Toshio Take

Failure analysis of medical linear accelerator with reliability analyses

We analyzed a number of cases about the Linac troubles in our hospital and have examined the effect of preventive maintenance with Weibull analysis and exponential distribution from April 2001 to March 2012. The total failure by irradiation disabled was 1, 192. (1) Medical linear accelerator (MLC) system was 24.0%, (2) radiation dosimetry system 13.1%, and the (3) cooling-water system was 26.5%. It accounts for 63.6% of the total number of failures. Each parameter value m, which means the shape parameter, and the failure period expectancy of parts μ were (1) 1.21, 1.46/3.9, 3.8 years. 3.7, 3.6 years. (2) 2.84, 1.59/6.6, 4.3 years. 6.7, 5.9 years. (3) 5.12, 4.16/6.1, 8.5 years. 6.1, 8.5 years. Each shape parameter was m>1. It is believed that they are in the worn-out failure period. To prevent failure, MLC performance should be overhauled once every 3 years and a cooling unit should be overhauled once every 7 years. Preventive maintenance is useful in assessing the failure of radiation therapy equipment. In a radiation dosimetry part, you can make a preemptive move before the failure by changing the monitors dosimeter board with a new part from the repairs stockpiled every 6 months for maintenance.

Overlap of radiation field and radiation field shape in cardiac catheterization

The radiation field shape for cardiac catheterization has changed from being circular to being rectangular with the spread of flat-panel detector systems. A rectangular radiation field provides a wide fluoroscopy field to the four corners of a subject area; however, in cardiac catheterization, there is not much usable information around the four corners at several angles, and this tends to be regarded as a meaningless radiation exposure. Hence, overlap of radiation fields has been of concern recently. The authors changed field sizes/fluoroscopy angles and examined entrance dose rates to study radiation field shapes and configurations of radiation exposure to patients, and they discussed a radiation exposure reduction method. In measurements of phantom entrance dose rates, we considered right anterior oblique (RAO) directions, cranial (CRA) directions and RAO–CRA directions and found that entrance dose rates rose considerably, particularly at the RAO–CRA. In the study of radiation field overlap, we discuss radiation field shapes (rectangular/circular) as well as angles. In the RAO–CRA directions, differences occurred in angles of non-overlapping radiation field by differences in radiation field shapes. For RAO–CRA, compared with the RAO and CRA directions, entrance dose rates increased with an increase in angle. When convenience in clinics is considered, the utilization frequency of the four corners of a rectangular field is low. When one considers the increases in radiation exposure caused by radiation field overlap, it is more effective to use circular radiation fields.