Tomoyo Okada

RA-GEF, a Novel Rap1A Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Containing a Ras/Rap1A-associating Domain, Is Conserved between Nematode and Humans

A yeast two-hybrid screening for Ras-binding proteins in nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has identified a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) containing a Ras/Rap1A-associating (RA) domain, termed Ce-RA-GEF. Both Ce-RA-GEF and its human counterpart Hs-RA-GEF possessed a PSD-95/DlgA/ZO-1 (PDZ) domain and a Ras exchanger motif (REM) domain in addition to the RA and GEF domains. They also contained a region homologous to a cyclic nucleotide monophosphate-binding domain, which turned out to be incapable of binding cAMP or cGMP. Although the REM and GEF domains are conserved with other GEFs acting on Ras family small GTP-binding proteins, the RA and PDZ domains are unseen in any of them. Hs-RA-GEF exhibited not only a GTP-dependent binding activity to Rap1A at its RA domain but also an activity to stimulate GDP/GTP exchange of Rap1A both in vitro and in vivo at the segment containing its REM and GEF domains. However, it did not exhibit any binding or GEF activity toward Ras. On the other hand, Ce-RA-GEF associated with and stimulated GDP/GTP exchange of both Ras and Rap1A. These results indicate that Ce-RA-GEF and Hs-RA-GEF define a novel class of Rap1A GEF molecules, which are conserved through evolution.

THE STRENGTH OF INTERACTION AT THE RAF CYSTEINE-RICH DOMAIN IS A CRITICAL DETERMINANT OF RESPONSE OF RAF TO RAS FAMILY SMALL GTPASES

ABSTRACT To be fully activated at the plasma membrane, Raf-1 must establish two distinct modes of interactions with Ras, one through its Ras-binding domain and the other through its cysteine-rich domain (CRD). The Ras homologue Rap1A is incapable of activating Raf-1 and even antagonizes Ras-dependent activation of Raf-1. We proposed previously that this property of Rap1A may be attributable to its greatly enhanced interaction with Raf-1 CRD compared to Ras. On the other hand, B-Raf, another Raf family member, is activatable by both Ras and Rap1A. When interactions with Ras and Rap1A were measured, B-Raf CRD did not exhibit the enhanced interaction with Rap1A, suggesting that the strength of interaction at CRDs may account for the differential action of Rap1A on Raf-1 and B-Raf. The importance of the interaction at the CRD is further supported by a domain-shuffling experiment between Raf-1 and B-Raf, which clearly indicated that the nature of CRD determines the specificity of response to Rap1A: Raf-1, whose CRD is replaced by B-Raf CRD, became activatable by Rap1A, whereas B-Raf, whose CRD is replaced by Raf-1 CRD, lost its response to Rap1A. Finally, a B-Raf CRD mutant whose interaction with Rap1A is selectively enhanced was isolated and found to possess the double mutation K252E/M278T. B-Raf carrying this mutation was not activated by Rap1A but retained its response to Ras. These results indicate that the strength of interaction with Ras and Rap1A at its CRD may be a critical determinant of regulation of the Raf kinase activity by the Ras family small GTPases.

Effect of Phosphorylation on Activities of Rap1A to Interact with Raf-1 and to Suppress Ras-dependent Raf-1 Activation

Rap1A is phosphorylated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA), and this phosphorylation has been shown to modulate its interaction with other proteins. However, it is not known whether Rap1A phosphorylation is involved in regulation of its cellular functions, including suppression of Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation. We have previously shown that this suppressive activity of Rap1A is attributable to its greatly enhanced ability to bind to the cysteine-rich region (CRR, residues 152–184) of Raf-1 compared with that of Ras. Here, we show that phosphorylation of Rap1A by PKA abolished its binding activity to CRR. Furthermore, a mutant Rap1A(S180E), whose sole PKA phosphorylation residue, Ser-180, was substituted by an acidic residue, Glu, to mimic its phosphorylated form, failed to suppress Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation in COS-7 cells. These results indicate that the CRR binding activity and the Ras-suppressive function of Rap1A can be modulated through phosphorylation and suggest that Rap1A may function as a PKA-dependent regulator of Raf-1 activation, not merely as a suppressor.

Association of Yeast Adenylyl Cyclase with Cyclase-Associated Protein CAP Forms a Second Ras-Binding Site Which Mediates Its Ras-Dependent Activation

ABSTRACT Posttranslational modification, in particular farnesylation, of Ras is crucial for activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeadenylyl cyclase (CYR1). Based on the previous observation that association of CYR1 with cyclase-associated protein (CAP) is essential for its activation by posttranslationally modified Ras, we postulated that the associated CAP might contribute to the formation of a Ras-binding site of CYR1, which mediates CYR1 activation, other than the primary Ras-binding site, the leucine-rich repeat domain. Here, we observed a posttranslational modification-dependent association of Ras with a complex between CAP and CYR1 C-terminal region. When CAP mutants defective in Ras signaling but retaining the CYR1-binding activity were isolated by screening of a pool of randomly mutagenized CAP, CYR1 complexed with two of the obtained three mutants failed to be activated efficiently by modified Ras and exhibited a severely impaired ability to bind Ras, providing a genetic evidence for the importance of the physical association with Ras at the second Ras-binding site. On the other hand, CYR1, complexed with the other CAP mutant, failed to be activated by Ras but exhibited a greatly enhanced binding to Ras. Conversely, a Ras mutant E31K, which exhibits a greatly enhanced binding to the CYR1-CAP complex, failed to activate CYR1 efficiently. Thus, the strength of interaction at the second Ras-binding site appears to be a critical determinant of CYR1 regulation by Ras: too-weak and too-strong interactions are both detrimental to CYR1 activation. These results, taken together with those obtained with mammalian Raf, suggest the importance of the second Ras-binding site in effector regulation.

Effect of Association with Adenylyl Cyclase-Associated Protein on the Interaction of Yeast Adenylyl Cyclase with Ras Protein

Posttranslational modification of Ras protein has been shown to be critical for interaction with its effector molecules, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase. However, the mechanism of its action was unknown. In this study, we used a reconstituted system with purified adenylyl cyclase and Ras proteins carrying various degrees of the modification to show that the posttranslational modification, especially the farnesylation step, is responsible for 5- to 10-fold increase in Ras-dependent activation of adenylyl cyclase activity even though it has no significant effect on their binding affinity. The stimulatory effect of farnesylation is found to depend on the association of adenylyl cyclase with 70-kDa adenylyl cyclase-associated protein (CAP), which was known to be required for proper in vivo response of adenylyl cyclase to Ras protein, by comparing the levels of Ras-dependent activation of purified adenylyl cyclase with and without bound CAP. The region of CAP required for this effect is mapped to its N-terminal segment of 168 amino acid residues, which coincides with the region required for the in vivo effect. Furthermore, the stimulatory effect is successfully reconstituted by in vitro association of CAP with the purified adenylyl cyclase molecule lacking the bound CAP. These results indicate that the association of adenylyl cyclase with CAP is responsible for the stimulatory effect of posttranslational modification of Ras on its activity and that this may be the mechanism underlying its requirement for the proper in vivo cyclic AMP response.

Quantitative analysis of mutually competitive binding of human Raf-1 and yeast adenylyl cyclase to Ras proteins.

Ras proteins appear to have two distinct downstream effectors, adenylyl cyclase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a product of raf-1 protooncogene in higher organisms. We found that in vitro activation of adenylyl cyclase by yeast Ras2 and human H-Ras proteins is subject to competitive inhibition by its leucine-rich repeats domain and by the N-terminal regulatory domain of human Raf-1 protein. Kinetic analyses of the inhibition patterns enabled us to determine exact dissociation constants (Kd) of the two polypeptides for Ras2 and H-Ras. The leucine-rich repeats domain bound to the posttranslationally modified Ras2 with the Kd of approximately 13 nM, which was close to the value (7 nM) of the whole adenylyl cyclase. The Kd of Raf-1 for the modified H-Ras, 3.5 nM, was significantly lower than that for Ras2, 24 nM, whereas adenylyl cyclase bound preferentially to Ras2. Similar inhibition was also observed in vivo by suppression of RAS2Val-19-dependent heat shock sensitivity and of Ras-dependent cAMP response to glucose upon overexpression of Raf-1 in yeast. These results indicate that the leucine-rich repeats domain contains the Ras protein-binding site and that Raf-1 and adenylyl cyclase, sharing no structural homology with each other, bind to a similar, if not identical, region of Ras with comparable affinities.

Membrane recruitment of Raf-1 is not the only function of Ras in Raf-1 activation.

Ras interacts with Raf-1 and stimulates its kinase activity, which results in activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase cascade. It has been proposed that the main function of Ras in Raf-1 activation is to recruit Raf-1 to the plasma membrane, where a separate activation event such as phosphorylation takes place. Here, we examined the activities of various mutants of human Ha-Ras to induce membrane translocation of Raf-1 and to activate Raf-1 in vivo. Overexpression of an activator region mutant Ha-RasV45E in COS7 cells induced membrane translocation of Raf-1 as effectively as wild-type Ha-Ras. However, the activity of this mutant to activate Raf-1 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase-2 (ERK2) was attenuated by approximately 70% compared to that of wild-type Ha-Ras. The decrease in the specific activity was further demonstrated by measuring the activity of the Ha-RasV45E-associated Raf-1 purified from the membrane fraction. These results imply that the association of Ras with Raf-1 has another important consequence, presumably dependent on the interaction between its activator region and Raf-1, than the simple recruitment of Raf-1 to the plasma membrane.

Antibody mimicking the action of RAS proteins on yeast adenylyl cyclase: implication for RAS-effector interaction.

Polyclonal antisera were raised against various subregions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae adenylyl cyclase in order to examine the molecular mechanism of interaction between adenylyl cyclase and RAS proteins. One of the antisera was found to activate adenylyl cyclase to an extent comparable to that activated by saturating amounts of yeast RAS2 protein produced in Escherichia coli. The stimulatory effect of this antiserum was shown to be additive with RAS2 protein when both antisera and RAS2 protein were present at low concentrations. At saturating amounts of RAS2 protein, the antisera did not exhibit additional stimulatory effects, suggesting that the actions of RAS2 protein and the antisera are complementary with each other. The antigenic determinant for the antibody involved in the activation was mapped to a 14-amino-acid segment, 1452-NSVDNGADVANLSY-1465, located between the leucine-rich repeats and the catalytic domain of adenylyl cyclase. Certain missense mutations affecting this 14-amino acid segment significantly reduced the response of adenylyl cyclase to both activating antibody and RAS proteins. These results suggest that this segment of adenylyl cyclase is intimately involved in the mechanism by which RAS proteins activate this downstream effector.