Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Travis C. Glenn is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Travis C. Glenn.


Methods in Enzymology | 2005

Isolating Microsatellite DNA Loci

Travis C. Glenn; Nancy A. Schable

A series of techniques are presented to construct genomic DNA libraries highly enriched for microsatellite DNA loci. The individual techniques used here derive from several published protocols but have been optimized and tested in our research laboratories as well as in classroom settings at the University of South Carolina and University of Georgia, with students achieving nearly 100% success. Reducing the number of manipulations involved has been a key to success, decreasing both the failure rate and the time necessary to isolate loci of interest. In our lab during the past 3 years alone, these protocols have been successfully used to isolate microsatellite DNA loci from at least 55 species representing three kingdoms. These protocols have made it possible to reduce the time to identify candidate loci for primer development from most eukaryotic species to as little as 1 week.


Molecular Ecology Resources | 2011

Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers

Travis C. Glenn

The diversity of available 2nd and 3rd generation DNA sequencing platforms is increasing rapidly. Costs for these systems range from <


Science | 2014

Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds

Paula F. Campos; Amhed Missael; Vargas Velazquez; José Alfredo Samaniego; Claudio V. Mello; Peter V. Lovell; Michael Bunce; Robb T. Brumfield; Frederick H. Sheldon; Erich D. Jarvis; Siavash Mirarab; Andre J. Aberer; Bo Li; Peter Houde; Cai Li; Simon Y. W. Ho; Brant C. Faircloth; Jason T. Howard; Alexander Suh; Claudia C Weber; Rute R. da Fonseca; Jianwen Li; Fang Zhang; Hui Li; Long Zhou; Nitish Narula; Liang Liu; Bastien Boussau; Volodymyr Zavidovych; Sankar Subramanian

100 000 to more than


Nature | 2011

The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals

Jessica Alföldi; Federica Di Palma; Manfred Grabherr; Christina Williams; Lesheng Kong; Evan Mauceli; Pamela Russell; Craig B. Lowe; Richard E. Glor; Jacob D. Jaffe; David A. Ray; Stéphane Boissinot; Andrew M. Shedlock; Todd A. Castoe; John K. Colbourne; Matthew K. Fujita; Ricardo Moreno; Boudewijn ten Hallers; David Haussler; Andreas Heger; David I. Heiman; Daniel E. Janes; Jeremy Johnson; Pieter J. de Jong; Maxim Koriabine; Marcia Lara; Peter Novick; Chris L. Organ; Sally E. Peach; Steven Poe

1 000 000, with instrument run times ranging from minutes to weeks. Extensive trade‐offs exist among these platforms. I summarize the major characteristics of each commercially available platform to enable direct comparisons. In terms of cost per megabase (Mb) of sequence, the Illumina and SOLiD platforms are clearly superior (≤


Biology Letters | 2012

More than 1000 ultraconserved elements provide evidence that turtles are the sister group of archosaurs

Nicholas G. Crawford; Brant C. Faircloth; John E. McCormack; Robb T. Brumfield; Kevin Winker; Travis C. Glenn

0.10/Mb vs. >


PLOS ONE | 2013

A Phylogeny of Birds Based on Over 1,500 Loci Collected by Target Enrichment and High-Throughput Sequencing

John E. McCormack; Michael G. Harvey; Brant C. Faircloth; Nicholas G. Crawford; Travis C. Glenn; Robb T. Brumfield

10/Mb for 454 and some Ion Torrent chips). In terms of cost per nonmultiplexed sample and instrument run time, the Pacific Biosciences and Ion Torrent platforms excel, with the 454 GS Junior and Illumina MiSeq also notable in this regard. All platforms allow multiplexing of samples, but details of library preparation, experimental design and data analysis can constrain the options. The wide range of characteristics among available platforms provides opportunities both to conduct groundbreaking studies and to waste money on scales that were previously infeasible. Thus, careful thought about the desired characteristics of these systems is warranted before purchasing or using any of them. Updated information from this guide will be maintained at: http://dna.uga.edu/ and http://tomato.biol.trinity.edu/blog/.


Nature | 2014

The drivers of tropical speciation

Brian Tilston Smith; John E. McCormack; Andrés M. Cuervo; Michael J. Hickerson; Alexandre Aleixo; Carlos Daniel Cadena; Jorge Pérez-Emán; Curtis W. Burney; Xiaoou Xie; Michael G. Harvey; Brant C. Faircloth; Travis C. Glenn; Elizabeth P. Derryberry; Jesse Prejean; Samantha Fields; Robb T. Brumfield

To better determine the history of modern birds, we performed a genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of 48 species representing all orders of Neoaves using phylogenomic methods created to handle genome-scale data. We recovered a highly resolved tree that confirms previously controversial sister or close relationships. We identified the first divergence in Neoaves, two groups we named Passerea and Columbea, representing independent lineages of diverse and convergently evolved land and water bird species. Among Passerea, we infer the common ancestor of core landbirds to have been an apex predator and confirm independent gains of vocal learning. Among Columbea, we identify pigeons and flamingoes as belonging to sister clades. Even with whole genomes, some of the earliest branches in Neoaves proved challenging to resolve, which was best explained by massive protein-coding sequence convergence and high levels of incomplete lineage sorting that occurred during a rapid radiation after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction event about 66 million years ago.


Science | 2014

Three crocodilian genomes reveal ancestral patterns of evolution among archosaurs

Richard E. Green; Edward L. Braun; Joel Armstrong; Dent Earl; Ngan Nguyen; Glenn Hickey; Michael W. Vandewege; John St. John; Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez; Todd A. Castoe; Colin Kern; Matthew K. Fujita; Juan C. Opazo; Jerzy Jurka; Kenji K. Kojima; Juan Caballero; Robert Hubley; Arian Smit; Roy N. Platt; Christine Lavoie; Meganathan P. Ramakodi; John W. Finger; Alexander Suh; Sally R. Isberg; Lee G. Miles; Amanda Y. Chong; Weerachai Jaratlerdsiri; Jaime Gongora; C. Moran; Andrés Iriarte

The evolution of the amniotic egg was one of the great evolutionary innovations in the history of life, freeing vertebrates from an obligatory connection to water and thus permitting the conquest of terrestrial environments. Among amniotes, genome sequences are available for mammals and birds, but not for non-avian reptiles. Here we report the genome sequence of the North American green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis. We find that A. carolinensis microchromosomes are highly syntenic with chicken microchromosomes, yet do not exhibit the high GC and low repeat content that are characteristic of avian microchromosomes. Also, A. carolinensis mobile elements are very young and diverse—more so than in any other sequenced amniote genome. The GC content of this lizard genome is also unusual in its homogeneity, unlike the regionally variable GC content found in mammals and birds. We describe and assign sequence to the previously unknown A. carolinensis X chromosome. Comparative gene analysis shows that amniote egg proteins have evolved significantly more rapidly than other proteins. An anole phylogeny resolves basal branches to illuminate the history of their repeated adaptive radiations.


Systematic Biology | 2014

Target Capture and Massively Parallel Sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements for Comparative Studies at Shallow Evolutionary Time Scales

Brian Tilston Smith; Michael G. Harvey; Brant C. Faircloth; Travis C. Glenn; Robb T. Brumfield

We present the first genomic-scale analysis addressing the phylogenetic position of turtles, using over 1000 loci from representatives of all major reptile lineages including tuatara. Previously, studies of morphological traits positioned turtles either at the base of the reptile tree or with lizards, snakes and tuatara (lepidosaurs), whereas molecular analyses typically allied turtles with crocodiles and birds (archosaurs). A recent analysis of shared microRNA families found that turtles are more closely related to lepidosaurs. To test this hypothesis with data from many single-copy nuclear loci dispersed throughout the genome, we used sequence capture, high-throughput sequencing and published genomes to obtain sequences from 1145 ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and their variable flanking DNA. The resulting phylogeny provides overwhelming support for the hypothesis that turtles evolved from a common ancestor of birds and crocodilians, rejecting the hypothesized relationship between turtles and lepidosaurs.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Not All Sequence Tags Are Created Equal: Designing and Validating Sequence Identification Tags Robust to Indels

Brant C. Faircloth; Travis C. Glenn

Evolutionary relationships among birds in Neoaves, the clade comprising the vast majority of avian diversity, have vexed systematists due to the ancient, rapid radiation of numerous lineages. We applied a new phylogenomic approach to resolve relationships in Neoaves using target enrichment (sequence capture) and high-throughput sequencing of ultraconserved elements (UCEs) in avian genomes. We collected sequence data from UCE loci for 32 members of Neoaves and one outgroup (chicken) and analyzed data sets that differed in their amount of missing data. An alignment of 1,541 loci that allowed missing data was 87% complete and resulted in a highly resolved phylogeny with broad agreement between the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood (ML) trees. Although results from the 100% complete matrix of 416 UCE loci were similar, the Bayesian and ML trees differed to a greater extent in this analysis, suggesting that increasing from 416 to 1,541 loci led to increased stability and resolution of the tree. Novel results of our study include surprisingly close relationships between phenotypically divergent bird families, such as tropicbirds (Phaethontidae) and the sunbittern (Eurypygidae) as well as between bustards (Otididae) and turacos (Musophagidae). This phylogeny bolsters support for monophyletic waterbird and landbird clades and also strongly supports controversial results from previous studies, including the sister relationship between passerines and parrots and the non-monophyly of raptorial birds in the hawk and falcon families. Although significant challenges remain to fully resolving some of the deep relationships in Neoaves, especially among lineages outside the waterbirds and landbirds, this study suggests that increased data will yield an increasingly resolved avian phylogeny.

Collaboration


Dive into the Travis C. Glenn's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth L. Jones

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicholas G. Crawford

California Academy of Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge