Toufan Bahrami

Early outcomes of bilateral sequential single lung transplantation after ex-vivo lung evaluation and reconditioning

BACKGROUND Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a novel approach for extended evaluation and/or reconditioning of donor lungs not meeting standard International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria for transplantation. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 13 consecutive EVLP runs between January 2009 and December 2010. Lungs rejected for routine transplantation were implanted to the EVLP circuit and reperfused using acellular supplemented Steen Solution (Vitrolife, Göteborg, Sweden) up to a target flow rate of 40% of the donors calculated flow at a cardiac index of 3.0 liters/min/m(2); target left atrial pressure < 5 mm Hg; and pulmonary artery pressure < 15 mm Hg. Mechanical ventilation was introduced after rewarming to 32°C: tidal volume, 6 to 8 ml/kg; respiratory rate, 7 to 8 breaths/min; duration of inspiration/expiration (I/E) ratio, 1:2; and positive end-expiratory pressure, 5 to 10 cm H(2)O. Hemodynamic and respiratory data monitoring with hourly clinical assessment were performed. Donor data, conversion rate to transplantation, and recipient outcome were analyzed. RESULTS Donor data (n = 13) were: age, 44.23 ± 8.33 years; female/male, 8:5; cause of death: intracranial hemorrhage, 11 (85%), stroke, 1 (7.5%), hypoxic brain injury, 1 (7.5%); smoking history, 9 (69%), 17.44 ± 8.92 pack-years; mechanical ventilation, 102.6 ± 91.92 hours; chest x-ray imaging: abnormal, 12 (92.5%); normal, 1 (7.5%). EVLP: mean 141 ± 28.83 minutes. Arterial partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen 100% before termination of the circuit vs pre-retrieval value: 57.32 ± 9.1 vs 42.36 ± 14.13 kPa (p < 0.05). Six (46%) pairs of donor lungs were transplanted. Median follow-up was 297.5 days (range, 100-390 days), with 100% survival at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS EVLP may facilitate assessment and/or reconditioning of borderline lungs, with a conversion rate of 46 % and good short-term survival.

Clinical Experience With HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure

BACKGROUND The gold standard treatment for end-stage heart failure is cardiac transplantation. Because of the increasing number of heart failure patients and the limited supply of donor hearts, a ventricular assist device (VAD) is used as a bridge to transplantation, recovery, or decision. Newer generation VADs have lower risk of fatal adverse events and are also smaller in size. We present our experience with the intrapericardial HeartWare VAD (HeartWare, Framingham, MA) and its clinical outcome. METHODS The clinical outcome of HeartWare VAD implantations for end-stage heart failure patients performed at Harefield Hospital from March 2007 to June 2011 was studied. The study design was a retrospective review of the prospectively collected data. RESULTS Thirty-four patients with a mean age of 51±10 years were included in this study. Twenty-nine patients were male (85%). The mean duration of mechanical support was 261±64 days. Five patients (15%) were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. The overall mortality was 24% (8 patients). There were 1 case of mechanical device failure (2%) and 3 cases of device failure due to thrombus formation (8%). Postoperative complications included 5 reoperations for bleeding (15%), 12 acute renal failures (36%), 7 respiratory failures (21%), 2 hepatic dysfunctions (6%), 3 neurologic dysfunctions (9%), 7 right-side heart failures (21%), and 5 driveline infections (15%). CONCLUSIONS Although cardiac transplantation remains the gold standard for treatment of end-stage heart failure patients, the HeartWare VAD can be used as a safe alternative with a satisfactory clinical outcome.

HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Through Bilateral Anterior Thoracotomy

The HeartWare left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a new addition to the family of second-generation continuous-flow LVADs. The miniaturized dimensions of the HeartWare LVAD provide the opportunity for its safe implantation through nonsternotomy incisions. We present our technique for HeartWare LVAD implantation through bilateral anterior thoracotomy incisions. This technique has proved to be safe and reproducible, with good clinical outcome.

Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse by papillary muscle repositioning: a new surgical option

BACKGROUND Although mitral valve repair is considered the gold standard for treating mitral regurgitation, anterior leaflet prolapse may still remain a challenging problem. This challenge is even greater for posterior commissural prolapse. We have used papillary muscle repositioning to treat anterior leaflet prolapse and suggest it as an alternative technique for all other methods previously described. METHODS From 1989 to 1999 we performed 253 mitral valve repairs, among which 132 involved anterior leaflet prolapse. In this population there were two groups: group I (n = 92) treated with papillary muscle repositioning and group II (n = 40) treated with chordal shortening. There was no statistical difference between the two groups concerning age, functional class, and left ventricular function. Etiology was similar in both groups, a degenerative process being predominant. At echocardiography, regurgitation was graded 3.4/4 in both groups. There was no statistical difference concerning preoperative ejection fraction, end-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricular diameter. RESULTS There were one in-hospital death in group I and two deaths in group II not related to mitral valve repair. Mean follow up is 36.4 +/- 29.2 months in group I and 70.5 +/- 9.5 months in group II. No patient was lost to follow-up. Mean regurgitation at follow-up was 0.75 +/- 0.67 in group I and 0.8 +/- 0.8 in group II (p = not significant). There was no statistical difference between the two groups concerning postoperative ejection fraction, end-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricular diameter. There was no late cardiac death in either group and there were no thromboembolic events. Actuarial survival rate is 98.9% and 96.3% in group I and 92.5% and 88.1% in group II at 3 and 8 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Therefore, we conclude that papillary muscle repositioning is a safe technique that provides excellent results at mid-term follow-up and facilitates treatment of anterior leaflet prolapse.

Long-term outcomes of patients bridged to recovery versus patients bridged to transplantation.

OBJECTIVE The proportion of patients who can be bridged with left ventricular assist devices to myocardial recovery and the long-term outcome of these patients is unknown. METHODS We investigated the outcomes of patients bridged to recovery compared with those bridged to transplantation. All left ventricular assist devices were implanted as a bridge to transplantation with a very proactive program of promoting myocardial recovery. A total of 40 patients were bridged to recovery and 52 to transplantation. Of the bridged to recovery (explanted) group, 33 were men (age, 32.8 ± 11.8 years), 37 had dilated cardiomyopathy (familial in 3, peripartum cardiomyopathy in 3) and 3 had myocarditis. Of the bridged to transplantation (transplanted) group, 42 were men (age, 42.3 ± 12.5 years; P < .0005 vs bridged to recovery). The diagnosis was ischemic heart disease in 24, dilated cardiomyopathy in 21 (only 13 received drug therapy), hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy in 2, arrythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia in 2, myocarditis in 1, and congestive heart disease in 2. RESULTS The survival rate was 89.9%, 73.9%, and 73.9% and 80.4%, 78.3, and 78.3% in the explanted and transplanted groups at 1, 5, and 7 years, respectively. In total, 12 (23%) patients bridged transplantation either died from, or required ventricular assist device support, for primary graft failure. Of the explanted patients, 4 (10%) subsequently required transplantation at 34, 512, 1019, and 1213 days (2 died 25 and 1867 days after transplantation and 2 were well after 1523 and 3199 days). The rate of transplant or ventricular assist device-free survival less noncardiac death for the bridged to recovery and bridged to transplantation groups, respectively, was 89.9%, 73.9%, and 73.9% and 80.4%, 78.3%, and 78.3% at 1, 3, and 7 years. At latest follow-up (1394 ± 1195 days for the bridged to recovery and 1913 ± 941 days for the bridged to transplantation group), 5 of the bridged to transplantation patients (9.6%) had malignancy, 34 (65.4%) had hypercholesterolemia, 25 (48.1%) had hypertension, and 7 (13.5%) had coronary disease. The creatinine was 125.5 ± 43.5 vs 95.2 ± 16.5 μmol/L for the bridged to transplantation and bridged to recovery groups (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The outcome after explantation for myocardial recovery is comparable, if not better than, after bridge to transplantation.

Lungs from donation after circulatory death donors: an alternative source to brain-dead donors? Midterm results at a single institution

OBJECTIVES Donor organ shortage remains to be the major limitation in lung transplantation, and donation after circulatory death (DCD) might represent one way to alleviate this problem. DCD was introduced to our institution in 2007 and has been a part of our clinical routine since then. Here, we present the mid-term results of lung transplantation from DCD in a single institution and compare the outcomes with the lung recipient cohort receiving lungs from donation after brain death (DBD). METHODS Since initiation of the DCD programme in March 2007, of the 157 lung transplantations performed, 26 (16.5%) were retrieved from DCD donors, with 25 double- and 1 single-lung transplants being performed. Results were compared with standard DBD transplantations. Analyses included, amongst others, donor characteristics, survival, prevalence of primary graft dysfunction, acute rejection, lung function tests during follow-up, onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) as well as duration of mechanical ventilation, hospital and intensive care unit length of stay. RESULTS While there was no significant difference between lung function, BOS and survival between the two groups, lungs from DCD donors had a higher PaO(2) (median; interquartile range) 498.3 (451.5; 525) vs. DBD 442.5 (371.25; 502) kPa before retrieval (P = 0.009). There was also a longer total ischaemic time in the DCD vs. DBD group: 320 min (298.75; 393.25) vs. 285.5 min (240; 373) (P = 0.025). All other parameters were comparable. CONCLUSIONS Medium-term results after lung transplantation with organs procured after circulatory death are comparable with those obtained after standard lung transplantation. Therefore, DCD could be used to significantly increase the donor pool.

CentriMag® short-term ventricular assist as a bridge to solution in patients with advanced heart failure: use beyond 30 days

OBJECTIVES Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) offer very valuable therapeutic options for patients with advanced heart failure. CentriMag (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA) is an extracorporeal short-term circulatory assist device Conformité Européenne-marked in Europe for use up to 30 days. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 41 patients with advanced heart failure who, from 2003 to 2011, were supported with CentriMag for >30 days as a bridge to recovery, long-term VAD or transplantation. RESULTS Forty-one adult patients were supported with 46 CentriMag devices for a total of 2695 days with a mean support time of 59 (range: 31-167) days. Indications were post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PC = 4), primary graft failure (PGF = 7) and refractory heart failure (RHF = 35). Six devices were used to support the left ventricle, 19 to support the right ventricle and 21 to support both the ventricles (biventricular support considered as single device unit). In the PC cohort, 3 (75%) patients were weaned from support, while 4 (57%) were weaned from support in the PGF cohort. In the RHF cohort, 8 patients were bridged to long-term VAD and 5 were bridged to transplantation; heart function recovered and device explanted in 14, while 8 patients died on support. There were no device failures. Overall, 34 (74%) patients were recovered or bridged, with a 1-year survival of 54%. CONCLUSIONS CentriMag proved to be a versatile, safe and effective short-term circulatory support for patients with advanced heart failure as a bridge to solution. Its use over 30 days is associated with acceptable survival and does not increase device-related complications.

The influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries on short- and long-term outcomes: A propensity score matching in accordance with current recommendations

OBJECTIVES We undertook a single-center, 12 years outcomes analysis of the influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) over single internal mammary artery (SIMA) on short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes by means of propensity score matching technique in accordance to current recommendations. METHODS A propensity score was generated for each patient from a multivariable logistic regression model based on 20 pretreatment covariates. The study population consisted of 4195 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft procedure using SIMA (n = 3445; 78.3%) or BIMA (n = 750; 21.7%). A total of 750 matching sets were derived. RESULTS The BIMA group was associated with an increased rate of superficial sternal wound infection (5.6% vs 1.7%; P = .0001) but the incidence of deep sternal wound infection was comparable between the 2 groups, at 2.1% and 1.5% in BIMA and SIMA groups, respectively (P = .43). With regard to other postoperative complications the 2 groups were comparable. Operative mortality rate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups, at 0.7% and 1.2% in the BIMA and SIMA groups, respectively (P = .28). After a mean follow-up time of 4.8 ± 3.2 years, BIMA use was associated with a significantly lower risk for late mortality (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.97; P = .03) and need for repeat revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.96; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS When compared with SIMA grafting, BIMA use did not increase operative morbidity and mortality and was associated with a better long-term survival.

De Novo Aortic Regurgitation After Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND Significant aortic regurgitation (AR) after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cf-LVAD) placement affects device performance and patient outcomes. This study examined the development of AR and long-term results after implantation of cf-LVADs. METHODS The study included all patients with no or less than mild AR who underwent HeartMate II (58 [62%]; Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) or HeartWare (35 [38%]; HeartWare International, Framingham, MA) implantation at our institute from July 2006 to July 2012. Serial echocardiograms were obtained preoperatively, at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and then at a minimum of 4-month intervals in patients with longer-term support. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from moderate or greater AR were generated. Logistic regression analysis was used to define independent predictors of AR after cf-LVAD implantation. RESULTS Median duration of LVAD support was 527 days (25(th), 75(th): 289, 907; range, 60 to 2,433 days). Mild AR developed in 48 patients (51.6%) over a median duration of 126 days, with progression to moderate AR in 13 (14%) over 493 days and to severe AR in 2 (2.1%) over 1,231 days. The incidence of mild or greater AR was 43.1% in HeartMate II vs 65.7% in HeartWare recipients (p = 0.035). Overall freedom from moderate or greater AR was 94.7% ± 2.6% at 1 year, 86.9% ± 4.5% at 2 years, 82.8% ± 5.9% at 3 years, and 31% ± 16.9% at 4 years. Independent predictors of AR were duration of support (odds ratio, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 1.000 to 1.004; p = 0.017) and a persistently closed aortic valve (odds ratio, 0.193; 95% confidence interval, 0.097 to 0.382; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AR is associated with longer cf-LVAD support duration and persistent aortic valve closure. Incidence of moderate or greater AR after cf-LVAD implantation increases significantly after 3 years. The clinical implications of these data may warrant consideration of prophylactic aortic valve replacement at the time of cf-LVAD implantation, particularly with expected longer duration of support and in patients with preexisting AR that is more than mild.

Distal Limb Perfusion: Achilles' Heel in Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary mechanical circulatory assist method that offers circulatory as well as respiratory support efficiently via peripheral access; however, it is liable to complications. Limb ischemia is one of the notorious complications of ECMO but can be avoided utilizing a proper distal limb perfusion method. A retrospective study of patients undergoing peripheral venoarterial (VA) ECMO for various reasons between June 2010 and December 2012 was performed. All patients were evaluated by our multidisciplinary team for suitability as candidates for ECMO. A peripheral VA-ECMO circuit was implanted via groin: inflow cannula in the femoral vein, an outflow cannula and distal-perfusion cannula, or an introducer sheath in the femoral artery. During the study period, 83 patients underwent various types of ECMO; 45 received peripheral VA-ECMO. Distal limb perfusion was achieved with an introducer sheath (6-8 Fr) in 13 cases and with a distal-perfusion cannula (10-12 Fr) in 32 cases. Nine (20%) patients developed signs of ischemia; five (11.2%) were treated conservatively, while four (8.8%) required surgical intervention. One patient required a below-knee amputation. The incidences of limb ischemia and limb ischemia requiring surgical intervention were significantly higher for the introducer sheath compared with the cannula (30.6 vs. 15.6% and 15.4 vs. 6.25%, respectively). Moreover, the patients supported on ECMO with a distal-perfusion cannula spent a significantly longer time on ECMO compared with the ones in whom an introducer sheath was used (11.9 ± 9.1 vs. 7.7 ± 4.3 days). The mean cannula size was significantly greater than the mean introducer sheath size (11.1 ± 1.3 vs. 7.0 ± 1.1 Fr). Use of a distal-perfusion cannula is a most reliable method of limb perfusion in peripheral VA-ECMO. The cannula can ensure adequate and smooth perfusion of the limb owing to its large caliber, its less turbulent flow, the ability it provides to monitor the flow, and the option to attach a side port.