Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Travis Redd is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Travis Redd.


Journal of Aapos | 2014

Electronic health record impact on productivity and efficiency in an academic pediatric ophthalmology practice

Travis Redd; Sarah Read-Brown; Dongseok Choi; Thomas R. Yackel; Daniel C. Tu; Michael F. Chiang

PURPOSE To measure the effect of electronic health record (EHR) implementation on productivity and efficiency in the pediatric ophthalmology division at an academic medical center. METHODS Four established providers were selected from the pediatric ophthalmology division at the Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute. Clinical volume was compared before and after EHR implementation for each provider. Time elapsed from chart open to completion (OTC time) and the proportion of charts completed during business hours were monitored for 3 years following implementation. RESULTS Overall there was an 11% decrease in clinical volume following EHR implementation, which was not statistically significant (P = 0.18). The mean OTC time ranged from 5.5 to 28.3 hours among providers in this study, and trends over time were variable among the four providers. Forty-four percent of all charts were closed outside normal business hours (30% on weekdays, 14% on weekends). CONCLUSIONS EHR implementation was associated with a negative impact on productivity and efficiency in our pediatric ophthalmology division.


Retina-the Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases | 2015

Effect Of Systemic Beta-blockers, Ace Inhibitors, And Angiotensin Receptor Blockers On Development Of Choroidal Neovascularization In Patients With Age-related Macular Degeneration

Akshay S. Thomas; Travis Redd; Thomas S. Hwang

Purpose: Recent studies have suggested that the use of systemic beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers can induce regression of choroidal neovascularization in rodent models. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if these agents have a protective effect against the development of choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Methods: In this single-center retrospective case–control study, the charts of 250 patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration were compared with those of 250 controls with dry age-related macular degeneration. Charts were reviewed for current and past use of beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers. Frequency tables were generated, and associations were examined using chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between rates of beta-blocker use (P = 0.57), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors use (P = 0.20), or angiotensin receptor blockers use (P = 0.61) between the 2 groups. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference between rates of use of combinations of the above drugs between the two groups. Conclusion: Although there is growing evidence that beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers can induce regression of choroidal neovascularization in rodent models, these medications do not seem to confer a protective effect against the development of choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration.


JAMA Ophthalmology | 2018

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ophthalmoscopy vs Telemedicine in Examinations for Retinopathy of Prematurity

hilal biten; Travis Redd; Chace Moleta; J. Peter Campbell; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R.V. Paul Chan; Michael F. Chiang

Importance Examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are typically performed using binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy. Telemedicine studies have traditionally assessed the accuracy of telemedicine compared with ophthalmoscopy as a criterion standard. However, it is not known whether ophthalmoscopy is truly more accurate than telemedicine. Objective To directly compare the accuracy and sensitivity of ophthalmoscopy vs telemedicine in diagnosing ROP using a consensus reference standard. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter prospective study conducted between July 1, 2011, and November 30, 2014, at 7 neonatal intensive care units and academic ophthalmology departments in the United States and Mexico included 281 premature infants who met the screening criteria for ROP. Exposures Each examination consisted of 1 eye undergoing binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy by an experienced clinician followed by remote image review of wide-angle fundus photographs by 3 independent telemedicine graders. Main Outcomes and Measures Results of both examination methods were combined into a consensus reference standard diagnosis. The agreement of both ophthalmoscopy and telemedicine was compared with this standard, using percentage agreement and weighted &kgr; statistics. Results Among the 281 infants in the study (127 girls and 154 boys; mean [SD] gestational age, 27.1 [2.4] weeks), a total of 1553 eye examinations were classified using both ophthalmoscopy and telemedicine. Ophthalmoscopy and telemedicine each had similar sensitivity for zone I disease (78% [95% CI, 71%-84%] vs 78% [95% CI, 73%-83%]; P > .99 [n = 165]), plus disease (74% [95% CI, 61%-87%] vs 79% [95% CI, 72%-86%]; P = .41 [n = 50]), and type 2 ROP (stage 3, zone I, or plus disease: 86% [95% CI, 80%-92%] vs 79% [95% CI, 75%-83%]; P = .10 [n = 251]), but ophthalmoscopy was slightly more sensitive in identifying stage 3 disease (85% [95% CI, 79%-91%] vs 73% [95% CI, 67%-78%]; P = .004 [n = 136]). Conclusions and Relevance No difference was found in overall accuracy between ophthalmoscopy and telemedicine for the detection of clinically significant ROP, although, on average, ophthalmoscopy had slightly higher accuracy for the diagnosis of zone III and stage 3 ROP. With the caveat that there was variable accuracy between examiners using both modalities, these results support the use of telemedicine for the diagnosis of clinically significant ROP.


Ocular Immunology and Inflammation | 2017

The Impact and Implication of Peripheral Vascular Leakage on Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Uveitis

Akshay S. Thomas; Travis Redd; John P. Campbell; Neal V. Palejwala; Justin T. Baynham; Eric B. Suhler; James T. Rosenbaum; Phoebe Lin

ABSTRACT Purpose: To study if peripheral vascular leakage (PVL) on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFFA) prognosticates complications of uveitis or necessitates treatment augmentation. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of uveitis patients imaged with UWFFA and ≥1 yr of follow-up. Results: We included 73 eyes of 42 patients with uveitis. There was no difference in baseline, intermediate, final visual acuity (p = 0.47–0.95) or rates of cystoid macular edema (CME) (p = 0.37–0.87) in eyes with PVL vs. those without. Eyes with PVL receiving baseline treatment augmentation were more likely to have baseline CME but were not more likely to have impaired visual acuity at final follow-up. PVL was independently associated with treatment augmentation on generalized estimating equation analysis with multivariable linear regression (OR: 4.39, p = 0.015). Conclusions: PVL did not confer an increased risk of impaired VA or CME at ≥1 yr follow-up but was possibly an independent driver of treatment augmentation.


The Journal of ambulatory care management | 2017

Perspectives and Uses of the Electronic Health Record Among US Pediatricians: A National Survey.

Julie Doberne; Travis Redd; Daniel Lattin; Thomas R. Yackel; Carl O. Eriksson; Vishnu Mohan; Jeffrey A. Gold; Joan S. Ash; Michael F. Chiang

Little is known about how existing electronic health records (EHRs) influence the practice of pediatric medicine. A total of 808 pediatricians participated in a survey about workflows using the EHR. The EHR was the most commonly used source of initial patient information. Seventy-two percent reported requiring between 2 and 10 minutes to complete an initial review of the EHR. Several moderately severe information barriers were reported regarding the display of information in the EHR. Pediatricians acquire information about new patients from EHRs more often than any other source. EHRs play a critical role in pediatric care but require improved design and efficiency.


Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care | 2015

Barriers to Information Access in Electronic Health Records during Initial Patient Visits A Qualitative Study

Julie Doberne; Roheet Kakaday; Travis Redd; Carl O. Eriksson; Thomas R. Yackel; Jenna L. Marquard; Jeffrey A. Gold; Vishnu Mohan; Joan S. Ash; Michael F. Chiang

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have been shown to markedly alter clinical workflows and are associated with lower professional satisfaction scores among providers post-implementation. In light of these issues, questions exist regarding what barriers currently exist in EHRs to adequately meet the workflow needs of providers. The objective of this study was to describe what physicians perceive to be the current barriers to information gathering and overall workflow when using electronic health records (EHRs) to evaluate new patients. A web-based national survey was distributed to practicing physicians in primary care, general internal medicine, medicine subspecialties, general surgery, surgery subspecialties, general pediatrics, and pediatrics subspecialties from June to September 2014. Prominent themes pertaining to information gathering and overall workflow in the EHR were identified from narrative survey responses using constant comparison and axial coding to arrive at a grounded theory. Narrative responses from 327 physicians were obtained and analyzed from a total of 1385 respondents (24%). Major identified themes included: 1) Physicians struggle with unintuitive workflows and negative time impact; 2) EHR documentation was excessive and often of poor clinical value; 3) Provider-provider communication is negatively impacted by EHR challenges; and 4) Frustration with EHRs led to mistrust of vendors and clinical administration responsible for building and selecting the EHR software. Barriers such as inefficient workflows, increased time demands, and inconsistent documentation practices exist in EHRs that prevent ideal information gathering when evaluating a new patient. Results from this study could provide insights into new EHR interface redesign and development, and into new physician EHR training opportunities.


american medical informatics association annual symposium | 2015

Variability in Electronic Health Record Usage and Perceptions among Specialty vs. Primary Care Physicians.

Travis Redd; Julie Doberne; Daniel Lattin; Thomas R. Yackel; Carl O. Eriksson; Vishnu Mohan; Jeffrey A. Gold; Joan S. Ash; Michael F. Chiang


JAMA Ophthalmology | 2018

Is This the Right Reference Standard Diagnosis for Retinopathy of Prematurity?—Reply

Travis Redd; J. Peter Campbell; Michael F. Chiang


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2017

Diagnostic Accuracy of Ophthalmoscopy vs. Telemedicine in Retinopathy of Prematurity Examination

Travis Redd; hilal biten; Chace Moleta; J. Peter Campbell; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; Robison Vernon Paul Chan; Michael F. Chiang


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016

The Impact and Implication of Peripheral Vascular Leakage on Ultra Widefield Fluorescein Angiography in Uveitis

Akshay S. Thomas; Travis Redd; J. Peter Campbell; Eric B. Suhler; James T. Rosenbaum; Phoebe Lin

Collaboration


Dive into the Travis Redd's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge