Tommaso Gasbarri

Minimally Invasive and Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND The study aimed to compare the short-term results of aortic valve replacement through minimally invasive and sternotomy approaches. METHODS This is a retrospective, observational, cohort study of prospectively collected data on 709 patients undergoing isolated primary aortic valve replacement between 2004 and 2011. Of these, 338 were performed through either right anterior minithoracotomy or upper ministernotomy. With propensity score matching, 182 patients (minimally invasive group) were compared with 182 patients in conventional sternotomy (control group). RESULTS After propensity matching, the 2 groups were comparable in terms of preoperative characteristics. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (117.5 vs 104.1 min, p<0.0001) and aortic cross-clamping time (83.8 vs 71.3 min, p<0.0001) were longer in the minimally invasive group, with no difference in length of stay (median 6 vs 5 days, p=0.43), but shorter assisted ventilation time (median 8 vs 7 hours, p=0.022). Overall in-hospital mortality was identical between the groups (1.64 vs 1.64%, p=1.0). No difference in the incidence of major and minor postoperative complications and related morbidity was observed. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement was associated with a lower incidence of new onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (21% vs 31%, p=0.04). Reduction of the complication rate was observed. Median transfusion pack per patient was higher in the control group (2 vs 1 units, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS Our experience shows that mini-access isolated aortic valve surgery is a reproducible, safe, and effective procedure and reduces assisted ventilation duration, the need for blood product transfusion, and incidence of post-surgery atrial fibrillation.

A New Vacuum-Assisted Probe for Minimally Invasive Radiofrequency Ablation

PURPOSE The Cobra Adhere XL (Estech, San Ramon, CA) is a multiple-electrode, temperature-controlled, monopolar radiofrequency probe with a vacuum-assisted stabilization system. We evaluated this new technology for epicardial ablation of atrial fibrillation in mitral valve patients through a right mini-thoracotomy. DESCRIPTION Between June and August 2008, 12 patients underwent minimal invasive surgery for mitral disease and ablation for atrial fibrillation with the Cobra Adhere XL (Estech). Three patients had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Off-pump pulmonary vein isolation was performed with an epicardial oval lesion parallel to the mitral plane. In 10 patients, an endocardial lesion to the mitral annulus was added. EVALUATION There were no operative deaths or major postoperative complications. At a mean follow-up of 8.76 +/- 1.0 months, 11 patients (91.67%) were in stable sinus rhythm. Echocardiography underscored a complete recovery of atrial transport function in most of these patients (90.91%). No major cardiac and cerebrovascular events occurred during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Left-side ablation combined with minimally invasive surgery for mitral disease can be easily, safely, and effectively performed with the Cobra Adhere XL probe.

Aortic arch replacement with prophylactic aortic arch debranching during type A acute aortic dissection repair: initial experience with 23 patients.

OBJECTIVE To improve the long-term results of acute type A dissection repair, we developed a technique that combines radical surgical resection, and, at the same time, creates a safe and long landing zone for subsequent endovascular procedure on the descending aorta. METHODS Since November 2006, 23 patients (62 ± 13 years) underwent aortic arch replacement concomitant with prophylactic debranching of the supra-aortic vessels, with a specially designed arch graft. The technique consists of replacing the ascending aorta and the aortic arch, and, at the same time, relocating the origin of the supra-aortic vessels just above the sinotubular junction creating a long and safe proximal landing zone for subsequent stent-graft deployment. Perfusion was antegrade through the ascending aorta during cooling and through the vascular prosthesis during rewarming. Distal arch anastomosis was performed under moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest for 25 ± 7 min and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (46 ± 14 min). Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time were 138 ± 46 and 63 ± 22 min. RESULTS Hospital mortality was 4.3% (1/23). Postoperative morbidity includes five acute renal failures and four lung failures. No major neurological complications were observed. At follow-up (22±10 months), survival was 100% and two patients required an endovascular thoracic aorta repair for aneurysmal enlargement. In both cases, the stent grafts were successfully released in the landing zone created at the time of primary repair. CONCLUSIONS Our technique extends the suitability of endovascular therapies during type A acute dissection repair, creating a long and stable landing zone that allows safe performance of a second endovascular step if needed, both in the short- and long term.

Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Incompetence

Sutureless prostheses for surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) are usually used in degenerative calcified aortic stenosis. Less is known on the application of sutureless prostheses for pure aortic incompetence.

Transapical transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve implantation versus minimally invasive surgery for failed mitral bioprostheses

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes and survival of patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve replacement through a right anterior minithoracotomy (MIMVR) versus patients undergoing transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve (M-VIV) implantation for a failed mitral bioprostheses. METHODS From 2005 to 2015, 61 patients with a failed mitral bioprosthesis underwent either MIMVR ( n  = 40 patients, 65.6%) or M-VIV implantation ( n  = 21, 34.4%) at our institution. The groups were compared in terms of early outcomes and survival rates. Treatment selection bias was controlled by a propensity score and was included along with the comparison variable in the multivariable analyses of outcome. RESULTS Patients with M-VIV implantation were older ( P  = 0.03), had more pulmonary hypertension ( P  = 0.02) and a higher EuroSCORE ( P  = 0.001). In-hospital mortality was 7.5% ( n  = 3) in the MIMVR group and 4.7% ( n  = 1) in the M-VIV group [odds ratio (OR) = 2.46; P  = 0.512]. Incidence of stroke was 12.5% ( n  = 5) in the MIMVR group vs 4.7% ( n  = 1) in the M-VIV group (OR = 0.887; P  = 0.935). No significant differences were noted in postprocedural complications, even after adjusting the results for the propensity score. M-VIV patients had shorter stays in the intensive care unit and in the hospital ( P  = 0.02). In the M-VIV group, 28% ( n  = 7) had less than mild paravalvular leakage, whereas no patients had mild paravalvular leakage in the MIMVR group ( P  < 0.001). Finally, the 2-year survival rates were 86 ± 1% vs 87 ± 1% in patients undergoing MIMVR compared with those undergoing M-VIV implantation, respectively ( P  = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS In selected patients, M-VIV can be performed safely with results comparable with those of surgical therapy.

Antegrade and retrograde perfusion in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with transthoracic aortic clamping: a single-institution experience with 1632 patients over 12 years.

Objectives The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of a retrograde arterial perfusion (RAP) strategy versus an antegrade arterial perfusion (AAP) strategy in a consecutive, large cohort of patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with transthoracic aortic clamping through a right minithoracotomy. Methods Between 2003 and 2015, 1632 consecutive patients underwent first-time minimally invasive mitral valve surgery with transthoracic aortic clamping at our institution; 141 (8.6%) of these patients received retrograde perfusion with femoral artery cannulation, whereas 1421 (91.4%) received antegrade perfusion with ascending aorta cannulation. Logistic regression was used to evaluate outcomes and risk factors for death and stroke between groups. Results The overall frequency of 30-day mortality was 0.7% (13/1632) and was similar between groups (retrograde arterial perfusion RAP 0.7% vs AAP 0.8%; P  = 0.903). The overall postoperative stroke rate was 1.3% (22/1632). The stroke rate was significantly higher in patients receiving retrograde perfusion (3.5% vs 1.1%; P  = 0.005). Risk factors for death were advanced age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.3; P  = 0.004), mitral valve replacement (OR = 3.9; P  = 0.05), emergent procedure (OR = 3.4; P  = 0.014) and conversion to sternotomy (OR = 3.7; P  = 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis revealed that retrograde perfusion was an independent risk factor for stroke (OR = 3.3; P  = 0.004). Other risk factors were conversion to sternotomy (OR = 12; P  = 0.001), active endocarditis (OR = 5.8; P  = 0.07) and hypercholesterolaemia (OR = 2.4; P  = 0.048). Interaction modelling revealed that the only significant risk factor for a neurological event was the use of retrograde perfusion in patients older than 70 years with an atherosclerotic burden (OR = 6.4; P  = 0.033). Conclusions Minimally invasive mitral valve procedures can be performed with low morbidity and mortality. The use of retrograde perfusion is associated with a higher incidence of neurological complications in older patients with atherosclerotic burden. Central aortic cannulation permits avoidance of complications associated with retrograde perfusion and extends the suitability of minimally invasive mitral procedures to those patients who have an absolute contraindication for femoral artery cannulation.

EuroSCORE Performance in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: Discrimination Ability and External Calibration

Objective Prediction of operative risk in adults undergoing cardiac surgery remains a challenge. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is one of the most commonly used in clinical settings. Recently, the new EuroSCORE II was published attempting to improve the accuracy of risk prediction. We sought to assess the predictive value of EuroSCORE or EuroSCORE II in selected field of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Methods Patients who underwent cardiac surgery operation with minimally invasive approach from 2007 to 2013 identified from prospective cardiac surgical database. Additional variables included in EuroSCORE II, but not in original EuroSCORE, were retrospectively collected via electronic health records reviewing. The C-statistic was calculated for the EuroSCORE (additive and logistic) and EuroSCORE II. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to assess model calibration by comparing observed and expected morality in number of risk strata. Results There were 39 hospitals deaths (1.6%). A total of 2472 patients were identified from the main database. The mean ± SD logistic EuroSCORE was 7.6 ± 8.3, mean ± SD additive EuroSCORE was 6.1 ± 2.7, and mean ± SD EuroSCORE II was 2.9 ± 4.2. EuroSCORE logistic model performed with substantial accuracy of 0.78, EuroSCORE additive performed with accuracy of 0.78, and EuroSCORE II performed as almost perfect 0.82. Model calibration was poor in EuroSCORE II (χ2 = 17.57, P = 0.02), calibration for logistic EuroSCORE was also poor (χ2 = 140.58, P < 0.01), and additive model also (χ2 = 94.95, P < 0.01). The area under the curve was high in all algorithms; logistic EuroSCORE was 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.71–0.85), additive EuroSCORE was 0.79 (95% confidence interval = 0.71–0.86), and EuroSCORE II was 0.82 (95% confidence interval = 0.75–0.89). Conclusions In overall settings, original EuroSCORE and EuroSCORE II perform poorly in minimally invasive operation conditions. Data suggest that EuroSCORE could not be used for estimating operative risks correctly. New risk score should be explored, developed, and implemented for selective minimally invasive cohorts.

Right-sided minithoracotomy as a surgical approach for the concomitant treatment of atrial fibrillation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia diagnosed in humans and therefore causes a high socioeconomic burden. The Cox-Maze IV procedure is the gold standard treatment for atrial fibrillation. Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of AF is also promising. Objectives: Our aim is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and immediate plus medium-term results of concomitant AF ablation therapy in patients undergoing minimally invasive valve surgery through right-sided minithoracotomy. Patients and Methods: Retrospective data were collected from January 2012 to December 2013. Seventy-five consecutive patients underwent radiofrequency ablation during valve surgery through a right-sided minithoracotomy. Results: All 75 patients underwent radiofrequency ablation. The pulmonary vein was isolated in 6 (8%) by encircling the left and right pulmonary veins. In 9 (12%) patients, endocardial box lesions were created using a monopolar probe, while in 47 (62.7%), epicardial box lesions were produced with a monopolar probe. Thirteen (17.3%) patients received a box lesion created with a bipolar probe. Finally, in 22 (293%) patients, a line of lesions was produced leading up to the posterior mitral annulus. Only 1 (1.3%) perioperative death was observed. At discharge, 43 (57.3%) patients were in sinus rhythm and 30 (40%) were in AF. After a mean follow-up of 21.6 ± 10.1 months, 46 patients (63%) were in a stable sinus rhythm and 27 were in (37%) in AF; 26 (56.5%) patients were free from antiarrhythmic therapy, while 19 (42.2%) were still taking at least one drug. Conclusions: We can conclude that treatment of AF using a right-sided minithoracotomy approach and RF energy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for various valve diseases is feasible, safe, and reproducible.