Travis Sapp

Security Concentration and Active Fund Management: Do Focused Funds Offer Superior Performance?

We examine gross fund returns based on the number of securities held and find no evidence that focused funds outperform diversified funds. After deducting expenses, focused funds significantly underperform. Controlling for various fund characteristics, fund performance is positively related to the fund’s number of holdings both before and after expenses. We find evidence linking focused fund underperformance to agency and liquidity problems. Finally, the attrition rate of focused funds is higher than that of diversified funds. These results do not support the view that managers holding focused portfolios have superior stock-picking skills or that focused funds provide value to investors.

The Nasdaq-Amex Merger, Nasdaq Reforms, and the Liquidity of Small Firms

After the Nasdaq and American Stock Exchange (AMEX) merged in 1998, officials of the new entity argued that some “smaller, harder to trade” companies on Nasdaq should switch to AMEX to improve liquidity. This recommendation is based on the traditional view among academics and practitioners alike that a substantial trading cost reduction should be realized when a company switches from the multidealer Nasdaq system to the AMEX specialist system. However, in light of the 1997 Nasdaq reforms, we reexamine the validity of these arguments using data from 1996–98 on firms that switch from the Nasdaq to the AMEX or the New York Stock Exchange. Evidence from transaction costs, volatility, and stock returns shows declining benefits to switching during the sample period. Our findings indicate that the liquidity improvement from exchange listing is limited in the wake of the Nasdaq reforms of 1997.

Insider Trading Ahead of Cyber Breach Announcements

Stock market reactions to cybersecurity breach announcements are generally negative. In virtually all cases, information asymmetry exists between firm management and investors between the date of cybersecurity breach discovery and the public announcement of the breach. We find significant evidence of opportunistic insider trading, with insiders saving an average of

Does Stock Return Momentum Explain the “Smart Money” Effect?

35,009 due to their timely selling in the three months prior to the announcement of a cybersecurity breach. Late filing violations by insiders, which are indicative of stealth trading, are more likely to occur near the announcement of a cyber breach. We also find that the bulk of opportunistic trading tends to occur 55 to 72 days before the public announcement. The results lend support to the SEC’s recently announced goal of tightening restrictions on insider trading ahead of cyber breach announcements, and we make several policy recommendations based on our findings.