Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Trishal Boodhna is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Trishal Boodhna.


Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics | 2015

Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data.

Trishal Boodhna; David P. Crabb

Large archives of visual field (VF) records from automated perimetry are used to examine severity of vision loss at diagnosis in glaucoma patients over a 13 year period in England.


BMC Health Services Research | 2016

More frequent, more costly? Health economic modelling aspects of monitoring glaucoma patients in England

Trishal Boodhna; David P. Crabb

BackgroundChronic open angle glaucoma (COAG) is an age-related eye disease causing irreversible loss of visual field (VF). Health service delivery for COAG is challenging given the large number of diagnosed patients requiring lifelong periodic monitoring by hospital eye services. Yet frequent examination better determines disease worsening and speed of VF loss under treatment. We examine the cost-effectiveness of increasing frequency of VF examinations during follow-up using a health economic model.MethodsTwo different VF monitoring schemes defined as current practice (annual VF testing) and proposed practice (three VF tests per year in the first 2 years after diagnosis) were examined. A purpose written health economic Markov model is used to test the hypothesis that cost effectiveness improves by implementing proposed practice on groups of patients stratified by age and severity of COAG. Further, a new component of the model, estimating costs of visual impairment, was added. Results were derived from a simulated cohort of 10000 patients with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) used as main outcome measures.ResultsAn ICER of £21,392 per QALY was derived for proposed practice improving to a value of £11,382 once savings for prevented visual impairment was added to the model. Proposed practice was more cost-effective in younger patients. Proposed practice for patients with advanced disease at diagnosis generated ICERs > £60,000 per QALY; these cases would likely be on the most intensive treatment pathway making clinical information on speed of VF loss redundant. Sensitivity analysis indicated results to be robust in relation to hypothetical willingness to pay threshold identified by national guidelines, although greatest uncertainty was allied to estimates of implementation and visual impairment costs.ConclusionIncreasing VF monitoring at the earliest stages of follow-up for COAG appears to be cost-effective depending on reasonable assumptions about implementation costs. Our health economic model highlights benefits of stratifying patients to more or less monitoring based on age and stage of disease at diagnosis; a prospective study is needed to prove these findings. Further, this works highlights gaps in knowledge about long term costs of visual impairment.


Eye | 2015

Are rates of vision loss in patients in English glaucoma clinics slowing down over time? Trends from a decade of data.

Trishal Boodhna; Luke J. Saunders; David P. Crabb

PurposeTo examine changes in rates of visual field (VF) progression in patients attending a sample of glaucoma clinics in England between 1999 and 2012.MethodsAn archive of 473 252 Humphrey VFs recorded across the UK was retrospectively examined. Distribution of rates recorded in the first half of the decade was compared with the second. The relationship between age and severity of MD loss at baseline with rates of loss and frequency of testing was examined.ResultsVF series from 18 926 eyes were analysed. Median rate of MD loss for the period before and after 2003 was −0.11 and −0.06 dB/year, respectively, but the proportion of eyes with medium or fast rates of MD loss remained constant. Median rate of MD loss in older (>70 years) eyes was faster than that observed in younger (<60 years) eyes (−0.21 compared with −0.01 dB/year). Median rate of loss did not vary with severity of MD loss at baseline. Frequency of testing, typically carried out annually, did not vary by age, rate of loss or disease severity.ConclusionsVFs of eyes treated in the first half of the decade deteriorated more rapidly than those in the second half. Several factors might explain these differences but average effects were small and there was no reduction in the proportion of rapidly progressing eyes over the decade. Older age and, to a lesser extent, worse VF damage at diagnosis are indicators for faster VF loss in clinics, but frequency of VF testing was similar for all patients.


Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology | 2017

Eradicating primary congenital glaucoma from Saudi Arabia: The case for a national screening program

Rizwan Malik; Rajiv Khandekar; Trishal Boodhna; Zuhair Rahbeeni; Abdul Elah Al. Towerki; Deepak P. Edward; Khaled K. Abu-Amero

The prevalence of primary congenital glaucoma (PCG) in Saudi Arabia is high and the condition is a cause of childhood blindness in the country. Children often present with severe disease, requiring multiple procedures and a lifetime of medical care. The social and economic burden of the condition is substantial. Presently, the mainstay of management is early diagnosis and treatment of PCG. Premarital screening, especially in recessive diseases, such as PCG can be immensely useful by detecting the presence of a defect in the causative gene, followed by genetic counseling to potential couples that will lead to eradication of the disease in future generations. The introduction of a national screening program similar to the one already functioning for thalassemia, could potentially eliminate childhood blindness from PCG in Saudi Arabia and is likely to prove cost-effective.


Health Services and Delivery Research | 2014

Frequency of visual field testing when monitoring patients newly diagnosed with glaucoma: mixed methods and modelling

David P Crabb; Richard A. Russell; Rizwan Malik; Nitin Anand; Helen Baker; Trishal Boodhna; Carol Bronze; Simon Sm Fung; David F. Garway-Heath; Fiona C Glen; R Hernández; James F Kirwan; Claire Lemer; Andrew I. McNaught; Ananth C. Viswanathan


Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science | 2016

Illness perception and beliefs in people newly diagnosed with glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Csilla Ajtony; Trishal Boodhna; Leanne McDonald; Paula Turnbull; Rupert Bourne; David P. Crabb


Archive | 2014

Visual field statistical modelling of different monitoring intervals in glaucoma patients

David P Crabb; Richard A. Russell; Rizwan Malik; Nitin Anand; Helen Baker; Trishal Boodhna; Carol Bronze; Simon Sm Fung; David F. Garway-Heath; Fiona C Glen; R Hernández; James F Kirwan; Claire Lemer; Andrew I. McNaught; Ananth C. Viswanathan


Archive | 2014

Patient views on the frequency of visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring

David P Crabb; Richard A. Russell; Rizwan Malik; Nitin Anand; Helen Baker; Trishal Boodhna; Carol Bronze; Simon Sm Fung; David F. Garway-Heath; Fiona C Glen; R Hernández; James F Kirwan; Claire Lemer; Andrew I. McNaught; Ananth C. Viswanathan


Archive | 2014

Health economic modelling of different monitoring intervals in glaucoma patients

David P Crabb; Richard A. Russell; Rizwan Malik; Nitin Anand; Helen Baker; Trishal Boodhna; Carol Bronze; Simon Sm Fung; David F. Garway-Heath; Fiona C Glen; R Hernández; James F Kirwan; Claire Lemer; Andrew I. McNaught; Ananth C. Viswanathan


Archive | 2014

A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines

David P Crabb; Richard A. Russell; Rizwan Malik; Nitin Anand; Helen Baker; Trishal Boodhna; Carol Bronze; Simon Sm Fung; David F. Garway-Heath; Fiona C Glen; R Hernández; James F Kirwan; Claire Lemer; Andrew I. McNaught; Ananth C. Viswanathan

Collaboration


Dive into the Trishal Boodhna's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rizwan Malik

UCL Institute of Ophthalmology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ananth C. Viswanathan

UCL Institute of Ophthalmology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew I. McNaught

Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David P Crabb

Nottingham Trent University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Helen Baker

UCL Institute of Ophthalmology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James F Kirwan

Queen Alexandra Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nitin Anand

Huddersfield Royal Infirmary

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge