Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tong Yow Ng is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tong Yow Ng.


Lancet Oncology | 2010

Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial

Monika Janda; Val Gebski; Alison Brand; Russel Hogg; Tom Jobling; Russel Land; Tom Manolitsas; Anthony McCartney; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L. Nicklin; Martin K. Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Tom Walsh; Peter Sykes; Hys Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Kar-Fai Tam; Karen Chan; C. David Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Andreas Obermair

BACKGROUND This two-stage randomised controlled trial, comparing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE), began in 2005. The primary objective of stage 1 was to assess whether TLH results in equivalent or improved quality of life (QoL) up to 6 months after surgery compared with TAH. The primary objective of stage 2 was to test the hypothesis that disease-free survival at 4.5 years is equivalent for TLH and TAH. Here, we present the results of stage 1. METHODS Between Oct 7, 2005, and April 16, 2008, 361 participants were enrolled in the QoL substudy at 19 centres across Australia, New Zealand, and Hong Kong; 332 completed the QoL analysis. Randomisation was done centrally and independently from other study procedures via a computer-generated, web-based system (providing concealment of the next assigned treatment), using stratified permuted blocks of three and six patients. Patients with histologically confirmed stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than 2 were randomly assigned to TLH (n=190) or TAH (n=142), stratified by histological grade and study centre. Patients and study personnel were not masked to treatment assignment. QoL was measured at baseline, 1 and 4 weeks (early), and 3 and 6 months (late) after surgery, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the difference between groups in QoL change from baseline at early and late timepoints (a 5% difference was considered clinically significant). Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle. Patients for both stages of the trial have now been recruited and are being followed up for disease-specific outcomes. The LACE trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00096408. FINDINGS Eight of 332 patients (2.4%) had treatment conversion-seven from TLH to TAH and one from TAH to TLH (patient preference). In the early phase of recovery, patients who had TLH reported significantly greater improvement in QoL from baseline compared with those who had TAH, in all subscales apart from emotional and social wellbeing. Improvements in QoL up to 6 months after surgery continued to favour TLH, except in the emotional and social wellbeing measures of FACT and the visual analogue scale of the EuroQoL five dimensions (EuroQoL-VAS). Operating time was significantly longer in the TLH group (138 min [SD 43]) than in the TAH group (109 min [34]; p=0.001). Although the proportion of intraoperative adverse events was similar between groups (TAH eight of 142 [5.6%] vs TLH 14 of 190 [7.4%]; p=0.53); postoperatively, twice as many patients in the TAH group experienced adverse events of grade 3 or higher (33 of 142 [23.2%] vs 22 of 190 [11.6%] in the TLH group; p=0.004). Postoperative serious adverse events occurred more in the TAH group (27 of 142 [19.0%]) than in the TLH group (16 of 190 [7.9%]; p=0.002). INTERPRETATION QoL improvements from baseline during early and later phases of recovery, and the adverse event profile, favour TLH compared with TAH for treatment of stage I endometrial cancer. FUNDING Cancer Council Queensland, Cancer Council New South Wales, Cancer Council Victoria, Cancer Council Western Australia; NHMRC project grant 456110; Cancer Australia project grant 631523; The Women and Infants Research Foundation, Western Australia; Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital Foundation; Wesley Research Institute; Gallipoli Research Foundation; Gynetech; TYCO Healthcare, Australia; Johnson and Johnson Medical, Australia; Hunter New England Centre for Gynaecological Cancer; Genesis Oncology Trust; and Smart Health Research Grant QLD Health.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2003

The use of music to reduce anxiety for patients undergoing colposcopy: A randomized trial

Y.M Chan; Peter W. H. Lee; Tong Yow Ng; Hys Ngan; L.C Wong

OBJECTIVE The goal of this work was to investigate the impact of music on womens anxiety and perceived pain during colposcopy examination. METHODS This was a prospective randomized study. Two hundred and twenty women referred for colposcopy for the first time were recruited. They were randomized to either the music or no-music group. Before colposcopy examination, each subject completed a Chinese version of the state anxiety questionnaire (STAI) and assessed the anticipated pain for colposcopy with a visual analog scale (VAS). Slow-rhythm music was played during colposcopy examination in the music group. Subjects in the no-music group were examined in the same setting without music. After colposcopy, each subject completed the STAI form again and assessed their pain during examination by the VAS. RESULTS Women in the music group experienced significantly less pain (mean VAS 3.32 [95% CI 2.86-3.78] vs 5.03 [4.54-5.52], P<0.001) and lower anxiety (mean STAI 39.36 [95% CI 37.33-41.39] vs 44.16 [41.82-46.49], P = 0.002) during colposcopy examination than women in the no-music group. On linear regression analysis, the factors significantly affecting anxiety during colposcopy were anxiety score at enrollment, pain score during colposcopy, and whether or not the women had listened to music during the colposcopy examination. The factors significantly affecting the pain scores were whether the women had listened to music during the procedure and the final anxiety scores. CONCLUSIONS Music is a simple, inexpensive, and easily used strategy to minimize anxiety and pain during colposcopy examination.


European Journal of Cancer | 2012

Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: Results from a randomised controlled trial

Andreas Obermair; Monika Janda; Jannah Baker; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Tom Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L. Nicklin; Martin K. Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hys Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Kar-Fai Tam; Karen Chan; David H. Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson

AIM To compare Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) with regard to surgical safety. METHODS Between October 2005 and June 2010, 760 patients with apparent early stage endometrial cancer were enroled in a multicentre, randomised clinical trial (LACE) comparing outcomes following TLH or TAH. The main study end points for this analysis were surgical adverse events (AE), hospital length of stay, conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy, including 753 patients who completed at least 6 weeks of follow-up. Postoperative AEs were graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria (V3), and those immediately life-threatening, requiring inpatient hospitalisation or prolonged hospitalisation, or resulting in persistent or significant disability/incapacity were regarded as serious AEs. RESULTS The incidence of intra-operative AEs was comparable in either group. The incidence of post-operative AE CTC grade 3+ (18.6% in TAH, 12.9% in TLH, p 0.03) and serious AE (14.3% in TAH, 8.2% in TLH, p 0.007) was significantly higher in the TAH group compared to the TLH group. Mean operating time was 132 and 107 min, and median length of hospital stay was 2 and 5 days in the TLH and TAH group, respectively (p<0.0001). The decline of haemoglobin from baseline to day 1 postoperatively was 2g/L less in the TLH group (p 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Compared to TAH, TLH is associated with a significantly decreased risk of major surgical AEs. A laparoscopic surgical approach to early stage endometrial cancer is safe.


JAMA | 2017

Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer. A randomized clinical trial

Monika Janda; Val Gebski; Lucy Davies; Peta Forder; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Tom Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L. Nicklin; Martin K. Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hys Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Kar-Fai Tam; Karen Chan; C. David Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson

Importance Standard treatment for endometrial cancer involves removal of the uterus, tubes, ovaries, and lymph nodes. Few randomized trials have compared disease-free survival outcomes for surgical approaches. Objective To investigate whether total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is equivalent to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) in women with treatment-naive endometrial cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants The Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium (LACE) trial was a multinational, randomized equivalence trial conducted between October 7, 2005, and June 30, 2010, in which 27 surgeons from 20 tertiary gynecological cancer centers in Australia, New Zealand, and Hong Kong randomized 760 women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer to either TLH or TAH. Follow-up ended on March 3, 2016. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to undergo TAH (n = 353) or TLH (n = 407). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was disease-free survival, which was measured as the interval between surgery and the date of first recurrence, including disease progression or the development of a new primary cancer or death assessed at 4.5 years after randomization. The prespecified equivalence margin was 7% or less. Secondary outcomes included recurrence of endometrial cancer and overall survival. Results Patients were followed up for a median of 4.5 years. Of 760 patients who were randomized (mean age, 63 years), 679 (89%) completed the trial. At 4.5 years of follow-up, disease-free survival was 81.3% in the TAH group and 81.6% in the TLH group. The disease-free survival rate difference was 0.3% (favoring TLH; 95% CI, −5.5% to 6.1%; P = .007), meeting criteria for equivalence. There was no statistically significant between-group difference in recurrence of endometrial cancer (28/353 in TAH group [7.9%] vs 33/407 in TLH group [8.1%]; risk difference, 0.2% [95% CI, −3.7% to 4.0%]; P = .93) or in overall survival (24/353 in TAH group [6.8%] vs 30/407 in TLH group [7.4%]; risk difference, 0.6% [95% CI, −3.0% to 4.2%]; P = .76). Conclusions and Relevance Among women with stage I endometrial cancer, the use of total abdominal hysterectomy compared with total laparoscopic hysterectomy resulted in equivalent disease-free survival at 4.5 years and no difference in overall survival. These findings support the use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with stage I endometrial cancer. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00096408; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: CTRN12606000261516


European Journal of Cancer | 2012

Risk factors to predict the incidence of surgical adverse events following open or laparoscopic surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: Results from a randomised controlled trial☆

Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Monika Janda; Val Gebski; Jannah Baker; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Tom Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L. Nicklin; Martin K. Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hys Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Kar-Fai Tam; Karen Chan; David H. Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson

AIMS To identify risk factors for major adverse events (AEs) and to develop a nomogram to predict the probability of such AEs in patients who have surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer. METHODS We used data from 753 patients who were randomised to either total laparoscopic hysterectomy or total abdominal hysterectomy in the LACE trial. Serious adverse events that prolonged hospital stay or postoperative adverse events (using common terminology criteria 3+, CTCAE V3) were considered major AEs. We analysed pre-surgical characteristics that were associated with the risk of developing major AEs by multivariate logistic regression. We identified a parsimonious model by backward stepwise logistic regression. The six most significant or clinically important variables were included in the nomogram to predict the risk of major AEs within 6weeks of surgery and the nomogram was internally validated. RESULTS Overall, 132 (17.5%) patients had at least one major AE. An open surgical approach (laparotomy), higher Charlsons medical co-morbidities score, moderately differentiated tumours on curettings, higher baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, higher body mass index and low haemoglobin levels were associated with AE and were used in the nomogram. The bootstrap corrected concordance index of the nomogram was 0.63 and it showed good calibration. CONCLUSIONS Six pre-surgical factors independently predicted the risk of major AEs. This research might form the basis to develop risk reduction strategies to minimise the risk of AEs among patients undergoing surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer.


Journal of The Society for Gynecologic Investigation | 2006

Potential Use of the Adenosine Triphosphate Cell Viability Assay in Endometrial Cancer

Kar Fai Tam; Tong Yow Ng; Percy C.K. Tsang; Chiu Fai Li; Hys Ngan

Objective: Adenosine triphosphate cell viability assay (ATP-CVA) was used prevously to evaluate chemotherapy in uterine cancer cell lines. In this study, we have performed the ATP-CVA on endometrial cancer patients to study the feasibility of using ATP-CVA in endometrial cancer to determine the intrinsic chemosensitivity of the cytotoxic drugs. Methods: Thirty-three patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma who presented for a staging operation were recruited. Endometrial cancer samples were obtained at the time of operation. In vitro ATP-CVA and chemosensitivity testing was performed using cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, etoposide, doxorubicin, 4-epidoxorubicin, and topotecan. Results: Thirty-two of the 33 endometrial cancer samples were evaluable for SF50 (survival fraction at 50% of the peak plasma concentration [PPC]) using ATP-CVA. The median SF50 of carboplatin (0.33) was significantly less than the median SF50 of cisplatin (0.71), topotecan (0.93), paclitaxel (0.68), doxorubicin (1.0), etoposide (0.70), or 4-epidoxorubicin (0.88) (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P <.001). Conclusion: This study showed the feasibility of using the ATP-CVA in endometrial cancer to determine the intrinsic chemosensitivity of cytotoxic drugs.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2000

Local Recurrence in High-Risk Node-Negative Stage I Endometrial Carcinoma Treated with Postoperative Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy

Tong Yow Ng; Lewis Perrin; James L. Nicklin; Robyn Cheuk; Alexander J. Crandon


Gynecologic Oncology | 2001

Postoperative Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy for Node-Negative Stage II (Occult) Endometrial Carcinoma

Tong Yow Ng; James L. Nicklin; Lewis Perrin; Robyn Cheuk; Alexander J. Crandon


International Journal of Gynecological Cancer | 2016

Disease-Free and Overall-Survival After Total Laparoscopy Versus Open Abdominal Hysterectomy for Early Stage Endometrial Cancer: Results From the Lace Trial

Andreas Obermair; Val Gebski; Lucy Davies; Alison Brand; Russel Hogg; Tom Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L. Nicklin; Martin K. Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hys Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Peta Forder; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Kar-Fai Tam; Karen Chan; David H. Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson


Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation | 2012

Risk factors to predict the incidence of surgical adverse events following open or laparoscopic surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial

Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan; Val Gebski; Monika Janda; Jannah Baker; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Tom Jobling; Russell Land; Thomas Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L. Nicklin; Martin K. Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hys Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Kar-Fai Tam; Karen Chan; David H. Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Roberstson

Collaboration


Dive into the Tong Yow Ng's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James L. Nicklin

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hys Ngan

University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kar-Fai Tam

University of Hong Kong

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrea Garrett

Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ian Hammond

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge