Tsogyal D. Latshang

Nocturnal periodic breathing during acclimatization at very high altitude at Mount Muztagh Ata (7,546 m)

RATIONALE Quantitative data on ventilation during acclimatization at very high altitude are scant. Therefore, we monitored nocturnal ventilation and oxygen saturation in mountaineers ascending Mt. Muztagh Ata (7,546 m). OBJECTIVES To investigate whether periodic breathing persists during prolonged stay at very high altitude. METHODS A total of 34 mountaineers (median age, 46 yr; 7 women) climbed from 3,750 m within 19-20 days to the summit at 7,546 m. During ascent, repeated nocturnal recordings of calibrated respiratory inductive plethysmography, pulse oximetry, and scores of acute mountain sickness were obtained. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Nocturnal oxygen saturation decreased, whereas minute ventilation and the number of periodic breathing cycles increased with increasing altitude. At the highest camp (6,850 m), median nocturnal oxygen saturation, minute ventilation, and the number of periodic breathing cycles were 64%, 11.3 L/min, and 132.3 cycles/h. Repeated recordings within 5-8 days at 4,497 m and 5,533 m, respectively, revealed increased oxygen saturation, but no decrease in periodic breathing. The number of periodic breathing cycles was positively correlated with days of acclimatization, even when controlled for altitude, oxygen saturation, and other potential confounders, whereas symptoms of acute mountain sickness had no independent effect on periodic breathing. CONCLUSIONS Our field study provides novel data on nocturnal oxygen saturation, breathing patterns, and ventilation at very high altitude. It demonstrates that periodic breathing increases during acclimatization over 2 weeks at altitudes greater than 3,730 m, despite improved oxygen saturation consistent with a progressive increase in loop gain of the respiratory control system. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00514826).

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: when are antibiotics indicated? A systematic review

BackgroundFor decades, there is an unresolved debate about adequate prescription of antibiotics for patients suffering from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of this systematic review was to analyse randomised controlled trials investigating the clinical benefit of antibiotics for COPD exacerbations.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of randomised, placebo-controlled trials assessing the effects of antibiotics on clinically relevant outcomes in patients with an exacerbation. We searched bibliographic databases, scrutinized reference lists and conference proceedings and asked the pharmaceutical industry for unpublished data. We used fixed-effects models to pool results. The primary outcome was treatment failure of COPD exacerbation treatment.ResultsWe included 13 trials (1557 patients) of moderate to good quality. For the effects of antibiotics on treatment failure there was much heterogeneity across all trials (I2 = 82%). Meta-regression revealed severity of exacerbation as significant explanation for this heterogeneity (p = 0.016): Antibiotics did not reduce treatment failures in outpatients with mild to moderate exacerbations (pooled odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 0.75–1.59, I2 = 18%). Inpatients with severe exacerbations had a substantial benefit on treatment failure rates (pooled odds ratio of 0.25, 95% CI 0.16–0.39, I2 = 0%; number-needed to treat of 4, 95% CI 3–5) and on mortality (pooled odds ratio of 0.20, 95% CI 0.06–0.62, I2 = 0%; number-needed to treat of 14, 95% CI 12–30).ConclusionAntibiotics effectively reduce treatment failure and mortality rates in COPD patients with severe exacerbations. For patients with mild to moderate exacerbations, antibiotics may not be generally indicated and further research is needed to guide antibiotic prescription in these patients.

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome benefit from acetazolamide during an altitude sojourn: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) are unable or unwilling to use continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy when traveling to the mountains for work or recreation even though they risk pronounced hypoxemia and exacerbation of sleep apnea. Because the treatment of OSA at altitude has not been established, we tested the hypothesis that acetazolamide improves hypoxemia, sleep, and breathing disturbances in otherwise untreated patients with OSA at altitude. METHODS Forty-five patients with OSA on long-term CPAP, median age 64 years, living at < 600 m underwent a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial randomized for the sequence of drug and altitude exposure (490 m, 1,860 m, and 2,590 m). Patients spent two 3-day periods at altitude and a 2-week wash-out period at < 600 m. At altitude, patients discontinued CPAP and received acetazolamide 2 × 250 mg daily or placebo. Polysomnography, vigilance, and symptoms were evaluated. RESULTS At 490 m, off CPAP, median nocturnal oxygen saturation was 93%, and the apnea/hypopnea index was 51.2/h. On placebo at 1,860 m and 2,590 m, the corresponding values were 89% and 85% and 63.6/h and 86.2/h, respectively (P < .01 vs 490 m, both instances). On acetazolamide at 1,860 m and 2,590 m, oxygen saturation was higher (91% and 88%) and apnea/hypopnea indices were lower (48.0/h and 61.4/h) than on placebo (P < .01 all instances). Acetazolamide reduced nocturnal transcutaneous Pco(2), improved sleep efficiency and subjective insomnia, and prevented excessive BP elevations at altitude. CONCLUSIONS In patients with OSA discontinuing CPAP during an altitude sojourn, acetazolamide improves oxygenation, breathing disturbances, and sleep quality by stimulating ventilation. Therefore, patients with OSA may benefit from acetazolamide at altitude if CPAP therapy is not feasible. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00714740; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Effect of Acetazolamide and AutoCPAP Therapy on Breathing Disturbances Among Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Who Travel to Altitude: A Randomized Controlled Trial

CONTEXT Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA) living near sea level travel to altitude, but this may expose them to hypoxemia and exacerbation of sleep apnea. The treatment in this setting is not established. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether acetazolamide and autoadjusted continuous positive airway pressure (autoCPAP) control breathing disturbances in OSA patients at altitude. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial involving 51 patients with OSA living below an altitude of 800 m and receiving CPAP therapy who underwent studies at a university hospital at 490 m and resorts in Swiss mountain villages at 1630 m and 2590 m in summer 2009. INTERVENTIONS Patients were studied during 2 sojourns of 3 days each in mountain villages, 2 days at 1630 m, 1 day at 2590 m, separated by a 2-week washout period at less than 800 m. At altitude, patients either took acetazolamide (750 mg/d) or placebo in addition to autoCPAP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were nocturnal oxygen saturation and the apnea/hypopnea index; secondary outcomes were sleep structure, vigilance, symptoms, adverse effects, and exercise performance. RESULTS Acetazolamide and autoCPAP treatment was associated with higher nocturnal oxygen saturation at 1630 m and 2590 m than placebo and autoCPAP: medians, 94% (interquartile range [IQR], 93%-95%) and 91% (IQR, 90%-92%) vs 93% (IQR, 92%-94%) and 89% (IQR, 87%-91%), respectively. Median increases were 1.0% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.0%) and 2.0% (95% CI, 2.0%-2.0). Median night-time spent with oxygen saturation less than 90% at 2590 m was 13% (IQR, 2%-38%) vs 57% (IQR, 28%-82%; P < .001). Acetazolamide and autoCPAP resulted in better control of sleep apnea at 1630 m and 2590 m than placebo and autoCPAP: median apnea/hypopnea index was 5.8 events per hour (5.8/h) (IQR, 3.0/h-10.1/h) and 6.8/h (IQR, 3.5/h-10.1/h) vs 10.7/h (IQR, 5.1/h-17.7/h) and 19.3/h (IQR, 9.3/h-29.0/h), respectively; median reduction was 3.2/h (95% CI, 1.3/h-7.5/h) and 9.2 (95% CI, 5.1/h-14.6/h). CONCLUSION Among patients with OSA spending 3 days at moderately elevated altitude, a combination of acetazolamide and autoCPAP therapy, compared with autoCPAP alone, resulted in improvement in nocturnal oxygen saturation and apnea/hypopnea index. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00928655.

Impaired Postural Control in Healthy Men at Moderate Altitude (1630 M and 2590 M): Data from a Randomized Trial

Objectives Intact postural control is essential for safe performance of mountain sports, operation of machinery at altitude, and for piloting airplanes. We tested whether exposure to hypobaric hypoxia at moderate altitude impairs the static postural control of healthy subjects. Methods In 51 healthy men, median age 24 y (quartiles 20;28), static control was evaluated on a balance platform in Zurich, 490 m, and during a 4-day sojourn in Swiss mountain villages at 1630 m and 2590 m, 2 days each. The order of altitude exposure was randomized. Total center of pressure path length (COPL) and sway amplitude measured in two directions by a balance platform, and pulse oximetry were recorded. Data were compared between altitudes. Results Median (quartiles) COPL during standing on both legs with eyes open at 490 m and in the evenings on the first and second days at 1630 and 2590 m, respectively were: 50 (45;57), 55 (48;62), 56 (49;61), 53 (47;59), 54 (48;60) cm, P<0.001 ANOVA. Corresponding arterial oxygen saturation was 97% (96;97), 95% (94;96), 95%(94;96), 92%(90;93), 93%(91;93), P<0.001. Anterior-posterior sway amplitudes were larger at 1630 and 2590 m compared to 490 m, P<0.001. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that higher altitudes (1630 and 2590m) were independently associated with increased COPL when controlled for the order of altitude exposure and age (P=0.001). Conclusions Exposure to 1630 and 2590m was associated with impaired static postural control even when visual references were available. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01130948.

Are nocturnal breathing, sleep, and cognitive performance impaired at moderate altitude (1,630-2,590 m)?

STUDY OBJECTIVES Newcomers at high altitude (> 3,000 m) experience periodic breathing, sleep disturbances, and impaired cognitive performance. Whether similar adverse effects occur at lower elevations is uncertain, although numerous lowlanders travel to moderate altitude for professional or recreational activities. We evaluated the hypothesis that nocturnal breathing, sleep, and cognitive performance of lowlanders are impaired at moderate altitude. DESIGN Randomized crossover trial. SETTING University hospital at 490 m, Swiss mountain villages at 1,630 m and 2,590 m. PARTICIPANTS Fifty-one healthy men, median (quartiles) age 24 y (20-28 y), living below 800 m. INTERVENTIONS Studies at Zurich (490 m) and during 4 consecutive days at 1,630 m and 2,590 m, respectively, 2 days each. The order of altitude exposure was randomized. Polysomnography, psychomotor vigilance tests (PVT), the number back test, several other tests of cognitive performance, and questionnaires were evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS The median (quartiles) apnea-hypopnea index at 490 m was 4.6/h (2.3; 7.9), values at 1,630 and 2,590 m, day 1 and 2, respectively, were 7.0/h (4.1; 12.6), 5.4/h (3.5; 10.5), 13.1/h (6.7; 32.1), and 8.0/h (4.4; 23.1); corresponding values of mean nocturnal oxygen saturation were 96% (95; 96), 94% (93; 95), 94% (93; 95), 90% (89; 91), 91% (90; 92), P < 0.05 versus 490 m, all instances. Slow wave sleep on the first night at 2,590 m was 21% (18; 25) versus 24% (20; 27) at 490 m (P < 0.05). Psychomotor vigilance and various other measures of cognitive performance did not change significantly. CONCLUSIONS Healthy men acutely exposed during 4 days to hypoxemia at 1,630 m and 2,590 m reveal a considerable amount of periodic breathing and sleep disturbances. However, no significant effects on psychomotor reaction speed or cognitive performance were observed. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01130948.

How to treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome during an altitude sojourn.

Considering the high prevalence of the obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA), it is expected that many patients with the disorder are traveling to altitude. However, this may expose them to the risk of pronounced hypoxemia, exacerbation of nocturnal breathing disturbances by frequent central apneas, impaired daytime performance, and high blood pressure. Recently, randomized studies specifically investigated the effects of altitude (1630-2590 m) in OSA patients and the optimal treatment in this setting. The results indicate that patients should continue to use continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) when sleeping at altitude. Since CPAP alone does not control central sleep apnea emerging at altitude, combined treatment with acetazolamide and CPAP should be considered, in particular, in patients with severe OSA and co-morbidities. Supplemental oxygen combined with CPAP might be advantageous in patients with OSA and concomitant cardiopulmonary disease by preventing hypoxemia and central sleep apnea. In patients unable to use CPAP or if electrical power is not available, an optimally fitted mandibular advancement device might be an alternative treatment option that can be combined with acetazolamide during altitude sojourns. Acetazolamide alone is also beneficial and better than no treatment at all, since it improves oxygen saturation, breathing disturbances, and the excessive blood pressure elevation in OSA patients traveling to altitude.

Cerebral Oxygenation in Patients With OSA: Effects of Hypoxia at Altitude and Impact of Acetazolamide

BACKGROUND Sleep-disordered breathing may impair cerebral oxygenation in patients with OSA syndrome, in particular during altitude travel. We studied cerebral tissue oxygenation (CTO) at low and moderate altitude in patients with OSA and evaluated whether acetazolamide improved CTO. METHODS Eighteen patients with OSA living at < 600 m discontinued CPAP therapy during studies in Zurich (490 m) and during two sojourns of 3 days in the Swiss Alps (2 days at 1,860 m and 1 day at 2,590 m) separated by a 2-week washout period at < 600 m. Patients received acetazolamide (2 × 250 mg/d) or placebo at altitude in a randomized, double-blind, crossover design. Nocturnal polysomnography, including CTO monitoring by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), was performed. RESULTS At 490 m, medians of CTO, peripheral oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry (Spo2), and apnea/hypopnea index were 65%, 93%, and 57.3/h, respectively. At 2,590 m, on placebo, the corresponding values were 59%, 86%, and 86.4/h, respectively (P < .05, all corresponding comparisons). Acetazolamide increased CTO and Spo2 at 2,590 m by mean values of 2% (95% CI, 0%-4%) and 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%), respectively, and reduced the apnea/hypopnea index by 23.4/h (95% CI, 14.0-32.8/h) (P < .05, all changes). Cerebral total hemoglobin concentration, a NIRS-derived surrogate reflecting regional cerebral blood volume, increased by a similar degree in response to apneas at 490 m and 2,590 m and during acetazolamide and placebo treatment. CONCLUSIONS In patients with OSA staying at altitude, nocturnal cerebral and arterial oxygenation were reduced in association with exacerbated sleep apnea. Acetazolamide partially improved CTO, Spo2, and sleep apnea without impairing the cerebral blood flow response to apneas. TRIAL REGISTRY ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00714740; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Comparison of photoplethysmographic and arterial tonometry-derived indices of arterial stiffness

Arterial tonometry is a method to assess arterial stiffness and has become a valuable tool in the stratification of cardiovascular risk. The arterial tonometry-derived augmentation index (AIx) is a marker of arterial stiffness and an independent predictor of mortality. As the AIx is relatively cumbersome to obtain, simpler methods such as analysis of pulse waves obtained by digital photoplethysmography have been proposed to estimate arterial stiffness. The objective of this study is to compare the usefulness of the stiffness index (SI) derived from digital photoplethysmography and the AIx derived from radial tonometry for stratification of cardiovascular risk. We studied 83 subjects with a heterogeneous cardiovascular risk profile and determined the ability of the two devices to differentiate subjects with low from subjects with high cardiovascular risk estimated by the Europe (EU)-heart score. Failure rate in both devices was similar (3.6%). AIx and SI were modestly correlated (r=0.48, P<0.001) and both indexes correlated with the EU-score (r=0.54, P<0.001) and (r=0.56, P<0.001), respectively. Both devices discriminated accurately between subjects with high cardiovascular risk (upper tertile of the EU-score) and low cardiovascular risk (lower tertile). However, only the SI differentiated significantly between subjects with intermediate risk (middle tertile) and high risk (upper tertile). Compared with the AIx, assessment of the SI derived by digital photoplethysmography is simple and possibly yields an advantage in risk stratification of subjects with intermediate and high cardiovascular risk. Therefore, digital pulse wave analysis may be a valuable tool to estimate arterial stiffness in large clinical studies.

Effects of Acute Exposure to Moderate Altitude on Vascular Function, Metabolism and Systemic Inflammation

Background Travel to mountain areas is popular. However, the effects of acute exposure to moderate altitude on the cardiovascular system and metabolism are largely unknown. Objectives To investigate the effects of acute exposure to moderate altitude on vascular function, metabolism and systemic inflammation. Methods In 51 healthy male subjects with a mean (SD) age of 26.9 (9.3) years, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, arterial stiffness, lipid profiles, low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, insulin resistance (HOMA-index), highly-sensitive C-reactive protein and pro-inflammatory cytokines were measured at 490 m (Zurich) and during two days at 2590 m, (Davos Jakobshorn, Switzerland) in randomized order. The largest differences in outcomes between the two altitudes are reported. Results Mean (SD) oxygen saturation was significantly lower at 2590 m, 91.0 (2.0)%, compared to 490 m, 96.0 (1.0)%, p<0.001. Mean blood pressure (mean difference +4.8 mmHg, p<0.001) and heart rate (mean difference +3.3 bpm, p<0.001) were significantly higher at 2590 m, compared to 490 m, but this was not associated with increased arterial stiffness. At 2590 m, lipid profiles improved (median difference triglycerides −0.14 mmol/l, p = 0.012, HDL +0.08 mmol/l, p<0.001, total cholesterol/HDL-ratio −0.25, p = 0.001), LDL particle size increased (median difference +0.45 nm, p = 0.048) and hsCRP decreased (median difference −0.18 mg/l, p = 0.024) compared to 490 m. No significant change in pro-inflammatory cytokines or insulin resistance was observed upon ascent to 2590 m. Conclusions Short-term stay at moderate altitude is associated with increased blood pressure and heart rate likely due to augmented sympathetic activity. Exposure to moderate altitude improves the lipid profile and systemic inflammation, but seems to have no significant effect on glucose metabolism. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01130948