Tommi Tenkanen
University of Helsinki
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Tommi Tenkanen.
Physical Review D | 2017
B. J. Carr; M. Raidal; Ville Vaskonen; Tommi Tenkanen; Hardi Veermäe
We revisit the cosmological and astrophysical constraints on the fraction of the dark matter in primordial black holes (PBHs) with an extended mass function. We consider a variety of mass functions, all of which are described by three parameters: a characteristic mass and width and a dark matter fraction. Various observations then impose constraints on the dark matter fraction as a function of the first two parameters. We show how these constraints relate to those for a monochromatic mass function, demonstrating that they usually become more stringent in the extended case than the monochromatic one. Considering only the well-established bounds, and neglecting the ones that depend on additional astrophysical assumptions, we find that there are three mass windows, around
International Journal of Modern Physics A | 2017
Nicolás Bernal; Matti Heikinheimo; Tommi Tenkanen; Kimmo Tuominen; Ville Vaskonen
4\times 10^{-17}M_\odot,
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2015
Sami Nurmi; Tommi Tenkanen; Kimmo Tuominen
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2016
Kimmo Kainulainen; Sami Nurmi; Tommi Tenkanen; Kimmo Tuominen; Ville Vaskonen
2\times 10^{-14}M_\odot
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2014
Kari Enqvist; Sami Nurmi; Tommi Tenkanen; Kimmo Tuominen
and
Physical Review D | 2017
B. J. Carr; Tommi Tenkanen; Ville Vaskonen
25-100M_\odot
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2016
Tommi Tenkanen; Kimmo Tuominen; Ville Vaskonen
, where PBHs can constitute all dark matter. However, if one includes all the bounds, PBHs can only constitute of order
Physical Review D | 2016
Tommi Tenkanen; Ville Vaskonen
10\%
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics | 2017
Tommi Tenkanen
of the dark matter.
Journal of High Energy Physics | 2016
Tommi Tenkanen
We present an overview of scenarios where the observed Dark Matter (DM) abundance consists of Feebly Interacting Massive Particles (FIMPs), produced nonthermally by the so-called freeze-in mechanism. In contrast to the usual freeze-out scenario, frozen-in FIMP DM interacts very weakly with the particles in the visible sector and never attained thermal equilibrium with the baryon–photon fluid in the early Universe. Instead of being determined by its annihilation strength, the DM abundance depends on the decay and annihilation strengths of particles in equilibrium with the baryon–photon fluid, as well as couplings in the DM sector. This makes frozen-in DM very difficult but not impossible to test. In this review, we present the freeze-in mechanism and its variations considered in the literature (dark freeze-out and reannihilation), compare them to the standard DM freeze-out scenario, discuss several aspects of model building, and pay particular attention to observational properties and general testability o...