Tony J. C. Harris

Adherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis

How adhesive interactions between cells generate and maintain animal tissue structure remains one of the most challenging and long-standing questions in cell and developmental biology. Adherens junctions (AJs) and the cadherin–catenin complexes at their core are therefore the subjects of intense research. Recent work has greatly advanced our understanding of the molecular organization of AJs and how cadherin–catenin complexes engage actin, microtubules and the endocytic machinery. As a result, we have gained important insights into the molecular mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis.

The positioning and segregation of apical cues during epithelial polarity establishment in Drosophila

Cell polarity is critical for epithelial structure and function. Adherens junctions (AJs) often direct this polarity, but we previously found that Bazooka (Baz) acts upstream of AJs as epithelial polarity is first established in Drosophila. This prompted us to ask how Baz is positioned and how downstream polarity is elaborated. Surprisingly, we found that Baz localizes to an apical domain below its typical binding partners atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and partitioning defective (PAR)-6 as the Drosophila epithelium first forms. In fact, Baz positioning is independent of aPKC and PAR-6 relying instead on cytoskeletal cues, including an apical scaffold and dynein-mediated basal-to-apical transport. AJ assembly is closely coupled to Baz positioning, whereas aPKC and PAR-6 are positioned separately. This forms a stratified apical domain with Baz and AJs localizing basal to aPKC and PAR-6, and we identify specific mechanisms that keep these proteins apart. These results reveal key steps in the assembly of the apical domain in Drosophila.

Adherens junction-dependent and -independent steps in the establishment of epithelial cell polarity in Drosophila.

Adherens junctions (AJs) are thought to be key landmarks for establishing epithelial cell polarity, but the origin of epithelial polarity in Drosophila remains unclear. Thus, we examined epithelial polarity establishment during early Drosophila development. We found apical accumulation of both Drosophila E-Cadherin (DE-Cad) and the apical cue Bazooka (Baz) as cells first form. Mutant analyses revealed that apical Baz accumulations can be established in the absence of AJs, whereas assembly of apical DE-Cad complexes requires Baz. Thus, Baz acts upstream of AJs during epithelial polarity establishment. During gastrulation the absence of AJs results in widespread cell dissociation and depolarization. Some epithelial structures are retained, however. These structures maintain apical Baz, accumulate apical Crumbs, and organize polarized cytoskeletons, but display abnormal cell morphology and fail to segregate the basolateral cue Discs large from the apical domain. Thus, although epithelial polarity develops in the absence of AJs, AJs play specific roles in maintaining epithelial architecture and segregating basolateral cues.

The PAR complex regulates pulsed actomyosin contractions during amnioserosa apical constriction in Drosophila.

Apical constriction is a major mechanism underlying tissue internalization during development. This cell constriction typically requires actomyosin contractility. Thus, understanding apical constriction requires characterization of the mechanics and regulation of actomyosin assemblies. We have analyzed the relationship between myosin and the polarity regulators Par-6, aPKC and Bazooka (Par-3) (the PAR complex) during amnioserosa apical constriction at Drosophila dorsal closure. The PAR complex and myosin accumulate at the apical surface domain of amnioserosa cells at dorsal closure, the PAR complex forming a patch of puncta and myosin forming an associated network. Genetic interactions indicate that the PAR complex supports myosin activity during dorsal closure, as well as during other steps of embryogenesis. We find that actomyosin contractility in amnioserosa cells is based on the repeated assembly and disassembly of apical actomyosin networks, with each assembly event driving constriction of the apical domain. As the networks assemble they translocate across the apical patch of PAR proteins, which persist at the apical domain. Through loss- and gain-of-function studies, we find that different PAR complex components regulate distinct phases of the actomyosin assembly/disassembly cycle: Bazooka promotes the duration of actomyosin pulses and Par-6/aPKC promotes the lull time between pulses. These results identify the mechanics of actomyosin contractility that drive amnioserosa apical constriction and how specific steps of the contractile mechanism are regulated by the PAR complex.

Independent cadherin–catenin and Bazooka clusters interact to assemble adherens junctions

Proper epithelial structure requires adherens junction (AJ) assembly. In the early Drosophila embryo, AJ assembly depends on Bazooka (Baz; PAR-3), but it is unclear how Baz affects AJ assembly and what precursors are involved. To understand this process at the molecular level, we counted the number of core AJ proteins and Baz proteins at an average spot AJ (SAJ) and determined their dynamics with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments. These data reveal that SAJs are subdivided into Baz clusters and cadherin–catenin clusters with independent protein numbers and dynamics. This independence suggests that precursory cadherin–catenin clusters might form before SAJ assembly. We identify cadherin–catenin clusters forming between apical microvilli. Further analyses show that they form independently of Baz and that Baz functions in repositioning them to apicolateral sites for full SAJ assembly. Our data implicate cell protrusions in initial cadherin–catenin clustering in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo. Then, independent Baz clusters appear to engage the cadherin–catenin clusters to assemble SAJs.

Chapter 3 How the Cytoskeleton Helps Build the Embryonic Body Plan: Models of Morphogenesis from Drosophila

One key challenge for cell and developmental biologists is to determine how the cytoskeletal toolkit is used to build embryonic tissues and organs. Here, we review recent progress in meeting this challenge, focusing on epithelial morphogenesis in the Drosophila embryo as a model. We outline how actin and microtubule networks are regulated by embryonic patterning systems, and how they affect cell shape, cell behavior, and cell-cell interactions to shape epithelial structures. We focus on the formation of the first epithelium at cellularization, the assembly of junctions, apical constriction of cells in the ventral furrow, cell intercalation in the germband, and epithelial sheet migration during dorsal closure. These events provide models for uncovering the cell biological basis of morphogenesis.

Bazooka inhibits aPKC to limit antagonism of actomyosin networks during amnioserosa apical constriction

Cell shape changes drive tissue morphogenesis during animal development. An important example is the apical cell constriction that initiates tissue internalisation. Apical constriction can occur through a phase of cyclic assembly and disassembly of apicomedial actomyosin networks, followed by stabilisation of these networks. Delayed negative-feedback mechanisms typically underlie cyclic behaviour, but the mechanisms regulating cyclic actomyosin networks remain obscure, as do mechanisms that transform overall network behaviour. Here, we show that a known inhibitor of apicomedial actomyosin networks in Drosophila amnioserosa cells, the Par-6-aPKC complex, is recruited to the apicomedial domain by actomyosin networks during dorsal closure of the embryo. This finding establishes an actomyosin-aPKC negative-feedback loop in the system. Additionally, we find that aPKC recruits Bazooka to the apicomedial domain, and phosphorylates Bazooka for a dynamic interaction. Remarkably, stabilising aPKC-Bazooka interactions can inhibit the antagonism of actomyosin by aPKC, suggesting that Bazooka acts as an aPKC inhibitor, and providing a possible mechanism for delaying the actomyosin-aPKC negative-feedback loop. Our data also implicate an increasing degree of Par-6-aPKC-Bazooka interactions as dorsal closure progresses, potentially explaining a developmental transition in actomyosin behaviour from cyclic to persistent networks. This later impact of aPKC inhibition is supported by mathematical modelling of the system. Overall, this work illustrates how shifting chemical signals can tune actomyosin network behaviour during development.

Adherens junction assembly and function in the Drosophila embryo.

Adherens junctions are essential for the development and physiology of epithelial tissues. The Drosophila embryo is an excellent model for understanding adherens junction assembly, maintenance, and regulation during tissue development. Here, I review our current state of knowledge in this model system. The review begins by outlining the structure of the cadherin-catenin complex in Drosophila including core (DE-cadherin, Armadillo, α-catenin, and p120-catenin) and peripheral proteins. Then, it summarizes adherens junction assembly at cellularization and maturation at gastrulation. Finally, the regulation of adherens junctions during tissue morphogenesis is discussed. This discussion compares major morphogenetic events in the embryo (invagination of the ventral furrow, convergent extension of the germband, flattening of the amnioserosa, maintenance of tissue borders, epithelial branching, lumen formation, cell delamination, cell division, apoptosis, and dorsal closure) and common mechanisms involved (myosin activity, endocytosis, and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transitions).

Involvement of a Triton-insoluble floating fraction in Dictyostelium cell-cell adhesion

We have isolated and characterized a Triton-insoluble floating fraction (TIFF) fromDictyostelium. Ten major proteins were consistently detected in TIFF, and six species were identified by mass spectrometry as actin, porin, comitin, regulatory myosin light chain, a novel member of the CD36 family, and the phospholipid-anchored cell adhesion molecule gp80. TIFF was enriched with many acylated proteins. Also, the sterol/phospholipid ratio of TIFF was 10-fold higher than that of the bulk plasma membrane. Immunoelectron microscopy showed that TIFF has vesicular morphology and confirmed the association of gp80 and comitin with TIFF membranes. Several TIFF properties were similar to those ofDictyostelium contact regions, which were isolated as a cytoskeleton-associated membrane fraction. Mass spectrometry demonstrated that TIFF and contact regions shared the same major proteins. During development, gp80 colocalized with F-actin, porin, and comitin at cell-cell contacts. These proteins were also recruited to gp80 caps induced by antibody cross-linking. Filipin staining revealed high sterol levels in both gp80-enriched cell-cell contacts and gp80 caps. Moreover, sterol sequestration by filipin and digitonin inhibited gp80-mediated cell-cell adhesion. This study reveals thatDictyostelium TIFF has structural properties previously attributed to vertebrate TIFF and establishes a role forDictyostelium TIFF in cell-cell adhesion during development.

Assembly of Bazooka polarity landmarks through a multifaceted membrane-association mechanism.

Epithelial cell polarity is essential for animal development. The scaffold protein Bazooka (Baz/PAR-3) forms apical polarity landmarks to organize epithelial cells. However, it is unclear how Baz is recruited to the plasma membrane and how this is coupled with downstream effects. Baz contains an oligomerization domain, three PDZ domains, and binding regions for the protein kinase aPKC and phosphoinositide lipids. With a structure–function approach, we dissected the roles of these domains in the localization and function of Baz in the Drosophila embryonic ectoderm. We found that a multifaceted membrane association mechanism localizes Baz to the apical circumference. Although none of the Baz protein domains are essential for cortical localization, we determined that each contributes to cortical anchorage in a specific manner. We propose that the redundancies involved might provide plasticity and robustness to Baz polarity landmarks. We also identified specific downstream effects, including the promotion of epithelial structure, a positive-feedback loop that recruits aPKC, PAR-6 and Crumbs, and a negative-feedback loop that regulates Baz.