Tom McIntosh

Beyond the divides: Towards critical population health research

The term ‘population health’ has supplanted that of public health and health promotion in many Anglophone countries. The ideas underlying the term are not new and owe much to the legacies of nineteenth-century public health radicalism, Latin American social medicine and, more recently, social epidemiology. Its influential modeling by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research in the early 1990s, however, was criticized for a lack of theory, reliance on large data sets, a simplistic modeling of the healthcare/economy relationship, little attention to the physical environment and an absence of human agency. While researchers working under the rubric of population health have addressed many of these early limitations, there has yet to be an articulation of what comprises a critical population health research practice. This article, based on the discussions and work of an interdisciplinary group of researchers in the Saskatchewan Population Health and Evaluation Research Unit (SPHERU) in Canada, argues that such a practice proceeds from a theoretical engagement (theories of knowledge, society and social change), community engagement (a politicization of research knowledge) and policy engagement (which must extend beyond the simplistic notions of ‘knowledge translation’ that now permeate the research communities). A critical population health research practice, it concludes, is a moral praxis built upon explicit social values and analyses.

Recommendations for action on the social determinants of health: a Canadian perspective

we are now well positioned to understand and address health disparities at the global, national, and local levels. The global resurgence of interest in addressing health disparities in the 1990s and 2000s through various movements, such as the WHO Commission on the Social Determinants of Health and their fi nal report with evidence-based recommendations,

Understanding and improving the health of workers in the new economy: A call for a participatory dialogue-based approach to work-health research

Changes in the nature and experience of work, and the emergence of new forms of injuries and illnesses, call into question the prevailing scientist-led, positivist approach to work and health research. This paper critiques this approach on epistemological, methodological and ethical grounds, arguing that it is not capable of understanding and improving workers’ health in todays global economy. The authors call for a more participatory approach to research to better understand the complex linkages between work and health, and to better bring about improvement to the health of workplaces.

The Fiscal Sustainability of Health Care in Canada: The Romanow Papers, Volume 1

The Fiscal Sustainability of Health Care - the first of a three-volume set of selected papers from the Romanow Commission - comprises the most influential discussion papers on the fiscal sustainability of public health care in the future. The subjects covered include the current and potential cost drivers of the system, the financing and delivery of health care, fiscal federalism, and international trade regimes. While some of the contributors are among Canadas best known and respected figures in the field, others are relatively new scholars from Canada and abroad who bring fresh perspectives and new insights to the issue of fiscal sustainability. Presenting divergent diagnoses and policy prescriptions, the papers collectively highlight the many factors that governments and health care sector managers must confront to keep the Canadian health care system viable in the 21st century.