Tso-Tsai Liu

Characterization of esophageal pressure-flow abnormalities in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia and normal manometry findings.

Patients with non‐obstructive dysphagia (NOD) report symptoms of impaired esophageal bolus transit without evidence of bolus stasis. In such patients, manometric investigation may diagnose esophageal motility disorders; however, many have normal motor patterns. We hypothesized that patients with NOD would demonstrate evidence of high flow‐resistance during bolus passage which in turn would relate to the reporting of bolus hold up perception.

Relevance of ineffective esophageal motility to secondary peristalsis in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

The study aimed to investigate the hypothesis whether the presence of Ineffective esophageal motility would affect physiological characteristics of secondary peristalsis.

Altered sensorimotor responses to esophageal acidification in older adults with GERD.

Abstract Objective. This study aimed to compare the effect of intraluminal acidification on esophageal sensory perception and motor activity between older and younger patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Material and methods. All 40 subjects had saline and hydrochloric acid infused into the mid-esophagus. The esophageal perception to acid infusion was documented including lag time, intensity rating, and sensitivity score. Esophageal body motility was recorded. Results. The younger group had a shorter lag time to initial heartburn perception (p = 0.01) and a greater sensory intensity rating (p = 0.001). The acid infusion sensitivity score was lower in the older patients (p = 0.001). Age positively correlated to lag time to initial symptom perception (r = 0.44, p = 0.005), but negatively correlated to sensory intensity (r = −0.40, p = 0.01) and acid infusion sensitivity score (r = −0.39, p = 0.01). When compared with saline infusion, acid infusion induced a significant increase in the deglutition frequency in younger patients (0.51 vs. 0.67, p = 0.005), but not in older patients (0.59 vs. 0.65, p = 0.67). Conclusions. Age-related decrease in sensorimotor response to esophageal acidification may be an important element in the pathogenesis and clinical presentation of GERD in older adults.

Atypical Symptoms in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Background/Aims Atypical symptoms are common in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive reflux disease (ERD) exhibit different clinical characteristics and responses to acid suppression treatment. We aimed to compare atypical characteristics in patients with NERD and ERD. We also investigated the presence of histological esophagitis in patients with NERD and ERD. Methods Eligible patients completed a questionnaire regarding reflux symptoms and concomitant atypical symptoms. Endoscopic biopsies with histological examination were performed. Results Of the 210 patients with GERD, 90 patients with ERD and 120 patients with NERD were studied. ERD patients were characterized by higher prevalence of hiatal hernia (P = 0.001) and smoking (P = 0.047). The prevalence of GERD was greater in the age group between 41 and 60 years regardless of endoscopic finding. There was no difference in the prevalence of atypical symptoms or histological esophagitis between NERD and ERD. In all subjects, heartburn was associated with dysphagia (r = 0.16, P = 0.01), dyspepsia (r = 0.22, P = 0.008) and hiccup (r = 0.19, P = 0.003), whereas acid regurgitation was associated with dyspepsia (r = 0.21, P = 0.014), belching (r = 0.15, P = 0.018) and hiccup (r = 0.19, P = 0.002). Conclusions Atypical symptoms did not correlate with the presence of histological esophagitis. Atypical symptoms were equally prevalent in patients with NERD and ERD. The existence of atypical symptoms appears to be associated with the presence of typical reflux symptoms irrespective of endoscopic and histological reflux esophagitis.

Evidence for Altered Anorectal Function in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients with Sleep Disturbance

Background/Aims: Sleep dysfunction is associated with altered gastrointestinal functioning and the presence of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We aimed to investigate whether sleep dysfunction would influence anorectal motility in IBS patients. Methods: A total of 16 healthy volunteers and 15 IBS patients underwent anorectal manometry. The anorectal parameters included resting and squeeze sphincter pressure, sensory thresholds in response to balloon distension, and rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Sleep dysfunction was assessed by using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Results: IBS patients had a lower threshold volume for urge (p = 0.04) and pain (p = 0.002) as compared with the controls. IBS patients with sleep dysfunction had a significantly lower threshold volume for urge (p = 0.04) and anal sphincter pressure for maximal squeeze (p = 0.048) as compared with those without sleep dysfunction. In IBS patients, the PSQI score significantly correlated with threshold volume for first sensation (r = –0.55; p = 0.03), urge (r = –0.56; p = 0.03) and pain (r = –0.58; p = 0.03). Conclusions: IBS patients with sleep dysfunction are characterized by lower thresholds for rectal perception. Sleep disturbance might be associated with anorectal dysfunction and appears to create some degree of rectal hyperalgesia in patients with IBS.

Predictive factors of silent reflux in subjects with erosive esophagitis

BACKGROUND Asymptomatic erosive esophagitis by definition is a condition lacking any reflux symptom. AIMS We aimed to investigate the prevalence of asymptomatic erosive esophagitis in a general population undergoing periodic health checkup. METHODS Consecutive subjects undergoing a medical checkup were enrolled for evaluation of reflux disease with upper endoscopy and a validated reflux questionnaire. The presence and severity of erosive esophagitis were evaluated. In all subjects, demographic characteristics and biochemical data were recorded, and sleep and psychological characteristics were assessed by means of self-administered Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire score, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score. RESULTS Of 2568 subjects eligible for this study, erosive esophagitis was found in 676 subjects (26.3%), in whom the proportions of asymptomatic and symptomatic erosive esophagitis were 59.2% (400 subjects) and 40.8% (276 subjects) respectively. At a univariate analysis, it was found that asymptomatic erosive esophagitis subjects were more frequently of female gender, of older age, with a lower level of education. They also showed less alcohol and tea consumption, less depression, less anxiety, lower serum level of triglyceride, and lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome. Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex (OR = 1.645, p = 0.0146) was a positive predictive factor for asymptomatic erosive esophagitis, whereas higher level of education (OR = 0.564, p = 0.044), higher Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire score (OR = 0.922, p < 0.001), and the presence of metabolic syndrome (OR = 0.625, p = 0.0379) were negative predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic erosive esophagitis is a common feature in otherwise healthy subjects and is independently associated with female gender, lower education level, less depression, and lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome.

Clinical, metabolic, and psychological characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease overlap with irritable bowel syndrome.

ObjectivesGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are highly prevalent in the general population, with significant symptom overlap, whereas the interaction between both remains poorly understood. We aim to identify the clinical and psychological factors that contribute toward the overlap of GERD and IBS. Patients and methodsWe carried out a case–control study among 806 GERD and 176 IBS patients from a health check-up cohort (n=2604). All participants were evaluated using the Reflux Disease Questionnaire score, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score, the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire score, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory score. Endoscopic findings were classified according to the Los Angeles classification. IBS was diagnosed on the basis of Rome III criteria, and metabolic syndrome was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition. ResultsAmong the study population, 727 individuals had GERD, 97 individuals had IBS, and 79 individuals had a diagnosis of both GERD and IBS (GERD-I). GERD-I patients had more severe GERD symptoms compared with patients with GERD or IBS alone (P<0.0001). Moreover, GERD-I patients had more frequent healthcare-seeking behavior, decreased quality of sleep, and higher depression scores than patients with GERD (P<0.0001) or IBS alone (P<0.05). In addition, GERD-I patients had lower blood pressure, waist-to-hip ratio, and higher serum high-density lipoprotein levels than those with GERD alone (P<0.05). ConclusionGERD patients overlapping with IBS have different clinical and psychological profiles than those with GERD or IBS alone. Our study suggests that awareness of these symptom presentations will help optimize the treatment of these conditions.

Disease Characteristics in Non-Erosive Reflux Disease with and without Endoscopically Minimal Change Esophagitis: Are They Different?

Background/Aims: The majority of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) appear to have non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). NERD may include minimal change esophagitis (MCE) and no endoscopic abnormalities (MCE–). We aimed to determine whether intraesophageal acid reflux as well as esophageal motility differed between patients with and without MCE. Methods: Consecutive patients with classic reflux symptoms were enrolled in the study. Patients without any mucosal injury were considered to be MCE–. Esophageal acid exposure as well as intragastric pH (<4) was determined by dual-channel ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring. Results: A total of 100 patients (MCE–, 52 patients; MCE, 48 patients) were studied. The percentage of effective peristalsis was found similar between patients with and without MCE (p = NS). Esophageal acid contact as well as the DeMeester score did not differ between the groups (p = NS). The prevalence of positive symptom index was greater in MCE– patients than in MCE patients (p = 0.001). Intragastric acidity (pH <4) was similar between MCE– and MCE groups (p = NS). Conclusions: NERD, regardless of the presence of MCE, might exhibit similar disease characteristics in terms of esophageal acid exposure and motor dysfunction.

Comparable effects of capsaicin‐containing red pepper sauce and hydrochloric acid on secondary peristalsis in humans

We aimed to evaluate whether acute esophageal instillation of capsaicin and hydrochloric acid had different effects on distension‐induced secondary peristalsis.

Effects of mosapride on secondary peristalsis in patients with ineffective esophageal motility

Abstract Objective. Ineffective esophageal motility is frequently found in patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseases. Secondary peristalsis contributes to esophageal acid clearance. Mosapride improves gastrointestinal (GI) motility by acting on 5-hydroxytrypatamine4 receptors. The authors aimed to evaluate the effect of mosapride on secondary peristalsis in patients with ineffective esophageal motility. Material and methods. After recording primary peristalsis baseline, secondary peristalsis was stimulated by slowly and rapidly injecting mid-esophageal air in 18 patients. Two separate experiments were randomly performed with 40 mg oral mosapride or placebo. Results. Mosapride had no effect on the threshold volume of secondary peristalsis during slow air distension (9.8 ± 0.97 vs. 10.2 ± 1.0 mL; p = 0.84), but decreased the threshold volume during rapid air distension (4.1 ± 0.2 vs. 4.6 ± 0.3 mL; p = 0.001). The efficiency of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distension increased with mosapride (70% [40–95%]) compared with placebo (60% [10–85%]; p = 0.0003). Mosapride had no effect on the amplitudes of distal pressure wave of secondary peristalsis during slow (94.3 ± 9 vs. 101.9 ± 9.1 mmHg; p = 0.63) or rapid air distension (89.3 ± 9 vs. 95.2 ± 8.3 mmHg; p = 0.24). Conclusions. Mosapride improves esophageal sensitivity of secondary peristalsis by abrupt air distension but has limited effect on the motor properties of secondary peristalsis in ineffective esophageal motility patients. Despite its well-known prokinetic effect, mosapride enhances the efficiency of secondary peristalsis in patients with ineffective esophageal motility through augmenting esophageal sensitivity instead of motility.