Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Trudy F. C. Mackay is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Trudy F. C. Mackay.


Nature | 2009

Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases

Teri A. Manolio; Francis S. Collins; Nancy J. Cox; David B. Goldstein; Lucia A. Hindorff; David J. Hunter; Mark I. McCarthy; Erin M. Ramos; Lon R. Cardon; Aravinda Chakravarti; Judy H. Cho; Alan E. Guttmacher; Augustine Kong; Elaine R. Mardis; Charles N. Rotimi; Montgomery Slatkin; David Valle; Alice S. Whittemore; Michael Boehnke; Andrew G. Clark; Evan E. Eichler; Greg Gibson; Jonathan L. Haines; Trudy F. C. Mackay; Steven A. McCarroll; Peter M. Visscher

Genome-wide association studies have identified hundreds of genetic variants associated with complex human diseases and traits, and have provided valuable insights into their genetic architecture. Most variants identified so far confer relatively small increments in risk, and explain only a small proportion of familial clustering, leading many to question how the remaining, ‘missing’ heritability can be explained. Here we examine potential sources of missing heritability and propose research strategies, including and extending beyond current genome-wide association approaches, to illuminate the genetics of complex diseases and enhance its potential to enable effective disease prevention or treatment.


Nature | 2012

The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel

Trudy F. C. Mackay; Stephen Richards; Eric A. Stone; Antonio Barbadilla; Julien F. Ayroles; Dianhui Zhu; Sònia Casillas; Yi Han; Michael M. Magwire; Julie M. Cridland; Mark F. Richardson; Robert R. H. Anholt; Maite Barrón; Crystal Bess; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; David Castellano; Lesley S. Chaboub; Laura H. Duncan; Zeke Harris; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Shalini N. Jhangiani; Katherine W. Jordan; Fremiet Lara; Faye Lawrence; Sandra L. Lee; Pablo Librado; Raquel S. Linheiro; Richard F. Lyman

A major challenge of biology is understanding the relationship between molecular genetic variation and variation in quantitative traits, including fitness. This relationship determines our ability to predict phenotypes from genotypes and to understand how evolutionary forces shape variation within and between species. Previous efforts to dissect the genotype–phenotype map were based on incomplete genotypic information. Here, we describe the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP), a community resource for analysis of population genomics and quantitative traits. The DGRP consists of fully sequenced inbred lines derived from a natural population. Population genomic analyses reveal reduced polymorphism in centromeric autosomal regions and the X chromosome, evidence for positive and negative selection, and rapid evolution of the X chromosome. Many variants in novel genes, most at low frequency, are associated with quantitative traits and explain a large fraction of the phenotypic variance. The DGRP facilitates genotype–phenotype mapping using the power of Drosophila genetics.


Nature Genetics | 2009

Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Julien F. Ayroles; Mary Anna Carbone; Eric A. Stone; Katherine W. Jordan; Richard F. Lyman; Michael M. Magwire; Stephanie M. Rollmann; Laura H. Duncan; Faye Lawrence; Robert R. H. Anholt; Trudy F. C. Mackay

Determining the genetic architecture of complex traits is challenging because phenotypic variation arises from interactions between multiple, environmentally sensitive alleles. We quantified genome-wide transcript abundance and phenotypes for six ecologically relevant traits in D. melanogaster wild-derived inbred lines. We observed 10,096 genetically variable transcripts and high heritabilities for all organismal phenotypes. The transcriptome is highly genetically intercorrelated, forming 241 transcriptional modules. Modules are enriched for transcripts in common pathways, gene ontology categories, tissue-specific expression and transcription factor binding sites. The high degree of transcriptional connectivity allows us to infer genetic networks and the function of predicted genes from annotations of other genes in the network. Regressions of organismal phenotypes on transcript abundance implicate several hundred candidate genes that form modules of biologically meaningful correlated transcripts affecting each phenotype. Overlapping transcripts in modules associated with different traits provide insight into the molecular basis of pleiotropy between complex traits.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2001

Quantitative trait loci in Drosophila

Trudy F. C. Mackay

Phenotypic variation for quantitative traits results from the simultaneous segregation of alleles at multiple quantitative trait loci. Understanding the genetic architecture of quantitative traits begins with mapping quantitative trait loci to broad genomic regions and ends with the molecular definition of quantitative trait loci alleles. This has been accomplished for some quantitative trait loci in Drosophila. Drosophila quantitative trait loci have sex-, environment- and genotype-specific effects, and are often associated with molecular polymorphisms in non-coding regions of candidate genes. These observations offer valuable lessons to those seeking to understand quantitative traits in other organisms, including humans.


Genome Research | 2009

Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans

Jonathan Flint; Trudy F. C. Mackay

We compare and contrast the genetic architecture of quantitative phenotypes in two genetically well-characterized model organisms, the laboratory mouse, Mus musculus, and the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, with that found in our own species from recent successes in genome-wide association studies. We show that the current model of large numbers of loci, each of small effect, is true for all species examined, and that discrepancies can be largely explained by differences in the experimental designs used. We argue that the distribution of effect size of common variants is the same for all phenotypes regardless of species, and we discuss the importance of epistasis, pleiotropy, and gene by environment interactions. Despite substantial advances in mapping quantitative trait loci, the identification of the quantitative trait genes and ultimately the sequence variants has proved more difficult, so that our information on the molecular basis of quantitative variation remains limited. Nevertheless, available data indicate that many variants lie outside genes, presumably in regulatory regions of the genome, where they act by altering gene expression. As yet there are very few instances where homologous quantitative trait loci, or quantitative trait genes, have been identified in multiple species, but the availability of high-resolution mapping data will soon make it possible to test the degree of overlap between species.


Nature Reviews Genetics | 2014

Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene–gene interactions

Trudy F. C. Mackay

The role of epistasis in the genetic architecture of quantitative traits is controversial, despite the biological plausibility that nonlinear molecular interactions underpin the genotype–phenotype map. This controversy arises because most genetic variation for quantitative traits is additive. However, additive variance is consistent with pervasive epistasis. In this Review, I discuss experimental designs to detect the contribution of epistasis to quantitative trait phenotypes in model organisms. These studies indicate that epistasis is common, and that additivity can be an emergent property of underlying genetic interaction networks. Epistasis causes hidden quantitative genetic variation in natural populations and could be responsible for the small additive effects, missing heritability and the lack of replication that are typically observed for human complex traits.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2012

Epistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits

Wen Huang; Stephen Richards; Mary Anna Carbone; Dianhui Zhu; Robert R. H. Anholt; Julien F. Ayroles; Laura H. Duncan; Katherine W. Jordan; Faye Lawrence; Michael M. Magwire; Crystal B. Warner; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Yi Han; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Shalini N. Jhangiani; Donna M. Muzny; Fiona Ongeri; Lora Perales; Yuan Qing Wu; Yiqing Zhang; Xiaoyan Zou; Eric A. Stone; Richard A. Gibbs; Trudy F. C. Mackay

Epistasis—nonlinear genetic interactions between polymorphic loci—is the genetic basis of canalization and speciation, and epistatic interactions can be used to infer genetic networks affecting quantitative traits. However, the role that epistasis plays in the genetic architecture of quantitative traits is controversial. Here, we compared the genetic architecture of three Drosophila life history traits in the sequenced inbred lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and a large outbred, advanced intercross population derived from 40 DGRP lines (Flyland). We assessed allele frequency changes between pools of individuals at the extremes of the distribution for each trait in the Flyland population by deep DNA sequencing. The genetic architecture of all traits was highly polygenic in both analyses. Surprisingly, none of the SNPs associated with the traits in Flyland replicated in the DGRP and vice versa. However, the majority of these SNPs participated in at least one epistatic interaction in the DGRP. Despite apparent additive effects at largely distinct loci in the two populations, the epistatic interactions perturbed common, biologically plausible, and highly connected genetic networks. Our analysis underscores the importance of epistasis as a principal factor that determines variation for quantitative traits and provides a means to uncover genetic networks affecting these traits. Knowledge of epistatic networks will contribute to our understanding of the genetic basis of evolutionarily and clinically important traits and enhance predictive ability at an individualized level in medicine and agriculture.


Genome Research | 2014

Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines

Wen Huang; Andreas Massouras; Yutaka Inoue; Jason A. Peiffer; Miquel Ràmia; Aaron M. Tarone; Lavanya Turlapati; Thomas Zichner; Dianhui Zhu; Richard F. Lyman; Michael M. Magwire; Kerstin P. Blankenburg; Mary Anna Carbone; Kyle Chang; Lisa L. Ellis; Sonia Fernandez; Yi Han; Gareth Highnam; Carl E. Hjelmen; John Jack; Mehwish Javaid; Joy Jayaseelan; Divya Kalra; Sandy Lee; Lora Lewis; Mala Munidasa; Fiona Ongeri; Shohba Patel; Lora Perales; Agapito Perez

