Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Tully Saunders is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Tully Saunders.


Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2014

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research

Thomas W. Concannon; Melissa Fuster; Tully Saunders; Kamal Patel; John Wong; Laurel K. Leslie; Joseph Lau

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVESWe conducted a review of the peer-reviewed literature since 2003 to catalogue reported methods of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research.METHODS AND RESULTSWe worked with stakeholders before, during and after the review was conducted to: define the primary and key research questions; conduct the literature search; screen titles, abstracts and articles; abstract data from the articles; and analyze the data. The literature search yielded 2,062 abstracts. The review was conducted on 70 articles that reported on stakeholder engagement in individual research projects or programs.FINDINGSReports of stakeholder engagement are highly variable in content and quality. We found frequent engagement with patients, modestly frequent engagement with clinicians, and infrequent engagement with stakeholders in other key decision-making groups across the healthcare system. Stakeholder engagement was more common in earlier (prioritization) than in later (implementation and dissemination) stages of research. The roles and activities of stakeholders were highly variable across research and program reports.RECOMMENDATIONSTo improve on the quality and content of reporting, we developed a 7-Item Stakeholder Engagement Reporting Questionnaire. We recommend three directions for future research: 1) descriptive research on stakeholder-engagement in research; 2) evaluative research on the impact of stakeholder engagement on the relevance, transparency and adoption of research; and 3) development and validation of tools that can be used to support stakeholder engagement in future work.


Pediatrics | 2012

Cardiac Screening Prior to Stimulant Treatment of ADHD: A Survey of US-Based Pediatricians

Laurel K. Leslie; Angie Mae Rodday; Tully Saunders; Joshua T. Cohen; John Wong; Susan K. Parsons

OBJECTIVES: To determine pediatricians’ attitudes, barriers, and practices regarding cardiac screening before initiating treatment with stimulants for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. METHODS: A survey of 1600 randomly selected, practicing US pediatricians with American Academy of Pediatrics membership was conducted. Multivariate models were created for 3 screening practices: (1) performing an in-depth cardiac history and physical (H & P) examination, (2) discussing potential stimulant-related cardiac risks, and (3) ordering an electrocardiogram (ECG). RESULTS: Of 817 respondents (51%), 525 (64%) met eligibility criteria. Regarding attitudes, pediatricians agreed that both the risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) (24%) and legal liability (30%) were sufficiently high to warrant cardiac assessment; 75% agreed that physicians were responsible for informing families about SCD risk. When identifying cardiac disorders, few (18%) recognized performing an in-depth cardiac H & P as a barrier; in contrast, 71% recognized interpreting a pediatric ECG as a barrier. When asked about cardiac screening practices before initiating stimulant treatment for a recent patient, 93% completed a routine H & P, 48% completed an in-depth cardiac H & P, and 15% ordered an ECG. Almost half (46%) reported discussing stimulant-related cardiac risks. Multivariate modeling indicated that ≥1 of these screening practices were associated with physicians’ attitudes about SCD risk, legal liability, their responsibility to inform about risk, their ability to perform an in-depth cardiac H & P, and family concerns about risk. CONCLUSIONS: Variable pediatrician attitudes and cardiac screening practices reflect the limited evidence base and conflicting guidelines regarding cardiac screening. Barriers to identifying cardiac disorders influence practice.


Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition | 2014

Evaluation of the Economic Burden of Diseases Associated With Poor Nutrition Status

Michael J. Cangelosi; Angie Mae Rodday; Tully Saunders; Joshua T. Cohen

BACKGROUND Geriatric acutely ill patients may frequently have insufficient nutrition intake, leading to malnutrition and increased susceptibility to additional morbidity. This compromised health status can increase costs by extending length of stay in the hospital, promoting the development of comorbidities, and requiring more intensive care. Understanding the value of measures improving the health of these patients depends in part on estimating the costs of prevented adverse outcomes. Because clinical trials often do not record these costs, it is difficult to assess the value of nutrition interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS This article comprehensively reviews 15 years of clinical trials of nutrition interventions to identify salient diseases and complications measured by previous clinical trials and then estimates costs corresponding with these conditions associated with poor nutrition status. RESULTS The most costly complication associated with poor nutrition status is acute respiratory infections (


Journal of Attention Disorders | 2015

Variations in physician attitudes regarding ADHD and their association with prescribing practices

R. Christopher Sheldrick; Laurel K. Leslie; Angie Mae Rodday; Susan K. Parsons; Tully Saunders; John Wong

13,350-


Medical Care | 2017

Stakeholders' Perspectives on Stakeholder-Engaged Research (SER): Strategies to Operationalize Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Principles for SER.

Thomas I. Mackie; Sheldrick Rc; de Ferranti Sd; Tully Saunders; Rojas Eg; Laurel K. Leslie

19,530 per hospitalization), while institutional long-term care is the greatest chronic cost contributor across many diseases (


Journal of Clinical Lipidology | 2017

Transitioning from pediatric to adult health care with familial hypercholesterolemia: Listening to young adult and parent voices

Samantha K. Sliwinski; Holly C. Gooding; Sarah D. de Ferranti; Thomas I. Mackie; Supriya Shah; Tully Saunders; Laurel K. Leslie

77,000 per year of care). CONCLUSION This review can facilitate imputation of nutrition intervention benefits for acutely ill patients by characterizing the costs of clinical outcomes often reported in trials.


Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research | 2016

Young adult and parent stakeholder perspectives on participation in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research

Tully Saunders; Thomas I. Mackie; Supriya Shah; Holly C. Gooding; Sarah D. de Ferranti; Laurel K. Leslie

Objective: The objective of this study was to test whether physicians’ attitudes regarding the impact of ADHD on health-related quality of life (HRQL) explain differences in practices for prescribing psychostimulants in children. Method: In a cross-sectional survey, U.S.-based pediatricians and psychiatrists (“physicians”) used the Paper-Standard Gamble—a widely used preference-based assessment of HRQL—to rate four vignettes describing ADHD health states of varying severity. Associations between standard gamble scores and questions about prescribing practices were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. Results: Surveys were mailed to 291 physicians; 127 (44%) returned complete forms. Lower standard gamble scores were associated with more emphasis on children’s ADHD symptoms (p = .03) and less emphasis on parents’ concerns about stimulant side effects (p = .03) when prescribing psychostimulants. Conclusion: Differences in physician perceptions of the severity of ADHD symptoms and in their emphasis on parental concerns about side effects may help explain variations in ADHD psychostimulant prescription patterns.


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016

A new survivorship model for adolescents and young adults (AYA).

Erin Marie Barthel; Sabrina Karim; Elizabeth Kiernan; Katherine Spencer; Rachel Murphy-Banks; Rebecca Burns; Mingqian Lin; Nadine Linendoll; Tully Saunders; Susan K. Parsons

Background: US federal funding agencies increasingly incentivize stakeholder-engaged research which represents a paradigm shift toward incorporating a range of stakeholders in research design, conduct, and dissemination. Objectives: We use qualitative methods to capture experience-based recommendations on how to operationalize 4 Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) principles in stakeholder-engaged research, specifically: (1) reciprocal relationships; (2) colearning; (3) partnership; and (4) trust, transparency, and honesty. Research Design: We conducted semistructured interviews with members of a stakeholder panel who participated in a 2-year comparative effectiveness study of cholesterol screening and treatment among young adults. Sample: Participants included 8 young adults and parent panelists and 11 professional panelists (clinicians, researchers, policy developers, and disseminators). Measures: The interview guide included questions about the 4 PCOR principles and queried preferred strategies to attain them. Interview transcripts were analyzed using an a priori and emergent coding structure. Results: Participants provided strategies to promote the 4 PCOR principles. Although some stakeholder-identified strategies were complementary, others conflicted due to (1) competing ideologies identified among the principles, and (2) distinct stakeholder preferences. Illustrative of competing ideologies, participants simultaneously preferred receiving relevant articles before calls (to facilitate colearning) but also minimal outside reading (to achieve partnership). Illustrative of distinct stakeholder preferences, young adult and parent panelists generally preferred calls to occur on weekends/evenings, whereas professional panelists preferred mid-week work hours. Conclusions: Our exploratory study provides stakeholder-identified strategies to achieve the 4 PCOR principles, and demonstrates the need to identify, acknowledge, and address potentially conflicting strategies due to the potential for competing ideologies or variation in stakeholder preferences.


Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology | 2014

Child and adolescent psychiatrists' attitudes and practices prescribing second generation antipsychotics.

Angie Mae Rodday; Susan K. Parsons; Christoph U. Correll; Adelaide S. Robb; Bonnie T. Zima; Tully Saunders; Laurel K. Leslie

BACKGROUND Young adults with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are at a critical period for establishing behaviors to promote future cardiovascular health. OBJECTIVE To examine challenges transitioning to adult care for young adults with FH and parents of FH-affected young adults in the context of 2 developmental tasks, transitioning from childhood to early adulthood and assuming responsibility for self-management of a chronic disorder. METHODS Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 12 young adults with FH and 12 parents of affected young adults from a pediatric subspecialty preventive cardiology program in a northeastern academic medical center. Analyses were conducted using a modified grounded theory framework. RESULTS Respondents identified 5 challenges: (1) recognizing oneself as a decision maker, (2) navigating emerging independence, (3) prioritizing treatment for a chronic disorder with limited signs and symptoms, (4) managing social implications of FH, and (5) finding credible resources for guidance. Both young adults and parents proposed similar recommendations for addressing these challenges, including the need for family and peer involvement to establish and maintain diet and exercise routines and to provide medication reminders. Systems-level recommendations included early engagement of adolescents in shared decision-making with health care team; providing credible, educational resources regarding FH; and using blood tests to track treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION Young adults with FH transitioning to adult care may benefit from explicit interventions to address challenges to establishing healthy lifestyle behaviors and medication adherence as they move toward being responsible for their medical care. Further research should explore the efficacy of recommended interventions.


Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology | 2015

Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists' Reported Monitoring Behaviors for Second-Generation Antipsychotics

Angie Mae Rodday; Susan K. Parsons; Catherine Mankiw; Christoph U. Correll; Adelaide S. Robb; Bonnie T. Zima; Tully Saunders; Laurel K. Leslie

AIM Explore perspectives of adolescent and young adult (AYA) and parent stakeholders regarding their engagement in comparative effectiveness research (CER) evaluating cholesterol screening and treatment strategies for 17-21 year olds. METHODS All nine AYAs and parent stakeholders participating in a 20-member panel of AYAs, parents and professionals (i.e., clinicians, researchers, policy makers, payers), completed a quantitative survey and a semistructured interview at the completion of the core CER study. RESULTS & CONCLUSION AYAs and parents stakeholders emphasized the role of power differentials regarding shared knowledge, relationships and trust, and logistics. To mitigate power differentials, stakeholders recommended more materials, clearer definition of roles and in-person meetings. Perceived positive outcomes included diversity of perspectives provided, better understanding their own health and decision-making and improving CER.

Collaboration


Dive into the Tully Saunders's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angie Mae Rodday

George Washington University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Holly C. Gooding

Boston Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge