Tracy M. Vogrin

Quantitative Analysis of Human Cruciate Ligament Insertions

The objective of this study was to provide quantitative data on the insertion sites of the cruciate ligaments. In the first part of the study, we determined the shapes and sizes of the insertions of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments (ACL and PCL), and further compared these data with the midsubstance cross-sectional areas of the ligaments. The cross-sectional area of the ACL and PCL midsubstance of 5 human knees was measured using a laser micrometer system. The insertion sites of each ligament were then digitized and the 2-dimensional insertion site areas were determined. Relative to the ligament midsubstance, the PCL tibial and femoral insertions were approximately 3 times larger, whereas those of the ACL were over 3.5 times larger. In the second part of the study, the ACLs and PCLs of 10 knees were each divided into their 2 components and the areas of each insertion were determined. Each component was approximately 50% of the total ligament insertion area and no significant difference between the 2 could be shown.

Effects of Increasing Tibial Slope on the Biomechanics of the Knee

Purpose To determine the effects of increasing anterior-posterior (A-P) tibial slope on knee kinematics and in situ forces in the cruciate ligaments. Methods Ten cadaveric knees were studied using a robotic testing system using three loading conditions: (1) 200 N axial compression; (2) 134 N A-P tibial load; and (3) combined 200 N axial and 134 N A-P loads. Resulting knee kinematics were determined before and after a 5-mm anterior opening wedge osteotomy. Resulting in situ forces in each cruciate ligament were determined. Results Tibial slope was increased from 8.8 ± 1.8 ° to 13.2 ± 2.1 °, causing an anterior shift in the resting position of the tibia relative to the femur up to 3.6 ± 1.4 mm. Under axial compression, the osteotomy caused a significant anterior tibial translation up to 1.9 ± 2.5 mm (90 °). Under A-P and combined loads, no differences were detected in A-P translation or in situ forces in the cruciates (intact versus osteotomy). Conclusions Results suggest that small increases in tibial slope do not affect A-P translations or in situ forces in the cruciate ligaments. However, increasing slope causes an anterior shift in tibial resting position that is accentuated under axial loads. This suggests that increasing tibial slope may be beneficial in reducing tibial sag in a PCL-deficient knee, whereas decreasing slope may be protective in an ACL-deficient knee.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

The objective of this study was to experimentally evaluate a single-bundle versus a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing the resulting knee biomechanics with those of the intact knee. Ten human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The knees were subjected to a 134-N posterior tibial load at five flexion angles. Three knee conditions were tested: 1) intact knee, 2) single-bundle reconstruction, and 3) double-bundle reconstruction. Posterior tibial translation of the intact knee ranged from 4.9 2.7 mm at 90° to 7.2 1.5 mm at full extension. After the single-bundle reconstruction, posterior tibial translation increased to 7.3 3.9 mm and 9.2 2.8 mm at 90° and full extension, respectively, while the corresponding in situ forces in the graft were up to 44 19 N lower than those in the intact ligament. Conversely, with double-bundle reconstruction, the posterior tibial translation did not differ significantly from the intact knee at any flexion angle tested. This reconstruction also restored in situ forces more closely than did the single-bundle reconstruction. These data suggest that a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can more closely restore the biomechanics of the intact knee than can the single-bundle reconstruction throughout the range of knee flexion.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Deficiency of the Posterolateral Structures as a Cause of Graft Failure

We hypothesized that posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are often compromised by associated injuries to the posterolateral structures. Therefore, we evaluated a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in isolated and combined injury models using a robotic/ universal force-moment sensor testing system. The resulting knee kinematics and the in situ forces in the native and reconstructed posterior cruciate ligament were determined under four external loading conditions. In the isolated injury model, reconstruction reduced posterior tibial translation to within 1.5 1.3 to 2.4 1.4 mm of the intact knee at 30° and 90° under a 134-N posterior tibial load. In the combined injury model, deficiency of the posterolateral structures increased posterior tibial translation of the reconstructed knee by 6.0 2.7 mm at 30° and 4.6 1.5 mm at 90° of flexion. External rotation increased up to 14° while varus rotation increased up to 7°. In situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament graft also increased significantly (by 22% to 150%) for all loading conditions. Our results demonstrate that a graft that restores knee kinematics for an isolated posterior cruciate ligament deficiency is rendered ineffective and may be overloaded if the posterolateral structures are deficient. Therefore, surgical reconstruction of both structures is recommended in the setting of a combined injury.

Healing and Repair of Ligament Injuries in the Knee

Although methods of treating ligamentous injuries have continually improved, many questions remain about enhancing the rate, quality, and completeness of ligament healing. It is known that the ability of a torn ligament to heal depends on a variety of factors, including anatomic location, presence of associated injuries, and selected treatment modality. A grade III injury of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) of the knee usually heals spontaneously. Surgical repair followed by immobilization of an isolated MCL tear does not enhance the healing process. In contrast, tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and the posterior cruciate ligament often require surgical reconstruction. The MCL component of a combined ACL‐MCL injury has a worse prognosis than an isolated MCL injury. The results of animal studies suggest that nonoperative treatment of an MCL injury is effective if combined with operative reconstruction of the ACL. Experimentation using animal models has helped to define the effects of ligament location, associated injuries, intrinsic factors, surgical repair, reconstruction, and exercise on ligament healing. New techniques utilizing growth factors and cell and gene therapies may offer the potential to enhance the rate and quality of healing of ligaments of the knee, as well as other ligaments in the body.

Importance of Tibial Slope for Stability of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament—Deficient Knee

Background Previous studies have shown that increasing tibial slope can shift the resting position of the tibia anteriorly. As a result, sagittal osteotomies that alter slope have recently been proposed for treatment of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. Hypotheses Increasing tibial slope with an osteotomy shifts the resting position anteriorly in a PCL-deficient knee, thereby partially reducing the posterior tibial “sag” associated with PCL injury. This shift in resting position from the increased slope causes a decrease in posterior tibial translation compared with the PCL-deficient knee in response to posterior tibial and axial compressive loads. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Three knee conditions were tested with a robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system: intact, PCL-deficient, and PCL-deficient with increased tibial slope. Tibial slope was increased via a 5-mm anterior opening wedge osteotomy. Three external loading conditions were applied to each knee condition at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of knee flexion: (1) 134-N anterior-posterior (A-P) tibial load, (2) 200-N axial compressive load, and (3) combined 134-N A-P and 200-N axial loads. For each loading condition, kinematics of the intact knee were recorded for the remaining 5 degrees of freedom (ie, A-P, medial-lateral, and proximal-distal translations, internal-external and varus-valgus rotations). Results Posterior cruciate ligament deficiency resulted in a posterior shift of the tibial resting position to 8.4 ± 2.6 mm at 90° compared with the intact knee. After osteotomy, tibial slope increased from 9.2° ± 1.0° in the intact knee to 13.8° ± 0.9°. This increase in slope reduced the posterior sag of the PCL-deficient knee, shifting the resting position anteriorly to 4.0 ± 2.0 mm at 90°. Under a 200-N axial compressive load with the osteotomy, an additional increase in anterior tibial translation to 2.7 ± 1.7 mm at 30° was observed. Under a 134-N A-P load, the osteotomy did not significantly affect total A-P translation when compared with the PCL-deficient knee. However, because of the anterior shift in resting position, there was a relative decrease in posterior tibial translation and increase in anterior tibial translation. Conclusion Increasing tibial slope in a PCL-deficient knee reduces tibial sag by shifting the resting position of the tibia anteriorly. This sag is even further reduced when the knee is subjected to axial compressive loads. Clinical Relevance These data suggest that increasing tibial slope may be beneficial for patients with PCL-deficient knees.

The Effects of a Popliteus Muscle Load on In Situ Forces in the Posterior Cruciate Ligament and on Knee Kinematics A Human Cadaveric Study

To investigate the effect of simulated contraction of the popliteus muscle on the in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament and on changes in knee kinematics, we studied 10 human cadaveric knees (donor age, 58 to 89 years) using a robotic manipulator/universal force moment sensor system. Under a 110-N posterior tibial load (simulated posterior drawer test), the kinematics of the intact knee and the in situ forces in the ligament were determined. The test was repeated with the addition of a 44-N load to the popliteus muscle. The posterior cruciate ligament was then sectioned and the knee was subjected to the same tests. The additional popliteus muscle load significantly reduced the in situ forces in the ligament by 9% to 36% at 90° and 30° of flexion, respectively. No significant effects on posterior tibial translation of the intact knee were found. However, in the ligament-deficient knee, posterior tibial translation was reduced by up to 36% of the translation caused by ligament transection. A coupled internal tibial rotation of 2° to 4° at 60° to 90° of knee flexion was observed in both the intact and ligament-deficient knees when the popliteus muscle load was added. Our results indicate that the popliteus muscle shares the function of the posterior cruciate ligament in resisting posterior tibial loads and can contribute to knee stability when the ligament is absent.

Effects of sectioning the posterolateral structures on knee kinematics and in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the effects of sectioning the posterolateral structures (PLS) on knee kinematics and in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in response to external and simulated muscle loads. Ten human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The knees were subjected to three loading conditions: (a) 134-N posterior tibial load, (b) 5-Nm external tibial torque, and (c) isolated hamstring load (40 N biceps/40 N semimembranosus). The knee kinematics and in situ forces in the PCL for the intact and PLS-deficient knee conditions were determined at full extension, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of knee flexion. Under posterior tibial loading posterior tibial translation with PLS deficiency increased significantly at all flexion angles by 5.5 ± 1.5 mm to 0.8 ± 1.2 mm at full extension and 90°, respectively. The corresponding in situ forces in the PCL increased by 17–¶19 N at full extension and 30° of knee flexion. Under the external tibial torque, external tibial rotation increased significantly with PLS deficiency by 15.1 ± 1.6° at 30° of flexion to 7.7 ± 3.5° at 90°, with the in situ forces in the PCL increasing by 15–90 N. The largest increase occurred at 60° to 120° of knee flexion, representing forces two to six times of those in the intact knee. Under the simulated hamstring load, posterior tibial translation and external tibial and varus rotations also increased significantly at all knee flexion angles with PLS deficiency, but this was not so for the in situ forces in the PCL. Our data suggest that injuries to the PLS put the PCL and other soft tissue structures at increased risk of injury due to increased knee motion and the elevated in situ forces in the PCL.

Anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the new millennium: a global perspective

In May 2000 over 50 surgeons representing 18 different countries and 5 continents assembled in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, for the Eighth Panther Sports Medicine Symposium. Entitled “From Robotics to Gene Therapy: Sports Medicine in the New Millennium,” the symposium focused on both current perspectives and new and emerging technologies in the field of orthopedic sports medicine. Topics covered ranged from cruciate ligament reconstruction and meniscal transplantation to future directions and outcomes measurements in orthopedic sports medicine. The symposium also offered the unique opportunity of obtaining “a global perspective” on the current approaches used around the world for various sports related injuries. Eight global panels were held to provide an international viewpoint on topics such as cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction, the dislocated knee, osteotomies about the knee, and return to play following ACL reconstruction. For each topic, each panelist gave a 6-min presentation describing his or her practice setting and patient profile, current techniques or approaches, and clinical outcomes. A 20-min question and answer session was then held (Fig.1). Finally, the session moderator presented the panel “consensus” in which the results were summarized and tabulated. The feedback that we received in response to these panels from both conferKNEE Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc (2001) 9 :330–336

Biomechanical Analysis of a Combined Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction

Background Failure to address both components of a combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner injury has been implicated as a reason for abnormal biomechanics and inferior clinical results. Hypothesis Combined double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction restores the kinematics and in situ forces of the intact knee ligaments. Study Design Controlled laboratory study Methods Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic testing system through sequential cutting and reconstructing of the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner. The knees were subjected to a 134-N posterior tibial load and a 5-N.m external tibial torque at multiple flexion angles. The double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction was performed using Achilles and semitendinosus tendons. The posterolateral corner reconstruction consisted of reattaching the popliteus tendon to its femoral origin and reconstructing the popliteofibular ligament with a gracilis tendon. Results Under the posterior load, the combined reconstruction reduced posterior translation to within 1.2 - 1.5 mm of the intact knee. The in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament grafts were significantly less than those in the native posterior cruciate ligament at all angles except full extension. Conversely, the forces in the posterolateral corner grafts were significantly higher than those in the native structures at all angles. Under the external torque with the combined reconstruction, external rotation as well as in situ forces in the posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner grafts were not different from the intact knee. Conclusions A combined posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction can restore intact knee kinematics at time zero. In situ forces in the intact posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner were not reproduced by the reconstruction; however, the posterolateral corner reconstruction reduced the loads experienced by the posterior cruciate ligament grafts. Clinical Relevance By addressing both structures of this combined injury, this technique restores native kinematics under the applied loads at fixed flexion angles and demonstrates load sharing among the grafts creating a potentially protective effect against early failure of the posterior cruciate ligament grafts but with increased force in the posterolateral corner construct.