The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) is a community resource of 205 sequenced inbred lines, derived to improve our understanding of the effects of naturally occurring genetic variation on molecular and organismal phenotypes. We used an integrated genotyping strategy to identify 4,853,802 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 1,296,080 non-SNP variants. Our molecular population genomic analyses show higher deletion than insertion mutation rates and stronger purifying selection on deletions. Weaker selection on insertions than deletions is consistent with our observed distribution of genome size determined by flow cytometry, which is skewed toward larger genomes. Insertion/deletion and single nucleotide polymorphisms are positively correlated with each other and with local recombination, suggesting that their nonrandom distributions are due to hitchhiking and background selection. Our cytogenetic analysis identified 16 polymorphic inversions in the DGRP. Common inverted and standard karyotypes are genetically divergent and account for most of the variation in relatedness among the DGRP lines. Intriguingly, variation in genome size and many quantitative traits are significantly associated with inversions. Approximately 50% of the DGRP lines are infected with Wolbachia, and four lines have germline insertions of Wolbachia sequences, but effects of Wolbachia infection on quantitative traits are rarely significant. The DGRP complements ongoing efforts to functionally annotate the Drosophila genome. Indeed, 15% of all D. melanogaster genes segregate for potentially damaged proteins in the DGRP, and genome-wide analyses of quantitative traits identify novel candidate genes. The DGRP lines, sequence data, genotypes, quality scores, phenotypes, and analysis and visualization tools are publicly available.


Nature Genetics | 2003

Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) affects variation in Drosophila longevity

Maria De Luca; Nataliya V Roshina; Gretchen L Geiger-Thornsberry; Richard F. Lyman; Elena G. Pasyukova; Trudy F. C. Mackay

Mutational analyses in model organisms have shown that genes affecting metabolism and stress resistance regulate life span, but the genes responsible for variation in longevity in natural populations are largely unidentified. Previously, we mapped quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting variation in longevity between two Drosophila melanogaster strains. Here, we show that the longevity QTL in the 36E;38B cytogenetic interval on chromosome 2 contains multiple closely linked QTLs, including the Dopa decarboxylase (Ddc) locus. Complementation tests to mutations show that Ddc is a positional candidate gene for life span in these strains. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping in a sample of 173 alleles from a single population shows that three common molecular polymorphisms in Ddc account for 15.5% of the genetic contribution to variance in life span from chromosome 2. The polymorphisms are in strong LD, and the effects of the haplotypes on longevity suggest that the polymorphisms are maintained by balancing selection. DDC catalyzes the final step in the synthesis of the neurotransmitters, dopamine and serotonin. Thus, these data implicate variation in the synthesis of bioamines as a factor contributing to natural variation in individual life span.


Heredity | 2006

Quantitative trait loci for thermotolerance phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster

Theodore J. Morgan; Trudy F. C. Mackay

For insects, temperature is a major environmental variable that can influence an individuals behavioral activities and fitness. Drosophila melanogaster is a cosmopolitan species that has had great success in adapting to and colonizing diverse thermal niches. This adaptation and colonization has resulted in complex patterns of genetic variation in thermotolerance phenotypes in nature. Although extensive work has been conducted documenting patterns of genetic variation, substantially less is known about the genomic regions or genes that underlie this ecologically and evolutionarily important genetic variation. To begin to understand and identify the genes controlling thermotolerance phenotypes, we have used a mapping population of recombinant inbred (RI) lines to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) that affect variation in both heat- and cold-stress resistance. The mapping population was derived from a cross between two lines of D. melanogaster (Oregon-R and 2b) that were not selected for thermotolerance phenotypes, but exhibit significant genetic divergence for both phenotypes. Using a design in which each RI line was backcrossed to both parental lines, we mapped seven QTL affecting thermotolerance on the second and third chromosomes. Three of the QTL influence cold-stress resistance and four affect heat-stress resistance. Most of the QTL were trait or sex specific, suggesting that overlapping but generally unique genetic architectures underlie resistance to low- and high-temperature extremes. Each QTL explained between 5 and 14% of the genetic variance among lines, and degrees of dominance ranged from completely additive to partial dominance. Potential thermotolerance candidate loci contained within our QTL regions are identified and discussed.

Collaboration


Dive into the Trudy F. C. Mackay's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert R. H. Anholt

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard F. Lyman

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Wen Huang

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mary Anna Carbone

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael M. Magwire

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tatiana V. Morozova

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Akihiko Yamamoto

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric A. Stone

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julien F. Ayroles

North Carolina State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge