Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Torbjörn Tomson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Torbjörn Tomson.


Epilepsia | 2005

Epileptic Seizures and Epilepsy: Definitions Proposed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE)

Ettore Beghi; Anne T. Berg; Arturo Carpio; Lars Forsgren; Dale C. Hesdorffer; W. Allen Hauser; Kristina Malmgren; Shlomo Shinnar; Nancy Temkin; David J. Thurman; Torbjörn Tomson

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) and the International Bureau for Epilepsy (IBE) have come to consensus definitions for the terms epileptic seizure and epilepsy. An epileptic seizure is a transient occurrence of signs and/or symptoms due to abnormal excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. Epilepsy is a disorder of the brain characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures and by the neurobiologic, cognitive, psychological, and social consequences of this condition. The definition of epilepsy requires the occurrence of at least one epileptic seizure.


Epilepsia | 2014

ILAE Official Report: A practical clinical definition of epilepsy

Robert S. Fisher; Carlos Acevedo; Alexis Arzimanoglou; Alicia Bogacz; J. Helen Cross; Christian E. Elger; Jerome Engel; Lars Forsgren; Jacqueline A. French; Mike Glynn; Dale C. Hesdorffer; Byung-In Lee; Gary W. Mathern; Solomon L. Moshé; Emilio Perucca; Ingrid E. Scheffer; Torbjörn Tomson; Masako Watanabe; Samuel Wiebe

Epilepsy was defined conceptually in 2005 as a disorder of the brain characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures. This definition is usually practically applied as having two unprovoked seizures >24 h apart. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) accepted recommendations of a task force altering the practical definition for special circumstances that do not meet the two unprovoked seizures criteria. The task force proposed that epilepsy be considered to be a disease of the brain defined by any of the following conditions: (1) At least two unprovoked (or reflex) seizures occurring >24 h apart; (2) one unprovoked (or reflex) seizure and a probability of further seizures similar to the general recurrence risk (at least 60%) after two unprovoked seizures, occurring over the next 10 years; (3) diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome. Epilepsy is considered to be resolved for individuals who either had an age‐dependent epilepsy syndrome but are now past the applicable age or who have remained seizure‐free for the last 10 years and off antiseizure medicines for at least the last 5 years. “Resolved” is not necessarily identical to the conventional view of “remission or “cure.” Different practical definitions may be formed and used for various specific purposes. This revised definition of epilepsy brings the term in concordance with common use.


Epilepsia | 2006

ILAE Treatment Guidelines: Evidence‐based Analysis of Antiepileptic Drug Efficacy and Effectiveness as Initial Monotherapy for Epileptic Seizures and Syndromes

Tracy A. Glauser; Elinor Ben-Menachem; Blaise F. D. Bourgeois; Avital Cnaan; David Chadwick; Carlos A. M. Guerreiro; Reetta Kälviäinen; Richard H. Mattson; Emilio Perucca; Torbjörn Tomson

Summary:  Purpose: To assess which antiepileptic medications (AEDs) have the best evidence for long‐term efficacy or effectiveness as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy.


Epilepsia | 2008

Antiepileptic drugs—best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: A position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Philip N. Patsalos; David J. Berry; Blaise F. D. Bourgeois; James C. Cloyd; Tracy A. Glauser; Svein I. Johannessen; Ilo E. Leppik; Torbjörn Tomson; Emilio Perucca

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose‐dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.


Lancet Neurology | 2008

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: current knowledge and future directions.

Torbjörn Tomson; Lina Nashef; Philippe Ryvlin

Although largely neglected in earlier literature, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the most important epilepsy-related mode of death, and is the leading cause of death in people with chronic uncontrolled epilepsy. Research during the past two to three decades has shown that incidence varies substantially depending on the epilepsy population studied, ranging from 0.09 per 1000 patient-years in newly diagnosed patients to 9 per 1000 patient-years in candidates for epilepsy surgery. Risk profiles have been delineated in case-control studies. These and other studies indicate that SUDEP mainly occurs in the context of a generalised tonic-clonic seizure. However, it remains unclear why a seizure becomes fatal in a person that might have had many similar seizures in the past. Here, we review SUDEP rates, risk factors, triggers, and proposed mechanisms, and critically assess potential preventive strategies. Gaps in knowledge are discussed and ways forward are suggested.


Epilepsy Research | 2007

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: A summary of the Eigth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII)

Meir Bialer; Svein I. Johannessen; Harvey J. Kupferberg; René H. Levy; Emilio Perucca; Torbjörn Tomson

The Eigth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)-EILAT VII, took place in Sitges, Barcelona from the 10th to 14th September, 2006. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 24 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included a focus on status epilepticus (epidemiology, current and future treatments), evidence-based treatment guidelines and the potential of neurostimulation in refractory epilepsy. Consistent with previous formats of this conference, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well as updates on marketed AEDs introduced since 1989. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in development, including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA-2-093), fluorofelbamate, ganaxolone, huperzine, lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide, seletracetam, stiripentol, talampanel, valrocemide, JZP-4, NS1209, PID and RWJ-333369. Updates on felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and new extended release oxcarbazepine formulations, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide and new extended release valproic acid formulations, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.


Epilepsia | 2011

Standards for epidemiologic studies and surveillance of epilepsy

David J. Thurman; Ettore Beghi; Charles E. Begley; Anne T. Berg; Jeffrey Buchhalter; Ding Ding; Dale C. Hesdorffer; W. Allen Hauser; Lewis E. Kazis; Rosemarie Kobau; Barbara L. Kroner; David M. Labiner; Kore Liow; Giancarlo Logroscino; Marco T. Medina; Charles R. Newton; Karen L. Parko; Angelia Paschal; Pierre-Marie Preux; Josemir W. Sander; Anbesaw W. Selassie; William H. Theodore; Torbjörn Tomson; Samuel Wiebe

Worldwide, about 65 million people are estimated to have epilepsy. Epidemiologic studies are necessary to define the full public health burden of epilepsy; to set public health and health care priorities; to provide information needed for prevention, early detection, and treatment; to identify education and service needs; and to promote effective health care and support programs for people with epilepsy. However, different definitions and epidemiologic methods complicate the tasks of these studies and their interpretations and comparisons. The purpose of this document is to promote consistency in definitions and methods in an effort to enhance future population‐based epidemiologic studies, facilitate comparison between populations, and encourage the collection of data useful for the promotion of public health. We discuss: (1) conceptual and operational definitions of epilepsy, (2) data resources and recommended data elements, and (3) methods and analyses appropriate for epidemiologic studies or the surveillance of epilepsy. Variations in these are considered, taking into account differing resource availability and needs among countries and differing purposes among studies.


The Lancet | 1999

Risk factors for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a case control study

Larsgunnar Nilsson; Bahman Y. Farahmand; Persson Pg; Thiblin I; Torbjörn Tomson

BACKGROUND Sudden unexpected death is substantially more common in people with epilepsy than in the general population. Our objective was to investigate the association between some clinical variables and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) to identify risk factors. METHODS This nested case-control study was based on a cohort of people aged between 15 and 70 years, who, during 1980-89, had been admitted to and discharged with a diagnosis of epilepsy from any hospital in the county of Stockholm. The study population was followed up through the National Cause of Death Register until Dec 31, 1991. Cases were individuals who had died, with a diagnosis of epilepsy registered on the death certificate, and who after review of medical and necropsy records were found to meet our SUDEP criteria. Three control participants, who were living epilepsy patients matched for age and sex, were selected from the same cohort for each case. All medical records were examined. Clinical data were collected and analysed on a predesigned protocol. FINDINGS 57 SUDEP cases were included, of whom 91% had undergone necropsy. The relative risk of SUDEP increased with number of seizures per year. The estimated relative risk was 10.16 (95% CI 2.94-35.18) in patients with more than 50 seizures per year, compared with those with up to two seizures per year. The risk of SUDEP increased with increasing number of antiepileptic drugs taken concomitantly--9.89 (3.20-30.60) for three antiepileptic drugs compared with monotherapy. Other major risk factors were early-onset versus late-onset epilepsy (7.72 [2.13-27.96]), and frequent changes of antiepileptic drug dosage compared with unchanged dosage (6.08 [1.99-18.56]). The association between SUDEP risk and early onset, and SUDEP risk and seizure frequency, was weaker for female than for male patients, whereas frequent dose changes showed a stronger association in female patients. INTERPRETATION Our data suggest that SUDEP is a seizure-related event, although the pathophysiological substrate that predisposes individuals to SUDEP may be established at an early age, and there may be some sex differences. Improvement of seizure control and possibly the avoidance of polytherapy may be ways to reduce the risk of SUDEP.


Lancet Neurology | 2013

Incidence and Mechanisms of Cardiorespiratory Arrests in Epilepsy Monitoring Units (MORTEMUS): A Retrospective Study.

Philippe Ryvlin; Lina Nashef; Samden D. Lhatoo; Lisa M. Bateman; J Bird; Andrew Bleasel; Paul Boon; Arielle Crespel; Barbara A. Dworetzky; Hans Høgenhaven; Holger Lerche; Louis Maillard; Michael P. Malter; Cécile Marchal; Jagarlapudi M K Murthy; Michael A. Nitsche; Ekaterina Pataraia; Terje Rabben; Sylvain Rheims; Bernard Sadzot; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Masud Seyal; Elson L. So; Mark C. Spitz; Anna Szucs; Meng Tan; James X. Tao; Torbjörn Tomson

BACKGROUND Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of death in people with chronic refractory epilepsy. Very rarely, SUDEP occurs in epilepsy monitoring units, providing highly informative data for its still elusive pathophysiology. The MORTEMUS study expanded these data through comprehensive evaluation of cardiorespiratory arrests encountered in epilepsy monitoring units worldwide. METHODS Between Jan 1, 2008, and Dec 29, 2009, we did a systematic retrospective survey of epilepsy monitoring units located in Europe, Israel, Australia, and New Zealand, to retrieve data for all cardiorespiratory arrests recorded in these units and estimate their incidence. Epilepsy monitoring units from other regions were invited to report similar cases to further explore the mechanisms. An expert panel reviewed data, including video electroencephalogram (VEEG) and electrocardiogram material at the time of cardiorespiratory arrests whenever available. FINDINGS 147 (92%) of 160 units responded to the survey. 29 cardiorespiratory arrests, including 16 SUDEP (14 at night), nine near SUDEP, and four deaths from other causes, were reported. Cardiorespiratory data, available for ten cases of SUDEP, showed a consistent and previously unrecognised pattern whereby rapid breathing (18-50 breaths per min) developed after secondary generalised tonic-clonic seizure, followed within 3 min by transient or terminal cardiorespiratory dysfunction. Where transient, this dysfunction later recurred with terminal apnoea occurring within 11 min of the end of the seizure, followed by cardiac arrest. SUDEP incidence in adult epilepsy monitoring units was 5·1 (95% CI 2·6-9·2) per 1000 patient-years, with a risk of 1·2 (0·6-2·1) per 10,000 VEEG monitorings, probably aggravated by suboptimum supervision and possibly by antiepileptic drug withdrawal. INTERPRETATION SUDEP in epilepsy monitoring units primarily follows an early postictal, centrally mediated, severe alteration of respiratory and cardiac function induced by generalised tonic-clonic seizure, leading to immediate death or a short period of partly restored cardiorespiratory function followed by terminal apnoea then cardiac arrest. Improved supervision is warranted in epilepsy monitoring units, in particular during night time. FUNDING Commission of European Affairs of the International League Against Epilepsy.


The Lancet | 2011

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

Simon Shorvon; Torbjörn Tomson

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) refers to the sudden death of a seemingly healthy individual with epilepsy, usually occurring during, or immediately after, a tonic-clonic seizure. The frequency of SUDEP varies depending on the severity of the epilepsy, but overall the risk of sudden death is more than 20 times higher than that in the general population. Several different mechanisms probably exist, and most research has focused on seizure-related respiratory depression, cardiac arrhythmia, cerebral depression, and autonomic dysfunction. Data from a pooled analysis of risk factors indicate that the higher the frequency of tonic-clonic seizures, the higher the risk of SUDEP; furthermore, risk of SUDEP is also elevated in male patients, patients with long-duration epilepsy, and those on antiepileptic polytherapy. SUDEP usually occurs when the seizures are not witnessed and often at night. In this Seminar, we provide advice to clinicians on ways to minimise the risk of SUDEP, information to pass on to patients, and medicolegal aspects of these deaths.

Collaboration


Dive into the Torbjörn Tomson's collaboration.

Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge