Toshimi Takano

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Mutations and Increased Copy Numbers Predict Gefitinib Sensitivity in Patients With Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE To evaluate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and copy number as predictors of clinical outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving gefitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-six patients with NSCLC who experienced relapse after surgery and received gefitinib were included. Direct sequencing of exons 18 to 24 of EGFR and exons 18 to 24 of ERBB2 was performed using DNA extracted from surgical specimens. Pyrosequencing and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed to analyze the allelic pattern and copy number of EGFR. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients (59%) had EGFR mutations; 20 patients had deletional mutations in exon 19, 17 patients had missense mutations (L858R) in exon 21, and two patients had missense mutations (G719S or G719C) in exon 18. No mutations were identified in ERBB2. Response rate (82% [32 of 39 patients] v 11% [three of 27 patients]; P < .0001), time to progression (TTP; median, 12.6 v 1.7 months; P < .0001), and overall survival (median, 20.4 v 6.9 months; P = .0001) were significantly better in patients with EGFR mutations than in patients with wild-type EGFR. Increased EGFR copy numbers (> or = 3/cell) were observed in 29 patients (44%) and were significantly associated with a higher response rate (72% [21 of 29 patients] v 38% [14 of 37 patients]; P = .005) and a longer TTP (median, 9.4 v 2.6 months; P = .038). High EGFR copy numbers (> or = 6/cell) were caused by selective amplification of mutant alleles. CONCLUSION EGFR mutations and increased copy numbers were significantly associated with better clinical outcome in gefitinib-treated NSCLC patients.

EGFR Mutations Predict Survival Benefit From Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Historical Comparison of Patients Treated Before and After Gefitinib Approval in Japan

PURPOSE This study evaluated whether the presence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations is a predictive marker for survival benefit from gefitinib and/or a prognostic marker in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who began first-line systemic therapy before and after gefitinib approval in Japan (January 1999 to July 2001 and July 2002 to December 2004, respectively). Deletional mutations in exon 19 or the L858R mutation in exon 21 of EGFR were evaluated using high-resolution melting analysis. RESULTS EGFR mutations were detected in 136 (41%) of the 330 patients included in this study. OS was significantly longer among the EGFR-mutant patients treated after gefitinib approval compared with the OS of patients treated before gefitinib approval (median survival time [MST], 27.2 v 13.6 months, respectively; P < .001), whereas no significant survival improvement was observed in patients without EGFR mutations (MST, 13.2 v 10.4 months, respectively; P = .13). A significant interaction between the presence of EGFR mutations and a survival improvement was seen (P = .045). Among patients treated before gefitinib approval, those with EGFR mutations lived longer than those without EGFR mutations (MST, 13.6 v 10.4 months, respectively; P = .034). The response rates to first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy were not significantly different between patients with and without EGFR mutations (31% v 28%, respectively; P = .50). CONCLUSION EGFR mutations significantly predict both a survival benefit from gefitinib and a favorable prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Detection of EGFR Mutations in Archived Cytologic Specimens of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Using High-Resolution Melting Analysis

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), particularly deletional mutations (DEL) in exon 19 and L858R in exon 21, are reportedly correlated with clinical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib, suggesting that detection of EGFR mutations would have an important role in clinical decision making. We established and validated an easy, inexpensive, and rapid method for detecting DEL and L858R from cytologic material by high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA). Dilution for sensitivity studies revealed that DEL and L858R were detectable in the presence of at least 10% and 0.1% EGFR-mutant cells, respectively. We analyzed 37 archived cytological slides of specimens from 29 patients with advanced NSCLC and compared the results with direct sequencing data obtained previously. Of 37 samples, 34 (92%) yielded consistent results with direct sequencing, 2 were false negative, and 1 was indeterminate. The sensitivity of this analysis was 90% (19/21) and specificity, 100% (15/15). These results suggest that HRMA of archived cytologic specimens of advanced NSCLC is useful for detecting EGFR mutations in clinical practice.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation Detection Using High-Resolution Melting Analysis Predicts Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Gefitinib

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, especially deletional mutations in exon 19 (DEL) and L858R, predict gefitinib sensitivity in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we validated EGFR mutation detection using high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) and evaluated the associations between EGFR mutations and clinical outcomes in advanced NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib on a larger scale. Experimental Design: The presence of DEL or L858R was evaluated using HRMA and paraffin-embedded tissues and/or cytologic slides from 212 patients. In 66 patients, the results were compared with direct sequencing data. Results: HRMA using formalin-fixed tissues had a 92% sensitivity and a 100% specificity. The analysis was successfully completed in 207 patients, and DEL or L858R mutations were detected in 85 (41%) patients. The response rate (78% versus 8%), time-to-progression (median, 9.2 versus 1.6 months), and overall survival (median, 21.7 versus 8.7 months) were significantly better in patients with EGFR mutations (P < 0.001). Even among the 34 patients with stable diseases, the time-to-progression was significantly longer in patients with EGFR mutations. Patients with DEL (n = 49) tended to have better outcomes than those with L858R (n = 36); the response rates were 86% and 67%, respectively (P = 0.037), and the median time-to-progression was 10.5 and 7.4 months, respectively (P = 0.11). Conclusions: HRMA is a precise method for detecting DEL and L858R mutations and is useful for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with gefitinib.

Prospective Study of the Accuracy of EGFR Mutational Analysis by High-Resolution Melting Analysis in Small Samples Obtained from Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, especially in-frame deletions in exon 19 (DEL) and a point mutation in exon 21 (L858R), predict gefitinib sensitivity in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, we verified the accuracy of EGFR mutation analysis in small samples by high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA), which is a rapid method using PCR amplification with a dye to analyze the melting curves in NSCLC. Experimental Design: We designed a prospective study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of HRMA and DNA sequencing with laser capture microdissection. Eligible patients with lung lesions were screened by bronchoscopy or percutaneous needle biopsy to histologically confirm the diagnosis, followed by surgical resection of the NSCLC. Small diagnostic specimens were analyzed for EGFR mutations by HRMA, and the surgically resected specimens were examined for mutations by HRMA and DNA sequencing. Results: The analyses for EGFR mutations were conducted in 52 eligible cases of the 92 enrolled patients. EGFR mutations were detected in 18 (34.6%) patients. The results of HRMA from surgically resected specimens as well as DNA sequencing revealed 100% sensitivity and specificity. On the other hand, the sensitivity and specificity of HRMA from the small diagnostic specimens were 83.3% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: In this study, we showed that HRMA is a highly accurate method for detecting DEL and L858R mutations in patients with NSCLC, although it is necessary to consider the identification of patients with a false-negative result when the analysis is conducted using small samples.

Proteomic Signature Corresponding to the Response to Gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839), an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Purpose: We aimed to identify candidate proteins for tumor markers to predict the response to gefitinib treatment. Experimental Design: We did two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis to create the protein expression profile of lung adenocarcinoma tissues from patients who showed a different response to gefitinib treatment. We used a support vector machine algorithm to select the proteins that best distinguished 31 responders from 16 nonresponders. The prediction performance of the selected spots was validated by an external sample set, including six responders and eight nonresponders. The results were validated using specific antibodies. Results: We selected nine proteins that distinguish responders from nonresponders. The predictive performance of the nine proteins was validated examining an additional six responders and eight nonresponders, resulting in positive and negative predictive values of 100% (six of six) and 87.5% (seven of eight), respectively. The differential expression of one of the nine proteins, heart-type fatty acid–binding protein, was successfully validated by ELISA. We also identified 12 proteins as a signature to distinguish tumors based on their epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation status. Conclusions: Study of these proteins may contribute to the development of personalized therapy for lung cancer patients.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation, but not sex and smoking, is independently associated with favorable prognosis of gefitinib‐treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have been reported as a predictive factor for favorable prognosis of gefitinib‐treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma. However, its confounding with sex and smoking makes it unclear whether the EGFR mutation is independently associated with prolonged patient survival. In this study, we analyzed a large‐scale database to discriminate the survival impact of EGFR mutations against those of sex and smoking after gefitinib therapy. EGFR mutations in exon19 and exon21 named drug‐sensitive EGFR mutations were examined to investigate the impact of EGFR mutation, sex, and smoking status on survival of 362 gefitinib‐treated patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Drug‐sensitive EGFR mutations were detected in 169 patients (46.7%). The multivariate analysis including EGFR, sex, and smoking status showed that drug‐sensitive EGFR mutations were significantly related to longer overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and progression‐free survival (PFS) (P < 0.001). In addition, we investigated the impact of sex and smoking status according to EGFR mutation status, and the impact of EGFR mutation status according to sex and smoking status on survival. Sex and smoking status were not significantly associated with longer OS and PFS according to EGFR mutation status. Drug‐sensitive EGFR mutations were significantly associated with longer OS and PFS according to sex or smoking status. Our results indicated that drug‐sensitive EGFR mutations were the only independent factor for longer survival of patients treated with gefitinib, suggesting that patient selection based on EGFR mutation status for gefitinib therapy will lead to a better outcome for patients with lung adenocarcinoma. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 303–308)

Taxanes versus S-1 as the first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (SELECT BC): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Oral fluoropyrimidines are used for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer to avoid severe adverse effects, although firm supporting evidence is lacking. We aimed to establish whether S-1 is non-inferior to taxanes in this setting. METHODS We did an open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at 154 hospitals in Japan. We enrolled individuals who had HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who had received no chemotherapy for advanced disease, and who were resistant to endocrine treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) either to taxane (docetaxel 60-75 mg/m(2) at intervals of 3-4 weeks; paclitaxel 80-100 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) at intervals of 3-4 weeks) or to S-1 (40-60 mg twice daily for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 14-day break). Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method, with stratification by institution, liver metastasis, oestrogen and progesterone receptor status, previous treatment with taxanes or oral fluorouracil, and time from surgery to recurrence. The primary endpoint was overall survival, with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 1·333 for the hazard ratio (HR). The primary efficacy analysis was done in the full analysis set, which consisted of all patients who took at least one study treatment and who had all data after randomisation. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan (protocol ID C000000416). FINDINGS Between Oct 27, 2006, and July 30, 2010, we enrolled 618 patients (309 assigned to taxane; 309 assigned to S-1). The full analysis set consisted of 286 patients in the taxane group and 306 in the S-1 group. Median follow-up was 34·6 months (IQR 17·9-44·4). Median overall survival was 35·0 months (95% CI 31·1-39·0) in the S-1 group and 37·2 months (33·0-40·1) in the taxane group (HR 1·05 [95% CI 0·86-1·27]; pnon-inferiority=0·015). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (20 [7%] of 307 patients in the S-1 group vs nine [3%] of 290 patients in the taxane group), fatigue (ten [3%] vs 12 [4%]), and oedema (one [<1%] vs 12 [4%]). Treatment-related deaths were reported in two patients in the taxane group. INTERPRETATION S-1 is non-inferior to taxane with respect to overall survival as a first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. S-1 should be considered a new option for first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. FUNDING Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research of the Public Health Research Foundation, Japan; Taiho.

Randomized study of FOLFIRI plus either panitumumab or bevacizumab for wild-type KRAS colorectal cancer-WJOG 6210G

This randomized phase II trial compared panitumumab plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI as second‐line chemotherapy for wild‐type (WT) KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and to explore the values of oncogenes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and serum proteins as predictive biomarkers. Patients with WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC refractory to first‐line chemotherapy containing oxaliplatin and bevacizumab were randomly assigned to panitumumab plus FOLFIRI or bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI. Of 121 randomly assigned patients, 117 were eligible. Median overall survival (OS) for panitumumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI were 16.2 and 13.4 months [hazard ratio (HR), 1.16; 95% CI, 0.76–1.77], respectively. Progression‐free survival (PFS) was also similar (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.78–1.66). KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF status using ctDNA was successfully examined in 109 patients, and mutations were identified in 19 patients (17.4%). Panitumumab plus FOLFIRI showed favorable survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in WT patients and unfavorable survival in those with mutations (P for interaction = 0.026 in OS and 0.054 in PFS). OS with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI was better than panitumumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with high serum vascular endothelial growth factor‐A (VEGF‐A) levels and worse in those with low levels (P for interaction = 0.016). Second‐line FOLFIRI plus panitumumab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab showed a similar efficacy in patients with WT KRAS exon 2 mCRC. RAS and BRAF mutation in ctDNA could be a negative predictive marker for panitumumab.

Comparison of two different S-1 plus cisplatin dosing schedules as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic and/or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, randomized phase III trial (SOS)

BACKGROUND Five-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP5) is one of the standard first-line regimens for advanced gastric cancer (GC), proven in a Japanese phase III study. To enhance the dose intensity of cisplatin, 3-weekly S-1 plus cisplatin (SP3) was developed. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study evaluated whether SP3 (S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1) was noninferior/superior to SP5 (S-1 80-120 mg/day on days 1-21 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 or 8) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic, recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either SP3 or SP5. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00915382). RESULTS Between February 2009 and January 2012, 625 patients were randomized at 42 sites in Korea and Japan. With a median follow-up duration of 32.4 months (range, 13.3-48.6 months) in surviving patients, SP3 was not only noninferior but also superior to SP5 in terms of PFS [median 5.5 versus 4.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-0.99; P = 0.0418 for superiority). There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the groups (median 14.1 versus 13.9 months; HR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.81-1.21; P = 0.9068). In patients with measurable disease, the response rates were 60% in the SP3 arm and 50% in the SP5 arm (P = 0.065). Both regimens were generally well tolerated, but grade 3 or higher anemia (19% versus 9%) and neutropenia (39% versus 9%) were more frequent in SP3. CONCLUSIONS SP3 is superior to SP5 in terms of PFS. However, since the improvement in PFS was only slight and there was no difference in OS, both SP3 and SP5 can be recommended as first-line treatments for patients with advanced GC.