Tong-Yuan Yang

Emerging Technologies to Increase Ligand Binding Assay Sensitivity

Ligand binding assays (LBAs) have been the method of choice for protein analyte measurements for more than four decades. Over the years, LBA methods have improved in sensitivity and achieved larger dynamic ranges by using alternative detection systems and new technologies. As a consequence, the landscape and application of immunoassay platforms has changed dramatically. The introduction of bead-based methods, coupled with single molecule detection standardization and the ability to amplify assay signals, has improved the sensitivity of many immunoassays, in some cases by several logs of magnitude. Three promising immunoassay platforms are described in this article: Single Molecule Counting (SMC™) from Singulex Inc, Single Molecule Arrays (Simoa™) from Quanterix Corporation, and Immuno-PCR (Imperacer®) from Chimera Biotec GmbH. These platforms have the potential to significantly improve immunoassay sensitivity and thereby address the bioanalytical needs and challenges faced during biopharmaceutical drug development.

Characterization of critical reagents in ligand-binding assays: enabling robust bioanalytical methods and lifecycle management.

The effective management of validated ligand-binding assays used for PK, PD and immunogenicity assessments of biotherapeutics is vital to ensuring robust and consistent assay performance throughout the lifetime of the method. The structural integrity and functional quality of critical reagents is often linked to ligand-binding assay performance; therefore, physicochemical and biophysical characterization coupled with assessment of assay performance can enable the highest degree of reagent quality. The implementation of a systematic characterization process for monitoring critical reagent attributes, utilizing detailed analytical techniques such as LC-MS, can expedite assay troubleshooting and identify deleterious trends. In addition, this minimizes the potential for costly delays in drug development due to reagent instability or batch-to-batch variability. This article provides our perspectives on a proactive critical reagent QC process. Case studies highlight the analytical techniques used to identify chemical and molecular factors and the interdependencies that can contribute to protein heterogeneity and integrity.

2015 White Paper on recent issues in bioanalysis: focus on new technologies and biomarkers (Part 3 – LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity)

The 2015 9th Workshop on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis (9th WRIB) took place in Miami, Florida with participation of 600 professionals from pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and regulatory agencies worldwide. WRIB was once again a 5 day, week-long event - A Full Immersion Bioanalytical Week - specifically designed to facilitate sharing, reviewing, discussing and agreeing on approaches to address the most current issues of interest in bioanalysis. The topics covered included both small and large molecules, and involved LCMS, hybrid LBA/LCMS and LBA approaches, including the focus on biomarkers and immunogenicity. This 2015 White Paper encompasses recommendations emerging from the extensive discussions held during the workshop, and is aimed to provide the bioanalytical community with key information and practical solutions on topics and issues addressed, in an effort to enable advances in scientific excellence, improved quality and better regulatory compliance. Due to its length, the 2015 edition of this comprehensive White Paper has been divided into three parts. Part 3 discusses the recommendations for large molecule bioanalysis using LBA, biomarkers and immunogenicity. Part 1 (small molecule bioanalysis using LCMS) and Part 2 (hybrid LBA/LCMS and regulatory inputs from major global health authorities) have been published in volume 7, issues 22 and 23 of Bioanalysis, respectively.

Challenges in selectivity, specificity and quantitation range of ligand-binding assays: case studies using a microfluidics platform

BACKGROUND Method developers of plate-based ligand-binding assays (LBAs) often face challenges establishing selectivity, specificity and range of quantitation to meet the needs of a particular study. Case studies are presented to compare different ligand-binding immunoassay platforms (plate-based vs microfluidic system) in method development to support pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. RESULTS Studies highlight the challenges of plate-based LBAs to establish selectivity, specificity and range of quantitation as a result of nonspecific background signal, matrix interference, lack of linearity and drug interference. The fast assay kinetics of a microfluidic immunoassay system was shown to generally reduce nonspecific background and matrix effects, while increasing assay linear range and drug tolerance. CONCLUSION The short incubation times with microfluidics can be beneficial for LBAs burdened by matrix effects and in these cases had superior assay performance compared with widely used immunoassay platforms in bioanalysis, for example, Meso Scale Discovery(®) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

A novel approach for the simultaneous quantification of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody in serum produced from two distinct host cell lines

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) possess a high degree of heterogeneity associated with the cell expression system employed in manufacturing, most notably glycosylation. Traditional immunoassay formats used to quantify therapeutic mAbs are unable to discriminate between different glycosylation patterns that may exist on the same protein amino acid sequence. Mass spectrometry provides a technique to distinguish specific glycosylation patterns of the therapeutic antibody within the same sample, thereby allowing for simultaneous quantification of the same mAb with different glycosylation patterns. Here we demonstrate a two-step approach to successfully differentiate and quantify serum mixtures of a recombinant therapeutic mAb produced in two different host cell lines (CHO vs. Sp2/0) with distinct glycosylation profiles. Glycosylation analysis of the therapeutic mAb, CNTO 328 (siltuximab), was accomplished through sample pretreatment consisting of immunoaffinity purification (IAP) and enrichment, followed by liquid chromatography (LC) and mass spectrometry (MS). LC-MS analysis was used to determine the percentage of CNTO 328 in the sample derived from either cell line based on the N-linked G1F oligosaccharide on the mAb. The relative amount of G1F derived from each cell line was compared with ratios of CNTO 328 reference standards prepared in buffer. Glycoform ratios were converted to concentrations using an immunoassay measuring total CNTO 328 that does not distinguish between the different glycoforms. Validation of the IAP/LC-MS method included intra-run and inter-run variability, method sensitivity and freeze-thaw stability. The method was accurate (%bias range = -7.30–13.68%) and reproducible (%CV range = 1.49–10.81%) with a LOQ of 2.5 μg/mL.

A Novel Approach to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetic Biocomparability of a Monoclonal Antibody Derived from Two Different Cell Lines Using Simultaneous Crossover Design

A parallel study design with a large number of subjects has been a typical path for pharmacokinetic (PK) biocomparability assessment of biotherapeutics with long half-lives and immunogenic propensity, for example, monoclonal antibodies (mAb). A recently published innovative bioanalytical method that can quantify mAb produced from two different cell lines in the same sample opened an avenue to exploring a simultaneous crossover study design for PK biocomparability assessment of biotherapeutics. Siltuximab, a chimeric IgG1 mAb-targeting interleukin-6, was studied as an example. The pharmacokinetic biocomparability of siltuximab derived from mouse myeloma (Sp2/0) cells and Chinese hamster ovary cells was previously assessed and demonstrated in a clinical PK biocomparability study that enrolled more than 140 healthy subjects using a parallel trial design. The biocomparability was successfully shown in six cynomolgus monkeys in a preclinical proof-of-concept study using the new crossover study design supported by the analytical method. The impact of antidrug antibodies on the assessment of biocomparability was minimal. This novel approach opened up a new arena for the evaluation of PK biocomparability of biotherapeutics with unique molecular signatures such as a mAb derived from different cell lines.

Implementing a tiered approach to bioanalytical method validation for large-molecule ligand-binding assay methods in pharmacokinetic assessments

Bioanalytical methods must enable the delivery of data that meet sound, scientifically justified, fit-for-purpose criteria. At early phases of biotherapeutic drug development, suitable criteria of a ligand-binding assay could be met for pharmacokinetic (PK) in-study sample testing without a full validation defined by regulatory guidelines. To ensure fit-for-purpose methods support PK testing through all phases of biotherapeutic development, three tiers of method validation - regulatory, scientific and research validations - are proposed. The three-tiered framework for method validation outlines the differences in the parameters that should be assessed, the acceptance criteria that may be applied, and the documentation necessary at each level. The criteria for selecting the appropriate application of each of these PK method validation workflows are discussed.