Triana Lobatón

A new rapid quantitative test for fecal calprotectin predicts endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis.

Background:Fecal calprotectin (FC) determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test has been proposed as a promising biomarker of endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, data on its accuracy in predicting endoscopic activity is scarce. Besides, FC determined by the quantitative-point-of-care test (FC-QPOCT) that provides rapid and individual results could optimize its use in clinical practice. The aims of our study were to evaluate the ability of FC to predict endoscopic activity according to the Mayo score in patients with UC when determined by FC-QPOCT and to compare it with the ELISA test (FC-ELISA). Methods:FC was determined simultaneously by FC-ELISA and FC-QPOCT in patients with UC undergoing colonoscopy. Clinical disease activity and endoscopy were assessed according to the Mayo score. Blood tests were taken to analyze serological biomarkers. Results:A total of 146 colonoscopies were performed on 123 patients with UC. FC-QPOCT correlated more closely with the Mayo endoscopic subscore (Spearman’s correlation coefficient rank r = 0.727, P < 0.001) than clinical activity (r = 0.636, P < 0.001), platelets (r = 0.381, P < 0.001), leucocytes (r = 0.300, P < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (r = 0.291, P = 0.002). The prediction of “endoscopic remission” (Mayo endoscopic subscore ⩽1) with FC-QPOCT (280 µg/g) and FC-ELISA (250 µg/g) presented an area under the curve of 0.906 and 0.924, respectively. The interclass correlation index between both tests was 0.904 (95% confidence interval, 0.864–0.932; P < 0.001). Conclusions:FC determined by QPOCT was an accurate surrogate marker of “endoscopic remission” in UC and presented a good correlation with the FC-ELISA test.

High within-day variability of fecal calprotectin levels in patients with active ulcerative colitis: what is the best timing for stool sampling?

Background:Fecal calprotectin (FC) is considered the best noninvasive way to assess disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is not known which is the more suitable moment for stool sampling in patients with increased stool frequency. The aims of this study were to assess the intraindividual variation of FC within day and to evaluate if the first bowel movement in the morning is the more suitable sample for FC measurement in patients with acute flares of UC. Patients and Methods:Patients admitted because of active UC were invited to collect samples from several bowel movements (including the first in the morning) during the same day providing their ordinal chronology. FC was measured by means of a quantitative rapid point-of-care test based on lateral flow assay immunochromatography. Results:Eighteen patients were included for a total of 56 stool samples. Most patients had extensive UC and severe disease activity. Within-day FC values varied widely, and the median coefficient of variation was 40% (5%–114%) with a median range of variation of FC values of 3887 mg/kg (69–9946). The sample from the first stool in the morning obtained the highest individual FC within-day value in 33.3% of cases and the lowest in 38.9%. Conclusions:FC values widely vary between motions in patients with active UC. Stool sample collection from the first bowel movement in the morning does not ensure the highest or lowest within-day FC value. In patients with overt active UC, a single FC determination should not be used as the basis for therapeutic strategies.

Novel methylation panel for the early detection of neoplasia in high-risk ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis patients†

Background:Patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohns colonic disease are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of the study was to analyze the methylation status of selected genes as a risk marker for CRC in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Methods:We evaluated the methylation status of four genes (TGFB2, SLIT2, HS3ST2, and TMEFF2) in biopsies of four groups of patients: 60 patients with sporadic CRC, 32 patients with IBD-associated neoplasia, 85 patients with IBD without associated neoplasia (20 at high risk and 65 at low risk), and 28 healthy controls. Methylation-specific melting curve analysis (MS-MCA) was used. Methylation status of these genes was also assessed in stool DNA from 60 IBD patients without neoplasia. Results:Methylation of the panel of genes analyzed was a very common phenomenon (78%) in IBD-associated neoplasia. The prevalence of methylation in adjacent nonneoplastic mucosa was also high (12/30). This prevalence was higher than in mucosa from healthy controls (2/28;7.1%; P < 0.05). Methylation of SLIT2 and TMEFF2 was more frequently detected in the mucosa of IBD patients at high risk of dysplasia or cancer (15/20) than patients at low risk (32/63) (P = 0.05 and P = 0.03, respectively). When stool samples were assessed, only SLIT2 gene methylation was more frequently methylated in the group of patients at high risk of dysplasia or cancer (4/16) compared to low risk (0/37) (P = 0.006). Conclusions:Analysis of a panel of methylation markers may help in the early identification of colorectal dysplasia or cancer in high-risk IBD patients.

Comparison of the long-term outcome of two therapeutic strategies for the management of abdominal abscess complicating Crohn's disease: percutaneous drainage or immediate surgical treatment

The management of abdominal abscesses complicating Crohns disease is complex and involves a difficult choice between medical, radiological and surgical procedures. The long‐term outcome was compared for two strategies for the management of abdominal abscess: percutaneous drainage (PD) followed by rescue surgery in the case of failure vs direct immediate surgery (IS). We also compared the results of IS with surgery performed after PD failure.

An urgent referral strategy for symptomatic patients with suspected colorectal cancer based on a quantitative immunochemical faecal occult blood test

BACKGROUND European health systems have developed referral guidelines for the selection of patients for the urgent investigation of suspected colorectal cancer. AIM To evaluate whether quantitative faecal immunochemical testing performs better than commonly used high-risk symptoms based strategies for fast-tracking cancer referrals. METHODS We prospectively studied 1054 symptomatic patients referred for a colonoscopy who provided a sample for faecal immunochemical testing. The usefulness of faecal immunochemical testing and two current guidelines for urgent referral were compared for their efficacy in the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia. RESULTS The guidelines detected 46.7% and 43.3% of cases of colorectal cancer while faecal haemoglobin concentration ≥15μg Hb/g detected 96.7% of cases. The diagnostic accuracy of both the guidelines and faecal haemoglobin concentration ≥15μg Hb/g for the detection of advanced neoplasia was: sensitivity 38.3%, 36.1%, 57.1% and specificity 71.8%, 69.5%, 86.6%, respectively. Male gender (OR 2.35; p<0.001), age (1.34; p=0.002), and faecal haemoglobin concentration ≥10μg Hb/g (7.81; p<0.001) were independent predictive factors of advanced neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS A faecal immunochemical test based-strategy performs better than current high-risk symptoms based strategies for fast-tracking cancer referrals. A score that combines gender, age and a faecal immunochemical test could accurately estimate the risk of advanced neoplasia.

Predicting Outcomes to Optimize Disease Management in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Background and Aims: Efforts to slow or prevent the progressive course of inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] include early and intensive monitoring and treatment of patients at higher risk for complications. It is therefore essential to identify high-risk patients – both at diagnosis and throughout disease course. Methods: As a part of an IBD Ahead initiative, we conducted a comprehensive literature review to identify predictors of long-term IBD prognosis and generate draft expert summary statements. Statements were refined at national meetings of IBD experts in 32 countries and were finalized at an international meeting in November 2014. Results: Patients with Crohn’s disease presenting at a young age or with extensive anatomical involvement, deep ulcerations, ileal/ileocolonic involvement, perianal and/or severe rectal disease or penetrating/stenosing behaviour should be regarded as high risk for complications. Patients with ulcerative colitis presenting at young age, with extensive colitis and frequent flare-ups needing steroids or hospitalization present increased risk for colectomy or future hospitalization. Smoking status, concurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis and concurrent infections may impact the course of disease. Current genetic and serological markers lack accuracy for clinical use. Conclusions: Simple demographic and clinical features can guide the clinician in identifying patients at higher risk for disease complications at diagnosis and throughout disease course. However, many of these risk factors have been identified retrospectively and lack validation. Appropriately powered prospective studies are required to inform algorithms that can truly predict the risk for disease progression in the individual patient.

Long-term comparative efficacy of cyclosporine- or infliximab-based strategies for the management of steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis attacks.

Background:The short-term efficacy of infliximab (IFX) and cyclosporine A (CsA) in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (SRUC) has been recently shown to be similar, but long-term outcomes are still unclear. Moreover, the need for further rescue therapies in patients treated with IFX or CsA for SRUC has not been reported. The aims of our study were to compare short-term and long-term efficacy between 2 different strategies based on initial treatment with CsA or IFX for SRUC attacks. Patients and Methods:Between January 2005 and December 2011, all patients admitted for SRUC who required medical rescue therapy were identified from the electronic databases of 3 referral centers and grouped according to whether they received CsA or IFX as first-line rescue therapy, and retrospectively reviewed. Results:Among 50 SRUC attacks, 20 were treated with CsA as first-line rescue therapy and 30 with IFX. The CsA group had a higher proportion of patients with severe UC activity immediately before rescue therapy (P = 0.03) and a shorter median time from intravenous corticosteroids to rescue therapy (P = 0.03). A higher proportion of patients in the CsA group received second-line drug therapy (switch) as compared with the IFX group (P = 0.04). Fifteen patients (30%) were colectomized during the study period, with no between-group differences. Previous thiopurine exposure (P = 0.004; odds ratio = 6.1 [1.7–20.9]) was the only independent predictor of colectomy. Conclusions:CsA- and IFX-based strategies for SRUC seem similarly effective in preventing colectomy in the short and long term, although second-line drug therapy is more often required with CsA-based strategies.

A Simplified Geboes Score for Ulcerative Colitis

Background and Aims The original Geboes Score [OGS] is the most commonly used histological score in ulcerative colitis [UC], but rather complicated to use in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a Simplified Geboes Score [SGS] and to compare it with the OGS in patients newly diagnosed with UC. Methods All patients diagnosed with UC at a tertiary referral centre between 2005 and 2010, who had serial colonoscopies with biopsies, were retrospectively included. The 5-year endoscopic/histological evolution after diagnosis was recorded. Histological activity was scored by an experienced inflammatory bowel disease pathologist and three trained readers using the OGS and also the new SGS that only includes variables linked to active inflammatory disease. The correlation between endoscopic and histological activity and the histological inter-observer agreement were measured. Results A total of 528 slides from 339 colonoscopies of 103 UC patients were reviewed. Forty [12%] colonoscopies presented Mayo 0, 74 [22%] Mayo 1, 107 [31%] Mayo 2 and 118 [35%] Mayo 3. Active microscopic disease [≥ 3.1 in both scores] was described in 10/40 [25%] patients who were in complete endoscopic remission [Mayo 0], and 62/74 [84%] with mild endoscopic lesions [Mayo 1]. The correlation analysis between endoscopy and OGS/SGS did not show significant differences between the histological scores. The inter-observer agreement was moderate for all the grades of the SGS. Conclusions The assessments of histological activity based on the OGS and the SGS were comparable in newly diagnosed active UC patients. Further prospective validation should now be done to replace the OGS with the SGS.

Acute histological inflammatory activity is associated with clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical and endoscopic remission

BACKGROUND It has been suggested that acute histological activity has a prognostic value in the outcome of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in clinical and endoscopic remission. Our aim was to assess the role of histology as a risk factor for clinical relapse (CR) in patients in both clinical and endoscopic remission. METHODS Patients with left-sided or extensive UC in clinical and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) undergoing colonoscopy for dysplasia surveillance with random colonic biopsies between 2005-2015 were included. Basal plasmacytosis, acute (AHA), and the chronic (CHA) histological inflammatory activity of all biopsy sets were evaluated. RESULTS One hundred and thirteen patients were included. Median time in clinical remission at inclusion was 27 months (IQR 15-56). Eight percent of patients relapsed within the first year and 33% during the whole follow-up period. In the univariate analysis, the presence of AHA, alone (P=0.048) or together with a past flare within the previous 12 months (P=0.01), was associated with CR within the first year of follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, AHA, together with a flare within the previous 12 months, remained the only risk factor for relapse (RR=7.5; IC95%; 1.8-29.9; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS In UC patients in clinical and endoscopic remission, the presence of AHA is a risk factor for clinical relapse.

Aeromonas species: an opportunistic enteropathogen in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases? A single center cohort study.

Background:The role of Aeromonas species as an enteropathogen in patients with and without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still debated. The aim was to explore the significance of positive Aeromonas stool cultures in IBD and patients without IBD. Methods:Observational retrospective study including all patients with a stool culture positive for Aeromonas between January 2011 and October 2013 at the Leuven University Hospitals. Demographics, clinical, and endoscopic outcomes and laboratory results were analyzed. Results:A total of 77 patients (11 IBD) were identified. In 37 cases, Aeromonas caused a mild self-limited gastrointestinal infection. Among the 40 patients needing antibiotics, 22 presented a mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal infection; 4 suffered from extraintestinal complications; and 4 were coinfected by Campylobacter spp. A. veronii caused more frequently severe infection than the other species (25% versus 5%; P = 0.046). In 2 patients with ulcerative colitis, Aeromonas triggered a moderate-to-severe flare and 2 cases appeared in the context of de novo Crohns disease. In contrast, in 1 patient with ulcerative colitis and 2 patients with Crohns disease, Aeromonas caused a mild gastrointestinal infection not worsening the disease activity and in 4 patients with Crohns disease, it presented in the context of active disease with no clear pathogenic role. Patients with IBD were treated more often with antibiotics (82 versus 41%, P = 0.012) and had more complications (46 versus 14%, P = 0.024). Conclusions:Aeromonas caused mostly mild infections but also moderate and severe infections. A. veronii was more prevalent in patients with IBD and was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Aeromonas caused milder infections in patients without IBD. Other risk factors for severe infection were not found.