Tomasz Spyt

Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve bioprosthesis.

INTRODUCTION Changes in atrioventricular (AV) conduction and need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) are a recognized complication after open aortic valve replacement. We hypothesized that the need for PPM after CoreValve (Corevalve Inc, Irvine, CA) can be predicted with a combination of baseline variables. METHODS In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, potential clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic predictors of permanent pacing requirement were studied. RESULTS Between January 2007 and March 2008, 34 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis were recruited in a single center. Mean age was 84.4 years (SD 5.4, range 71-93). Of 34 cases paced at baseline, 3 (8.8%) were excluded from this analysis, as was the single periprocedural mortality. Of the remaining 30, 10 underwent permanent pacemaker implantation during the same admission (33.3%). PPM was for prolonged high-grade AV block in 4 cases, episodic high-grade AV block in 5, and sinus node disease in 1. Need for pacemaker was correlated to left axis deviation at baseline (P = .004, r = 0.508) and left bundle-branch block with left axis deviation (P = .002, r = 0.548). It was related to diastolic interventricular septal dimension on transthoracic echocardiography >17 mm (P = .045, r = 0.39) and the baseline thickness of the native noncoronary cusp (P = .002, r = 0.655). A susceptibility model was generated, and if at least one of (1) left bundle-branch block with left axis deviation, (2) interventricular septal dimension >17 mm, or (3) noncoronary cusp thickness >8 mm was present, the likelihood of PPM could be predicted with 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity and a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.93 +/- 0.055 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS After transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve, permanent pacing was performed in around a third of patients and we present preliminary concepts towards a predictive model for this phenomenon.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the United Kingdom Temporal Trends, Predictors of Outcome, and 6-Year Follow-Up: A Report From the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Registry, 2007 to 2012

Background— We assessed trends in the performance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom from the first case in 2007 to the end of 2012. We analyzed changes in case mix, complications, outcomes to 6 years, and predictors of mortality. Methods and Results— Annual cohorts were examined. Mortality outcomes were analyzed in the 92% of patients from England and Wales for whom independent mortality tracking was available. A total of 3980 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed. In successive years, there was an increase in frequency of impaired left ventricular function, but there was no change in Logistic EuroSCORE. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.3%; it was highest in the first cohort (2007–2008), after which there were no further significant changes. One-year survival was 81.7%, falling to 37.3% at 6 years. Discharge by day 5 rose from 16.7% in 2007 and 2008 to 28% in 2012. The only multivariate preprocedural predictor of 30-day mortality was Logistic EuroSCORE ≥40. During long-term follow-up, multivariate predictors of mortality were preprocedural atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, creatinine >200 μmol/L, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. The strongest independent procedural predictor of long-term mortality was periprocedural stroke (hazard ratio=3.00; P <0.0001). Nonfemoral access and postprocedural aortic regurgitation were also significant predictors of adverse outcome. Conclusions— We analyzed transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an entire country, with follow-up over 6 years. Although clinical profiles of enrolled patients remained unchanged, longer-term outcomes improved, and patients were discharged earlier. Periprocedural stroke, nonfemoral access, and postprocedural aortic regurgitation are predictors of adverse outcome, along with intrinsic patient risk factors. # CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE {#article-title-29}Background— We assessed trends in the performance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom from the first case in 2007 to the end of 2012. We analyzed changes in case mix, complications, outcomes to 6 years, and predictors of mortality. Methods and Results— Annual cohorts were examined. Mortality outcomes were analyzed in the 92% of patients from England and Wales for whom independent mortality tracking was available. A total of 3980 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed. In successive years, there was an increase in frequency of impaired left ventricular function, but there was no change in Logistic EuroSCORE. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.3%; it was highest in the first cohort (2007–2008), after which there were no further significant changes. One-year survival was 81.7%, falling to 37.3% at 6 years. Discharge by day 5 rose from 16.7% in 2007 and 2008 to 28% in 2012. The only multivariate preprocedural predictor of 30-day mortality was Logistic EuroSCORE ≥40. During long-term follow-up, multivariate predictors of mortality were preprocedural atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, creatinine >200 &mgr;mol/L, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. The strongest independent procedural predictor of long-term mortality was periprocedural stroke (hazard ratio=3.00; P<0.0001). Nonfemoral access and postprocedural aortic regurgitation were also significant predictors of adverse outcome. Conclusions— We analyzed transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an entire country, with follow-up over 6 years. Although clinical profiles of enrolled patients remained unchanged, longer-term outcomes improved, and patients were discharged earlier. Periprocedural stroke, nonfemoral access, and postprocedural aortic regurgitation are predictors of adverse outcome, along with intrinsic patient risk factors.

Reliability of Allen's test in selection of patients for radial artery harvest.

BACKGROUND Allens test is widely used to assess the ulnar collateral blood supply of the hand before radial artery harvest for coronary bypass surgery. This study was performed to determine the optimum cut-off point for a positive Allens test and the clinical reliability of Allens test in this role. METHODS Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were examined by independent observers using both Allens test and a Doppler ultrasound test of the ulnar collateral circulation. RESULTS We examined 93 hands in 47 patients; mean age was 63.6 years. Receiver operating characteristic analysis found that at a conventional cut-off of 6 seconds on Allens test had a sensitivity of 54.5%, specificity of 91.7%, and diagnostic accuracy of 78.5%. At a cut-off of 5 seconds diagnostic accuracy was maximal (79.6%), with sensitivity of 75.8% and specificity of 81.7%; 100% sensitivity occurred at a cut-off of 3 seconds, with specificity of 27% and diagnostic accuracy of 52%. CONCLUSIONS At no cut-off point does Allens test perform satisfactorily as a discriminatory test. It should be replaced by more objective tests, such as Doppler ultrasound.

Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis

AIMS Prosthesis-patient mismatch (P-PM) is an important determinant of morbidity and mortality following open aortic valve replacement. The aims of this study were to report its incidence and determinants following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Corevalve bioprosthesis, which have-thus far-not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis received TAVI with the Corevalve bioprosthesis via transfemoral route. Following TAVI, moderate P-PM was defined as indexed aortic valve effective orifice area (AVAi) < or =0.85 cm(2)/m(2) and severe P-PM as AVAi < or =0.65 cm(2)/m(2). Clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural factors relating to P-PM were studied. Optimal device position was defined on fluoroscopy as final position of the proximal aspect of the Corevalve stent frame 5-10 mm below the native aortic annulus. Between January 2007 and January 2009, 50 consecutive patients underwent TAVI in a single centre with the Corevalve bioprosthesis. Mean age was 82.8 years (SD 5.9; 70-93) and 48% were male. P-PM occurred in 16 of 50 cases (32%). Optimal position was achieved in 50% of cases. P-PM was unrelated to age, annulus size, LVOT size, Corevalve size, aortic angulation, ejection fraction, and sex. It was inversely correlated to optimal position (Spearman rho r = -0.34, P = 0.015). Those with optimal positioning had a 16% incidence of P-PM relative to 48% of those with suboptimal positioning (Pearson chi(2) P = 0.015). CONCLUSION The incidence of P-PM following TAVI with the Corevalve bioprosthesis is compared favourably with that seen after AVR with conventional open stented bioprostheses and its occurrence is influenced by device positioning.

Risk factors for intestinal ischaemia in cardiac surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE Mesenteric ischaemia is an uncommon (<1%) but serious complication of cardiac surgery associated with a mortality >50%. Predictors of this complication are not well defined, and diagnosis can be difficult and prompt surgical intervention can be lifesaving. METHODS AND RESULTS In a retrospective case-note analysis from May 1994 through to May 2000, we identified mesenteric ischaemia in 39 of 5349 consecutive patients (0.07%) undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. By logistic multivariate analysis, we have identified six possible predictors of intestinal ischaemia: duration of cross-clamp, use of significant inotropic support, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation for low cardiac output, need for blood transfusions, triple vessel disease and peripheral vascular disease. In all patients a combination of four predictors were present. Patients who survived this complication had surgical intervention earlier (6.4+/-3.8 h) than those who did not (16.9+/-10 h). CONCLUSIONS The diagnosis and prompt treatment of mesenteric ischaemia post cardiac surgery requires a high degree of awareness. These predictors may be useful in alerting medical staff to the possibility of gastro-intestinal ischaemic complications after cardiac surgery particularly that early surgical intervention reduces mortality.

Decrease of pulmonary hypertension impacts on prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

AIMS Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is established as a treatment strategy for patients with end-stage aortic stenosis, many of whom are suffering from severe pulmonary hypertension (PH). In cardiac surgery patients, PH is associated with less symptomatic improvement and increased late mortality. This study elucidates the impact of PH on outcome after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS Pre and 90 days post-TAVR, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was determined non-invasively by echocardiography in 353 patients undergoing TAVR. PH was classified as absent (<30 mmHg), mild-to-moderate (30-60 mmHg), and severe (>60 mmHg). Three hundred and fifty-three patients at high surgical risk, indicated by a logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6±16.5%, underwent TAVR. The severity of PH before TAVR was related to outcome with two-year mortality rates of 13.9%, 27.3%, and 48.4% for PASP <30 mmHg, 30-60 mmHg, and >60 mmHg, respectively (p=0.001). In patients with baseline PASP >60 mmHg, PASP decreased from 65.6±7.6 mmHg to 49.5±14.0 mmHg (p<0.001) at 90 days after TAVR. Patients with persistent severe PH had a worse prognosis than patients with a decrease of PASP below 60 mmHg (two-year mortality rate: 50.0% vs. 18.6%; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Severe pulmonary hypertension predicts adverse outcome after TAVR. Reduction of PASP after the procedure is associated with favourable prognosis.

Anatomic suitability for present and next generation transcatheter aortic valve prostheses: evidence for a complementary multidevice approach to treatment.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the proportion of patients anatomically suitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by multiple access approaches. BACKGROUND The devices currently in mainstream use for transcatheter treatment of severe aortic stenosis are those of Edwards (Edwards Lifesciences, Nyon, Switzerland) and Medtronic CoreValve (M-C) (Luxembourg City, Luxembourg). The range of patients that these can presently treat requires elucidation to guide the necessary evolution of these technologies and increase their scope of therapy. METHODS A consecutive series of patients were assessed with transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography and invasive angiography to assess anatomical suitability by different approaches. The transfemoral access requirements for Edwards and M-C (Edwards currently 22- and 24-F, soon to be 18- and 19-F; M-C 18-F) as well as the aortic valve annular criteria (18 to 25 mm and 20 to 27 mm, respectively) were incorporated in this assessment. Patients unsuitable for the transfemoral approach were considered for Edwards transapical and M-C transaxillary and direct ascending aortic access. Patients suitable for these devices and access approaches were identified. RESULTS Data were analyzed for 100 consecutive patients. Edwards suitability was 28% for Edwards-Sapien transfemoral, 78% for Edwards Novaflex transfemoral, and 88% for Edwards-Sapien transapical. Medtronic CoreValve suitability was 84% for transfemoral and 89% using additional transaxillary and direct aortic approaches. Of the 12 patients unsuitable for Edwards-based procedures, 8 were suitable for M-C. Of the 11 patients unsuitable for M-C-based techniques, 8 were suitable for Edwards. Only 3% were anatomically unsuitable for all approaches. CONCLUSIONS In this series, 97% of patients were anatomically suitable for a complementary approach to treatment.

Lung volume reduction surgery – a comparison of the long term outcome of unilateral vs. bilateral approaches

OBJECTIVE Bilateral lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) is thought to be preferable to unilateral surgery due to greater initial benefit but the subsequent rate of decline may also be greater. We compared the long term physiological and health status outcome of LVRS performed on one or simultaneously on both lungs. METHODS Prospective data were collected on a consecutive series of 65 patients undergoing LVRS who were all suitable for bilateral surgery. Twenty-six patients: age 59 (8) years underwent bilateral LVRS by video-assisted thoracoscopy (VAT) or sternotomy and 39 patients: age 60 (6) years underwent unilateral VAT. The perioperative effects of LVRS on spirometry were prospectively recorded at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. RESULTS The unilateral group had similar preoperative lung volumes to the bilateral patients: forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) 26 vs. 30% predicted, RV 275 vs. 246% predicted and total lung capacity (TLC) 148 vs. 142% predicted. Unilateral LVRS was associated with significantly lower weight of lung resected: 80 (31) vs. 118 (46) g; hospital stay: 16 (10) days vs. 28 (22) days. Thirty-day mortality was 3% in the unilateral and 8% in the bilateral group (P=0.34). Postoperative ventilation occurred in 5% in the unilateral and in 42% in the bilateral group (P=0.0002). The decline of FEV(1) during the first postoperative year was significant in the bilateral group (-313 ml/y, P=0.04) but not significant in the unilateral group (-50 ml/y, P=0.18). SF 36 scores in all eight domains were similar in both groups preoperatively and at any postoperative interval. CONCLUSION We have found no benefit from bilateral simultaneous LVRS and prefer unilateral LVRS because of the lower morbidity, resulting in earlier discharge, and slower decline in physiological benefit.

Mitral valve repair for active culture positive infective endocarditis

Objective: To describe the clinical and echocardiographic outcome after mitral valve (MV) repair for active culture positive infective MV endocarditis. Patients and methods: Between 1996 and 2004, 36 patients (mean (SD) age 53 (18) years) with positive blood culture up to three weeks before surgery (or positive culture of material removed at operation) and intraoperative evidence of endocarditis underwent MV repair. Staphylococci and streptococci were the most common pathogens. All patients had moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR). Mean New York Heart Association (NYHA) class was 2.3 (1.0). Follow up was complete (mean 38 (19) months). Results: Operative mortality was 2.8% (one patient). At follow up, endocarditis has not recurred. One patient developed severe recurrent MR and underwent valve replacement and one patient had moderate MR. There were two late deaths, both non-cardiac. Kaplan-Meier five year freedom from recurrent moderate to severe MR, freedom from repeat operation, and survival were 94 (4)%, 97 (3)%, and 93 (5)%, respectively. At the most recent review the mean NYHA class was 1.17 (0.3) (p < 0.0001). At the latest echocardiographic evaluation, left atrial diameters, left ventricular end diastolic diameter, and MV diameter were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) compared with preoperative values. Conclusions: MV repair for active culture positive endocarditis is associated with low operative mortality and provides satisfactory freedom from recurrent infection, freedom from repeat operation, and survival. Hence, every effort should be made to repair infected MVs and valves should be replaced only when repair is not possible.

Transcutaneous ultrasound assessment of internal thoracic artery to coronary artery grafts in patients with and without ischaemic symptoms.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate transcutaneous duplex ultrasound in the assessment of internal thoracic artery to coronary artery grafts. SETTING--Regional cardiothoracic centre. METHODS--Prospective duplex ultrasound evaluation of 83 consecutive patients undergoing left internal thoracic artery to coronary artery grafts, together with combined angiographic and duplex ultrasound evaluation of 17 patients with suspected recurrent myocardial ischaemia after internal thoracic artery grafting. RESULTS--The grafted internal thoracic artery was imaged in 65 (78%) of 83 consecutive postoperative patients, and in 13 (75%) of 17 patients with suspected graft dysfunction. Grafts were recognised by their characteristic position and biphasic blood flow pattern. Resting graft flow was estimated from the time averaged velocity and graft cross sectional area. Median resting flow in patients without ischaemic symptoms was 36 ml/min (interquartile range 24 to 49 ml/min). Of 13 patients with recurrent ischaemia in whom the graft could be imaged, nine patients with estimated flow in the lowest quartile or abnormal flow profiles, or both, had graft disease or anastomotic problems on angiography, while four with satisfactory graft flow on ultrasound examination had normal graft flow on angiography, but had evidence of native disease progression in other vessels. Two of four patients in whom it was not possible to image the graft on ultrasound had satisfactory graft function on angiography. CONCLUSIONS--For those patients whose internal thoracic artery graft can be imaged, transcutaneous duplex ultrasound is a helpful non-invasive guide to graft function. The main limitations to the technique are an inability to image the graft in about 20% of patients, and possible inaccuracy in estimating graft diameter.