Toshikatsu Tominaga

Predictors of neurologic recovery in acute central cervical cord injury with only upper extremity impairment.

STUDY DESIGN A prospective study of 22 patients with the syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury with motor and sensory impairment involving only upper extremities (ACCSCI-U) was done from admission to the 2-year follow-up. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the course of neurologic function and to identify predictors of a good neurologic recovery in patients with ACCSCI-U. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Little is known regarding the time-course profile of neurologic and functional recovery and the prognostic factors for neurologic recovery in patients with ACCSCI-U. METHODS Between 1997 and 1998, 22 new cases of ACCSCI-U were identified (15 men and 7 women) with a mean age of 45.9 years (range, 13-75 years). They were all treated nonsurgically. Neurologic impairment, as evaluated by the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor and sensory scores, was assessed on patient arrival at the emergency department and followed prospectively at intervals from admission to the 2-year follow-up. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed acutely (1 hours to 2 days after injury), subacutely (3-21 days after injury), and chronically (3-9 months after injury). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the variables that were associated with neurologic improvement. RESULTS No patient sustained cervical fractures. The mean sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canals (14.8 mm) was smaller than that of normal subjects in Japan. Of these 22 patients, seven (32%) had radiologic evidence of developmental cervical canal stenosis and two (9%) had evidence of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. Thirteen (59%) had cervical spondylosis: of these, four (31%) had cervical stenosis. Nonsurgical treatment resulted in nearly full neurologic recovery within approximately 6 weeks after the injury. None of the patients went on to need surgery. Their average ASIA score of motor, light touch sensation, and pin sensation was increased from 82.2, 104.5, and 104.3 at admission to 99.3, 111.2, and 111.0, respectively, at 2 years after injury. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the best predictor associated with a better neurologic recovery of motor, light touch sensation, and pin sensation was the absence of MRI findings of abnormal signal intensity in the spinal cord, with an odds ratio of 64 (P < 0.006), 13 (P < 0.04),and 15 (P < 0.03), respectively. The results also revealed that percent deficit improvement became significant at 1 week after injury to predict neurologic recovery at 2-year follow-up points. CONCLUSIONS In patients with ACCSCI-U, a favorable neurologic prognosis can be predicted following nonsurgical treatment. Most recovery occurred by 6 weeks, and patients with severe initial neurologic damage and old age had poorer recovery. Touch and pin sensation recovered at the same rate, whereas motor recovered more quickly. The absence of abnormal MRI signal intensity in the spinal cord and a good early neurologic improvement were the significant predictors of long-term improvement in neurologic function.

Validation study of a clinical diagnosis support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis

BackgroundA clinical diagnosis support tool for lumbar spinal stenosis was developed by the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research. However, the use of this tool has not yet been validated.MethodsPatients with symptoms in the lower extremities and who visited the Department of Orthopedics initially were recruited to the study. Orthopedic physicians who were not spine specialists completed the support tools. Spine specialists examined the patients, made a diagnosis, and completed the lumbar spine examination sheet made for the study. The support tool and lumbar spine examination sheet were sent to a central panel comprising four panelists who then decided on a final diagnosis.ResultsIn total, 118 patients were evaluated, including 62 males and 56 females. Lumbar spinal stenosis was diagnosed in 58 and nonlumbar spinal stenosis in 60 patients. The mean score in the lumbar spinal stenosis group was 12.2 points (median 13 points). In the nonlumbar spinal stenosis group, the mean score was 7.5 points (median 7 points). Sensitivity was 0.948, and specificity was 0.40.ConclusionsPatients with lumbar spinal stenosis with a very low score were diagnosed with mild lumbar spinal stenosis, whereas nonlumbar spinal stenosis patients with a very high score were diagnosed as suffering from spine disease and needing special treatment by spine surgeons. Our results validate the use of the support tool for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Although the specificity observed in the present study was lower than that reported at development, we conclude that this support tool is useful for screening patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Comparisons on Efficacy of Elcatonin and Limaprost Alfadex in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Concurrent Osteoporosis: A Preliminary Study Using a Crossover Design

Study Design Multicenter prospective study with a crossover design. Purpose The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of limaprost alfadex (LP) and elcatonin (EL) for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients with concurrent osteoporosis. Overview of Literature It has been increasingly important to improve quality of life by establishing appropriate conservative treatments for LSS patients with concurrent osteoporosis who will presumably continue to increase due to the percentage of the aging elevations, however there is no prospective study. Methods A total of 19 patients with LSS and concurrent osteoporosis were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups and compared using a crossover design. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and short-form (SF)-8 health survey scale were used for clinical evaluations. Results There was a significant improvement of buttock-leg pain and numbness in the EL group. A significant improvement of impaired walking function was noted for the LP group according to the JOABPEQ while the rest of the items in the JOABPEQ showed no significant differences. The SF-8 health survey revealed that somatic pains and physical summary scores in the EL group and physical functioning and physical summary scores in the LP group tended to improve but not to any statistically significant extents. Conclusions Concomitant uses of EL may be useful in patients who do not respond satisfactorily to the treatments of LP for 6-8 weeks.

Short-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty (Axiom)

A retrospective analysis of 40 total knee arthroplasties was performed on cases with a mean 2-year follow up. Axiom total knee prosthesis was used in all cases.At 2 years, the JOA score in OA cases (27 joints) improved from 47 points preoperatively to 79 points postoperatively. RA cases (13 joints) improved from 47 points to 77 points.The mean range of motion for the series went from 93° preoperatively to 107° postoperatively.Radiolucent lines, 2mm or greater in width, were not noted in radiographs.Short-term results were good.