Toshiyuki Kozuki

Randomized Phase III Trial of Erlotinib Versus Docetaxel As Second- or Third-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial (DELTA)

PURPOSE To investigate the efficacy of erlotinib versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -unselected patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate, safety, and analyses on EGFR wild-type tumors. Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, previous treatment with one or two chemotherapy regimens, evaluable or measurable disease, and performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible. RESULTS From August 2009 to July 2012, 150 and 151 patients were randomly assigned to erlotinib (150 mg daily) and docetaxel (60 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks), respectively. EGFR wild-type NSCLC was present in 109 and 90 patients in the erlotinib and docetaxel groups, respectively. Median PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel was 2.0 v 3.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.55; P = .09), and median OS was 14.8 v 12.2 months (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.22; P = .53), respectively. In a subset analysis of EGFR wild-type tumors, PFS for erlotinib versus docetaxel was 1.3 v 2.9 months (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.94; P = .01), and OS was 9.0 v 10.1 months (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.39; P = .91), respectively. CONCLUSION Erlotinib failed to show an improvement in PFS or OS compared with docetaxel in an EGFR-unselected patient population.

Emergence of epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation during chronic exposure to gefitinib in a non-small cell lung cancer cell line

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib may provide dramatic clinical responses in some patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma carrying activating mutations of the EGFR. However, prolonged administration of gefitinib may eventually induce acquired resistance in such patients. To gain insight into the mechanisms of this phenomenon, we placed PC-9, a cell line derived from pulmonary adenocarcinoma that has a 15-bp deletion in EGFR exon 19, under the continuous selective pressure of low levels of gefitinib without any mutagen, and established a subline that was able to grow in the presence of 2 micromol/L of gefitinib (designated RPC-9). In this cell line, about half of the reverse transcription-PCR products from mutated EGFR also carried an additional mutation (T790M). In keeping with the proposed role of T790M in abrogating gefitinib binding with EGFR, gefitinib-treated RPC-9 hardly displayed any decrease in the constitutive phosphorylation of EGFR, Akt, or Erk1/2 unlike in PC-9 cells. Interestingly, transfection of the EGFR carrying only a 15-bp deletion reversed the resistance to gefitinib in RPC-9 cells. Thus, the balance of expression levels between gefitinib-sensitive or gefitinib-resistant EGFR may govern the response to gefitinib in lung cancer.

Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Alectinib, a potent, highly selective, CNS-active inhibitor of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), showed promising efficacy and tolerability in the single-arm phase 1/2 AF-001JP trial in Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Given those promising results, we did a phase 3 trial to directly compare the efficacy and safety of alectinib and crizotinib. METHODS J-ALEX was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial that recruited ALK inhibitor-naive Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer, who were chemotherapy-naive or had received one previous chemotherapy regimen, from 41 study sites in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system using a permuted-block method stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, treatment line, and disease stage to receive oral alectinib 300 mg twice daily or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review facility. The efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population, and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The study is ongoing and patient recruitment is closed. This study is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center (number JapicCTI-132316). FINDINGS Between Nov 18, 2013, and Aug 4, 2015, 207 patients were recruited and assigned to the alectinib (n=103) or crizotinib (n=104) groups. At data cutoff for the second interim analysis, 24 patients in the alectinib group had discontinued treatment compared with 61 in the crizotinib group, mostly due to lack of efficacy or adverse events. At the second interim analysis (data cutoff date Dec 3, 2015), an independent data monitoring committee determined that the primary endpoint of the study had been met (hazard ratio 0·34 [99·7% CI 0·17-0·71], stratified log-rank p<0·0001) and recommended an immediate release of the data. Median progression-free survival had not yet been reached with alectinib (95% CI 20·3-not estimated) and was 10·2 months (8·2-12·0) with crizotinib. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred at a greater frequency with crizotinib (54 [52%] of 104) than alectinib (27 [26%] of 103). Dose interruptions due to adverse events were also more prevalent with crizotinib (77 [74%] of 104) than with alectinib (30 [29%] of 103), and more patients receiving crizotinib (21 [20%]) than alectinib (nine [9%]) discontinued the study drug because of an adverse event. No adverse events with a fatal outcome occurred in either treatment group. INTERPRETATION These results provide the first head-to-head comparison of alectinib and crizotinib and have the potential to change the standard of care for the first-line treatment of ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. The dose of alectinib (300 mg twice daily) used in this study is lower than the approved dose in countries other than Japan; however, this limitation is being addressed in the ongoing ALEX study. FUNDING Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.

Preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an induction chemoradiotherapy regimen followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). A total of 22 patients with LA-NSCLC were treated with induction chemoradiotherapy consisting of cisplatin (40 mg m−2) and docetaxel (40 mg m−2) given on days 1, 8, 29 and 36 plus concurrent thoracic irradiation at a dose of 40–60 Gy (2 Gy fraction−1 day−1). Surgical resection was performed within 6 weeks after completion of induction therapy. Objective response to the induction therapy was obtained in 16 patients (73%). In all, 20 patients (91%) underwent surgery and complete resection was achieved in 19 patients (86%). Pathological downstaging and pathological complete response were obtained in 14 (64%) and five (23%) patients, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 32 months, the calculated 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 66 and 61%, respectively. It is noteworthy that the 3-year overall survival rate in 14 patients achieving pathological downstaging was extremely high (93%). Toxicity was manageable with standard approaches. No treatment-related deaths occurred. This combined modality treatment is feasible and highly effective in patients with LA-NSCLC. The results warrant further large-scale study to confirm the effectiveness of this regimen.

A prospective, phase II, open-label study (JO22903) of first-line erlotinib in Japanese patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor erlotinib is associated with survival benefits in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase II, single-arm study examined the efficacy and safety of first-line erlotinib in Japanese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. METHODS Eligible patients received erlotinib 150 mg/day until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS A high degree of concordance was observed between different mutation testing methodologies, suggesting feasibility of early, rapid detection of EGFR mutations. Median PFS was 11.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7-15.3) at data cut-off (1 June 2012) (n = 102). Exon 19 deletions seemed to be associated with longer PFS compared with L858R mutations; T790M mutations were tentatively linked with shorter PFS. The safety profile was as expected: rash (any grade; 83%) and diarrhea (any grade; 81%) were most common. Six interstitial lung disease (ILD)-like cases were reported, and 5 were confirmed as ILD-like events by the extramural committee. Two patients died of treatment-related pneumonitis (JAPIC Clinical Trials Information number: Japic CTI-101085). CONCLUSION Erlotinib should be considered for first-line treatment in this subset of Japanese patients, with close monitoring for ILD-like events.

Phase II Trial of Gefitinib in Combination with Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy for Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with Activating EGFR Gene Mutations: The Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 1001

Purpose: Whether bevacizumab enhances the effect of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor gefitinib on EGFR mutant non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) remains unknown. We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib when combined with bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR gene mutations. Methods: In this trial, 42 patients with a performance status of 0 to 2 received gefitinib (250 mg/d) and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks). The primary end point of this study was the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. We assumed that a 1-year PFS rate of 55% would indicate potential usefulness and that a 1-year PFS rate of 40% would constitute the lower limit of interest. Results: Forty-two patients were enrolled in the study with a median age of 73 (range 42–86) years. Activating EGFR gene mutations included exon 19 deletion (57%) and L858R point mutations in exon 21 (38%). The objective response rate was 73.8% and included two complete responses. The 1-year PFS rate and median PFS time were 56.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.9–70.5) and 14.4 months (95% CI 10.1–19.2), respectively. The median PFS differed significantly between EGFR exon 19 deletion and the L858R point mutation (18.0 versus 9.4 months, respectively; p = 0.006). The median overall survival had not yet been reached. Severe adverse events included grade 3 skin rash (15%), hypertension (17%), aspartate transaminase/alanine aminotransferase elevation (17%), proteinuria (7%), intracranial hemorrhage (2%), and grade 4 perforation of the digestive tract (2%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Gefitinib in combination with bevacizumab as first-line therapy seems to be a favorable and well-tolerated treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC with activating EGFR gene mutations, especially those with EGFR exon 19 deletion mutations, although the primary end point was not met because the lower limit of the CI was less than 40%.

Casein kinase I δ/ɛ phosphorylates topoisomerase IIα at serine-1106 and modulates DNA cleavage activity

We previously reported that phosphorylation of topoisomerase (topo) IIα at serine-1106 (Ser-1106) regulates enzyme activity and sensitivity to topo II-targeted drugs. In this study we demonstrate that phosphorylation of Ser-1106, which is flanked by acidic amino acids, is regulated in vivo by casein kinase (CK) Iδ and/or CKIɛ, but not by CKII. The CKI inhibitors, CKI-7 and IC261, reduced Ser-1106 phosphorylation and decreased formation of etoposide-stabilized topo II–DNA cleavable complex. In contrast, the CKII inhibitor, 5,6-dichlorobenzimidazole riboside, did not affect etoposide-stabilized topo II–DNA cleavable complex formation. Since, IC261 specifically targets the Ca2+-regulated isozymes, CKIδ and CKIɛ, we examined the effect of down-regulating these enzymes on Ser-1106 phosphorylation. Down-regulation of these isozymes with targeted si-RNAs led to hypophosphorylation of the Ser-1106 containing peptide. However, si-RNA-mediated down-regulation of CKIIα and α′ did not alter Ser-1106 phosphorylation. Furthermore, reduced phosphorylation of Ser-1106, observed in HRR25 (CKIδ/ɛ homologous gene)-deleted Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells transformed with human topo IIα, was enhanced following expression of human CKIɛ. Down-regulation of CKIδ and CKIɛ also led to reduced formation of etoposide stabilized topo II–DNA cleavable complex. These results provide strong support for an essential role of CKIδ/ɛ in phosphorylating Ser-1106 in human topo IIα and in regulating enzyme function.

Combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan versus topotecan alone as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (JCOG0605): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Etoposide and irinotecan are key drugs in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. We did this study to investigate whether combined chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide, and irinotecan was superior to topotecan monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy in patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer. METHODS We did this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial at 29 institutions in Japan. Patients with small-cell lung cancer that responded to first-line treatment but showed evidence of disease relapse or progression at least 90 days after completion of the first-line treatment were eligible to participate. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive combination chemotherapy with cisplatin plus etoposide plus irinotecan or topotecan alone. Randomisation was done via the minimisation method with biased-coin balancing for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease stage at enrolment, and institution. Combination chemotherapy consisted of five 2-week courses of intravenous cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, intravenous etoposide 60 mg/m(2) on days 1-3, and intravenous irinotecan 90 mg/m(2) on day 8, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor given by hypodermic injection every day starting from day 9 of the first course (except on the days anticancer drugs were given). Topotecan therapy consisted of four courses of intravenous topotecan 1·0 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population, which was analysed with a one-sided α of 5%, and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trial is registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000000828. FINDINGS Between Sept 20, 2007, and Nov 30, 2012, 180 patients were enrolled, with 90 assigned to each treatment group. The median follow-up for censored patients was 22·7 months (IQR 20·0-35·3). Overall survival was significantly longer in the combination chemotherapy group (median 18·2 months, 95% CI 15·7-20·6) than in the topotecan group (12·5 months, 10·8-14·9; hazard ratio 0·67, 90% CI 0·51-0·88; p=0·0079). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (75 [83%] patients in the combination chemotherapy group vs 77 [86%] patients in the topotecan group), anaemia (76 [84%] vs 25 [28%]), and leucopenia (72 [80%] vs 46 [51%]). Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia was more common in the combination chemotherapy group than in the topotecan group (28 [31%] vs six [7%]), as was grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (37 [41%] vs 25 [28%]). Serious adverse events were reported in four (4%) patients in the topotecan group and nine (10%) in the combination chemotherapy group. Two treatment-related deaths (one each of pneumonitis and pulmonary infection) occurred in the topotecan group and one (febrile neutropenia with sepsis) occurred in the combination chemotherapy group. INTERPRETATION Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin plus etoposide plus irinotecan could be considered the standard second-line chemotherapy for selected patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer. FUNDING National Cancer Center and the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

STAT3 expression in activating EGFR-driven adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) pattern is often seen at the margin of invasive adenocarcinomas. We investigated EGFR signaling abnormalities involved in the progression of adenocarcinoma. Fifty tumors were obtained from patients who underwent surgery for lung adenocarcinoma seen as dense areas in ground glass opacity on computed tomography. Six, 18, and 26 tumors <1cm, 1-2 cm, and ≥2 cm in diameter, respectively, were analyzed. Of the 24 tumors ≤2 cm in diameter, nine were preinvasive and 15 were invasive. EGFR, pAKT, and pMAPK were overexpressed in the center of the adenocarcinoma compared to the BAC component (p<0.01) by immunohistochemistry, while pSTAT3 expression was reversed (p=0.017). In the tumors ≤2 cm in diameter, pSTAT3 expression in the central area was higher in preinvasive tumors than in invasive tumors (p=0.005). pSTAT3 was identified in the BAC component of 88% of the EGFR mutant (n=17) and 82% of the wild-type tumors (n=33). Transgenic mice expressing delE748-A752 EGFR and two lung cancer cell lines (PC-9 mutant and A549 wild-type EGFR) were also investigated. In transgenic mice, pSTAT3 was overexpressed in the BAC component around the adenocarcinoma center. Two lung cancer cell lines that overexpressed pSTAT3 were equally sensitive to a JAK2/STAT3 inhibitor (JSI-124). The role of STAT3 in the progression of adenocarcinoma should be further pursued.

A phase II study of cisplatin plus S-1 with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: The Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Trial 0501

BACKGROUND Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy combined with thoracic irradiation (TRT) is a standard treatment for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this treatment outcome has remained unsatisfactory. We had previously conducted a phase I trial of cisplatin plus S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, and TRT, which were safe and effective. METHODS In this phase II trial, 48 patients with stage III NSCLC received cisplatin (40mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 29 and 36) and S-1 (80mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and 29-42) and TRT (60Gy). The primary endpoint was the response rate. RESULTS A partial response was observed in 37 patients (77%; 95% confidence interval: 63-88%). At a median follow up of 54 months, the median progression-free survival and median survival time were 9.3 and 31.3 months, respectively. No difference in efficacy was observed when the patients were stratified by histology. Toxicities were generally mild except for grade 3 or worse febrile neutropenia and pneumonitis of 8% and 4%, respectively. No patient developed severe esophagitis. At the time of this analysis, 35 (73%) of the 48 patients recurred; 15 (31%) showed distant metastasis, 17 (35%) had loco-regional disease, and 2 (4%) showed both loco-regional disease and distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS This chemoradiotherapy regimen yielded a relatively favorable efficacy with mild toxicities in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.