the risk of ventricular rupture, should enhance survival after mitral valve replacement.

Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacy.

The effect of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds in humans is unknown. This prospective, randomized evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation thresholds was performed in 21 survivors of ventricular fibrillation (VF) undergoing cardiac surgery. Defibrillation was always performed with 2 identical large rectangular, wire mesh electrodes positioned over the anterior wall of the right ventricle and the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle. The initial electrode polarity for the left ventricular (LV) electrode was chosen randomly for determination of the defibrillation threshold. Subsequently, electrode polarity was reversed. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate VF with a single discharge delivered 10 seconds after initiation of an episode of VF with alternating current. For each defibrillation pulse, voltage, current, resistance and delivered energy were recorded. Of the 21 patients, 15 (71%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was positive, 2 patients (10%) had a lower defibrillation threshold when the LV electrode was negative and 4 patients (19%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 0.5 J) regardless of polarity. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 370 +/- 88 volts when the LV electrode was negative and 320 +/- 109 volts (14% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.014). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 9.3 +/- 3.1 amps when the LV electrode was negative compared to 7.7 +/- 3.1 amps (17% less) when the LV electrode was positive (p = 0.0033). There were no differences in resistance with the 2 configurations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Transvenous defibrillation in humans via the coronary sinus.

A consistently effective transvenous defibrillation system for use in automatic defibrillators could significantly alter the approach to patients at risk of sudden death. Transvenous defibrillation systems that use a right ventricular (RV) electrode only or an RV electrode in combination with a chest patch are relatively inefficient at applying current to the posterolateral left ventricle. An RV electrode combined with a coronary sinus (CS) electrode, however, may improve current distribution to the posterolateral left ventricle. The purpose of this investigation, therefore, was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a specially designed transvenous lead system with a CS electrode capable of current delivery to this relatively inaccessible region of the heart. In 20 survivors of cardiac arrest, we determined defibrillation efficacy immediately before defibrillator surgery for monophasic pulses delivered between an RV catheter electrode and a CS catheter electrode system and compared these findings with an RV catheter electrode-thoracic patch defibrillation system. Subsequently, we referenced the efficacy of both transvenous systems to an epicardial patch electrode system at the time of defibrillator implantation. The mean delivered-energy defibrillation threshold for the CS-RV electrode system was 17.5 +/- 7.9 J, which was substantially lower than the RV electrode-thoracic patch system (25.6 +/- 11.4 J, p = 0.0016 [46% more]). Defibrillation threshold voltage was 529 +/- 123 V for the CS-RV electrode system and 647 +/- 164 V (22% more) for the RV electrode-thoracic patch system (p = 0.0013).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Some factors affecting bubble formation with catheter-mediated defibrillator pulses.

Factors affecting bubble formation during delivery of defibrillator pulses to arrhythmogenic cardiac tissue via a catheter are unknown. We investigated the role of energy, electrode surface area, interelectrode distance, and electrode polarity on bubble formation and on current and voltage waveforms during delivery of damped sinusoidal discharges from a standard defibrillator to anticoagulated bovine blood. Gas composition was studied with mass spectrometry. Defibrillator energy settings were varied between 5 and 360 J. The principal catheter used for study was a Medtronic 6992A lead. Additional electrodes tested included 2, 5, and 10 mm long No. 6F, 7F, and 8F copper electrodes. Interelectrode distances used to assess the effect of anode-cathode spacing were 1, 5, 10, and 20 cm. Bubble volume increased linearly from 0.043 to 0.134 ml per cathodal pulse and from 0.030 to 3.50 ml per anodal pulse as energy settings were increased from 5 to 360 J (r = .99). Typical smooth waveforms for both current and voltage were seen only in the absence of bubbles. The voltage waveform was distorted for each cathodal pulse of 100 J or more and for each anodal pulse of 10 J or more only if bubbles were present. The effect of electrode surface area on bubble formation was tested at a 200 J energy setting and at a 10 cm interelectrode distance with the use of cathodal pulses. Bubble formation varied inversely with electrode surface area (r = .876). Bubble formation, however, varied minimally as interelectrode spacing was changed from 1 to 20 cm. The effect of polarity on bubble formation when the Medtronic 6992A distal electrode and an 8.5 cm disk electrode separated by 10 cm were used was highly significant. For a 200 J pulse, bubble formation with the catheter as anode was 3.30 +/- 0.10 ml and with the catheter as cathode it was 0.070 +/- 0.002 ml (p less than .001). Mass spectrometry of both anodal and cathodal gas samples demonstrated the constituents of the gas bubble to include a variety of gases, which is inconsistent with simple electrolytic production of the bubbles observed. The predominance of nitrogen in either polarity sample suggested that the principal source of the bubble was dissolved air. In summary, bubble formation at an electrode receiving damped sinusoidal outputs from a standard defibrillator does not vary significantly with varying interelectrode distance. However, it is directly proportional to energy and inversely proportional to electrode surface area. Anodal catheter discharges produce considerably more bubbles than do cathodal discharges.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Prospective comparison of sequential pulse and single pulse defibrillation with use of two different clinically available systems

Sixteen out-of-hospital survivors of ventricular fibrillation underwent a prospective, randomized, intraoperative comparison of sequential pulse and single pulse defibrillation with use of two distinct electrode systems and waveform shapes currently available for clinical use. Defibrillation was tested alternately with either the single pulse or the sequential pulse system 10 s into an episode of ventricular fibrillation. Sequential pulse defibrillation was performed with two 4 ms truncated exponential pulses of constant duration delivered to three equally spaced oval epicardial patch electrodes composed of concentric coils. The posterior left ventricular electrode served as the common cathode. The first anode was over the anterior right ventricle and the second anode was over the anterior left ventricle. Single pulse defibrillation was performed with the standard intracardiac defibrillation system with use of a single truncated exponential pulse with a fixed 65% tilt delivered across two rectangular, wire mesh epicardial patch electrodes positioned over the anterior right ventricle and posterolateral left ventricle. During defibrillation threshold determination, voltage and current waveforms were recorded and used to determine pulsing resistance and delivered and stored energy. Average defibrillation threshold leading edge voltage for the single pulse technique was 273 +/- 101 V compared with 246 +/- 67 V (11% less) for the sequential pulse technique (p = 0.136). Defibrillation threshold leading edge current for the single pulse technique was 6.7 +/- 2.5 A compared with 5.2 +/- 1.7 A (29% less) for the sequential pulse method (p = 0.005). The defibrillation threshold delivered energy was 5.6 +/- 4.0 J for the single pulse technique and 3.5 +/- 1.8 J (38% less) for the sequential pulse technique (p = 0.021).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Failure of the automatic implantable defibrillator to detect ventricular fibrillation

Abstract Some of the reported problems with the use of the automatic implantable defibrillator (AID) include inappropriate discharge, 1–3 failure to defibrillate because of excessively high defibrillation thresholds 3–5 and failure to sense ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients who also have pacemakers. 1,2 In this report, we describe another potential problem: the failure of an AID to sense VF because of variable bipolar epicardial electrogram amplitudes during VF.

Boerhaave syndrome. Successful conservative management in three patients with late presentation

Three patients with Boerhaave syndrome were successfully managed with nonoperative treatment. The diagnosis was delayed 5 days in one patient and 10 days in the other two. None of the patients appeared septic. Their conditions had been misdiagnosed as myocardial infarction, pneumonia and pulmonary embolism. Treatment consisted of intravenous hyperalimentation and administration of antacids and antibiotics. Cimetidine was also used in one patient. Two patients were discharged 14 days after diagnosis and the third on the 20th hospital day. Follow-up barium swallows showed complete healing in 2 months in all three patients. Conservative management of spontaneous esophageal perforation is feasible when (1) the perforation is already 5 days old, (2) there are no signs of severe sepsis, (3) esophageal barium study shows a wide-mouthed cavity draining freely back into the esophagus, and (4) the pleural space is not contaminated. When the diagnosis is made promptly, surgical therapy remains the treatment of choice, and patients managed conservatively who show signs of sepsis should be operated on without hesitation. Follow-up esophageal evaluation should be performed to confirm complete healing and to evaluate underlying disease.

Postinfarction angina: results of early revascularization.

To assess the efficacy of surgical revascularization for postinfarction angina within 30 days of acute infarction, the clinical course of 103 patients treated surgically from January 1979 to July 1982 was reviewed. There were 84 men (82%) and 19 women (18%) with a mean age of 58 years (range 34 to 80). Group A (11 patients) underwent surgery within 24 hours of infarction, Group B (21 patients) within 7 days and Group C (71 patients) within 30 days. Eighty-four patients (82%) had subendocardial infarctions and 19 patients (18%) had transmural infarction. Transmural infarction was more common in patients in Group A (36%) than in those in either Group B (19%) or Group C (15%). There were two deaths, both in Group C (1.9%), within 30 days of surgery. The use of intraaortic balloon or inotropic support and the occurrence of major arrhythmias or perioperative infarction was noted in 30 patients (29%) (64% in Group A, 33% in Group B and 18% in Group C). The average time in the intensive care unit was 3.2 days, with an average total hospital stay after surgery of 8.3 days. Late follow-up (mean 15.4 months, range 1 to 39) is complete for 97 patients (97%). There were no late myocardial infarctions and 93 patients (96%) were essentially free of angina. The only late death (1.0%) was caused by septicemia from delayed sternal wound infection. This study suggests that myocardial revascularization within the first 30 days after myocardial infarction can be accomplished with an acceptable operative mortality in selected patients with postinfarction angina refractory to medical management.